Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Pairing of near-ultraviolet solar cells with electrochromic windows for smart management of the solar spectrum

Nature Energy volume 2, Article number: 17104 (2017) Cite this article

Subjects

An Author Correction to this article was published on 18 September 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

Current smart window technologies offer dynamic control of the optical transmission of the visible and near-infrared portions of the solar spectrum to reduce lighting, heating and cooling needs in buildings and to improve occupant comfort. Solar cells harvesting near-ultraviolet photons could satisfy the unmet need of powering such smart windows over the same spatial footprint without competing for visible or infrared photons, and without the same aesthetic and design constraints. Here, we report organic single-junction solar cells that selectively harvest near-ultraviolet photons, produce open-circuit voltages eclipsing 1.6 V and exhibit scalability in power generation, with active layers (10 cm2) substantially larger than those typical of demonstration organic solar cells (0.04–0.2 cm2). Integration of these solar cells with a low-cost, polymer-based electrochromic window enables intelligent management of the solar spectrum, with near-ultraviolet photons powering the regulation of visible and near-infrared photons for natural lighting and heating purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Proposed management of the solar spectrum.
Figure 2: Chemical structures and thin-film optoelectronic properties.
Figure 3: Active-layer characterization.
Figure 4: Solar cell characterization.
Figure 5: Area scaling of solar cells.
Figure 6: Large-area solar cell with an alternative electrode.
Figure 7: Electrochromic window (ECW) characterization.
Figure 8: Combined ECW and PV stack optical transmittance.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 18 September 2017

    In the version of this Article originally published, Fig. 4f was incorrect. This error has now been corrected.

References

  1. Korgel, B. A. Materials science: composite for smarter windows. Nature 500, 278–279 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dyer, A. L. et al. A vertically integrated solar-powered electrochromic window for energy efficient buildings. Adv. Mater. 26, 4895–4900 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. US Dep. Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 2011 Buildings Energy Data Book (D & R International, Ltd., 2012); http://go.nature.com/2rI7grb

  4. Wang, Y., Runnerstom, E. L. & Milliron, D. J. Switchable materials for smart windows. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 7, 283–304 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shehabi, A. et al. U.S. energy savings potential from dynamic daylighting control glazings. Energy Build. 66, 415–423 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. DeForest, N. et al. United States energy and CO2 savings potential from deployment of near-infrared electrochromic window glazings. Build. Environ. 89, 107–117 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Llordés, A., Garcia, G., Gazquez, J. & Milliron, D. J. Tunable near-infrared and visible-light transmittance in nanocrystal-in-glass composites. Nature 500, 323–326 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khandelwal, H., Schenning, A. P. H. J. & Debije, M. G. Infrared regulating smart window based on organic materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 1602209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201602209 (2017).

  9. Wu, J.-J. et al. Fast-switching photovoltachromic cells with tunable transmittance. ACS Nano 3, 2297–2303 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cannavale, A. et al. Perovskite photovoltachromic cells for building integration. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1578–1584 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cannavale, A. et al. Forthcoming perspectives of photoelectrochromic devices: a critical review. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 2682–2719 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lunt, R. R. & Bulovic, V. Transparent, near-infrared organic photovoltaic solar cells for window and energy-scavenging applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 113305 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Betancur, R. et al. Transparent polymer solar cells employing a layered light-trapping architecture. Nat. Photon. 7, 995–1000 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, C. et al. Visibly transparent polymer solar cells produced by solution processing. ACS Nano 6, 7185–7190 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Polman, A. et al. Photovoltaic materials: present effiencies and future challenges. Science 352, aad4424 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gao, Y. et al. Homo-tandem polymer solar cells with Voc > 1.8 V for efficient PV-driven water splitting. Adv. Mater. 28, 3366–3373 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, X. et al. Flexible all-solution-processed all-plastic multijunction solar cells for powering electronic devices. Mater. Horiz. 3, 452–459 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Heliatek Heliatek Sets New Organic Photovoltaic World Record Efficiency of 13.2% (2016); http://www.heliatek.com/en/press/press-releases/details/heliatek-sets-new-organic-photovoltaic-world-record-efficiency-of-13-2

  19. Rand, B. P., Burk, D. P. & Forrest, S. R. Offset energies at organic semiconductor heterojunctions and their influence on the open-circuit voltage of thin-film solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 75, 115327 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davy, N. C. et al. Contorted hexabenzocoronenes with extended heterocyclic moieties improve visible-light absorption and performance in organic solar cells. Chem. Mater. 28, 673–681 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hiszpanski, A. M. et al. Halogenation of a nonplanar molecular semiconductor to tune energy levels and bandgaps for electron transport. Chem. Mater. 27, 1892–1900 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Loo, Y.-L. et al. Unusual molecular conformations in fluorinated, contorted hexabenzocoronenes. Org. Lett. 12, 4840–4843 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hiszpanski, A. M. et al. Post-deposition processing methods to induce preferential orientation in contorted hexabenzocoronene thin films. ACS Nano 7, 294–300 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hiszpanski, A. M. et al. Tuning polymorphism and orientation in organic semiconductor thin films via post-deposition processing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15749–15756 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Benning, P. J. et al. C60 and C70 fullerenes and potassium fullerides. Phys. Rev. B 45, 6899–6913 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sullivan, P. et al. An N-ethylated barbituric acid end-capped bithiophene as an electron-acceptor material in fullerene-free organic photovoltaics. Chem. Commun. 51, 6222–6225 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Akkerman, Q. A. et al. Strongly emissive perovskite nanocrystal inks for high-voltage solar cells. Nat. Energy 2, 16194 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng, Y. et al. High open-circuit voltage, high fill factor single-junction organic solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 083304 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sullivan, P. et al. Halogenated boron subphthalocyanines as light harvesting electron acceptors in organic photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 352–355 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bartynski, A. N. et al. Symmetry-breaking charge transfer in a zinc chlorodipyrrin acceptor for high open circuit voltage organic photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5397–5405 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bijleveld, J. C., Verstrijden, R. A. M., Wienk, M. M. & Janssen, R. A. J. Maximizing the open-circuit voltage of polymer: fullerene solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 85–88 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Suddard-Bangsund, J. et al. Organic salts as a route to energy level control in low bandgap, high open-circuit voltage organic and transparent solar cells that approach the excitonic voltage limit. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501659 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Masuko, K. et al. Achievement of more than 25% conversion heterojunction solar cell. IEEE J. Photovolt. 4, 1433–1435 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ben Dkhil, S. et al. Square-centimeter-sized high-efficiency polymer solar cells: how the processing atmosphere and film quality influence performance at large scale. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1600290 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Choi, S., Potscavage, W. J. & Kippelen, B. Area-scaling of organic solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 54507 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Verreet, B., Heremans, P., Stesmans, A. & Rand, B. P. Microcrystalline organic thin-film solar cells. Adv. Mater. 25, 5504–5507 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cnops, K. et al. 8.4% efficient fullerene-free organic solar cells exploiting long-range exciton energy transfer. Nat. Commun. 5, 3406 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li, Y. et al. High-efficiency robust perovskite solar cells on ultrathin flexible substrates. Nat. Commun. 7, 10214 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhan, C., Zhang, X. & Yao, J. New advances in non-fullerene acceptor based organic solar cells. RSC Adv. 5, 93002–93026 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsai, P. et al. Large-area organic solar cells by accelerated blade coating. Org. Electron. 22, 166–172 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Agrawal, N. et al. Efficient up-scaling of organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 157, 960–965 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Organic Solar Cells: Fundamentals, Devices, and Upscaling (Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., 2014).

  43. Peters, C. H. et al. High Efficiency Polymer solar cells with long operating lifetimes. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 491–494 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peters, C. H. et al. The mechanism of burn-in loss in a high efficiency polymer solar cell. Adv. Mater. 24, 663–668 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, Y. et al. PCDTBT based solar cells: one year of operation under real-world conditions. Sci. Rep. 6, 21632 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Tong, X. et al. Intrinsic burn-in efficiency loss of small-molecule organic photovoltaic cells due to exciton-induced trap formation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 118, 116–123 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Cheng, P. & Zhan, X. Stability of organic solar cells: challenges and strategies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 2544–2582 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Xie, Z. et al. Integrated smart electrochromic windows for energy saving and storage applications. Chem. Commun. 50, 608–610 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Amasawa, E., Sasagawa, N., Kimura, M. & Taya, M. Design of a new energy-harvesting electrochromic window based on an organic polymeric dye, a cobalt couple, and PProDOT-Me2 . Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400379 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tarver, J. D., Yoo, J. E. & Loo, Y.-L. Polyaniline exhibiting stable and reversible switching in the visible extending into the near-IR in aqueous media. Chem. Mater. 22, 2333–2340 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yoo, J. E. et al. Directly patternable, highly conducting polymers for broad applications in organic electronics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5712–5717 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Yoo, J. E. et al. Polymer conductivity through particle connectivity. Chem. Mater. 21, 1948–1954 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yoo, J. E., Bucholz, T. L., Jung, S. & Loo, Y.-L. Narrowing the size distribution of the polymer acid improves PANI conductivity. J. Mater. Chem. 18, 3129–3135 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Yoo, J. E. et al. Improving the electrical conductivity of polymer acid-doped polyaniline by controlling the template molecular weight. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 1268–1275 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Horowitz, A. I., Wang, Y. & Panzer, M. J. Reclamation and reuse of ionic liquids from silica-based ionogels using spontaneous water-driven separation. Green Chem. 15, 3414–3420 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Lin, T. H. & Ho, K. C. A. complementary electrochromic device based on polyaniline and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene). Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90, 506–520 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Tarver, J. & Loo, Y.-L. Mesostructures of polyaniline films affect polyelectrochromic Switching. Chem. Mater. 23, 4402–4409 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Hachmann, J. et al. The Harvard clean energy project: large-scale computational screening and design of organic photovoltaics on the world community grid. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2241–2251 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Arroyave, F. A. & Reynolds, J. R. Dioxypyrrole-based polymers via dehalogenation polycondensation using various electrophilic halogen sources. Macromolecules 45, 5842–5849 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wu, C. I., Hirose, Y., Sirringhaus, H. & Kahn, A. Electron-hole interaction energy in the organic molecular semiconductor PTCDA. Chem. Phys. Lett. 272, 43–47 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Hanson, E. L. et al. Bonding self-assembled, compact organophosphonate monolayers to the native oxide surface of silicon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 16074–16080 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.C.D. acknowledges financial support from the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE 1148900. We (N.C.D., M.S.-E. and Y.-L.L.) acknowledge support from NSF MRSEC funding through Princeton Center for Complex Materials (DMR-1420541) and the Wilke Family Fund administered by the School of Engineering and Applied Science at Princeton University. A.K. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DMR-1506097. We thank M. Panzer and H. Qin of Tufts University for valuable discussions regarding ionogels, and G. Man of Princeton University for assistance with UPS/IPES analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

    Nicholas C. Davy, Melda Sezen-Edmonds, Jia Gao, Amy Liu & Yueh-Lin Loo

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

    Xin Lin & Antoine Kahn

  3. Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials (PRISM), Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

    Nan Yao

  4. Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

    Yueh-Lin Loo

Authors
  1. Nicholas C. Davy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melda Sezen-Edmonds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jia Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xin Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Amy Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nan Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Antoine Kahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yueh-Lin Loo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.C.D., M.S.-E. and Y.-L.L. wrote the manuscript; N.C.D. synthesized molecular semiconductors; X.L. and A.K. provided UPS/IPES measurements and analysis; N.C.D. and J.G. fabricated and characterized PV cells; M.S.-E. synthesized PANI-PAAMPSA; M.S.-E. and A.L. fabricated and characterized ECWs; M.S.-E. and N.D. integrated ECW and PV components for solar-powered ECW demonstration. N.Y. conducted TEM sample preparation and imaging. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yueh-Lin Loo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1–10 and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. (PDF 985 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Demonstration of a 2.25 cm2 solar-powered electrochromic window comprising stacked films of PANI-PAAPMSA and PEDOT:PSS separated by a gel electrolyte. The switching of this window between its coloured and bleached states is driven by a 1.38 cm2 D/A1 cell under 1 sun AM1.5G illumination. (MP4 19631 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davy, N., Sezen-Edmonds, M., Gao, J. et al. Pairing of near-ultraviolet solar cells with electrochromic windows for smart management of the solar spectrum. Nat Energy 2, 17104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.104

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.104

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing