Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Arthur Eddington was innocent!

The trend for debunking science's simple narratives can be overdone, says Philip Ball.

British astronomer Arthur Eddington: guilty as charged? Credit: Wikimedia Commons

References

  1. Kennefick, D." Preprint at http://xxx.arxiv.org/abs/0709.0685":http://xxx.arxiv.org/abs/0709.0685,

  2. Earman, J., Glymour, C., Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 11, 49-85 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, H. M., Pinch, T., The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science. Cambridge University Press (1993).

  4. Dyson, F. W., Eddington, A.S., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. A 220, 291-330 (1920).

Download references

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related external links

Kennefick's paper

Original report of the 1919 expedition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ball, P. Arthur Eddington was innocent!. Nature (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/news070903-20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/news070903-20

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing