Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203–208 (2006).
Kang, H.M. et al. Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics 178, 1709–1723 (2008).
Kang, H.M. et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42, 348–354 (2010).
Zhang, Z. et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 42, 355–360 (2010).
Lippert, C. et al. FaST linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Methods 8, 833–835 (2011).
Zhou, X. & Stephens, M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 44, 821–824 (2012).
Segura, V. et al. An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 44, 825–830 (2012).
Korte, A. et al. A mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies of correlated traits in structured populations. Nat. Genet. 44, 1066–1071 (2012).
Listgarten, J. et al. Improved linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Methods 9, 525–526 (2012).
Svishcheva, G.R., Axenovich, T.I., Belonogova, N.M., van Duijn, C.M. & Aulchenko, Y.S. Rapid variance components–based method for whole-genome association analysis. Nat. Genet. 44, 1166–1170 (2012).
Listgarten, J., Lippert, C. & Heckerman, D. FaST-LMM-Select for addressing confounding from spatial structure and rare variants. Nat. Genet. 45, 470–471 (2013).
Yang, J., Zaitlen, N.A., Goddard, M.E., Visscher, P.M. & Price, A.L. Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixed-model association methods. Nat. Genet. 46, 100–106 (2014).
Yang, J. et al. Genomic inflation factors under polygenic inheritance. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 807–812 (2011).
Stahl, E.A. et al. Bayesian inference analyses of the polygenic architecture of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Genet. 44, 483–489 (2012).
Lippert, C. et al. The benefits of selecting phenotype-specific variants for applications of mixed models in genomics. Sci. Rep. 3, 1815 (2013).
Rakitsch, B., Lippert, C., Stegle, O. & Borgwardt, K. A Lasso multi-marker mixed model for association mapping with population structure correction. Bioinformatics 29, 206–214 (2013).
Meuwissen, T.H., Hayes, B.J. & Goddard, M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001).
de Los Campos, G., Hickey, J.M., Pong-Wong, R., Daetwyler, H.D. & Calus, M.P. Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics 193, 327–345 (2013).
Zhou, X., Carbonetto, P. & Stephens, M. Polygenic modeling with Bayesian sparse linear mixed models. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003264 (2013).
Meuwissen, T.H., Solberg, T.R., Shepherd, R. & Woolliams, J.A. A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome-wide estimates of genetic value. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41, 2 (2009).
Carbonetto, P. & Stephens, M. Scalable variational inference for Bayesian variable selection in regression, and its accuracy in genetic association studies. Bayesian Anal. 7, 73–108 (2012).
Logsdon, B.A., Hoffman, G.E. & Mezey, J.G. A variational Bayes algorithm for fast and accurate multiple locus genome-wide association analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 58 (2010).
Jakobsdottir, J. & McPeek, M.S. MASTOR: mixed-model association mapping of quantitative traits in samples with related individuals. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 92, 652–666 (2013).
Bulik-Sullivan, B. et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 10.1038/ng.3211 (2 February 2015).
Ridker, P.M. et al. Rationale, design, and methodology of the Women's Genome Health Study: a genome-wide association study of more than 25,000 initially healthy American women. Clin. Chem. 54, 249–255 (2008).
García-Cortés, L.A., Moreno, C., Varona, L. & Altarriba, J. Variance component estimation by resampling. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 109, 358–363 (1992).
Matilainen, K., Mäntysaari, E.A., Lidauer, M.H., Strandén, I. & Thompson, R. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in Newton-type methods for restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters. PLoS ONE 8, e80821 (2013).
Legarra, A. & Misztal, I. Computing strategies in genome-wide selection. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 360–366 (2008).
VanRaden, P.M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 4414–4423 (2008).
Sawcer, S. et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature 476, 214–219 (2011).
Aulchenko, Y.S., Ripke, S., Isaacs, A. & Van Duijn, C.M. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23, 1294–1296 (2007).
Price, A.L. et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 38, 904–909 (2006).
Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55, 997–1004 (1999).
Wray, N.R. et al. Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 507–515 (2013).
Campbell, C.D. et al. Demonstrating stratification in a European American population. Nat. Genet. 37, 868–872 (2005).
Tucker, G., Price, A.L. & Berger, B.A. Improving the power of GWAS and avoiding confounding from population stratification with PC-Select. Genetics 197, 1045–1049 (2014).
Stephens, M. & Balding, D.J. Bayesian statistical methods for genetic association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 681–690 (2009).
Logsdon, B.A., Carty, C.L., Reiner, A.P., Dai, J.Y. & Kooperberg, C. A novel variational Bayes multiple locus Z-statistic for genome-wide association studies with Bayesian model averaging. Bioinformatics 28, 1738–1744 (2012).
Styrkarsdottir, U. et al. Nonsense mutation in the LGR4 gene is associated with several human diseases and other traits. Nature 497, 517–520 (2013).
Do, C.B. et al. Web-based genome-wide association study identifies two novel loci and a substantial genetic component for Parkinson's disease. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002141 (2011).
Hayeck, T. et al. Mixed model with correction for case-control ascertainment increases association power. bioRxiv 10.1101/008755 (2014).
Speed, D. & Balding, D.J. MultiBLUP: improved SNP-based prediction for complex traits. Genome Res. 24, 1550–1557 (2014).
Chen, W.-M. & Abecasis, G.R. Family-based association tests for genomewide association scans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 913–926 (2007).
Aulchenko, Y.S., De Koning, D.-J. & Haley, C. Genomewide rapid association using mixed model and regression: a fast and simple method for genomewide pedigree-based quantitative trait loci association analysis. Genetics 177, 577–585 (2007).
Chen, W.-M., Manichaikul, A. & Rich, S.S. A generalized family-based association test for dichotomous traits. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 364–376 (2009).
Boyd, S.P. & Vandenberghe, L. Convex Optimization (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Yang, J. et al. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs. Nat. Genet. 43, 519–525 (2011).
Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010).