Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Signaling from maize organ primordia via FASCIATED EAR3 regulates stem cell proliferation and yield traits

Nature Genetics volume 48, pages 785–791 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Shoot apical meristems are stem cell niches that balance proliferation with the incorporation of daughter cells into organ primordia. This balance is maintained by CLAVATA–WUSCHEL feedback signaling between the stem cells at the tip of the meristem and the underlying organizing center. Signals that provide feedback from organ primordia to control the stem cell niche in plants have also been hypothesized, but their identities are unknown. Here we report FASCIATED EAR3 (FEA3), a leucine-rich-repeat receptor that functions in stem cell control and responds to a CLAVATA3/ESR-related (CLE) peptide expressed in organ primordia. We modeled our results to propose a regulatory system that transmits signals from differentiating cells in organ primordia back to the stem cell niche and that appears to function broadly in the plant kingdom. Furthermore, we demonstrate an application of this new signaling feedback, by showing that weak alleles of fea3 enhance hybrid maize yield traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: fea3 mutant phenotypes and gene identification.
Figure 2: Expression of FEA3 and ZmWUS1.
Figure 3: Interactions between FEA3 and its putative ligand, ZmFCP1.
Figure 4: Computational model and tests of FEA3 function.
Figure 5: Arabidopsis FEA3 RNAi mutants are fasciated.
Figure 6: Yield traits for weak fea3 alleles.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

NCBI Reference Sequence

References

  1. Morrison, S.J. & Spradling, A.C. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 132, 598–611 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Heidstra, R. & Sabatini, S. Plant and animal stem cells: similar yet different. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 301–312 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brand, U., Fletcher, J.C., Hobe, M., Meyerowitz, E.M. & Simon, R. Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 289, 617–619 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schoof, H. et al. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100, 635–644 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stahl, Y. & Simon, R. Plant primary meristems: shared functions and regulatory mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 53–58 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Emery, J.F. et al. Radial patterning of Arabidopsis shoots by class III HD-ZIP and KANADI genes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1768–1774 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldshmidt, A., Alvarez, J.P., Bowman, J.L. & Eshed, Y. Signals derived from YABBY gene activities in organ primordia regulate growth and partitioning of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristems. Plant Cell 20, 1217–1230 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanaka, W. et al. The YABBY gene TONGARI-BOUSHI1 is involved in lateral organ development and maintenance of meristem organization in the rice spikelet. Plant Cell 24, 80–95 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Scanlon, M.J. The polar auxin transport inhibitor N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid disrupts leaf initiation, KNOX protein regulation, and formation of leaf margins in maize. Plant Physiol. 133, 597–605 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Taguchi-Shiobara, F., Yuan, Z., Hake, S. & Jackson, D. The fasciated ear2 gene encodes a leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein that regulates shoot meristem proliferation in maize. Genes Dev. 15, 2755–2766 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeong, S., Trotochaud, A.E. & Clark, S.E. The Arabidopsis CLAVATA2 gene encodes a receptor-like protein required for the stability of the CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase. Plant Cell 11, 1925–1934 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, S.E., Williams, R.W. & Meyerowitz, E.M. The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89, 575–585 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bommert, P. et al. thick tassel dwarf1 encodes a putative maize ortholog of the Arabidopsis CLAVATA1 leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase. Development 132, 1235–1245 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson, D., Veit, B. & Hake, S. Expression of maize KNOTTED1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120, 405–413 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nimchuk, Z.L., Tarr, P.T., Ohno, C., Qu, X. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Plant stem cell signaling involves ligand-dependent trafficking of the CLAVATA1 receptor kinase. Curr. Biol. 21, 345–352 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lüscher, C. et al. Role of AMPA receptor cycling in synaptic transmission and plasticity. Neuron 24, 649–658 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fletcher, J.C., Brand, U., Running, M.P., Simon, R. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283, 1911–1914 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nardmann, J. & Werr, W. The shoot stem cell niche in angiosperms: expression patterns of WUS orthologues in rice and maize imply major modifications in the course of mono- and dicot evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 2492–2504 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kondo, T. et al. A plant peptide encoded by CLV3 identified by in situ MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Science 313, 845–848 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito, Y. et al. Dodeca-CLE peptides as suppressors of plant stem cell differentiation. Science 313, 842–845 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bommert, P., Je, B.I., Goldshmidt, A. & Jackson, D. The maize Gα gene COMPACT PLANT2 functions in CLAVATA signalling to control shoot meristem size. Nature 502, 555–558 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Opsahl-Ferstad, H.G., Le Deunff, E., Dumas, C. & Rogowsky, P.M. ZmEsr, a novel endosperm-specific gene expressed in a restricted region around the maize embryo. Plant J. 12, 235–246 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Suzaki, T. et al. Conservation and diversification of meristem maintenance mechanism in Oryza sativa: function of the FLORAL ORGAN NUMBER2 gene. Plant Cell Physiol. 47, 1591–1602 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzaki, T., Yoshida, A. & Hirano, H.Y. Functional diversification of CLAVATA3-related CLE proteins in meristem maintenance in rice. Plant Cell 20, 2049–2058 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. McCarty, D.R. & Meeley, R.B. Transposon resources for forward and reverse genetics in maize. in Handbook of Maize: Genetics and Genomics (eds. Bennetzen, J.L. & Hake, S.C.) 561–584 (Springer Press, 2009).

  26. Yadav, R.K. et al. Plant stem cell maintenance involves direct transcriptional repression of differentiation program. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 654 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Chickarmane, V.S., Gordon, S.P., Tarr, P.T., Heisler, M.G. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Cytokinin signaling as a positional cue for patterning the apical–basal axis of the growing Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4002–4007 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gruel, J. et al. An epidermis-driven mechanism positions and scales stem cell niches in plants. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500989 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kinoshita, A. et al. RPK2 is an essential receptor-like kinase that transmits the CLV3 signal in Arabidopsis. Development 137, 3911–3920 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Q., Luo, A., Zadrozny, T., Sylvester, A. & Jackson, D. Fluorescent protein marker lines in maize: generation and applications. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 57, 535–543 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Clark, S.E., Running, M.P. & Meyerowitz, E.M. CLAVATA1, a regulator of meristem and flower development in Arabidopsis. Development 119, 397–418 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Clark, S.E., Running, M.P. & Meyerowitz, E.M. CLAVATA3 is a specific regulator of shoot and floral meristem development affecting the same processes as CLAVATA1. Development 121, 2057–2067 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kayes, J.M. & Clark, S.E. CLAVATA2, a regulator of meristem and organ development in Arabidopsis. Development 125, 3843–3851 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bommert, P., Nagasawa, N.S. & Jackson, D. Quantitative variation in maize kernel row number is controlled by the FASCIATED EAR2 locus. Nat. Genet. 45, 334–337 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hsu, Y.C., Li, L. & Fuchs, E. Transit-amplifying cells orchestrate stem cell activity and tissue regeneration. Cell 157, 935–949 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohanty, A. et al. Advancing cell biology and functional genomics in maize using fluorescent protein–tagged lines. Plant Physiol. 149, 601–605 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Crawford, K.M. & Zambryski, P.C. Subcellular localization determines the availability of non-targeted proteins to plasmodesmatal transport. Curr. Biol. 10, 1032–1040 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Osterrieder, A. et al. Fluorescence lifetime imaging of interactions between Golgi tethering factors and small GTPases in plants. Traffic 10, 1034–1046 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S.Y. & Guindon, S. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695–1701 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Juarez, M.T., Twigg, R.W. & Timmermans, M.C. Specification of adaxial cell fate during maize leaf development. Development 131, 4533–4544 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Krishnakumar, V. et al. A maize database resource that captures tissue-specific and subcellular-localized gene expression, via fluorescent tags and confocal imaging (Maize Cell Genomics Database). Plant Cell Physiol. 56, e12(1–7) (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yadav, R.K. et al. WUSCHEL protein movement mediates stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Genes Dev. 25, 2025–2030 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gordon, S.P., Chickarmane, V.S., Ohno, C. & Meyerowitz, E.M. Multiple feedback loops through cytokinin signaling control stem cell number within the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16529–16534 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ogawa, M., Shinohara, H., Sakagami, Y. & Matsubayashi, Y. Arabidopsis CLV3 peptide directly binds CLV1 ectodomain. Science 319, 294 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Jönsson, H., Shapiro, B.E., Meyerowitz, E.M. & Mjolsness, E. Signalling in multicellular models of plant development. in On Growth, Form and Computers (eds. Kumar, S. & Bentley, P.J.) 156–161 (Elsevier Academic Press, 2003).

  48. Iliev, I. & Kitin, P. Origin, morphology, and anatomy of fasciation in plants cultured in vivo and in vitro. Plant Growth Regul. 63, 115–129 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yonekura-Sakakibara, K., Kojima, M., Yamaya, T. & Sakakibara, H. Molecular characterization of cytokinin-responsive histidine kinases in maize. Differential ligand preferences and response to cis-zeatin. Plant Physiol. 134, 1654–1661 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Hansen, N. The CMA evolution strategy: a comparing review. in Towards a New Evolutionary Computation: Advances in Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (eds. Lozano, J.A., Larrañga, P., Inza, I. & Bengoetxea, E.) 75–102 (Springer Press, 2006).

  51. Kurakawa, T. et al. Direct control of shoot meristem activity by a cytokinin-activating enzyme. Nature 445, 652–655 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hong, R.L., Hamaguchi, L., Busch, M.A. & Weigel, D. Regulatory elements of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS identified by phylogenetic footprinting and shadowing. Plant Cell 15, 1296–1309 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Whipple, C.J. et al. grassy tillers1 promotes apical dominance in maize and responds to shade signals in the grasses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E506–E512 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Eveland, A.L. et al. Regulatory modules controlling maize inflorescence architecture. Genome Res. 24, 431–443 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The fea3-0 allele was kindly provided by V. Shcherbak (Krasnodar Research Institute of Agriculture). We also thank U. Hernandez for assistance with cloning, A. Masson for assistance with peptide assays, and members of the Jackson laboratory for comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge funding from a collaborative agreement with DuPont Pioneer and from NSF Plant Genome Research program grant IOS-1238202 and grant MCB-1027445 and from Agriculture and Food Research Initiative competitive grant 2016-67013-24572 of the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. The study also received support from the Gatsby Charitable Foundation (GAT3395/PR4) and the Swedish Research Council (VR2013-4632) to H.J. and through the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (SSAC; project PJ01184302) from the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andrea L Eveland

    Present address: Present address: Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,

  2. Jeremy Gruel and Young Koung Lee: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, New York, USA

    Byoung Il Je, Young Koung Lee, Peter Bommert, Edgar Demesa Arevalo, Andrea L Eveland, Qingyu Wu, Alexander Goldshmidt & David Jackson

  2. Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Jeremy Gruel & Henrik Jönsson

  3. Agricultural Biotechnology, DuPont Pioneer, Johnston, Iowa, USA

    Robert Meeley

  4. Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA

    Madelaine Bartlett

  5. Agricultural Biotechnology, DuPont Pioneer, Wilmington, Delaware, USA

    Mai Komatsu & Hajime Sakai

  6. Computational Biology and Biological Physics Group, Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Henrik Jönsson

Authors
  1. Byoung Il Je
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Gruel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Young Koung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter Bommert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edgar Demesa Arevalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrea L Eveland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qingyu Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Alexander Goldshmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Robert Meeley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Madelaine Bartlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Mai Komatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hajime Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Henrik Jönsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. David Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.I.J. performed all experimental procedures except for those listed below, prepared figures, and wrote the draft of the manuscript. Y.K.L. and P.B. mapped and cloned FEA3. J.G. performed computational modeling, supervised by H.J. E.D.A. analyzed transactivation lines, using constructs generated by Q.W. A.L.E. performed expression analyses. A.G. performed ZmWUS1 reporter line construction and characterization. R.M. provided the ZmFCP1 mutants. M.B. performed phylogenetic analyses. M.K. and H.S. provided field genetics and mapping support and analysis. D.J. supervised the research and co-wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Jackson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors (B.I.J., Y.K.L., D.J., M.K., and H.S., on behalf of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and DuPont Pioneer) have obtained patent US20150047071 A1 based in part on this work from the US Patent and Trademark Office.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Phenotypic analysis of fea3 mutants.

(a) Wild-type (WT) or fea3 SAM longitudinal and transverse sections probed in situ for KNOTTED1 (KN1) mRNA. The fea3 SAM showed a wider expression domain but normal patterning. Transverse sections are shown in the right panels. Scale bars, 50 μm. (b) The height of fea3 plants (right) is similar to that of wild-type plants (left). (c) Wild-type male spikelets normally contain two flowers, each with three anthers, and fea3 plants show normal spikelet and floret architecture. Anthers are indicated by arrowheads. (d) A wild-type female spikelet shows a carpel (asterisk), one degenerated floret (red arrow), and three immature anthers (arrowheads), and the fea3 mutant shows normal female spikelet and floret architecture. The images in c and d are from scanning electron microscopy. Scale bars in c and d, 100 μm.

Supplementary Figure 2 Structure and expression analysis of FEA3.

(a) A partial retrotransposon insertion (red text) between 10-bp duplicated target sites (blue) in the fea3-0 allele introduced a premature stop codon (asterisk). (b) FEA3 has two exons; mutations in the fea3-0 and EMS alleles are marked. (c) qRT–PCR indicates that FEA3 expression was enriched in SAM and root apical meristem (RAM), similar to FEA2. RE1 and RE2, root elongation zones; L-RAM, RAM of lateral root; Ct, coleoptiles; LS, leaf sheath; LB, leaf blade. (d–f) In situ hybridization of FEA3. (d) A sketch of the expression pattern in the SAM. (e) Hybridization with control sense probe. (f) FEA3 is similarly expressed in the central region of ear spikelet meristems (arrows). Scale bars, 50 μm.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 3 Complementation assay and localization of FEA3.

(a) Constructs for the FEA3-RFP fusion proteins. Dark green boxes, FEA3 coding region; light green boxes, UTR. Fusions were near the N- terminus, after the signal peptide, or at the C terminus. (b) FEA3-RFP transgenes rescued the fasciation phenotypes (Non-t, non-transgenic) (left); the genotypes of the plants are shown (the red arrow indicates the FEA3-RFP transgene, and the blue arrows indicate spurious PCR products from annealing of wild-type and FEA3-RFP PCR products) (right). (c,d) FEA3-RFP is localized to the inner-layer cells of the SAM central zone (c) and becomes enriched at the cell periphery after 2 h of D15 treatment (d) (laser confocal microscopy images). Note that the signal in upper SAM layers is background autofluorescence (asterisk). (e) Aqueous two-phase partitioning shows an increase in plasma membrane FEA3 localization after treatment with D15 peptide. S, soluble fraction; PM, plasma membrane fraction; IM, internal membrane-enriched fraction; cPM, control plasma membrane. (f–j) FEA3-RFP localization in young tassel (enlarged on right) (f), tassel spikelet meristems (arrows) (g), young ear (h), root apical meristem (i), and leaf primordium (j). FEA3-RFP was detected in the RAM in presumptive vascular initials but not in the quiescent center (QC); arrow indicates QC cells. In i, the tissue was counterstained with calcofluor white (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 4 CLE peptide assays in maize roots.

fea2 roots showed partial resistance to CLV3; however, fea3 roots did not show resistance. Root length measurements are shown on the right. Error bars, s.d. (n = 10 for each genotype). **P < 0.001, Student’s t test; NS, not significant.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 5 Phylogenetic relationships among select CLE and FEA3-like genes.

(a–c) Although neither clade was ever strongly supported, Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of 45 CLE genes repeatedly resolved two gene clades, shown in green and blue (a). These two clades were further analyzed in separate, smaller analyses (b,c). CLE peptide sequences and gene identification numbers are listed in Supplementary Table 3. (d) FEA3 falls in a strongly supported clade with three genes from Arabidopsis. Thickened branches in all panels represent posterior probability >0.95.

Supplementary Figure 6 CLE peptide assays.

(a) fea3 roots show resistance specifically to ZmFCP1. Error bars, s.d. (n = 10 for each genotype). **P < 0.001, Student’s t test; NS, not significant. (b) In fea3 fea2 double-mutant segregating families, fea3 roots again showed resistance only to ZmFCP1, whereas fea2 showed resistance to all peptides tested and fea2 fea3 double mutants showed additive resistance to ZmFCP1. Error bars, s.d. (n = 10 for each genotype). **P < 0.001, Student’s t test; NS, not significant.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 7 FEA3 and ZmFCP1 expression, and the tissue template used in computational modeling.

Supplementary Figure 8 Schematic of the model.

Gene expression domains are represented with uniform color intensity, while diffusing molecules are shown with a color gradient.

Supplementary Figure 9 Model behavior example.

Expression domains of ZmWUS1 (top) and ZmCLV3 (bottom) for different genotypes. From left to right, wild type, Zmclv3, fea2, fea3, fea3 fea2, fcp1, and fcp1 overexpression.

Supplementary Figure 10 Expression predictions from the model.

Variation in gene expression levels of ZmWUS1 (green) and ZmCLV3 (red) between wild type and single or double mutants. fcp1-ox= fcp1 over-expression.

Supplementary Figure 11 Rice-like model behavior example.

Expression domains of ZmWUS1 (top) and ZmCLV3 (bottom) for different genotypes. From left to right, wild type, Zmclv3, fea2, fea3, fea3 fea2, fcp1, and fcp1 overexpression.

Supplementary Figure 12 Expression predictions from the rice-like model.

Variation in gene expression levels of ZmWUS1 (green) and ZmCLV3 (red) between wild type and single or double mutants. fcp1-ox= fcp1 over-expression.

Supplementary Figure 13 RNA levels of a maize CLV3 ortholog, ZmCLE7 (GRMZM2G372364), were increased in the inflorescence meristem tips of fea3 mutants in comparison to wild type (WT).

RNA-seq reads from two biological replicates were normalized and are plotted as fragments per kilobase per million (FPKM) reads mapped. The difference is significant (Students t test, P < 0.015).

Source data

Supplementary Figure 14 Two-component transactivation of ZmFCP1.

(a) Construction of the two-component system. LhG4 expression is driven by the primordium-specific YABBY14 promoter (pYABBY), which activates cis and trans pOp promoters. (b) Cis-activated NLS-RFP expression was detected specifically in leaf primordia (P1, P2) using laser confocal microscopy. (c) Transactivated ZmFCP1 expression was increased about 15-fold (three biological replicates, ±3.2 s.d.) as compared with the pOp-ZmFCP1 single-component line.

Source data

Supplementary Figure 15 Artificial microRNA and RNAi of Arabidopsis FEA3 and expression of CLE27.

(a,b) AtFEA3 artificial miRNA transgenic plants show fasciation and split inflorescence stems (arrows). (c) qRT–PCR shows RNAi specificity to the Arabidopsis FEA3 orthologous gene, At3g25670; two close homologs were not significantly downregulated. (d,e) AtFEA3 RNAi plants showed normal flower and silique development. (f) Floral organ number does not show a significant difference. Error bars, s.d. (n = 200 for each genotype). P > 0.6, Student’s t test; NS, = not significant. (g) CLE27 is expressed in the SAM peripheral zone, where cells destined to differentiate are incorporated into primordia, but not in the SAM central zone. (FACS sorting data are from the Arabidopsis eFP browser57,58).

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–15, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Note. (PDF 3612 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

List of primers and oligonucleotide sequences. (XLSX 14 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

List of peptides. (XLSX 12 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

Data corresponding to Supplementary Table 1. (XLSX 20 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

Genotype data. (PDF 61 kb)

Supplementary Data 3

CLE alignments 2+2. (PDF 54 kb)

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Je, B., Gruel, J., Lee, Y. et al. Signaling from maize organ primordia via FASCIATED EAR3 regulates stem cell proliferation and yield traits. Nat Genet 48, 785–791 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3567

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3567

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing