Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition

The framing of funding programmes can sustain existing ways of conceptualizing particular problems, as well as create new ones. Yet, without more prominent roles for social sciences and humanities, the techno-economic conceptualization of energy consumers could hinder long-term low-carbon aspirations.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton Univ. Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Smith, K. Br. J. Sociol. 61, 176–195 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Guy, S. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 24, 645–659 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lutzenhiser, L. & Shove, E. Energy Policy 27, 217–227 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Strengers, Y. Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Ozaki, R. & Shaw, I. Sociology 48, 590–605 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Geoghegan-Quinn, M. Horizon 2020: A Paradigm Shift for Funding Research and Innovation in Europe (European Commission, 2014); http://go.nature.com/1WG73wX

  8. 8

    Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016–2017: Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission, 2015); http://go.nature.com/1WG7M1c

  9. 9

    What is Horizon 2020? (European Commission, 2016); http://go.nature.com/1ZAsWfk

  10. 10

    Factsheet: Horizon 2020 Budget (European Commission, 2013); http://go.nature.com/1Oell5k

  11. 11

    Pacheco-Torgal, F. Constr. Build. Mater. 51, 151–162 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission, 2016); http://go.nature.com/1tclFYj

  13. 13

    Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan: Accelerating the European Energy System Transformation (European Commission, 2015); http://go.nature.com/25Nvo9k

  14. 14

    Scoping Paper for Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge ‘Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy’ (European Commission, 2014).

  15. 15

    Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Gallagher, K. S. & Nemet, G. F. Nature Clim. Change 2, 780–788 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Hargreaves, T., Nye, M. & Burgess, J. Local Environ. 13, 743–758 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Weber, L. Energy Policy 25, 833–835 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Warde, A. J. Consum. Cult. 5, 131–153 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Shove, E., Southerton, D. & Welch, D. Interventions in Practice: Re-framing Policy Approaches to Consumer Behaviour (Sustainable Practices Research Group, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Sovacool, B. K. et al. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6, 95–99 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Castree, N. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 763–768 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Foulds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foulds, C., Christensen, T. Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition. Nat Energy 1, 16087 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.87

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing