Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Mouse ooplasm confers context-specific reprogramming capacity

Nature Genetics volume 44, pages 978–980 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Enucleated oocytes have the distinctive ability to reprogram somatic nuclei back to totipotency. Here, we investigate genome-scale DNA methylation patterns after nuclear transfer and compare them to the dynamics at fertilization. We identify specific targets for DNA demethylation after nuclear transfer, such as germline-associated promoters, as well as unique limitations that include certain repetitive element classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Classifying common and unique DNA methylation dynamics during fertilization and nuclear transfer.
Figure 2: Promoter dynamics during SCNT include demethylation of gamete-specific genes.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Reik, W., Dean, W. & Walter, J. Science 293, 1089–1093 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rideout, W.M. III., Eggan, K. & Jaenisch, R. Science 293, 1093–1098 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wakayama, T., Perry, A.C., Zuccotti, M., Johnson, K.R. & Yanagimachi, R. Nature 394, 369–374 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meissner, A. et al. Nature 454, 766–770 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, Z.D. et al. Nature 484, 339–344 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodier, J.L., Ostertag, E.M., Du, K. & Kazazian, H.H. Jr. Genome Res. 11, 1677–1685 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wossidlo, M. et al. EMBO J. 29, 1877–1888 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Egli, D. et al. Nat. Commun. 2, 488 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dean, W. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13734–13738 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Polanski, Z., Motosugi, N., Tsurumi, C., Hiiragi, T. & Hoffmann, S. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 52, 295–298 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng, R.K. & Gurdon, J.B. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 102–109 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gu, T.P. et al. Nature 477, 606–610 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wossidlo, M. et al. Nat. Commun. 2, 241 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Branco, M.R., Ficz, G. & Reik, W. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 7–13 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Booth, M.J. et al. Science 336, 934–937 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the members of the Meissner and Regev laboratories. We thank M. Garber, N. Yosef, J. Ye, R. Koche, H. Gu, A. Gnirke and T. Mikkelsen for technical advice and discussion and all members of the Broad Sequencing Platform, in particular, F. Kelley, J. Meldrim, T. Fennel, K. Tibbetts and J. Fostel. We also thank S. Levine, M. Gravina and K. Thai from the MIT BioMicro Center. D.E. is supported by the New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSCF). A.R. is an investigator of the Merkin Foundation for Stem Cell Research at the Broad Institute and is supported by a US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Pioneer Award (5DP1OD003958), a National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) Centers of Excellence in Genomic Science (CEGS) grant (1P50HG006193), the Burroughs Wellcome Career Award at the Scientific Interface and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). A.M. is supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Human Frontiers Science Program and the NIH (U01ES017155, P01GM099117 and 1P50HG006193).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michelle M Chan, Zachary D Smith and Dieter Egli: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Michelle M Chan, Zachary D Smith, Aviv Regev & Alexander Meissner

  2. Computational and Systems Biology Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Michelle M Chan

  3. Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Zachary D Smith & Alexander Meissner

  4. Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Zachary D Smith & Alexander Meissner

  5. The New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory, New York, New York, USA

    Dieter Egli

  6. Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Aviv Regev

  7. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

    Aviv Regev

Authors
  1. Michelle M Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zachary D Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dieter Egli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aviv Regev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexander Meissner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M.C., Z.D.S., D.E. and A.M. conceived and designed the study. D.E. performed SCNT, Z.D.S. performed methylation profiling, and M.M.C. performed all analysis. M.M.C., Z.D.S., A.R. and A.M. interpreted the data. M.M.C., Z.D.S. and A.M. wrote the manuscript with input from the other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Meissner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, M., Smith, Z., Egli, D. et al. Mouse ooplasm confers context-specific reprogramming capacity. Nat Genet 44, 978–980 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2382

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2382

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing