Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News
  • Published:

Reproducibility of brainscan studies questioned

Nature (2010)Cite this article

Subjects

Some magnetic resonance imaging studies could be less reliable than has been presumed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bennett, C. M. & Miller, M. B. Ann. NY Acad Sci. (in the press).

  2. Vul, E. et al. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 274-290 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Richard A. Lovett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Related links

Related links

Related external links

Ed Vul's website, on Voodoo Correlations

Miller and Bennett's paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovett, R. Reproducibility of brainscan studies questioned. Nature (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.129

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2010.129

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing