Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Electricity market design for the prosumer era


Prosumers are agents that both consume and produce energy. With the growth in small and medium-sized agents using solar photovoltaic panels, smart meters, vehicle-to-grid electric automobiles, home batteries and other ‘smart’ devices, prosuming offers the potential for consumers and vehicle owners to re-evaluate their energy practices. As the number of prosumers increases, the electric utility sector of today is likely to undergo significant changes over the coming decades, offering possibilities for greening of the system, but also bringing many unknowns and risks that need to be identified and managed. To develop strategies for the future, policymakers and planners need knowledge of how prosumers could be integrated effectively and efficiently into competitive electricity markets. Here we identify and discuss three promising potential prosumer markets related to prosumer grid integration, peer-to-peer models and prosumer community groups. We also caution against optimism by laying out a series of caveats and complexities.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Structural attributes of three prosumer markets.


  1. 1

    Bazilian, M. et al.Re-considering the economics of photovoltaic power. Renew. Energy 53, 329–338 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Tran, M., Banister, D., Bishop, J. D. K. & McCulloch, M. D. Realizing the electric-vehicle revolution. Nature Clim. Change. 2, 328–333 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Chiang, Y.-M. Building a better battery. Science 330, 1485–1486 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Monthly Deployment of all Solar Photovoltaic Capacity in the United Kingdom (Department of Energy & Climate Change, accessed 28 January 2016);

  5. 5

    Nelson, J., Gambhir, A. & Ekins-Daukes, N. Solar Power for CO 2 Mitigation Briefing Paper No. 11 (Grantham Institute for Climate Change, 2014);

  6. 6

    Harvey, F. UK should have 10 million homes with solar panels by 2020, experts say. The Guardian (29 January 2014);

  7. 7

    Agnew, S. & Dargusch, P. Effect of residential solar and storage on centralized electricity supply systems. Nature Clim. Change 5, 315–318 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Benchmarking Smart Metering Deployment in the EU-27 with a Focus on Electricity (European Commission, 2014);

  9. 9

    Barnard, M. Here's why Tesla's battery is a big deal. Forbes (14 May 2015);

  10. 10

    Sandalow, D. B. (ed.) Plug-in Electric Vehicles: What Role for Washington? 1st edn (The Brookings Institution, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Global EV Outlook 2015 (International Energy Agency, 2015);

  12. 12

    LaMarche, J., Cheney, K., Christian, S. & Roth, K. Home Energy Management Products & Trends (Fraunhofer CSE, 2011);

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Saad al-sumaiti, A., Ahmed, M. H. & Salama, M. M. A. Smart home activities: a literature review. Electr. Pow. Compo. Sys. 42, 294–305 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zipperer, A. et al. Electric energy management in the smart home: perspectives on enabling technologies and consumer behavior. Proc. IEEE 101, 2397–2408 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Home Automation (Luxury, Mainstream, DIY (Do It Yourself) and Managed) Market by Networking Technology (Wired, Power-line, Computing Network and Wireless) for Lighting, Safety and Security, HVAC, Entertainment and Other (Robotics and Heath Care) Applications - Global Industry Perspective, Comprehensive Analysis, and Forecast, 2014–2020 (Zion Research, 2015).

  16. 16

    Reforming the Energy Vision (New York Department of Public Service, 2015);

  17. 17

    Trabish, H. K. How California plans to integrate distributed resources into its ISO market. Utility Dive (24 June 2015);

  18. 18

    Skjølsvold, T. M., Ryghaug, M. & Berker, T. A traveler's guide to smart grids and the social sciences. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 9, 1–8 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Balta-Ozkan, N., Boteler, B. & Amerighi, O. European smart home market development: public views on technical and economic aspects across the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 3, 65–77 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Goulden, M., Bedwell, B., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Rodden, T. & Spence, A. Smart grids, smart users? The role of the user in demand side management. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2, 21–29 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Jones, K., Zoppo, D. & Smarter, A. Greener Grid: Forging Environmental Progress through Smart Energy Policies and Technologies (Praegar, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Fox-Penner, P. S. Smart power: Climate Change, the Smart Grid, and the Future of Electric Utilities (Island, 2010).

  23. 23

    Sioshansi, F. P. Distributed Generation and its Implications for the Utility Industry (Academic Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Sioshansi, F. P. Evolution of Global Electricity Markets: New Paradigms, New Challenges, New Approaches (Academic Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Elliott, N., Molina, M. & Trombley, D. A Defining Framework for Intelligent Efficiency Research Report E125 (American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Marnay, C. & Lai, J. Serving electricity and heat requirements efficiently and with appropriate energy quality via microgrids. Electric. J. 25, 7–15 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Rodríguez-Molina, J., Martínez-Núñez, M., Martínez, J.-F. & Pérez-Aguiar, W. Business models in the smart grid: challenges, opportunities and proposals for prosumer profitability. Energies 7, 6142–6171 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Hvelplund, F. Renewable energy and the need for local energy markets. Energy 31, 2293–2302 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Rosen, C. & Madlener, R. Regulatory Options for Local Reserve Energy Markets: Implications for Prosumers, Utilities, and other Stakeholders FCN Working Paper No. 12/2014 (Institute for Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Linnenberg, T., Wior, I., Schreiber, S. & Fay, A. A market-based multi-agent-system for decentralized power and grid control. In IEEE 16th Conference on Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation 1–8 (IEEE, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Crosby, M. An Airbnb or Uber for the electricity grid? RMI Outlet (2 September 2014);

  32. 32

    Marqués, A. et al. NOBEL — a neighborhood oriented brokerage electricity and monitoring system. In 1st International ICST Conference on E-Energy (eds Hatziargyriou, N. et al.) 187–196 (Springer, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Karnouskos, S., Serrano, M., Marques, A. & Marron, P. J. Prosumer interactions for efficient energy management in smartgrid neighborhood. In 2nd Workshop on eeBuildings Data Models, CIB Conference W078-W012 243–250 (European Commission, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Parag, P. Beyond energy efficiency: a ‘prosumer market’ as an integrated platform for consumer engagement with the energy system. In ECEEE 2015 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency 15–23 (ECEEE, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Corn, M., Cerne, G., Papic, I. & Atanasijevic-Kunc, M. Improved integration of renewable energy sources with the participation of active customers. Stroj. Vestn.-J. Mech. E. 60, 274–282 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Karnouskos, S. Demand side management via prosumer interactions in a smart city energy marketplace. In Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), 2011 2nd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition 1–7 (IEEE, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Geelen, D., Reinders, A. & Keyson, D. Empowering the end-user in smart grids: recommendations for the design of products and services. Energy Policy 61, 151–161 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Pentland, W. AutoGrid Systems strikes deal with Dutch energy provider for software-defined power plant. Forbes (13 November 2015);

  39. 39

    Rathnayaka, A. D., Potdar, V. M., Dillon, T. S., Hussain, O. K. & Chang, E. A methodology to find influential prosumers in prosumer community groups. IEEE T. Ind. Inform. 10, 706–713 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Rathnayaka, A. J. D., Potdar, V. M., Dillon, T., Hussain, O. & Kuruppu, S. Goal-oriented prosumer community groups for the smart grid. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 33, 41–48 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Rathnayaka, A. J. D., Potdar, V. M., Dillon, T. S. & Kuruppu, S. Formation of virtual community groups to manage prosumers in smart grids. Int. J. Grid Util. Comput. 6, 47–56 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Rathnayaka, A. J. D., Vidyasagar, M., Potdar, S. & Kuruppu, J. Design of smart grid prosumer communities via online social networking communities. Int. J. Infonom. 5, 544–556 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Jian, L., Zhu, X., Shao, Z., Niu, S. & Chan, C. C. A scenario of vehicle-to-grid implementation and its double-layer optimal charging strategy for minimizing load variance within regional smart grids. Energy Convers. Manage. 78, 508–517 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Mwasilu, F., Justo, J. J., Kim, E.-K., Do, T. D. & Jung, J.-W. Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: a review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 34, 501–516 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Haddadian, G., Khalili, N., Khodayar, M. & Shahidehpour, M. Optimal scheduling of distributed battery storage for enhancing the security and the economics of electric power systems with emission constraints. Electr. Pow. Syst. Res. 124, 152–159 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Fanone, E., Gamba, A. & Prokopczuk, M. The case of negative day-ahead electricity prices. Energy Econ. 35, 22–34 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Sioshansi, P. New headache: over-generation — Perry Sioshansi's letter from America. Energy Spectrum 18–19 (23 February 2015);

  48. 48

    Mulder, F. M. Implications of diurnal and seasonal variations in renewable energy generation for large scale energy storage. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 6, 033105 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Bronski, P. et al. The Economics of Load Defection (Rocky Mountain Institute, 2015);

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Bronski, P. et al. The Economics of Grid Defection (Rocky Mountain Institute, 2014);

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Simshauser, P. & Nelson, T. The Energy Market Death Spiral - Rethinking Customer Hardship Working Paper No. 31 (AGL Applied Economic and Policy Research, 2012);

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Simshauser, P. Demand Tariffs: Resolving Rate Instability and Hidden Subsidies Working Paper No. 45 (AGL Applied Economic and Policy Research, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Kempton, W., Marra, F., Andersen, P. B. & Garcia-Valle, R. in Electric Vehicle Integration into Modern Power Networks (eds Garcia-Valle, R. & Peças Lopes, J. A. ) 87–105 (Springer, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Sovacool, B. K. Rejecting renewables: the socio-technical impediments to renewable electricity in the United States. Energy Policy 37, 4500–4513 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Sovacool, B. K. & Blyth, P. L. Energy and environmental attitudes in the green state of Denmark: implications for energy democracy, low carbon transitions, and energy literacy. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 304–15 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Döbelt, S., Jung, M., Busch, M. & Tscheligi, M. Consumers' privacy concerns and implications for a privacy preserving smart grid architecture—results of an Austrian study. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 9, 137–145 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Sovacool, B. K. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 13, 202–215 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Edgerton, D. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Melosi, M. in The Energy Reader (ed. Nader, L. ) 45–60 (Wiley Blackwell, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are appreciative for the grants that have supported elements of the work reported here: EU FP7 Marie Curie CIG grant no. 303443, STESS: Socio-technical approach to energy services security; the Research Councils United Kingdom (RCUK) Energy Program grant no. EP/K011790/1, Research Centre on Innovation and Energy Demand; and the Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) Sapere Aude grant no. 4182-00033B, Societal Implications of a Vehicle-to-Grid Transition in Northern Europe.Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union, the RCUK Energy Program or the DFF.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yael Parag.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parag, Y., Sovacool, B. Electricity market design for the prosumer era. Nat Energy 1, 16032 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing