The scientific process, and scientific progress, require a critical examination of all published reports. Recent publications detailing errors in the draft human genome sequence are an integral part of our quest to better understand nature and demonstrate the value of free access to scientific data.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Katsanis, N., Worley, K. & Lupski, J.R. Nature Genet. 29, 88–91 (2001).
Salzberg, S.L., White, O., Peterson, J. & Eisen, J.A. Science 29, 1848–1850 (2001).
Andersson, J.O., Doolittle, W.F. & Nesbo, C.L. Science 292, 1903–1906 (2001).
Stanhope, M.J., Lupas, A., Italia, M.J., Koretke, K.K., Volker, C. & Brown, J.R. Nature 411, 940–944 (2001).
Lander, E.S. et al. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
Venter, J.C. et al. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quackenbush, J. The power of public access: the human genome project and the scientific process. Nat Genet 29, 4–6 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0901-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0901-4
This article is cited by
-
Reviews and comment from nature journals
Nature Reviews Cancer (2001)
