Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition

The framing of funding programmes can sustain existing ways of conceptualizing particular problems, as well as create new ones. Yet, without more prominent roles for social sciences and humanities, the techno-economic conceptualization of energy consumers could hinder long-term low-carbon aspirations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (Princeton Univ. Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, K. Br. J. Sociol. 61, 176–195 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guy, S. Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy 24, 645–659 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lutzenhiser, L. & Shove, E. Energy Policy 27, 217–227 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Strengers, Y. Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozaki, R. & Shaw, I. Sociology 48, 590–605 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Geoghegan-Quinn, M. Horizon 2020: A Paradigm Shift for Funding Research and Innovation in Europe (European Commission, 2014);

  8. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016–2017: Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission, 2015);

  9. What is Horizon 2020? (European Commission, 2016);

  10. Factsheet: Horizon 2020 Budget (European Commission, 2013);

  11. Pacheco-Torgal, F. Constr. Build. Mater. 51, 151–162 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy (European Commission, 2016);

  13. Towards an Integrated Strategic Energy Technology (SET) Plan: Accelerating the European Energy System Transformation (European Commission, 2015);

  14. Scoping Paper for Horizon 2020 Societal Challenge ‘Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy’ (European Commission, 2014).

  15. Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Gallagher, K. S. & Nemet, G. F. Nature Clim. Change 2, 780–788 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M. & Burgess, J. Local Environ. 13, 743–758 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weber, L. Energy Policy 25, 833–835 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Warde, A. J. Consum. Cult. 5, 131–153 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Spurling, N., McMeekin, A., Shove, E., Southerton, D. & Welch, D. Interventions in Practice: Re-framing Policy Approaches to Consumer Behaviour (Sustainable Practices Research Group, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sovacool, B. K. et al. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 6, 95–99 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Castree, N. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 763–768 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Foulds.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foulds, C., Christensen, T. Funding pathways to a low-carbon transition. Nat Energy 1, 16087 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing