Letter | Published:

Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos

Nature Genetics volume 43, pages 811814 (2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

Elucidating how and to what extent CpG islands (CGIs) are methylated in germ cells is essential to understand genomic imprinting and epigenetic reprogramming1,2,3. Here we present, to our knowledge, the first integrated epigenomic analysis of mammalian oocytes, identifying over a thousand CGIs methylated in mature oocytes. We show that these CGIs depend on DNMT3A and DNMT3L4,5 but are not distinct at the sequence level, including in CpG periodicity6. They are preferentially located within active transcription units and are relatively depleted in H3K4me3, supporting a general transcription-dependent mechanism of methylation. Very few methylated CGIs are fully protected from post-fertilization reprogramming but, notably, the majority show incomplete demethylation in embryonic day (E) 3.5 blastocysts. Our study shows that CGI methylation in gametes is not entirely related to genomic imprinting but is a strong factor in determining methylation status in preimplantation embryos, suggesting a need to reassess mechanisms of post-fertilization demethylation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Genomic imprinting: employing and avoiding epigenetic processes. Genes Dev. 23, 2124–2133 (2009).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, R47–R58 (2005).

  3. 3.

    & Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 129–140 (2008).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 294, 2536–2539 (2001).

  5. 5.

    et al. Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 429, 900–903 (2004).

  6. 6.

    , , , & Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation. Nature 449, 248–251 (2007).

  7. 7.

    , , & Epigenetic decisions in mammalian germ cells. Science 316, 398–399 (2007).

  8. 8.

    et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766–770 (2008).

  9. 9.

    , , , & High-throughput bisulfite sequencing in mammalian genomes. Methods 48, 226–232 (2009).

  10. 10.

    & Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development 113, 119–127 (1991).

  11. 11.

    et al. Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001134 (2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. Transcription is required for establishment of germline methylation marks at imprinted genes. Genes Dev. 23, 105–117 (2009).

  13. 13.

    , , & Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13, 839–849 (2004).

  14. 14.

    et al. A novel CpG island set identifies tissue-specific methylation at developmental gene loci. PLoS Biol. 6, e22 (2008).

  15. 15.

    et al. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 466, 253–257 (2010).

  16. 16.

    , & Specific differentially methylated domain sequences direct the maintenance of methylation at imprinted genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 8347–8356 (2006).

  17. 17.

    , , & EpiGRAPH: user-friendly software for statistical analysis and prediction of (epi)genomic data. Genome Biol. 10, R14 (2009).

  18. 18.

    , , & Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 129, 1983–1993 (2002).

  19. 19.

    et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature 463, 1101–1105 (2010).

  20. 20.

    et al. KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature 461, 415–418 (2009).

  21. 21.

    et al. Human LSD2/KDM1b/AOF1 regulates gene transcription by modulating intragenic H3K4me2 methylation. Mol. Cell 39, 222–233 (2010).

  22. 22.

    et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 448, 714–717 (2007).

  23. 23.

    et al. Chromatin methylation activity of Dnmt3a and Dnmt3a/3L is guided by interaction of the ADD domain with the histone H3 tail. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4246–4253 (2010).

  24. 24.

    et al. The Dnmt3a PWWP domain reads histone 3 lysine 36 trimethylation and guides DNA methylation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 26114–26120 (2010).

  25. 25.

    et al. Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat. Genet. 42, 1093–1100 (2010).

  26. 26.

    et al. Impaired migration of trophoblast cells caused by simvastatin is associated with decreased membrane IGF-I receptor, MMP2 activity and HSP27 expression. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1161–1167 (2007).

  27. 27.

    , & Epigenetic dynamics of stem cells and cell lineage commitment: digging Waddington's canal. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 526–537 (2009).

  28. 28.

    & Bismark: A flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).

  29. 29.

    & A rapid micro chromatin immunoprecipitation assay (ChIP). Nat. Protoc. 3, 1032–1045 (2008).

  30. 30.

    et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931–21936 (2010).

  31. 31.

    et al. Dynamic stage-specific changes in imprinted differentially methylated regions during early mammalian development and prevalence of non-CpG methylation in oocytes. Development 138, 811–820 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Tabbada for technical assistance with Illumina sequencing, H. Mertani, P. Mollard, W. Dean and W. Reik for input and discussions and M. Branco and W. Reik for making available the DNMT3A conditional knockout line. This work was supported by grants G0800013 and G0801156 from the Medical Research Council to G.K. and by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. S.A.S. was supported by the Babraham Institute and the Centre for Trophoblast Research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Epigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.

    • Sébastien A Smallwood
    • , Shin-ichi Tomizawa
    • , Nico Ruf
    • , Natasha Carli
    •  & Gavin Kelsey
  2. Bioinformatics Group, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK.

    • Felix Krueger
    • , Anne Segonds-Pichon
    •  & Simon R Andrews
  3. Department of Maternal-Fetal Biology, National Research Institute for Child Health and Development, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan.

    • Shun Sato
    •  & Kenichiro Hata
  4. Centre for Trophoblast Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

    • Gavin Kelsey

Authors

  1. Search for Sébastien A Smallwood in:

  2. Search for Shin-ichi Tomizawa in:

  3. Search for Felix Krueger in:

  4. Search for Nico Ruf in:

  5. Search for Natasha Carli in:

  6. Search for Anne Segonds-Pichon in:

  7. Search for Shun Sato in:

  8. Search for Kenichiro Hata in:

  9. Search for Simon R Andrews in:

  10. Search for Gavin Kelsey in:

Contributions

S.A.S. designed the study, performed RRBS, mRNA-Seq, direct BS-PCR experiments, data analysis and wrote the manuscript. S.-i.T. contributed to direct bisulphite sequencing PCR experiments and performed oocyte collections. F.K. and S.R.A. performed CpG methylation calls, general Illumina sequence alignments and data analysis. N.R. performed ChIP-Seq experiments. N.C. analyzed data. A.S.-P. performed statistical analysis. S.S. and K.H. provided Dnmt3L wild-type and knockout oocytes. G.K. designed and supervised the study and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin Kelsey.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1–9 and Supplementary Tables 2–4.

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    CpG Island methylation calls (separate Excel file).

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.864

Further reading