Nat. Genet. 44, 751–759 (2012); published online 10 June 2012; corrected after print 21 June 2012
In the version of this article initially published, the P value given in the abstract for the anticorrelation between BAP1 and PBRM1 mutations was given incorrectly as 9 × 10−6 instead of 3 × 10−5. The definition of mutant allele ratios (MARs) in the text on p. 1 of the PDF has been corrected. The titles and legends of Figure 1 and Table 1 incorrectly stated that data were presented from multiple tumors and tumorgrafts; these have been corrected to reflect that data came from one index subject. The title of Figure 2 originally referred to mutated residues; this has now been corrected to state that alterations in BAP1 are shown. On p. 7 of the PDF the text has been corrected to state that “a few tumors had loss of both BAP1 and PBRM,” whereas the text originally incorrectly cited somatic mutations in both genes. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2323
About this article
Cite this article
Peña-Llopis, S., Vega-Rubín-de-Celis, S., Liao, A. et al. Erratum: BAP1 loss defines a new class of renal cell carcinoma. Nat Genet 44, 1072 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0912-1072b