Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Genomic privacy and limits of individual detection in a pool

Nature Genetics volume 41, pages 965–967 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that statistical methods can be used to detect the presence of a single individual within a study group based on summary data reported from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). We present an analytical and empirical study of the statistical power of such methods. We thereby aim to provide quantitative guidelines for researchers wishing to make a limited number of SNPs available publicly without compromising subjects' privacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: ROC curves comparing the LR test with a plug-in allele frequency estimate, its theoretical power (denoted “LR theory”) as computed using a modified version of equation (1) corrected to account for the use of the plug-in estimate, and the statistic proposed by Homer et al.1 on a pool of size n = 1,000.
Figure 2: The power attained by the LR test is not population specific.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Homer, N. et al. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000167 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gilbert, N. Nature doi:10.1038/news.2008.1083 (4 September 2008).

  3. Barrett, J.C. et al. Nat. Genet. 40, 955–962 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeggini, E. et al. Nat. Genet. 40, 638–645 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, J.D. et al. Nat. Genet. 40, 1399–1401 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehmann, E.L. Testing Statistical Hypotheses (Springer, New York, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Nature 447, 661–683 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

E.H. was supported by US National Science Foundation grant IIS-0713254. E.H. is a faculty fellow of the Edmond J. Safra Bioinformatics program at Tel-Aviv University. M.I.J., S.S. and G.O. were supported by NIH/NIGMS R01 grant GM071749. This study makes use of data generated by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium; a full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the data is available from http://www.wtccc.org.uk. Funding for the project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 076113.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sriram Sankararaman and Guillaume Obozinski: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science Division, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA

    Sriram Sankararaman & Michael I Jordan

  2. Department of Statistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA

    Guillaume Obozinski & Michael I Jordan

  3. International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California, USA

    Eran Halperin

  4. School of Computer Science and the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Eran Halperin

Authors
  1. Sriram Sankararaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guillaume Obozinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael I Jordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eran Halperin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.S. and G.O. contributed to the design of the experiments and implemented the experiments; they also developed the theoretical analysis and contributed to writing the paper. M.I.J. contributed to the design of the experiments, the theoretical analysis and the writing of the paper as well as to the funding of the project. E.H. initiated the project and proposed the framework, and he contributed to the design of the experiments, the theoretical analysis, the writing of the paper and the funding of the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eran Halperin.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Note (PDF 764 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sankararaman, S., Obozinski, G., Jordan, M. et al. Genomic privacy and limits of individual detection in a pool. Nat Genet 41, 965–967 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.436

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.436

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing