Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W. & Jasin, M. Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a016600 (2015).
Antoniou, A. et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 1117–1130 (2003).
Ceccaldi, R., Rondinelli, B. & D'Andrea, A.D. Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break. Trends Cell Biol. 26, 52–64 (2016).
Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490, 61–70 (2012).
Burstein, M.D. et al. Comprehensive genomic analysis identifies novel subtypes and targets of triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 21, 1688–1698 (2015).
Ellis, M.J. & Perou, C.M. The genomic landscape of breast cancer as a therapeutic roadmap. Cancer Discov. 3, 27–34 (2013).
Ciriello, G. et al. Comprehensive molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast cancer. Cell 163, 506–519 (2015).
Ceccaldi, R. et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours are dependent on Polθ-mediated repair. Nature 518, 258–262 (2015).
Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences. Nature 534, 47–54 (2016).
Alexandrov, L.B. et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature 500, 415–421 (2013).
Lawrence, M.S. et al. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature 499, 214–218 (2013).
Kim, J. et al. Somatic ERCC2 mutations are associated with a distinct genomic signature in urothelial tumors. Nat. Genet. 48, 600–606 (2016).
Kasar, S. et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals activation-induced cytidine deaminase signatures during indolent chronic lymphocytic leukaemia evolution. Nat. Commun. 6, 8866 (2015).
Nielsen, F.C., van Overeem Hansen, T. & Sørensen, C.S. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes in confined pathways. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 599–612 (2016).
Easton, D.F. et al. Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2243–2257 (2015).
Lord, C.J. & Ashworth, A. BRCAness revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16, 110–120 (2016).
Eccles, D.M. et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing—pitfalls and recommendations for managing variants of uncertain clinical significance. Ann. Oncol. 26, 2057–2065 (2015).
Nik-Zainal, S. et al. Mutational processes molding the genomes of 21 breast cancers. Cell 149, 979–993 (2012).
Landrum, M.J. et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D980–D985 (2014).
Meeks, H.D. et al. BRCA2 polymorphic stop codon K3326X and the risk of breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 108, djv315 (2015).
Scully, R. & Livingston, D.M. In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nature 408, 429–432 (2000).
Merajver, S.D. et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and loss of the wild-type allele in tumors from families with early onset breast and ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 1, 539–544 (1995).
Cornelis, R.S. et al. High allele loss rates at 17q12-q21 in breast and ovarian tumors from BRCA1-linked families. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 13, 203–210 (1995).
Thompson, E.R. et al. Panel testing for familial breast cancer: calibrating the tension between research and clinical care. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 1455–1459 (2016).
Southey, M.C. et al. PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS. J. Med. Genet. 53, 800–811 (2016).
Waddell, N. et al. Whole genomes redefine the mutational landscape of pancreatic cancer. Nature 518, 495–501 (2015).
Connor, A.A. et al. Association of distinct mutational signatures with correlates of increased immune activity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Oncol. 3, 774–783 (2017).
Livingston, D.M. Cancer. Complicated supercomplexes. Science 324, 602–603 (2009).
Loveday, C. et al. Germline RAD51C mutations confer susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 44, 475–476 (2012).
Couch, F.J. et al. Inherited mutations in 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes among a large triple-negative breast cancer cohort unselected for family history of breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 304–311 (2015).
Blanco, A. et al. RAD51C germline mutations found in Spanish site-specific breast cancer and breast-ovarian cancer families. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 147, 133–143 (2014).
Curtis, C. et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486, 346–352 (2012).
Pereira, B. et al. The somatic mutation profiles of 2,433 breast cancers refines their genomic and transcriptomic landscapes. Nat. Commun. 7, 11479 2016).
Foulkes, W.D. et al. Germline BRCA1 mutations and a basal epithelial phenotype in breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 95, 1482–1485 (2003).
Esteller, M. et al. Promoter hypermethylation and BRCA1 inactivation in sporadic breast and ovarian tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 564–569 (2000).
Foulkes, W.D., Smith, I.E. & Reis-Filho, J.S. Triple-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1938–1948 (2010).
Dietze, E.C., Sistrunk, C., Miranda-Carboni, G., O'Regan, R. & Seewaldt, V.L. Triple-negative breast cancer in African-American women: disparities versus biology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 248–254 (2015).
Rehm, H.L. et al. ClinGen—the Clinical Genome Resource. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 2235–2242 (2015).
Spurdle, A.B. et al. ENIGMA—evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: an international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Hum. Mutat. 33, 2–7 (2012).
Richards, S. et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet. Med. 17, 405–424 (2015).
Hashizume, R. et al. The RING heterodimer BRCA1-BARD1 is a ubiquitin ligase inactivated by a breast cancer-derived mutation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 14537–14540 (2001).
Górski, B. et al. Founder mutations in the BRCA1 gene in Polish families with breast-ovarian cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66, 1963–1968 (2000).
Abkevich, V. et al. Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 107, 1776–1782 (2012).
Popova, T. et al. Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. Cancer Res. 72, 5454–5462 (2012).
Youden, W.J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3, 32–35 (1950).
Min, A. et al. RAD51C-deficient cancer cells are highly sensitive to the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Mol. Cancer Ther. 12, 865–877 (2013).
Evans, T. & Matulonis, U. PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: evidence, experience and clinical potential. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 9, 253–267 (2017).
Chan, S.L. & Mok, T. PARP inhibition in BRCA-mutated breast and ovarian cancers. Lancet 376, 211–213 (2010).
Fong, P.C. et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 123–134 (2009).
Kaufman, B. et al. Olaparib monotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 244–250 (2015).
Patch, A.M. et al. Whole-genome characterization of chemoresistant ovarian cancer. Nature 521, 489–494 (2015).
Clamp, A. & Jayson, G. PARP inhibitors in BRCA mutation-associated ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol. 16, 10–12 (2015).
Pathania, S. et al. BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5496 (2014).
Yeeles, J.T., Poli, J., Marians, K.J. & Pasero, P. Rescuing stalled or damaged replication forks. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012815 (2013).
Lindor, N.M. et al. A review of a multifactorial probability-based model for classification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Hum. Mutat. 33, 8–21 (2012).
Hyman, D.M. et al. Precision medicine at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: clinical next-generation sequencing enabling next-generation targeted therapy trials. Drug Discov. Today 20, 1422–1428 (2015).
Cibulskis, K. et al. Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol 31, 213–219 (2013).
Saunders, C.T. et al. Strelka: accurate somatic small-variant calling from sequenced tumor-normal sample pairs. Bioinformatics 28, 1811–1817 (2012).
Costello, M. et al. Discovery and characterization of artifactual mutations in deep coverage targeted capture sequencing data due to oxidative DNA damage during sample preparation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e67– (2013).
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).
Carter, S.L. et al. Absolute quantification of somatic DNA alterations in human cancer. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 413–421 (2012).