Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize

Nature Genetics volume 44, pages 217–220 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Maize is both an exciting model organism in plant genetics and also the most important crop worldwide for food, animal feed and bioenergy production. Recent genome-wide association and metabolic profiling studies aimed to resolve quantitative traits to their causal genetic loci and key metabolic regulators. Here we present a complementary approach that exploits large-scale genomic and metabolic information to predict complex, highly polygenic traits in hybrid testcrosses. We crossed 285 diverse Dent inbred lines from worldwide sources with two testers and predicted their combining abilities for seven biomass- and bioenergy-related traits using 56,110 SNPs and 130 metabolites. Whole-genome and metabolic prediction models were built by fitting effects for all SNPs or metabolites. Prediction accuracies ranged from 0.72 to 0.81 for SNPs and from 0.60 to 0.80 for metabolites, allowing a reliable screening of large collections of diverse inbred lines for their potential to create superior hybrids.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Genealogy of the population.
Figure 2: Structure of whole-genome LD.
Figure 3: Observed versus whole-genome–predicted GCA for dry matter yield.
Figure 4: Analysis of the core set of 124 lines.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schnable, P.S. et al. The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326, 1112–1115 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Montes, J.M., Technow, F., Dhillon, B.S., Mauch, F. & Melchinger, A.E. High-throughput non-destructive biomass determination during early plant development in maize under field conditions. Field Crops Res. 121, 268–273 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Montes, J.M., Melchinger, A.E. & Reif, J.C. Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends Plant Sci. 12, 433–436 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinfath, M. et al. Discovering plant metabolic biomarkers for phenotype prediction using an untargeted approach. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8, 900–911 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Meyer, R.C. et al. The metabolic signature related to high plant growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4759–4764 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schauer, N. et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 447–454 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kump, K.L. et al. Genome-wide association study of quantitative resistance to southern leaf blight in the maize association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 43, 163–168 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian, F. et al. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat. Genet. 43, 159–162 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Poland, J.A. et al. Genome-wide nested association mapping of quantitative resistance to northern leaf blight in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6893–6898 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernardo, R. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 48, 1649–1664 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, Y. & Crouch, J. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci. 48, 391–407 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heffner, E.L., Sorrells, M.E. & Jannink, J.-L. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci. 49, 1–12 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lippman, Z.B. & Zamir, D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends Genet. 23, 60–66 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallauer, A.R., Carena, M.J. & Filho, J.B.M. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding (Iowa State University Press, 2010).

  15. Meuwissen, T.H.E., Hayes, B.J. & Goddard, M.E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157, 1819–1829 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayes, B.J. et al. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92, 433–443 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jannink, J.-L., Lorenz, A.J. & Iwata, H. Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct. Genomics 9, 166–177 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorenzana, R.E. & Bernardo, R. Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 151–161 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion oft the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, J. et al. Genome partitioning of genetic variation for complex traits using common SNPs. Nat. Genet. 43, 519–525 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. de los Campos, G., Gianola, D. & Allison, D.B. Predicting genetic predispositions in humans: the promise of whole-genome markers. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 880–886 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith, J.S.C. et al. Use of doubled haploids in maize breeding: implications for intellectual property protection and genetic diversity in hybrid crops. Mol. Breed. 22, 51–59 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slatkin, M. Linkage disequilibrium—understanding the evolutionary past and mapping the medical future. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9, 477–485 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ching, A. et al. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. BMC Genet. 3, 19 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Inghelandt, D. et al. Extent and genome-wide distribution of linkage disequilibrium in commercial maize germplasm. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 11–20 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan, J. et al. Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers. PLoS ONE 4, e8451 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Elshire, R.J. et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6, e19379 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meuwissen, T. & Goddard, M. Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185, 623–631 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernie, A.R. & Schauer, N. Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement? Trends Genet. 25, 39–48 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Stitt, M., Sulpice, R. & Keurentjes, J. Metabolic networks: how to identify key components in the regulation of metabolism and growth. Plant Physiol. 152, 428–444 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sulpice, R. et al. Starch as a major integrator in the regulation of plant growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10348–10353 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lisec, J., Schauer, N., Kopka, J., Willmitzer, L. & Fernie, A.R. Gas chromatography mass spectrometry-based metabolite profiling in plants. Nat. Protoc. 1, 387–396 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Keurentjes, J.J.B. et al. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat. Genet. 38, 842–849 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu, J. et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet. 38, 203–208 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Piepho, H.-P. Ridge regression and extensions for genomewide selection in maize. Crop Sci. 49, 1165–1176 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Albrecht, T. et al. Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 339–350 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Habier, D., Fernando, R.L., Kizilkaya, K. & Garrick, D.J. Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 186 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Clark, S.A., Hickey, J.M. & van der Werf, J.H.J. Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43, 18 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Goddard, M. Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximation of long term response. Genetica 136, 245–257 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Duvick, D.N., Smith, J.S.C. & Cooper, M. Long term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program. Plant Breed. Rev. 24, 109–151 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Eyre-Walker, A., Gaut, R.L., Hilton, H., Feldman, D.L. & Gaut, B.S. Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4441–4446 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hoisington, D. et al. Plant genetic resources: what can they contribute toward increased crop productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5937–5943 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nelson, P.T. et al. Molecular characterization of maize inbreds with expired U.S. plant variety protection. Crop Sci. 48, 1673–1685 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Melchinger, A.E., Gumber, R.K., Leipert, R.B., Vuylsteke, M. & Kuiper, M. Prediction of testcross means and variances among F3 progenies of F1 crosses from testcross means and genetic distances of their parents in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96, 503–512 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saito, K. & Matsuda, F. Metabolomics for functional genomics, systems biology, and biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 61, 463–489 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Fischer, S. et al. Trends in genetic variance components during 30 years of hybrid maize breeding at the University of Hohenheim. Plant Breed. 127, 446–451 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Desper, R. & Gascuel, O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. J. Comput. Biol. 9, 687–705 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Cross, J.M. et al. Variation of enzyme activities and metabolite levels in 24 Arabidopsis accessions growing in carbon-limited conditions. Plant Physiol. 142, 1574–1588 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Cuadros-Inostroza, Á. et al. TargetSearch—a bioconductor package for the efficient preprocessing of GC-MS metabolite profiling data. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 428 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Chen, W.-M. & Abecasis, G.R. Family-based association tests for genome-wide association scans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 913–926 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hayes, B.J., Visscher, P.M. & Goddard, M.E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet. Res. (Camb). 91, 47–60 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang, J., Lee, H., Goddard, M.E. & Visscher, P.M. GCTA: a tool for fenome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 76–82 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Legarra, A., Robert-Granié, C., Manfredi, E. & Elsen, J.-M. Performance of genomic selection in mice. Genetics 180, 611–618 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the experimental research stations of the University of Hohenheim for assistance in conducting the field experiments. This research was funded by the Max-Planck Society and the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the project GABI-Energy (FKZ: 0315045) and the AgroClustEr 'Synbreed—Synergistic plant and animal breeding' (FKZ: 0315528D).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

    Christian Riedelsheimer, Christoph Grieder, Frank Technow & Albrecht E Melchinger

  2. Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany

    Angelika Czedik-Eysenberg, Jan Lisec, Ronan Sulpice, Mark Stitt & Lothar Willmitzer

  3. Department of Molecular Genetics, Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Germany

    Thomas Altmann

  4. King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Lothar Willmitzer

Authors
  1. Christian Riedelsheimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angelika Czedik-Eysenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christoph Grieder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Lisec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Frank Technow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ronan Sulpice
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Altmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mark Stitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lothar Willmitzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Albrecht E Melchinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.A., M.S., L.W. and A.E.M. designed the experiments and supervised research. C.R. and C.G. conducted the field experiments. C.R., A.C.-E., R.S. and J.L. performed the metabolic profiling. C.G. analyzed the phenotypic data. C.R. analyzed genomic and metabolic data and developed software. F.T. contributed to the statistical analysis. C.R. and A.E.M. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albrecht E Melchinger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–12, Supplementary Tables 1–4 and Supplementary Note (PDF 3802 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riedelsheimer, C., Czedik-Eysenberg, A., Grieder, C. et al. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat Genet 44, 217–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.1033

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research