Article

Frequency of mononuclear diploid cardiomyocytes underlies natural variation in heart regeneration

Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Adult mammalian cardiomyocyte regeneration after injury is thought to be minimal. Mononuclear diploid cardiomyocytes (MNDCMs), a relatively small subpopulation in the adult heart, may account for the observed degree of regeneration, but this has not been tested. We surveyed 120 inbred mouse strains and found that the frequency of adult mononuclear cardiomyocytes was surprisingly variable (>7-fold). Cardiomyocyte proliferation and heart functional recovery after coronary artery ligation both correlated with pre-injury MNDCM content. Using genome-wide association, we identified Tnni3k as one gene that influences variation in this composition and demonstrated that Tnni3k knockout resulted in elevated MNDCM content and increased cardiomyocyte proliferation after injury. Reciprocally, overexpression of Tnni3k in zebrafish promoted cardiomyocyte polyploidization and compromised heart regeneration. Our results corroborate the relevance of MNDCMs in heart regeneration. Moreover, they imply that intrinsic heart regeneration is not limited nor uniform in all individuals, but rather is a variable trait influenced by multiple genes.

  • Subscribe to Nature Genetics for full access:

    $59

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

Accessions

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. 1.

    , , , & Cardiomyocyte DNA synthesis and binucleation during murine development. Am. J. Physiol. 271, H2183–H2189 (1996).

  2. 2.

    et al. Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331, 1078–1080 (2011).

  3. 3.

    , & Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 298, 2188–2190 (2002).

  4. 4.

    & Response of the adult newt ventricle to injury. J. Exp. Zool. 187, 249–253 (1974).

  5. 5.

    et al. Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464, 606–609 (2010).

  6. 6.

    et al. Evidence for cardiomyocyte renewal in humans. Science 324, 98–102 (2009).

  7. 7.

    et al. Mammalian heart renewal by pre-existing cardiomyocytes. Nature 493, 433–436 (2013).

  8. 8.

    et al. Existing cardiomyocytes generate cardiomyocytes at a low rate after birth in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 8850–8855 (2014).

  9. 9.

    , , & Rapid transition of cardiac myocytes from hyperplasia to hypertrophy during postnatal development. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 28, 1737–1746 (1996).

  10. 10.

    & Mandarim-de-Lacerda, C.A. Cardiomyocyte proliferation and hypertrophy in the human fetus: quantitative study of the myocyte nuclei. Bull. Assoc. Anat. (Nancy) 79, 27–31 (1995).

  11. 11.

    et al. Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4+ cardiomyocytes. Nature 464, 601–605 (2010).

  12. 12.

    et al. Cardiomyocyte proliferation contributes to heart growth in young humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1446–1451 (2013).

  13. 13.

    et al. Cardiomyocytes in young infants with congenital heart disease: a three-month window of proliferation. Sci. Rep. 6, 23188 (2016).

  14. 14.

    , , & Neuregulin1/ErbB4 signaling induces cardiomyocyte proliferation and repair of heart injury. Cell 138, 257–270 (2009).

  15. 15.

    et al. Cardiomyocyte proliferation and progenitor cell recruitment underlie therapeutic regeneration after myocardial infarction in the adult mouse heart. EMBO Mol. Med. 5, 191–209 (2013).

  16. 16.

    et al. Adolescent feline heart contains a population of small, proliferative ventricular myocytes with immature physiological properties. Circ. Res. 100, 536–544 (2007).

  17. 17.

    et al. Periostin induces proliferation of differentiated cardiomyocytes and promotes cardiac repair. Nat. Med. 13, 962–969 (2007).

  18. 18.

    et al. Cardiac-specific overexpression of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 increases smaller mononuclear cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 88, 443–450 (2001).

  19. 19.

    et al. Meis1 regulates postnatal cardiomyocyte cell cycle arrest. Nature 497, 249–253 (2013).

  20. 20.

    et al. A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice. Genome Res. 20, 281–290 (2010).

  21. 21.

    et al. Genetic architecture of atherosclerosis in mice: a systems genetics analysis of common inbred strains. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005711 (2015).

  22. 22.

    & Heart regeneration. Nature 473, 326–335 (2011).

  23. 23.

    et al. High fat feeding in mice is insufficient to induce cardiac dysfunction and does not exacerbate heart failure. PLoS One 8, e83174 (2013).

  24. 24.

    When bigger is better: the role of polyploidy in organogenesis. Trends Genet. 31, 307–315 (2015).

  25. 25.

    & The cardiomyocyte cell cycle in hypertrophy, tissue homeostasis, and regeneration. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 165, 67–96 (2013).

  26. 26.

    et al. Identification of cardiomyocyte nuclei and assessment of ploidy for the analysis of cell turnover. Exp. Cell Res. 317, 188–194 (2011).

  27. 27.

    et al. Contribution of bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells to the generation of donor-marker+ cardiomyocytes in vivo. PLoS One 8, e62506 (2013).

  28. 28.

    et al. c-kit+ cells minimally contribute cardiomyocytes to the heart. Nature 509, 337–341 (2014).

  29. 29.

    et al. Circulating cells contribute to cardiomyocyte regeneration after injury. Circ. Res. 116, 633–641 (2015).

  30. 30.

    et al. Hybrid mouse diversity panel: a panel of inbred mouse strains suitable for analysis of complex genetic traits. Mamm. Genome 23, 680–692 (2012).

  31. 31.

    et al. Cloning and characterization of a novel cardiac-specific kinase that interacts specifically with cardiac troponin I. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 81, 297–304 (2003).

  32. 32.

    et al. Tnni3k modifies disease progression in murine models of cardiomyopathy. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000647 (2009).

  33. 33.

    et al. Dissection of a quantitative trait locus for PR interval duration identifies Tnni3k as a novel modulator of cardiac conduction. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003113 (2012).

  34. 34.

    et al. Inhibition of the cardiomyocyte-specific kinase TNNI3K limits oxidative stress, injury, and adverse remodeling in the ischemic heart. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 207ra141 (2013).

  35. 35.

    & Cardiac regenerative capacity and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 28, 719–741 (2012).

  36. 36.

    et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).

  37. 37.

    et al. Distribution and clinical impact of functional variants in 50,726 whole-exome sequences from the DiscovEHR study. Science 354, 1549 (2016).

  38. 38.

    et al. Predictors of clinical course, coronary anatomy and left ventricular function after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 62, 960–970 (1980).

  39. 39.

    et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation 76, 44–51 (1987).

  40. 40.

    et al. ERBB2 triggers mammalian heart regeneration by promoting cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 627–638 (2015).

  41. 41.

    et al. The oxygen-rich postnatal environment induces cardiomyocyte cell-cycle arrest through DNA damage response. Cell 157, 565–579 (2014).

  42. 42.

    et al. AOP-1 interacts with cardiac-specific protein kinase TNNI3K and down-regulates its kinase activity. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 72, 1199–1204 (2007).

  43. 43.

    , , , & Overexpression of TNNI3K, a cardiac-specific MAPKKK, promotes cardiac dysfunction. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 54, 101–111 (2013).

  44. 44.

    et al. TNNI3K mutation in familial syndrome of conduction system disease, atrial tachyarrhythmia and dilated cardiomyopathy. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 5793–5804 (2014).

  45. 45.

    et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies the TNNI3K gene as a cause of familial conduction system disease and congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia. Int. J. Cardiol. 185, 114–116 (2015).

  46. 46.

    et al. High-density genotypes of inbred mouse strains: improved power and precision of association mapping. G3 (Bethesda) 5, 2021–2026 (2015).

  47. 47.

    , & Comparison of co-expression measures: mutual information, correlation, and model based indices. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 328 (2012).

  48. 48.

    et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 13, 602–616 (2013).

  49. 49.

    et al. A novel and efficient model of coronary artery ligation and myocardial infarction in the mouse. Circ. Res. 107, 1445–1453 (2010).

  50. 50.

    et al. The Tol2kit: a multisite gateway-based construction kit for Tol2 transposon transgenesis constructs. Dev. Dyn. 236, 3088–3099 (2007).

  51. 51.

    , , , & Isolation and in vitro culture of primary cardiomyocytes from adult zebrafish hearts. Nat. Protoc. 8, 800–809 (2013).

  52. 52.

    et al. Igf signaling is required for cardiomyocyte proliferation during zebrafish heart development and regeneration. PLoS One 8, e67266 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.P. was funded by CIRM Training Grant TG2-01161, an award from the University of Southern California's Provost Office and NHLBI NRSA 1F32HL124932. Zebrafish work was supported in part by a Doerr Family Foundation award provided to M.P. and L.B. S.R.K. was supported by K08HL121191. Purchase and husbandry of HMDP strains was supported by grants HL123295 and HL114437 to A.J.L. and grant NS083265 to T.M.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Michaela Patterson
    • , Lindsey Barske
    • , Ben Van Handel
    • , Peiheng Gan
    • , Avneesh Sharma
    • , Yukiko Yamaguchi
    • , Hua Shen
    • , J Gage Crump
    •  & Henry M Sucov
  2. Department of Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Christoph D Rau
    •  & Aldons J Lusis
  3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

    • Shan Parikh
    •  & Thomas I Force
  4. Department of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Matt Denholtz
  5. Program of Developmental Biology and Regenerative Medicine, The Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Ying Huang
    •  & Ching-Ling Lien
  6. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Hooman Allayee
  7. Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Ching-Ling Lien
    •  & S Ram Kumar
  8. Developmental Neuroscience Program, The Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Takako Makita
  9. Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    • Takako Makita

Authors

  1. Search for Michaela Patterson in:

  2. Search for Lindsey Barske in:

  3. Search for Ben Van Handel in:

  4. Search for Christoph D Rau in:

  5. Search for Peiheng Gan in:

  6. Search for Avneesh Sharma in:

  7. Search for Shan Parikh in:

  8. Search for Matt Denholtz in:

  9. Search for Ying Huang in:

  10. Search for Yukiko Yamaguchi in:

  11. Search for Hua Shen in:

  12. Search for Hooman Allayee in:

  13. Search for J Gage Crump in:

  14. Search for Thomas I Force in:

  15. Search for Ching-Ling Lien in:

  16. Search for Takako Makita in:

  17. Search for Aldons J Lusis in:

  18. Search for S Ram Kumar in:

  19. Search for Henry M Sucov in:

Contributions

M.P., L.B., B.V.H., P.G. and A.S. conducted laboratory analyses. C.D.R. contributed bioinformatics insight and analysis, and M.D. provided FISH probes. S.P. and T.I.F. provided Tnni3k conditional mice. M.D., Y.H., Y.Y. and H.S. gave technical guidance. H.A. and A.J.L. provided insight into the use of the HMDP, and A.J.L. provided most of the HMDP mice. J.G.C., C.-L.L., T.M. and A.J.L. provided conceptual advice. S.R.K. read and interpreted echocardiographic data and provided conceptual advice. The overall project was conceived by, data were interpreted by, and the manuscript was written by M.P. and H.M.S.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry M Sucov.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Text and Figures

    Supplementary Figures 1 and 2, Supplementary Tables 1–3 and Supplementary Data