Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Collinearity of Transcriptional and Traditional Genetic Maps

Abstract

THE transcriptional mapping method1 makes possible the detection of polycistronic operons in systems which are not amenable to fine structure genetic mapping. The theory behind transcriptional mapping is that a defined interference with the travel of the genetic transcribing enzyme can be used for genetic analysis in a variety of ways. For example, a series of random blocks can be introduced along the genome, allowing detection of size differences among separate cistrons or operons as well as the order of genes read by the transcribing enzyme. The agent used to interfere with the transcription process in the series of experiments reported here was actino-mycin D, an antibiotic with a well defined mode of action2. The fact that the actinomycin D interferes with the travel of RNA polymerase by introducing a random block(s) along the DNA was used by Bleyman and Woese1 and by Perry3 to demonstrate that this interruption of transcription can be described by a target theory model, in which the synthesis of RNA from larger cistrons is more sensitive to inhibition than synthesis from smaller cistrons. The data presented here extend the method to the translational level.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bleyman, M., and Woese, C., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 63, 532 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Müller, W., and Crothers, D. M., J. Mol. Biol., 35, 251 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Perry, R. E., and Kelly, D. E., Amer. Soc. Cell Biol. (Abstr. No. 252) (1969).

  4. Bleyman, M., Kondo, M., Hecht, N., and Woese, C., J. Bact., 99, 535 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Levinthal, C., Signer, E. R., and Fetherolf, K., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 48, 1230 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pardee, A. B., Jacob, F., and Monod, J., J. Mol. Biol., 1, 1965 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fox, C. F., and Kennedy, E. P., Analyt. Biochem., 18, 286 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leive, L., and Kollin, V., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 28, 229 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacob, F., and Monod, J., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 18, 693 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WEBB, K., BLEYMAN, M. Collinearity of Transcriptional and Traditional Genetic Maps. Nature New Biology 237, 79–81 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio237079a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio237079a0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing