Achieving net-zero emissions through the reframing of UK national targets in the post-Paris Agreement era

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 15 May 2017


The Paris Agreement provides an international framework aimed at limiting average global temperature rise to well below 2 C, implemented through actions determined at the national level. As the Agreement necessitates a ‘net-zero’ emissions energy system by 2100, decarbonization analyses in support of national climate policy should consider the post-2050 period. Focusing solely on mitigation objectives for 2030 or 2050 could lead to blindsiding of the challenge, inadequate ambition in the near term, and poor investment choices in energy infrastructure. Here we show, using the UK as an example, that even an ambitious climate policy is likely to fall short of the challenge of net-zero, and that analysis of the post-2050 period is therefore critical. We find that the analysis of detailed, longer-term national pathways that achieve net-zero is important for future reassessment of ambition under nationally determined contributions (NDCs).

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Net CO2 emissions from the energy system under the 2 C (66% probability) carbon budget range based on Equity and Inertia allocations.
Figure 2: Cumulative CO2 emissions captured and stored between 2025–2100 as a percentage of the overall carbon budget.
Figure 3: Selected decarbonization transition indicators.


  1. 1

    IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Meyer, L. A. ) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014);

  2. 2

    Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).

  3. 3

    Conf. of the Parties Twenty-First Session: Adoption of the Paris Agreement (UNFCCC, 2015);

  4. 4

    Rogelj, J. et al. Zero emission targets as long-term global goals for climate protection. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105007 (2015).

  5. 5

    Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).

  6. 6

    Ea Energy Analyses & COWI Bhutan: A National Strategy and Action Plan for Low Carbon Development (Ea Energy Analyses, 2012);

  7. 7

    Pratt, L., Rivera, L. & Sancho, F. Options for Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Costa Rica: Towards Carbon Neutrality in 2021 (INCAE Business School/MINAET, 2010);

  8. 8

    Environmental Protection Agency Ethiopia’s Climate-Resilient Green Economy Strategy (Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 2011); CRGE.pdf

  9. 9

    Knowledge Base for Low-Carbon Transition in Norway (Kuunskapsgrunnlag for lavutslippsutvikling) (Norwegian Environment Agency, 2014);

  10. 10

    Roadmap Basis for Sweden without Climate Emissions in 2050 (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2012);

  11. 11

    O’Neill, B. C., Riahi, K. & Keppo, I. Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1011–1016 (2010).

  12. 12

    Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges—implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 8–23 (2015).

  13. 13

    Deep Decarbonization Pathways Project Pathways to Deep Decarbonization 2015 Report (2015);

  14. 14

    Allen, M. R. et al. Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne. Nature 458, 1163–1166 (2009).

  15. 15

    Meinshausen, M. et al. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 C. Nature 458, 1158–1162 (2009).

  16. 16

    Rogelj, J. et al. Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).

  17. 17

    Füssel, H. M. How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: a comprehensive indicator-based assessment. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 597–611 (2010).

  18. 18

    Höhne, N., Elzen, M. D. & Escalante, D. Regional GHG reduction targets based on effort sharing: a comparison of studies. Clim. Policy 14, 122–147 (2014).

  19. 19

    Ringius, L., Torvanger, A. & Underdal, A. Burden sharing and fairness principles in international climate policy. Int. Environ. Agreem. 2, 1–22 (2002).

  20. 20

    Raupach, M. R. et al. Sharing a quota on cumulative carbon emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 873–879 (2014).

  21. 21

    Peters, G. P., Andrew, R. M., Solomon, S. & Friedlingstein, P. Measuring a fair and ambitious climate agreement using cumulative emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 105004 (2015).

  22. 22

    Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 413–510 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  23. 23

    Bruckner, T. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 511–597 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  24. 24

    Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G. & Maroto-Valer, M. M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 39, 426–443 (2014).

  25. 25

    Grübler, A. The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: a case of negative learning by doing. Energy Policy 38, 5174–5188 (2010).

  26. 26

    Corner, A. et al. Nuclear power, climate change and energy security: exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 39, 4823–4833 (2011).

  27. 27

    Fuss, S. et al. Betting on negative emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).

  28. 28

    Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2015).

  29. 29

    Slade, R., Bauen, A. & Gross, R. Global bioenergy resources. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 99–105 (2014).

  30. 30

    Pye, S., Usher, W. & Strachan, N. The uncertain but critical role of demand reduction in meeting long-term energy decarbonisation targets. Energy Policy 73, 575–586 (2014).

  31. 31

    Infrastructure and Projects Authority National Infrastructure Delivery Plan 2016–2021 (HMSO, 2016);

  32. 32

    Energy and Climate Change Committee Future of Carbon Capture and Storage in the UK (UK Parliament, 2016);

  33. 33

    Geden, O. An actionable climate target. Nat. Geosci. 9, 340–342 (2016).

  34. 34

    Reducing Emissions and Preparing for Climate Change: 2015 Progress Report to Parliament (Committee on Climate Change, 2015);

  35. 35

    UK Climate Action Following the Paris Agreement (Committee on Climate Change, 2016);

  36. 36

    Climate Change Act 2008 (HMSO, 2008);

  37. 37

    Lockwood, M. The political sustainability of climate policy: the case of the UK Climate Change Act. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1339–1348 (2013).

  38. 38

    Anandarajah, G., Strachan, N., Ekins, P., Kannan, R. & Hughes, N. Pathways to a Low Carbon Economy: Energy Systems Modelling (UK Energy Research Centre, 2009);

  39. 39

    Usher, W. & Strachan, N. UK MARKAL Modelling—Examining Decarbonisation Pathways in the 2020s on the Way to Meeting the 2050 Emissions Target: Final Report for the Committee on Climate Change (CCC, 2010);

  40. 40

    Pye, S., Anandarajah, G., Fais, B., McGlade, C. & Strachan, N. Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in the United Kingdom (IDDRI & UNSDSN, 2015);

  41. 41

    Kannan, R., Strachan, N., Pye, S., Anandarajah, G. & Balta-Ozkan, N. UK MARKAL Model Documentation (University College London, 2007);

  42. 42

    Building a Low-Carbon Economy—the UK’s Contribution to Tackling Climate Change (Committee on Climate Change, 2008);

  43. 43

    The Carbon Plan: Delivering Our Low Carbon Future (HMSO, 2011);

  44. 44

    The Fifth Carbon Budget: The Next Step Towards a Low-Carbon Economy (Committee on Climate Change, 2015);

  45. 45

    DECC Digest of United Kingdom Energy Statistics 2011 (National Statistics, 2011);

  46. 46

    HM Treasury The Green Book (TSO London, 2011);

  47. 47

    Pye, S., Sabio, N. & Strachan, N. An integrated systematic analysis of uncertainties in UK energy transition pathways. Energy Policy 87, 673–684 (2015).

  48. 48

    DECC Fossil Fuel Price Projections: 2014 (Committee on Climate Change, 2014);

  49. 49

    Bioenergy Review (Committee on Climate Change, 2011);

  50. 50

    DECC Dynamic Dispatch Model (DDM) (Department of Energy & Climate Change, 2012);

  51. 51

    Griffin, P., Hammond, G. & Norman, J. Industrial Energy Use from a Bottom-Up Perspective: Developing the Usable Energy Database (Beta version) (UK Energy Research Centre, 2013);

  52. 52

    Fais, B., Sabio, N. & Strachan, N. The critical role of the industrial sector in reaching long-term emission reduction, energy efficiency and renewable targets. Appl. Energy 162, 699–712 (2016).

  53. 53

    A Review of the Efficiency and Cost Assumptions for Road Transport Vehicles to 2050 (Ricardo-AEA, 2012);

  54. 54

    Agricultural GHG Emissions Abatement—An Appraisal and Update of Agricultural Marginal Abatement Cost Curve analyses. Unpublished analysis (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, 2015).

Download references


This study was carried out under a programme of work supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under the Whole Systems Energy Modelling Consortium (WholeSEM, Grant EP/K039326/1). We would like to acknowledge the efforts of the energy system modelling team at the UCL Energy Institute for the development of UKTM. We also thank N. Strachan for his valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

S.P. and B.F. set up and undertook the energy modelling. All authors contributed to designing the research, analysing the results and writing the paper.

Correspondence to Steve Pye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Note 1–3; Supplementary Figures 1–8; Supplementary References. (PDF 507 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pye, S., Li, F., Price, J. et al. Achieving net-zero emissions through the reframing of UK national targets in the post-Paris Agreement era. Nat Energy 2, 17024 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading