Cantone, I. & Fisher, A.G. Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 282–289 (2013).
Smith, Z.D. et al. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 484, 339–344 (2012).
Bird, A.P. & Wolffe, A.P. Methylation-induced repression—belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell 99, 451–454 (1999).
Smith, Z.D. & Meissner, A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 204–220 (2013).
Rossant, J. Stem cells and early lineage development. Cell 132, 527–531 (2008).
Ying, Q.L. et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519–523 (2008).
Ficz, G. et al. FGF signaling inhibition in ESCs drives rapid genome-wide demethylation to the epigenetic ground state of pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 13, 351–359 (2013).
Habibi, E. et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 13, 360–369 (2013).
Hayashi, K., Ohta, H., Kurimoto, K., Aramaki, S. & Saitou, M. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell 146, 519–532 (2011).
Brons, I.G. et al. Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191–195 (2007).
Tesar, P.J. et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196–199 (2007).
Kojima, Y. et al. The transcriptional and functional properties of mouse epiblast stem cells resemble the anterior primitive streak. Cell Stem Cell 14, 107–120 (2014).
Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324, 930–935 (2009).
Ito, S. et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science 333, 1300–1303 (2011).
He, Y.F. et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 333, 1303–1307 (2011).
Koh, K.P. et al. Tet1 and Tet2 regulate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine production and cell lineage specification in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 8, 200–213 (2011).
Ficz, G. et al. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 473, 398–402 (2011).
Williams, K. et al. TET1 and hydroxymethylcytosine in transcription and DNA methylation fidelity. Nature 473, 343–348 (2011).
Wu, H. & Zhang, Y. Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 156, 45–68 (2014).
Hackett, J.A. et al. Synergistic mechanisms of DNA demethylation during transition to ground-state pluripotency. Stem Cell Rep. 1, 518–531 (2013).
Sohni, A. et al. Dynamic switching of active promoter and enhancer domains regulates Tet1 and Tet2 expression during cell state transitions between pluripotency and differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 35, 1026–1042 (2015).
Dawlaty, M.M. et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell 9, 166–175 (2011).
Yamaguchi, S. et al. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature 492, 443–447 (2012).
Zhang, R.R. et al. Tet1 regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition. Cell Stem Cell 13, 237–245 (2013).
Kang, J. et al. Simultaneous deletion of the methylcytosine oxidases Tet1 and Tet3 increases transcriptome variability in early embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4236–E4245 (2015).
Dawlaty, M.M. et al. Combined deficiency of Tet1 and Tet2 causes epigenetic abnormalities but is compatible with postnatal development. Dev. Cell 24, 310–323 (2013).
Dai, H.Q. et al. TET-mediated DNA demethylation controls gastrulation by regulating Lefty–Nodal signalling. Nature 538, 528–532 (2016).
Li, J. & Zhou, B.P. Activation of β-catenin and Akt pathways by Twist are critical for the maintenance of EMT associated cancer stem cell–like characters. BMC Cancer 11, 49 (2011).
Lin, H.H. et al. Neuronatin promotes neural lineage in ESCs via Ca2+ signaling. Stem Cells 28, 1950–1960 (2010).
Shen, M.M. Nodal signaling: developmental roles and regulation. Development 134, 1023–1034 (2007).
Wu, H. et al. Dual functions of Tet1 in transcriptional regulation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 473, 389–393 (2011).
Zhou, W. et al. HIF1α induced switch from bivalent to exclusively glycolytic metabolism during ESC-to-EpiSC/hESC transition. EMBO J. 31, 2103–2116 (2012).
Tanaka, S., Kunath, T., Hadjantonakis, A.K., Nagy, A. & Rossant, J. Promotion of trophoblast stem cell proliferation by FGF4. Science 282, 2072–2075 (1998).
Rugg-Gunn, P.J., Cox, B.J., Ralston, A. & Rossant, J. Distinct histone modifications in stem cell lines and tissue lineages from the early mouse embryo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10783–10790 (2010).
Buecker, C. et al. Reorganization of enhancer patterns in transition from naive to primed pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 14, 838–853 (2014).
Booth, M.J. et al. Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science 336, 934–937 (2012).
Stadler, M.B. et al. DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature 480, 490–495 (2011).
Shirane, K. et al. Global landscape and regulatory principles of DNA methylation reprogramming for germ cell specification by mouse pluripotent stem cells. Dev. Cell 39, 87–103 (2016).
Yu, M. et al. Base-resolution analysis of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian genome. Cell 149, 1368–1380 (2012).
Zalzman, M. et al. Zscan4 regulates telomere elongation and genomic stability in ES cells. Nature 464, 858–863 (2010).
Nakai-Futatsugi, Y. & Niwa, H. Zscan4 is activated after telomere shortening in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 6, 483–495 (2016).
Lu, F., Liu, Y., Jiang, L., Yamaguchi, S. & Zhang, Y. Role of Tet proteins in enhancer activity and telomere elongation. Genes Dev. 28, 2103–2119 (2014).
Yang, J. et al. Tet enzymes regulate telomere maintenance and chromosomal stability of mouse ESCs. Cell Rep. 15, 1809–1821 (2016).
Johansson, C. et al. The roles of Jumonji-type oxygenases in human disease. Epigenomics 6, 89–120 (2014).
Kim, T.G., Kraus, J.C., Chen, J. & Lee, Y. JUMONJI, a critical factor for cardiac development, functions as a transcriptional repressor. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42247–42255 (2003).
Rudenko, A. et al. Tet1 is critical for neuronal activity-regulated gene expression and memory extinction. Neuron 79, 1109–1122 (2013).
Liao, J. et al. Targeted disruption of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B in human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 47, 469–478 (2015).
Cimmino, L. et al. TET1 is a tumor suppressor of hematopoietic malignancy. Nat. Immunol. 16, 653–662 (2015).
Vermeire, L. et al. Essential validation of gene trap mouse ES cell lines: a test case with the gene Ttrap. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 1045–1051 (2009).
de Vree, P.J. et al. Targeted sequencing by proximity ligation for comprehensive variant detection and local haplotyping. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1019–1025 (2014).
Koentgen, F. et al. Exclusive transmission of the embryonic stem cell–derived genome through the mouse germline. Genesis 54, 326–333 (2016).
Meno, C. et al. Two closely-related left–right asymmetrically expressed genes, lefty-1 and lefty-2: their distinct expression domains, chromosomal linkage and direct neuralizing activity in Xenopus embryos. Genes Cells 2, 513–524 (1997).
Bachman, M. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is a predominantly stable DNA modification. Nat. Chem. 6, 1049–1055 (2014).
Czechanski, A. et al. Derivation and characterization of mouse embryonic stem cells from permissive and nonpermissive strains. Nat. Protoc. 9, 559–574 (2014).
Taiwo, O. et al. Methylome analysis using MeDIP–seq with low DNA concentrations. Nat. Protoc. 7, 617–636 (2012).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Thomson, J.P. et al. Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e206 (2013).
Matarese, F., Carrillo-de Santa Pau, E. & Stunnenberg, H.G. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine: a new kid on the epigenetic block? Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 562 (2011).
Robinson, M.D. et al. Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation. Genome Res. 20, 1719–1729 (2010).
Masser, D.R., Stanford, D.R. & Freeman, W.M. Targeted DNA methylation analysis by next-generation sequencing. J. Vis. Exp. 96, e52488 (2015).
Kumaki, Y., Oda, M. & Okano, M. QUMA: quantification tool for methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W170–W175 (2008).
Krueger, F. & Andrews, S.R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite–Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).
Smallwood, S.A. et al. Single-cell genome-wide bisulfite sequencing for assessing epigenetic heterogeneity. Nat. Methods 11, 817–820 (2014).
Wang, Z. et al. swDMR: a sliding window approach to identify differentially methylated regions based on whole genome bisulfite sequencing. PLoS One 10, e0132866 (2015).
Yu, G., Wang, L.G. & He, Q.Y. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382–2383 (2015).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).