Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Political economy of Clinton's ambitious energy program

Hillary Clinton's campaign has stressed her continuity with Obama's energy policy on key aspects such as decarbonization of the US economy, technological innovation and global cooperation. However, policy reforms to deliver long-term climate goals might be out of reach in a highly divided Congress.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Advancing American energy. The White House (2016); http://go.nature.com/2cyYYsf

  2. 2

    Climate change. Hillary for America (2016); http://go.nature.com/2dpoy4T

  3. 3

    Short-term energy outlook. Energy Information Administration; http://go.nature.com/2cyXWNa

  4. 4

    Electricity data browser. Energy Information Administration; http://bit.ly/2cyYZwl

  5. 5

    Aldy, J. E. Rev. Env. Econ. Policy 7, 136–155 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Aldy, J. E. & Stavins, R. N. Daedalus 141, 45–60 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Schmalensee, R. & Stavins, R. N. J. Econ. Perspect. 27, 103–121 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    United States Congress Climate Protection and Justice Act S2399 (Government Publishing Office, 2015).

  9. 9

    2016 Democratic Party Platform (Democratic Platform Committee, 2016); http://go.nature.com/2d2D5z5

  10. 10

    Burtraw, D., Sweeney, R. & Walls, M. Natl Tax J. 62, 497–518 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hassett, K. A., Mathur, A. & Metcalf, G. E. Energy J. 30, 155–178 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    United States Congress American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 HR2454 (Government Publishing Office, 2009).

  13. 13

    United States Congress Energy Policy Modernization Act of 2016 S2012 (Government Publishing Office, 2016).

  14. 14

    Clinton has a plan to help struggling coal communities. Hillary for America (2016); http://bit.ly/2dfs12v

  15. 15

    Aldy, J. E. Learning from Experience: An Assessment of the Retrospective Review of Agency Rules and the Evidence for Improving Design and Implementation of Regulatory Policy (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2014); http://go.nature.com/2d5ZmPY

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Roberts, D. Hillary Clinton's climate and energy policies, explained. Vox (29 July 2016); http://go.nature.com/2dgk15O

  17. 17

    U.S.-China joint announcement on climate change. The White House (12 November 2014); http://go.nature.com/2dpqIRW

  18. 18

    Clean power plan for existing power plants. US EPA (2016); http://go.nature.com/2dprpus

  19. 19

    Freeman, J. & Lazarus, R. Update on the clean power plan: the knowns and unknowns. Environmental Law Program, Harvard University (2016); http://go.nature.com/2cXjCkS

  20. 20

    Goulder, L. H. & Stavins, R. N. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 253–257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Levinson, A. in The Design and Implementation of US Climate Policy 127–140 (Univ. Chicago Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Houde, S. & Aldy, J. E. Belt and Suspenders and More: The Incremental Impact of Energy Efficiency Subsidies in the Presence of Existing Policy Instruments Working Paper 20541 (2014); http://go.nature.com/2cyZ8jx

  23. 23

    Jacobsen, M. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Pol. 5, 148–187 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    An $80 billion start. New York Times (17 February 2009); http://go.nature.com/2cqPVXc

  25. 25

    Larsen, J., Larsen, K., Herndon, W. & Mohan, S. Taking Stock: Progress Toward Meeting US Climate Goals (The Rhodium Group, 2016); http://bit.ly/2d3yKvj

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Vine, D. US can reach its Paris Agreement goal. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (26 March 2016); http://go.nature.com/2cXkWEz

  27. 27

    Hausker, K., Meek, K., Gasper, R., Aden, N. & Obeiter, M. Delivering on the U.S. Climate Commitment: A 10-point Plan Toward a Low-carbon Future (World Resources Institute, 2015); http://go.nature.com/2cWSZhs

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Aldy, J. E. Future Child. 26, 157–178 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Taylor, J. The Conservative Case for a Carbon Tax (Niskanen Center, 2015); http://bit.ly/2cz1oay

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph E. Aldy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aldy, J. Political economy of Clinton's ambitious energy program. Nat Energy 1, 16162 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.162

Download citation

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing