Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans

Abstract

The considerable range of observed phenotypic variation in human populations may reflect, in part, distinctive processes of natural selection and adaptation to variable environmental conditions. Although recent genome-wide studies have identified candidate regions under selection1,2,3,4,5, it is not yet clear how natural selection has shaped population differentiation. Here, we have analyzed the degree of population differentiation at 2.8 million Phase II HapMap single-nucleotide polymorphisms6. We find that negative selection has globally reduced population differentiation at amino acid–altering mutations, particularly in disease-related genes. Conversely, positive selection has ensured the regional adaptation of human populations by increasing population differentiation in gene regions, primarily at nonsynonymous and 5′-UTR variants. Our analyses identify a fraction of loci that have contributed, and probably still contribute, to the morphological and disease-related phenotypic diversity of current human populations.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Consistent enrichment of nonsynonymous SNPs showing low degrees of population differentiation (FST).
Figure 2: Enrichment of nonsynonymous SNPs presenting low FST among low-frequency variants.
Figure 3: Imprints of negative selection in the human genome.
Figure 4: Imprints of positive selection in the human genome.
Figure 5: Enrichment of genic SNPs presenting high FST when matching for different allele frequency bins.

References

  1. 1

    The International Haplotype Map Consortium. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437, 1299–1320 (2005).

  2. 2

    Carlson, C.S. et al. Genomic regions exhibiting positive selection identified from dense genotype data. Genome Res. 15, 1553–1565 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sabeti, P.C. et al. Genome-wide detection and characterization of positive selection in human populations. Nature 449, 913–918 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Voight, B.F., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X. & Pritchard, J.K. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 4, e72 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Williamson, S.H. et al. Localizing recent adaptive evolution in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 3, e90 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Frazer, K.A. et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 449, 851–861 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Tishkoff, S.A. et al. Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe. Nat. Genet. 39, 31–40 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Hamblin, M.T. & Di Rienzo, A. Detection of the signature of natural selection in humans: evidence from the Duffy blood group locus. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1669–1679 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Weir, C.L. & Cockerham, C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Excoffier, L., Smouse, P.E. & Quattro, J.M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Nielsen, R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 197–218 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Akey, J.M., Zhang, G., Zhang, K., Jin, L. & Shriver, M.D. Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Res. 12, 1805–1814 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Weir, B.S., Cardon, L.R., Anderson, A.D., Nielsen, D.M. & Hill, W.G. Measures of human population structure show heterogeneity among genomic regions. Genome Res. 15, 1468–1476 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Clark, A.G., Hubisz, M.J., Bustamante, C.D., Williamson, S.H. & Nielsen, R. Ascertainment bias in studies of human genome-wide polymorphism. Genome Res. 15, 1496–1502 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hinds, D.A. et al. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science 307, 1072–1079 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Ramensky, V., Bork, P. & Sunyaev, S. Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3894–3900 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Cargill, M. et al. Characterization of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes. Nat. Genet. 22, 231–238 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Williamson, S.H. et al. Simultaneous inference of selection and population growth from patterns of variation in the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7882–7887 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Kelley, J.L., Madeoy, J., Calhoun, J.C., Swanson, W. & Akey, J.M. Genomic signatures of positive selection in humans and the limits of outlier approaches. Genome Res. 16, 980–989 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    McVean, G. & Spencer, C.C. Scanning the human genome for signals of selection. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 624–629 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sabeti, P.C. et al. Positive natural selection in the human lineage. Science 312, 1614–1620 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Teshima, K.M., Coop, G. & Przeworski, M. How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res. 16, 702–712 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Sabeti, P.C. et al. Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419, 832–837 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Monreal, A.W. et al. Mutations in the human homologue of mouse dl cause autosomal recessive and dominant hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Nat. Genet. 22, 366–369 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Mou, C., Jackson, B., Schneider, P., Overbeek, P.A. & Headon, D.J. Generation of the primary hair follicle pattern. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9075–9080 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Cockburn, I.A. et al. A human complement receptor 1 polymorphism that reduces Plasmodium falciparum rosetting confers protection against severe malaria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 272–277 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Meyre, D. et al. Variants of ENPP1 are associated with childhood and adult obesity and increase the risk of glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 37, 863–867 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Di Rienzo, A. & Hudson, R.R. An evolutionary framework for common diseases: the ancestral-susceptibility model. Trends Genet. 21, 596–601 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Drake, J.A. et al. Conserved noncoding sequences are selectively constrained and not mutation cold spots. Nat. Genet. 38, 223–227 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Williamson, S. & Orive, M.E. The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1376–1384 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the International HapMap Consortium and Perlegen Sciences for making available their datasets to the scientific community; J. Hey for providing the forward population genetics (FPG) simulation program; S. Sunyaev for help with Polyphen analyses; M. Przeworski, R. Nielsen and E. Heyer for helpful suggestions and discussion; and L. Abel, T. Bourgeron, J.L. Casanova, S. Jamain, K. McElreavey and O. Neyrolles for critical reading of the manuscript. Financial support was provided by Institut Pasteur, by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) and by an Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) research grant (ANR-05-JCJC-0124-01). L.B.B. is supported by a “Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia” fellowship (SFRH/BD/18580/2004), and E.P. by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

L.B.B., G.L., E.P. and L.Q.-M. conceived the study. The data analyses were primarily performed by L.B.B and G.L., with contributions from E.P. H.Q. performed the genotyping experiments. The paper was written primarily by L.B.B. and L.Q.-M., with contributions from G.L. and E.P.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lluís Quintana-Murci.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–6, Supplementary Note (PDF 1252 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Exhaustive list of 582 genes containing at least one genic mutation showing signs of positive selection (XLS 203 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barreiro, L., Laval, G., Quach, H. et al. Natural selection has driven population differentiation in modern humans. Nat Genet 40, 340–345 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.78

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing