Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A co-clinical approach identifies mechanisms and potential therapies for androgen deprivation resistance in prostate cancer

An Author Correction to this article was published on 03 September 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Here we report an integrated analysis that leverages data from treatment of genetic mouse models of prostate cancer along with clinical data from patients to elucidate new mechanisms of castration resistance. We show that castration counteracts tumor progression in a Pten loss–driven mouse model of prostate cancer through the induction of apoptosis and proliferation block. Conversely, this response is bypassed with deletion of either Trp53 or Zbtb7a together with Pten, leading to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Mechanistically, the integrated acquisition of data from mouse models and patients identifies the expression patterns of XAF1, XIAP and SRD5A1 as a predictive and actionable signature for CRPC. Notably, we show that combined inhibition of XIAP, SRD5A1 and AR pathways overcomes castration resistance. Thus, our co-clinical approach facilitates the stratification of patients and the development of tailored and innovative therapeutic treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Prostate tumors characterized by distinct genetic alterations differentially respond to castration.
Figure 2: Analysis of human prostate cancer unveils the relevance of ZBTB7A loss in the response to androgen deprivation.
Figure 3: Differential responses to castration in distinct genetic backgrounds.
Figure 4: Deregulation of XAF1 and SRD5A1 levels dictates prostate cancer progression and castration resistance in mice and humans.
Figure 5: Synergistic effect of ADT and embelin in mouse CRPC.
Figure 6: Genetic and molecular assessments in mice and humans dictate new experimental treatment to overcome CRPC.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Change history

  • 03 September 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. Nardella, C., Lunardi, A., Patnaik, A., Cantley, L.C. & Pandolfi, P.P. The APL paradigm and the “co-clinical trial” project. Cancer Discov. 1, 108–116 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Catalona, W.J. Management of cancer of the prostate. N. Engl. J. Med. 331, 996–1004 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Molina, A. & Belldegrun, A. Novel therapeutic strategies for castration resistant prostate cancer: inhibition of persistent androgen production and androgen receptor mediated signaling. J. Urol. 185, 787–794 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, G. et al. Zbtb7a suppresses prostate cancer through repression of a Sox9-dependent pathway for cellular senescence bypass and tumor invasion. Nat. Genet. published online; doi:10.1038/ng.2654 (2 June 2013).10.1038/ng.2654

  5. Chen, Z. et al. Crucial role of p53-dependent cellular senescence in suppression of Pten-deficient tumorigenesis. Nature 436, 725–730 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Schlomm, T. et al. Clinical significance of p53 alterations in surgically treated prostate cancers. Mod. Pathol. 21, 1371–1378 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tepper, C.G. et al. Profiling of gene expression changes caused by p53 gain-of-function mutant alleles in prostate cancer cells. Prostate 65, 375–389 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Markert, E.K., Mizuno, H., Vazquez, A. & Levine, A.J. Molecular classification of prostate cancer using curated expression signatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 21276–21281 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abou-Kheir, W.G., Hynes, P.G., Martin, P.L., Pierce, R. & Kelly, K. Characterizing the contribution of stem/progenitor cells to tumorigenesis in the Pten−/−TP53−/− prostate cancer model. Stem Cells 28, 2129–2140 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar, A. et al. Exome sequencing identifies a spectrum of mutation frequencies in advanced and lethal prostate cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17087–17092 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor, B.S. et al. Integrative genomic profiling of human prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 18, 11–22 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pourmand, G. et al. Role of PTEN gene in progression of prostate cancer. Urol. J. 4, 95–100 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trotman, L.C. et al. Pten dose dictates cancer progression in the prostate. PLoS Biol. 1, E59 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, S. et al. Prostate-specific deletion of the murine Pten tumor suppressor gene leads to metastatic prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 4, 209–221 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carver, B.S. et al. Reciprocal feedback regulation of PI3K and androgen receptor signaling in PTEN-deficient prostate cancer. Cancer Cell 19, 575–586 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, W. et al. Inhibition of tumor growth progression by antiandrogens and mTOR inhibitor in a Pten-deficient mouse model of prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 7466–7472 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kent, E.C. & Hussain, M.H. The patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: determining who, when, and how to treat. Urology 62 (suppl. 1), 134–140 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kent, E.C. & Hussain, M.H. Neoadjuvant Therapy for prostate cancer: an oncologist's perspective. Rev. Urol. 5 (suppl. 3), S28–S37 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, W. et al. Copy number analysis indicates monoclonal origin of lethal metastatic prostate cancer. Nat. Med. 15, 559–565 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Grasso, C.S. et al. The mutational landscape of lethal castration-resistant prostate cancer. Nature 487, 239–243 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee, S.U. & Maeda, T. POK/ZBTB proteins: an emerging family of proteins that regulate lymphoid development and function. Immunol. Rev. 247, 107–119 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomlins, S.A. et al. Integrative molecular concept modeling of prostate cancer progression. Nat. Genet. 39, 41–51 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baretton, G.B., Klenk, U., Diebold, J., Schmeller, N. & Lohrs, U. Proliferation- and apoptosis-associated factors in advanced prostatic carcinomas before and after androgen deprivation therapy: prognostic significance of p21/WAF1/CIP1 expression. Br. J. Cancer 80, 546–555 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gelmann, E.P. Molecular biology of the androgen receptor. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 3001–3015 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liston, P. et al. Identification of XAF1 as an antagonist of XIAP anti-Caspase activity. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 128–133 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang, J. et al. XAF1 as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 101, 559–567 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tu, S.P. et al. Restoration of XAF1 expression induces apoptosis and inhibits tumor growth in gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer 125, 688–697 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiang, C., Yi, X.P., Shen, H. & Li, Y.X. Targeting X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein inhibits pancreatic cancer cell growth through p-Akt depletion. World J. Gastroenterol. 18, 2956–2965 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dai, Y. et al. Adenovirus-mediated down-regulation of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein inhibits colon cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 8, 2762–2770 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Qiao, L. et al. Gene expression profile in colon cancer cells with respect to XIAP expression status. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 24, 245–260 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dubrez-Daloz, L., Dupoux, A. & Cartier, J. IAPs: more than just inhibitors of apoptosis proteins. Cell Cycle 7, 1036–1046 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nikolovska-Coleska, Z. et al. Discovery of embelin as a cell-permeable, small-molecular weight inhibitor of XIAP through structure-based computational screening of a traditional herbal medicine three-dimensional structure database. J. Med. Chem. 47, 2430–2440 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zou, B. et al. XIAP-associated factor 1 (XAF1), a novel target of p53, enhances p53-mediated apoptosis via post-translational modification. Mol. Carcinog. 51, 422–432 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chang, K.H. et al. Dihydrotestosterone synthesis bypasses testosterone to drive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13728–13733 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamaoka, M., Hara, T. & Kusaka, M. Overcoming persistent dependency on androgen signaling after progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 4319–4324 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Luo, J.H. et al. Gene expression analysis of prostate cancers. Mol. Carcinog. 33, 25–35 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, P. et al. Sex-determining region Y box 4 is a transforming oncogene in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66, 4011–4019 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. LaTulippe, E. et al. Comprehensive gene expression analysis of prostate cancer reveals distinct transcriptional programs associated with metastatic disease. Cancer Res. 62, 4499–4506 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Stephenson, A.J. et al. Integration of gene expression profiling and clinical variables to predict prostate carcinoma recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 104, 290–298 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Dai, Y. et al. Natural IAP inhibitor Embelin enhances therapeutic efficacy of ionizing radiation in prostate cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 1, 128–143 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Taplin, M.E. et al. Phase II study of androgen synthesis inhibition with ketoconazole, hydrocortisone, and dutasteride in asymptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7099–7105 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Sartor, O., Gomella, L.G., Gagnier, P., Melich, K. & Dann, R. Dutasteride and bicalutamide in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: the Therapy Assessed by Rising PSA (TARP) study rationale and design. Can. J. Urol. 16, 4806–4812 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sartor, O. et al. Activity of dutasteride plus ketoconazole in castration-refractory prostate cancer after progression on ketoconazole alone. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 7, E90–E92 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Varambally, S. et al. Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression. Cancer Cell 8, 393–406 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Danquah, M., Duke, C.B. III, Patil, R., Miller, D.D. & Mahato, R.I. Combination therapy of antiandrogen and XIAP inhibitor for treating advanced prostate cancer. Pharm. Res. 29, 2079–2091 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, Z. et al. A murine lung cancer co-clinical trial identifies genetic modifiers of therapeutic response. Nature 483, 613–617 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Maeda, T. et al. LRF is an essential downstream target of GATA1 in erythroid development and regulates BIM-dependent apoptosis. Dev. Cell 17, 527–540 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu, X. et al. Generation of a prostate epithelial cell–specific Cre transgenic mouse model for tissue-specific gene ablation. Mech. Dev. 101, 61–69 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nastiuk, K.L. et al. In vivo MRI volumetric measurement of prostate regression and growth in mice. BMC Urol. 7, 12 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank current members of the Pandolfi laboratory for critical discussion and T. Garvey for insightful editing. We are grateful to the Preclinical Murine Pharmacogenetics Facility at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center for expert support in all aspects related to the work in mice. The Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center is supported in part by a National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support grant (US National Institutes of Health (NIH) 5 P30 CA06516). We also thank C. Abate-Shen (Columbia University) for kindly providing the antibody to Probasin and the Small-Animal Imaging Facility at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center for the MRI work. Additionally, we are grateful to G. Fedele and X. Wu from the Loda laboratory and the Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology at Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's for their technical support in the generation, staining and analysis of the TMA. U.A. has been supported by a fellowship from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) under grant IG-9408. A.L. has been supported in part by a fellowship from the Istituto Toscano Tumori (ITT, Italy). This work has been supported through the Mouse Models of Human Cancer Consortium/National Cancer Institute grant (RC2 CA147940-01) and the A. David Mazzone Research Awards Program, Project Development Award to P.P.P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.L., C.N. and P.P.P. designed, realized and analyzed the experiments. U.A., R. Mazzucchelli, M.B., E.C.S., R.L., A.P., L.C.C., G.B., C.C.-C., W.L.G. and R. Montironi conducted the human genetic and molecular analysis. K.A.W. performed the hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry on mouse prostate samples. M.T.E., L.S., J.G.C. and G.W. helped with the experiments. M.L. and S.S. reviewed all mouse pathology. A.L., C.N. and P.P.P. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pier Paolo Pandolfi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Note, Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Tables 1 and 4 (PDF 7470 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Clinical information of patient specimens used for the TMA. (XLS 50 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

List of genes co-lost with PTEN in CR metastasis. (XLS 44 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lunardi, A., Ala, U., Epping, M. et al. A co-clinical approach identifies mechanisms and potential therapies for androgen deprivation resistance in prostate cancer. Nat Genet 45, 747–755 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2650

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2650

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing