Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Moving beyond alternative fuel hype to decarbonize transportation


In the past three decades, government, industry and other stakeholders have repeatedly been swept up with the ‘fuel du jour’, claiming that a particular alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) technology can succeed in replacing conventional gasoline-powered vehicles. However, AFV technologies have experienced relatively little success, with fossil fuels still accounting for about 95% of global transport energy use. Here, using the US as a case study, we conduct a media analysis to show how society’s attention has skipped among AFV types between 1980 and 2013, including methanol, natural gas, plug-in electric, hybrid electric, hydrogen and biofuels. Although our results provide no indication as to whether hype ultimately has a net positive or negative impact on AFV innovation, we offer several recommendations that governments can follow to move past hype to support significant AFV adoption and displace fossil fuel use in the transportation sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Graphical representation of emerging technology hype.
Figure 2: Media attention for all alternative fuel vehicle technologies for 1980–2013.
Figure 3: Hype and disappointment cycles for select AFV technologies.
Figure 4: Media attention for each alternative fuel vehicle technology for 1980–2013.
Figure 5: Positive and negative evaluations for each alternative fuel vehicle technology.


  1. Sims, R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 599–670 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Energy and Climate Change World Energy Outlook Special Report (OECD/IEA, 2015).

  3. Williams, J. et al. The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity. Science 335, 53–59 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nichols, R. J. The methanol story: a sustainable fuel for the future. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 62, 97–105 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. President Bush delivers State of the Union Address. The White House (31 January 2006);

  6. Remarks by the President in State of Union Address. The White House (25 January 2011);

  7. Annual Energy Review (US Energy Information Administration, 2015);

  8. Annual Energy Outlook (US Energy Information Administration, 2015);

  9. Beynon-Jones, S. M. & Brown, N. Time, timing and narrative at the interface between UK techno-science and policy. Sci. Public Policy 38, 639–648 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berti, P. & Levidow, L. Fuelling expectations: a policy-promise lock-in of UK biofuel policy. Energy Policy 66, 135–143 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sperling, D. & Gordon, D. Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wesseling, J. H., Faber, J. & Hekkert, M. P. How competitive forces sustain electric vehicle development. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 81, 154–164 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K. & van Wee, B. Technological diversity of emerging eco-innovations: a case study of the automobile industry. J. Cleaner Prod. 37, 211–220 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Alkemade, F. & Suurs, R. Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79.3, 448–456 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bakker, S., van Lente, H. & Engels, R. Competition in a technological niche: the cars of the future. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 24.5, 421–434 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. & van Lente, H. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 18, 285–298 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruef, A. & Markard, J. What happens after a hype? How changing expectations affected innovation activities in the case of stationary fuel cells. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 22, 317–338 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Lente, H., Spitters, C. & Peine, A. Comparing technological hype cycles: towards a theory. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80, 1615–1628 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fenn, J. & Raskino, M. Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time (Harvard Business Press, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Konrad, K. The social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 18, 429–444 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bakker, S. The car industry and the blow-out of the hydrogen hype. Energy Policy 38, 6540–6544 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schäfer, A., Heywood, J. B. & Weiss, M. A. Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: a 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment. Energy 31, 2064–2087 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. van den Hoed, R. Commitment to fuel cell technology?: how to interpret carmakers’ efforts in this radical technology. J. Power Sources 141, 265–271 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bakker, S., van Lente, H. & Meeus, M. T. Credible expectations—The US Department of Energy’s Hydrogen Program as enactor and selector of hydrogen technologies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79, 1059–1071 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Budde, B., Alkemade, F. & Hekkert, M. On the relation between communication and innovation activities: a comparison of hybrid electric and fuel cell vehicles. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 14, 45–59 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown, N. & Beynon-Jones, S. M. ‘Reflex regulation’: an anatomy of promissory science governance. Health Risk Soc. 14, 223–240 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Konrad, K., Markard, J., Ruef, A. & Truffer, B. Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79, 1084–1098 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown, N. Hope against hype–accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Sci. Stud. 16, 3–21 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Weber, K. M. & Rohracher, H. Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Res. Policy 41, 1037–1047 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Foxon, T. & Pearson, P. Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. J. Cleaner Prod. 16.1, S148–S161 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Selin, C. Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology. Sci. Eng. Ethics 17, 723–737 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. FY2014 Statistical Table by Appropriation (US Department of Energy, 2014);

  33. Sierzchula, W. & Nemet, G. Using patents and prototypes for preliminary evaluation of technology-forcing policies: lessons from California’s Zero Emission Vehicle regulations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 100, 213–224 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bakker, S. & Budde, B. Technological hype and disappointment: lessons from the hydrogen and fuel cell case. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage. 24, 549–563 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Delshad, A. & Raymond, L. Media framing and public attitudes toward biofuels. Rev. Policy Res. 30, 190–210 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wald, M. L. Imagining the electric-car future. New York Times (28 April 1993);

  37. Dixon, C. Leased and abandoned: revolt of the EV-1 lovers. New York Times (22 October 2003);

  38. Krebs, M. Promise, and pitfalls, of fuel cells. New York Times (2 April 1999);

  39. Text of President Bush’s 2003 State of the Union Address. The Washington Post (28 January 2003);

  40. Wald, M. L. US drops research into fuel cells for cars. New York Times (7 May 2009);

  41. Berman, B. Fuel cells at center stage. New York Times (24 November 2013);

  42. Ulrich, L. Hydrogen fuel cell cars return for another run. New York Times (16 April 2015);

  43. Eliminating MTBE in Gasoline in 2006 (US Energy Information Administration, 2006);

  44. 2014 RFS2 Data (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2014);

  45. Preliminary Summary of Air Resources Board Action (3/27/08)–Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Program (California Air Resources Board, 2008);

  46. Rascoe, A. & Seetharaman, D. US backs off goal of one million electric cars by 2015. Reuters (31 January 2013);

  47. Uptake of Ultra Low Emission Vehicles in the UK: A Rapid Evidence Assessment for the Department of Transport (Office for Low Emission Vehicles, 2015);

  48. Grubler, A. & Nemet, G. F. Energy Technology Innovation: Learning from Historical Successes and Failures Ch. 10 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. van Est, R. & Brom, F. Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics 2nd edn, 306–320 (2012).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Kalhammer, F., Kopf, B., Swan, D., Roan, V. & Walsh, M. Status and Prospects for Zero Emissions Vehicle Technology: Report of the ARB Independent Expert Panel 2007 (California Air Resources Board, 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  51. Blair, P. D. Science and Public Policy 1–9 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Healy, P. & Dean, C. Clinton says she would shield science from politics. New York Times (5 October 2007);

  53. Rhodes, E., Axsen, J. & Jaccard, M. Does effective climate policy require well-informed citizen support? Glob. Environ. Change 29, 92–104 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Azar, C. & Sandén, B. A. The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Trans. 1, 135–139 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Riffe, D., Lacy, S. & Fico, F. G. Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lacy, S. & Riffe, D. Sampling error and selecting intercoder reliability samples for nominal content categories. Journalism Mass Commun. Q. 73, 963–973 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sims, C. New step for clean air: a natural gas bus. New York Times (27 September 1989);

  59. Fisher, L. M. G. M., in a first, will sell a car designed for electric power this fall. New York Times (5 January 1996);

  60. Levin, D. P. Car makers weigh gasoline changes to cut pollution. New York Times (12 September 1989);

  61. Wald, M. L. Natural gas as auto fuel gets a push in New York. New York Times (14 September 1991);

  62. Levin, D. P. G. M. to begin production of a battery-powered car. New York Times (19 April 1990);

  63. Hakim, D. Hybrid cars are catching on. New York Times (28 January 2003);

  64. Barrionuevo, A. Fill up on corn if you can; an alternative fuel is scarce, even in the farm belt. New York Times (31 August 2006);

  65. Quotations of vice chairman Bob. New York Times (19 March 2010);

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



D.S. provided initial inspiration for this project. J.A. and N.M. developed the study design, and N.M. analysed the data. All authors contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Noel Melton.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melton, N., Axsen, J. & Sperling, D. Moving beyond alternative fuel hype to decarbonize transportation. Nat Energy 1, 16013 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing