Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis

Nature Genetics volume 45, pages 269–278 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Crossing-over ensures accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis, and every pair of chromosomes obtains at least one crossover, even though the majority of recombination sites yield non-crossovers. A putative regulator of crossing-over is RNF212, which is associated with variation in crossover rates in humans. We show that mouse RNF212 is essential for crossing-over, functioning to couple chromosome synapsis to the formation of crossover-specific recombination complexes. Selective localization of RNF212 to a subset of recombination sites is shown to be a key early step in the crossover designation process. RNF212 acts at these sites to stabilize meiosis-specific recombination factors, including the MutSγ complex (MSH4-MSH5). We infer that selective stabilization of key recombination proteins is a fundamental feature of meiotic crossover control. Haploinsufficiency indicates that RNF212 is a limiting factor for crossover control and raises the possibility that human alleles may alter the amount or stability of RNF212 and be risk factors for aneuploid conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Dynamic localization of RNF212 to synaptonemal complexes and crossover sites in mouse spermatocytes.
Figure 2: Genetic requirements for RNF212 localization.
Figure 3: Gonad morphology and homolog synapsis in Rnf212−/− knockout mice.
Figure 4: RNF212 is required for chiasma formation and assembly of crossover-specific recombination complexes.
Figure 5: RNF212 stabilizes two ZMM factors, Mutsγ and TEX11.
Figure 6: Rnf212 is haploinsufficient.
Figure 7: Summary and model of RNF212 function.

References

  1. Hunter, N. Meiotic recombination. in Molecular Genetics of Recombination (eds. Aguilera, A. & Rothstein, R.) 381–442 (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 2006).

  2. Zickler, D. & Kleckner, N. Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33, 603–754 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sakuno, T., Tanaka, K., Hauf, S. & Watanabe, Y. Repositioning of aurora B promoted by chiasmata ensures sister chromatid mono-orientation in meiosis I. Dev. Cell 21, 534–545 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hirose, Y. et al. Chiasmata promote monopolar attachment of sister chromatids and their co-segregation toward the proper pole during meiosis I. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001329 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hassold, T., Hall, H. & Hunt, P. The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16 (Spec. No. 2), R203–R208 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassold, T. & Hunt, P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 280–291 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keeney, S. Spo11 and the formation of DNA double-strand breaks in meiosis. Genome Dyn. Stab. 2, 81–123 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, G.H. The control of chiasma distribution. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 38, 293–320 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole, F. et al. Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 424–430 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Allers, T. & Lichten, M. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106, 47–57 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter, N. & Kleckner, N. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double–Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106, 59–70 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bishop, D.K. & Zickler, D. Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117, 9–15 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Börner, G.V., Kleckner, N. & Hunter, N. Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117, 29–45 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynn, A., Soucek, R. & Borner, G.V. ZMM proteins during meiosis: crossover artists at work. Chromosome Res. 15, 591–605 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zakharyevich, K., Tang, S., Ma, Y. & Hunter, N. Delineation of joint molecule resolution pathways in meiosis identifies a crossover-specific resolvase. Cell 149, 334–347 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong, A. et al. Sequence variants in the RNF212 gene associate with genome-wide recombination rate. Science 319, 1398–1401 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stefansson, H. et al. A common inversion under selection in Europeans. Nat. Genet. 37, 129–137 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chowdhury, R., Bois, P.R., Feingold, E., Sherman, S.L. & Cheung, V.G. Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000648 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fledel-Alon, A. et al. Variation in human recombination rates and its genetic determinants. PLoS ONE 6, e20321 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fledel-Alon, A. et al. Broad-scale recombination patterns underlying proper disjunction in humans. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000658 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kong, A. et al. Recombination rate and reproductive success in humans. Nat. Genet. 36, 1203–1206 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ségurel, L., Leffler, E.M. & Przeworski, M. The case of the fickle fingers: how the PRDM9 zinc finger protein specifies meiotic recombination hotspots in humans. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001211 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brick, K., Smagulova, F., Khil, P., Camerini-Otero, R.D. & Petukhova, G.V. Genetic recombination is directed away from functional genomic elements in mice. Nature 485, 642–645 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Grey, C. et al. Mouse PRDM9 DNA-binding specificity determines sites of histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation for initiation of meiotic recombination. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001176 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Baudat, F. et al. PRDM9 is a major determinant of meiotic recombination hotspots in humans and mice. Science 327, 836–840 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Myers, S. et al. Drive against hotspot motifs in primates implicates the PRDM9 gene in meiotic recombination. Science 327, 876–879 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hinch, A.G. et al. The landscape of recombination in African Americans. Nature 476, 170–175 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Agarwal, S. & Roeder, G.S. Zip3 provides a link between recombination enzymes and synaptonemal complex proteins. Cell 102, 245–255 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jantsch, V. et al. Targeted gene knockout reveals a role in meiotic recombination for ZHP-3, a Zip3-related protein in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 7998–8006 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Deshaies, R.J. & Joazeiro, C.A. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 399–434 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng, C.H. et al. SUMO modifications control assembly of synaptonemal complex and polycomplex in meiosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 20, 2067–2081 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Perry, J., Kleckner, N. & Borner, G.V. Bioinformatic analyses implicate the collaborating meiotic crossover/chiasma proteins Zip2, Zip3, and Spo22/Zip4 in ubiquitin labeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 17594–17599 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuan, L. et al. The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol. Cell 5, 73–83 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carlton, P.M. Three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy and its application to chromosome structure. Chromosome Res. 16, 351–365 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moens, P.B., Marcon, E., Shore, J.S., Kochakpour, N. & Spyropoulos, B. Initiation and resolution of interhomolog connections: crossover and non-crossover sites along mouse synaptonemal complexes. J. Cell Sci. 120, 1017–1027 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Snowden, T., Acharya, S., Butz, C., Berardini, M. & Fishel, R. hMSH4-hMSH5 recognizes Holliday junctions and forms a meiosis-specific sliding clamp that embraces homologous chromosomes. Mol. Cell 15, 437–451 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Edelmann, W. et al. Mammalian MutS homologue 5 is required for chromosome pairing in meiosis. Nat. Genet. 21, 123–127 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kneitz, B. et al. MutS homolog 4 localization to meiotic chromosomes is required for chromosome pairing during meiosis in male and female mice. Genes Dev. 14, 1085–1097 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kolas, N.K. & Cohen, P.E. Novel and diverse functions of the DNA mismatch repair family in mammalian meiosis and recombination. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 107, 216–231 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lipkin, S.M. et al. Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy in MLH3-deficient mice. Nat. Genet. 31, 385–390 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Anderson, L.K., Reeves, A., Webb, L.M. & Ashley, T. Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. Genetics 151, 1569–1579 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Baker, S.M. et al. Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over. Nat. Genet. 13, 336–342 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Edelmann, W. et al. Meiotic pachytene arrest in MLH1-deficient mice. Cell 85, 1125–1134 (1996).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Baudat, F., Manova, K., Yuen, J.P., Jasin, M. & Keeney, S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell 6, 989–998 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Romanienko, P.J. & Camerini-Otero, R.D. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol. Cell 6, 975–987 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. de Vries, F.A. et al. Mouse Sycp1 functions in synaptonemal complex assembly, meiotic recombination, and XY body formation. Genes Dev. 19, 1376–1389 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Barchi, M. et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 7203–7215 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Di Giacomo, M. et al. Distinct DNA-damage–dependent and –independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 737–742 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kan, R. et al. Comparative analysis of meiotic progression in female mice bearing mutations in genes of the DNA mismatch repair pathway. Biol. Reprod. 78, 462–471 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ward, J.O. et al. Mutation in mouse Hei10, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, disrupts meiotic crossing over. PLoS Genet. 3, e139 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Otto, S.P. et al. About PAR: the distinct evolutionary dynamics of the pseudoautosomal region. Trends Genet. 27, 358–367 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Cobb, J., Cargile, B. & Handel, M.A. Acquisition of competence to condense metaphase I chromosomes during spermatogenesis. Dev. Biol. 205, 49–64 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Holloway, J.K., Booth, J., Edelmann, W., McGowan, C.H. & Cohen, P.E. MUS81 generates a subset of MLH1-MLH3–independent crossovers in mammalian meiosis. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000186 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Marcon, E. & Moens, P. MLH1p and MLH3p localize to precociously induced chiasmata of okadaic-acid–treated mouse spermatocytes. Genetics 165, 2283–2287 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kolas, N.K. et al. Localization of MMR proteins on meiotic chromosomes in mice indicates distinct functions during prophase I. J. Cell Biol. 171, 447–458 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ashley, T., Walpita, D. & de Rooij, D.G. Localization of two mammalian cyclin dependent kinases during mammalian meiosis. J. Cell Sci. 114, 685–693 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Woods, L.M. et al. Chromosomal influence on meiotic spindle assembly: abnormal meiosis I in female Mlh1 mutant mice. J. Cell Biol. 145, 1395–1406 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Santucci-Darmanin, S. et al. MSH4 acts in conjunction with MLH1 during mammalian meiosis. FASEB J. 14, 1539–1547 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang, F. et al. Meiotic failure in male mice lacking an X-linked factor. Genes Dev. 22, 682–691 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Adelman, C.A. & Petrini, J.H. ZIP4H (TEX11) deficiency in the mouse impairs meiotic double strand break repair and the regulation of crossing over. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000042 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Tsubouchi, T., Zhao, H. & Roeder, G.S. The meiosis-specific Zip4 protein regulates crossover distribution by promoting synaptonemal complex formation together with Zip2. Dev. Cell 10, 809–819 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Schwacha, A. & Kleckner, N. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83, 783–791 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Oh, S.D. et al. BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multichromatid joint molecules. Cell 130, 259–272 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Jessop, L., Rockmill, B., Roeder, G.S. & Lichten, M. Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of Sgs1. PLoS Genet. 2, e155 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Iyer, R.R., Pluciennik, A., Burdett, V. & Modrich, P.L. DNA mismatch repair: functions and mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 106, 302–323 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bhalla, N. & Dernburg, A.F. Prelude to a division. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24, 397–424 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Bhalla, N., Wynne, D.J., Jantsch, V. & Dernburg, A.F. ZHP-3 acts at crossovers to couple meiotic recombination with synaptonemal complex disassembly and bivalent formation in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000235 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Macqueen, A.J. & Roeder, G.S. Fpr3 and Zip3 ensure that initiation of meiotic recombination precedes chromosome synapsis in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 19, 1519–1526 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Yokoo, R. et al. COSA-1 reveals robust homeostasis and separable licensing and reinforcement steps governing meiotic crossovers. Cell 149, 75–87 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Chelysheva, L. et al. The Arabidopsis HEI10 is a new ZMM protein related to Zip3. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002799 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang, K. et al. The role of rice HEI10 in the formation of meiotic crossovers. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002809 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Singh, M.K. et al. HEI10 negatively regulates cell invasion by inhibiting cyclin B/Cdk1 and other promotility proteins. Oncogene 26, 4825–4832 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Strong, E.R. & Schimenti, J.C. Evidence implicating CCNB1IP1, a RING domain–containing protein required for meiotic crossing over in mice, as an E3 SUMO ligase. Genes (Basel) 1, 440–451 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Nabeshima, K., Villeneuve, A.M. & Colaiacovo, M.P. Crossing over is coupled to late meiotic prophase bivalent differentiation through asymmetric disassembly of the SC. J. Cell Biol. 168, 683–689 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Martinez-Perez, E. et al. Crossovers trigger a remodeling of meiotic chromosome axis composition that is linked to two-step loss of sister chromatid cohesion. Genes Dev. 22, 2886–2901 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Kleckner, N. et al. A mechanical basis for chromosome function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12592–12597 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Zickler, D. From early homologue recognition to synaptonemal complex formation. Chromosoma 115, 158–174 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Henderson, K.A. & Keeney, S. Synaptonemal complex formation: where does it start? Bioessays 27, 995–998 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Anderson, L.K. & Stack, S.M. Recombination nodules in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 109, 198–204 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Xu, K., Lu, T., Zhou, H., Bai, L. & Xiang, Y. The role of MSH5 C85T and MLH3 C2531T polymorphisms in the risk of male infertility with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. Clin. Chim. Acta 411, 49–52 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Terribas, E. et al. Changes in the expression profile of the meiosis-involved mismatch repair genes in impaired human spermatogenesis. J. Androl. 31, 346–357 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hanks, M., Wurst, W., Anson-Cartwright, L., Auerbach, A.B. & Joyner, A.L. Rescue of the En-1 mutant phenotype by replacement of En-1 with En-2. Science 269, 679–682 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Nagy, A., Rossant, J., Nagy, R., Abramow-Newerly, W. & Roder, J.C. Derivation of completely cell culture–derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8424–8428 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Markel, P. et al. Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains. Nat. Genet. 17, 280–284 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Susiarjo, M., Rubio, C. & Hunt, P. Analyzing mammalian female meiosis. Methods Mol. Biol. 558, 339–354 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Qiao, H., Lohmiller, L. & Anderson, L. Cohesin proteins load sequentially during prophase I in tomato primary microsporocytes. Chromosome Res. 19, 193–207 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Meuwissen, R.L. et al. A coiled-coil related protein specific for synapsed regions of meiotic prophase chromosomes. EMBO J. 11, 5091–5100 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Holloway, J.K., Morelli, M.A., Borst, P.L. & Cohen, P.E. Mammalian BLM helicase is critical for integrating multiple pathways of meiotic recombination. J. Cell Biol. 188, 779–789 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Heyting (Wageningen University) for antibodies to SYCP1 and SYCP3, S. Keeney and M. Jasin (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) for Spo11 knockout mice, M. Paddy for help with SIM imaging, J. Trimmer for help with imaging tissue sections and G. Coop for discussions. Knockout mice were generated in collaboration with the University of California, Davis, Mouse Biology Program (MBP). B.d.M. is supported by grants from the CNRS, Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-BLAN-0269-01). This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant R01GM084955 to N.H. N.H. is an Early Career Scientist of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

    April Reynolds, Huanyu Qiao, Ye Yang, Jefferson K Chen, Neil Jackson, Kajal Biswas & Neil Hunter

  2. Department of Microbiology & Molecular Genetics, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

    April Reynolds, Huanyu Qiao, Ye Yang, Jefferson K Chen, Neil Jackson, Kajal Biswas & Neil Hunter

  3. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Center for Reproductive Genomics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    J Kim Holloway & Paula E Cohen

  4. Institut de Génétique Humaine, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Montpellier, France

    Frédéric Baudat & Bernard de Massy

  5. Department of Animal Biology, Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    Jeremy Wang

  6. Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Christer Höög

  7. Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

    Neil Hunter

  8. Department of Cell Biology & Human Anatomy, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA

    Neil Hunter

Authors
  1. April Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huanyu Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ye Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jefferson K Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Neil Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kajal Biswas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. J Kim Holloway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Frédéric Baudat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bernard de Massy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jeremy Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Christer Höög
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Paula E Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Neil Hunter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.R., N.J., H.Q., Y.Y., K.B., P.E.C. and N.H. conceived and designed the experiments. A.R., N.J., H.Q., Y.Y., J.K.C., K.B., J.K.H., B.d.M., F.B. and N.H. performed the experiments. A.R., H.Q., Y.Y., J.K.C., K.B., B.d.M. and N.H. analyzed the data. J.W. and C.H. contributed reagents, materials and/or analysis tools. A.R., H.Q., Y.Y., K.B. and N.H. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Hunter.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–7 and Supplementary Table 1 (PDF 5242 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reynolds, A., Qiao, H., Yang, Y. et al. RNF212 is a dosage-sensitive regulator of crossing-over during mammalian meiosis. Nat Genet 45, 269–278 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2541

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2541

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing