Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Common variants at 10p12.31, 10q21.1 and 13q12.13 are associated with sporadic pituitary adenoma

Abstract

Pituitary adenoma is one of the most common intracranial neoplasms, and its genetic basis remains largely unknown. To identify genetic susceptibility loci for sporadic pituitary adenoma, we performed a three-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) in the Han Chinese population. We first analyzed genome-wide SNP data in 771 pituitary adenoma cases and 2,788 controls and then carried forward the promising variants for replication in another 2 independent sets (2,542 cases and 3,620 controls in total). We identified three new susceptibility loci below the genome-wide significance threshold (P < 5 × 10−8) in the combined analyses: 10p12.31 (rs2359536, Pmeta = 2.25 × 10−10 and rs10828088, Pmeta = 6.27 × 10−10), 10q21.1 (rs10763170, Pmeta = 6.88 × 10−10) and 13q12.13 (rs17083838, Pmeta = 1.89 × 10−8). This study is the first GWAS to our knowledge on sporadic pituitary adenoma, and our results provide insight into the genetic basis of this disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Regional plots of association.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Lecoq, A.L., Kamenicky, P., Guiochon-Mantel, A. & Chanson, P. Genetic mutations in sporadic pituitary adenomas—what to screen for? Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 11, 43–54 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aflorei, E.D. & Korbonits, M. Epidemiology and etiopathogenesis of pituitary adenomas. J. Neurooncol. 117, 379–394 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Couldwell, W.T. & Cannon-Albright, L. A heritable predisposition to pituitary tumors. Pituitary 13, 130–137 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elston, M.S., McDonald, K.L., Clifton-Bligh, R.J. & Robinson, B.G. Familial pituitary tumor syndromes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 5, 453–461 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Daly, A.F., Tichomirowa, M.A. & Beckers, A. The epidemiology and genetics of pituitary adenomas. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 23, 543–554 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou, Y., Zhang, X. & Klibanski, A. Genetic and epigenetic mutations of tumor suppressive genes in sporadic pituitary adenoma. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 386, 16–33 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Altas, M. et al. The effect of polymorphisms in the promoter region of the MMP-1 gene on the occurrence and invasiveness of hypophyseal adenoma. Acta Neurochir. (Wien) 152, 1611–1617 discussion 1617 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gomes, L. et al. CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to pituitary tumors. Acta Med. Port. 18, 339–343 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao, L. et al. LRRC4 haplotypes are associated with pituitary adenoma in a Chinese population. Med. Oncol. 31, 888 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dobbins, S.E. et al. Common variation at 10p12.31 near MLLT10 influences meningioma risk. Nat. Genet. 43, 825–827 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pharoah, P.D. et al. GWAS meta-analysis and replication identifies three new susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer. Nat. Genet. 45, 362–370 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Michailidou, K. et al. Large-scale genotyping identifies 41 new loci associated with breast cancer risk. Nat. Genet. 45, 353–361 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bliss, K.T., Chu, M., Jones-Weinert, C.M. & Gregorio, C.C. Investigating lasp-2 in cell adhesion: new binding partners and roles in motility. Mol. Biol. Cell 24, 995–1006 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hale, J.S., Li, M. & Lathia, J.D. The malignant social network: cell-cell adhesion and communication in cancer stem cells. Cell Adh. Migr. 6, 346–355 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ortiz-Plata, A. et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule expression in pituitary adenomas: an immunohistochemical study. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 14, 418–424 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ramasamy, A. et al. Genetic variability in the regulation of gene expression in ten regions of the human brain. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1418–1428 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. de Tayrac, M. et al. Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals a robust genomic glioblastoma signature associated with copy number driving changes in gene expression. Genes Chromosom. Cancer 48, 55–68 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haruki, S. et al. Frequent silencing of protocadherin 17, a candidate tumour suppressor for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 31, 1027–1036 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed, Z.M. et al. Mutations of the protocadherin gene PCDH15 cause Usher syndrome type 1F. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69, 25–34 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Doucette, L. et al. Profound, prelingual nonsyndromic deafness maps to chromosome 10q21 and is caused by a novel missense mutation in the Usher syndrome type IF gene PCDH15. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17, 554–564 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Huertas-Vazquez, A. et al. A nonsynonymous SNP within PCDH15 is associated with lipid traits in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Hum. Genet. 127, 83–89 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ovsyannikova, I.G. et al. Genome-wide association study of antibody response to smallpox vaccine. Vaccine 30, 4182–4189 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Murcia, C.L. & Woychik, R.P. Expression of Pcdh15 in the inner ear, nervous system and various epithelia of the developing embryo. Mech. Dev. 105, 163–166 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kapoor, A. et al. The histone variant macroH2A suppresses melanoma progression through regulation of CDK8. Nature 468, 1105–1109 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Firestein, R. et al. CDK8 is a colorectal cancer oncogene that regulates β-catenin activity. Nature 455, 547–551 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, M.Y., Han, S.I. & Lim, S.C. Roles of cyclin-dependent kinase 8 and β-catenin in the oncogenesis and progression of gastric adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 38, 1375–1383 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Morris, E.J. et al. E2F1 represses β-catenin transcription and is antagonized by both pRB and CDK8. Nature 455, 552–556 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chambers, T.J., Giles, A., Brabant, G. & Davis, J.R. Wnt signalling in pituitary development and tumorigenesis. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 20, R101–R111 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Elston, M.S. et al. Wnt pathway inhibitors are strongly down-regulated in pituitary tumors. Endocrinology 149, 1235–1242 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Donner, A.J., Szostek, S., Hoover, J.M. & Espinosa, J.M. CDK8 is a stimulus-specific positive coregulator of p53 target genes. Mol. Cell 27, 121–133 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lo, H.S. et al. Identification of somatic mutations of the RNF6 gene in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 62, 4191–4193 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernando, H.S., Sanders, A.J., Kynaston, H.G. & Jiang, W.G. WAVE3 is associated with invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Urol. Oncol. 28, 320–327 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor, M.A. et al. Upregulated WAVE3 expression is essential for TGF-β–mediated EMT and metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 142, 341–353 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Teng, Y., Ghoshal, P., Ngoka, L., Mei, Y. & Cowell, J.K. Critical role of the WASF3 gene in JAK2/STAT3 regulation of cancer cell motility. Carcinogenesis 34, 1994–1999 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, Y. et al. Expression of MMP-9 and WAVE3 in colorectal cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 138, 2035–2044 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Raverot, G., Jouanneau, E. & Trouillas, J. Management of endocrine disease: clinicopathological classification and molecular markers of pituitary tumours for personalized therapeutic strategies. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 170, R121–R132 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Jaffe, C.A. Clinically non-functioning pituitary adenoma. Pituitary 9, 317–321 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Price, A.L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 904–909 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Barrett, J.C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M.J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ge, D. et al. WGAViewer: software for genomic annotation of whole genome association studies. Genome Res. 18, 640–643 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pruim, R.J. et al. LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics 26, 2336–2337 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. de Bakker, P.I. et al. Practical aspects of imputation-driven meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, R122–R128 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Delaneau, O., Zagury, J.F. & Marchini, J. Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nat. Methods 10, 5–6 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Howie, B., Fuchsberger, C., Stephens, M., Marchini, J. & Abecasis, G.R. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat. Genet. 44, 955–959 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56–65 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank and acknowledge all of the participants in the study. We gratefully thank Y. Wang, Q. Song, Y. Zhang and Q. Zhu for sample collection. The research was supported by the China Pituitary Adenoma Specialist Council (CPASC) and has received funding from the National High-Technology Research and Development Program of China (2014AA020611), the 973 Program (2015CB559100), the National Program for Support of Top-Notch Young Professionals, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81172391, 31325014, 81130022 and 81272302), the Program for New-Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-10-0356), the Shanghai Rising-Star Tracking Program (12QH1400400), the National 863 Program (2012AA02A515), the Shanghai Jiao Tong University Liberal Arts and Sciences Cross-Disciplinary Project (13JCRZ02), the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders (13dz2260500), the 'Shu Guang' project supported by the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission and the Shanghai Education Development Foundation (12SG17).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y. Zhao and Y.S. were the overall principal investigators for the study who conceived the study and obtained financial support, and they were responsible for study design and oversaw the entire study. Z. Ye, Z.L., Q.Z. and C.H. participated in the study design. Y. Zhao, L.Z., S.L., Y.M., Yongfei Wang, M.S., D.G., Z.Z. and Y.L. supervised the diagnosis of patients and subject recruitment. Y.S. and Z.L. supervised the experiments and data analyses. Y.S., Z.L., Z. Song and J.S. performed biostatistics and bioinformatics analyses, and the results were interpreted by Y.S., Y. Zhao and Z.L. L.P., W.B., J.W., X.S., K.Z., Yi Zhang, R.X., Z.M., N.Q., H.Q., W.H., Yichao Zhang, S.H., T.W., Z. Shi, Y. Zhu, H.Y., B.L., Z. Yao, W.T., Yin Wang, H. Chen and H. Cheng coordinated and provided samples. J.C., J.J., M.W., Z.W., W.L., K.L., J.Z. and L.W. performed the experiments. The manuscript was drafted by Z.L., Z. Ye and Q.Z. under the supervision of Y. Zhao and Y.S., who synthesized the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the article and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yongyong Shi or Yao Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 PCA plot of the first two components of our sample in the discovery stage.

The first principal component (C1; x axis) was plotted against the second principal component (C2; y axis). Controls are orange circles, and cases are blue circles.

Supplementary Figure 2 Quantile-quantile plot for the discovery stage.

The quantile-quantile plot presents the observed (y axis) versus expected (x axis) SNP distribution. The plot was generated on PCA-adjusted data. The λ value was 1.0157, calculated from the bottom 90% of SNPs. The red line denotes the 90th percentile.

Supplementary Figure 3 Manhattan plot of the GWAS of the discovery cohort comprising 771 cases of sporadic pituitary adenoma and 2,788 controls.

Genome-wide P values (–log10 (P); y axis) plotted against their respective chromosomal positions (x axis). The blue line is the significance level used for follow-up (1 × 10−4).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–3 and Supplementary Tables 1–9. (PDF 1154 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, Z., Li, Z., Wang, Y. et al. Common variants at 10p12.31, 10q21.1 and 13q12.13 are associated with sporadic pituitary adenoma. Nat Genet 47, 793–797 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3322

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3322

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing