Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes


Amid burgeoning environmental concerns, electrochemical energy storage has rapidly gained momentum. Among the contenders in the ‘beyond lithium’ energy storage arena, the lithium–sulfur (Li–S) battery has emerged as particularly promising, owing to its potential to reversibly store considerable electrical energy at low cost. Whether or not Li–S energy storage will be able to fulfil this potential depends on simultaneously solving many aspects of its underlying conversion chemistry. Here, we review recent developments in tackling the dissolution of polysulfides — a fundamental problem in Li–S batteries — focusing on both experimental and computational approaches to tailor the chemical interactions between the sulfur host materials and polysulfides. We also discuss smart cathode architectures enabled by recent materials engineering, especially for high areal sulfur loading, as well as innovative electrolyte design to control the solubility of polysulfides. Key factors that allow long-life and high-loading Li–S batteries are summarized.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Fundamental problems with using porous carbon as a sulfur host material.
Figure 2: Summary of the polar–polar chemical interactions between lithium polysulfides and polar sulfur hosts.
Figure 3: Entrapping lithium polysulfides by metal-sulfur bonding.
Figure 4: Strategy of binding polysulfides by sulfur-chain catenation via nucleophilic substitution.
Figure 5: Binding energy metrics for chemical interactions between lithium polysulfides and sulfur hosts.
Figure 6: Various cathode architectures for high areal sulfur loading in Li–S cells.
Figure 7: Concept of using non-solvents compared with typical ether-based electrolytes.
Figure 8: A summary of five aspects to be addressed to allow long-life and high-loading Li–S batteries.


  1. 1

    Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Choi, N.-S. et al. Challenges facing lithium batteries and electrical double-layer capacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9994–10024 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Yin, Y. X., Xin, S., Guo, Y. G. & Wan, L. J. Lithium–sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 13186–13200 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Manthiram, A., Chung, S. H. & Zu, C. Lithium–sulfur batteries: progress and prospects. Adv. Mater. 27, 1980–2006 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Ma, L., Hendrickson, K. E., Wei, S. & Archer, L. A. Nanomaterials: science and applications in the lithium–sulfur battery. Nano Today 10, 315–338 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Pang, Q., Liang, X., Kwok, C. Y. & Nazar, L. F. The importance of chemical interactions between sulfur host materials and lithium polysulfides for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A2567–A2576 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Rosenman, A. et al. Review on Li–sulfur battery systems: an integral perspective. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500212 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Eroglu, D., Zavadil, K. R. & Gallagher K. G. Critical link between materials chemistry and cell-level design for high energy density and low cost lithium–sulfur transportation battery. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, A982–A990 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Pope, M. A. & Aksay, R. A. Structural design of cathodes for Li–S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 201500124 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ji, X., Lee, K. T. & Nazar, L. F. A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Mater. 8, 500–506 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Jayaprakash, N., Shen, J., Moganty, S. S., Corona, A. & Archer, L. A. Porous hollow carbon@sulfur composites for high-power lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. 123, 6026–6030 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Xin, S. et al. Small sulfur molecules promise better lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18510–18513 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Li, Z. et al. A highly ordered meso@microporous carbon-supported sulfur@smaller sulfur core–shell structured cathode for Li–S batteries. ACS Nano 8, 9295–9303 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    He, G. et al. Tailoring porosity in carbon nanospheres for lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. ACS Nano 7, 10920–10930 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Strubel, P. et al. ZnO hard templating for synthesis of hierarchical porous carbons with tailored porosity and high performance in a lithium–sulfur battery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 287–297 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Evers, S. & Nazar, L. F. New approaches for high energy density lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1135–1143 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Yang, Y., Zheng, G. & Cui, Y. Nanostructured sulphur cathodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 3018–3032 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Wang, L. et al. A quantum-chemical study on the discharge reaction mechanism of lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Energy Chem. 22, 72–77 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Zhang, Q. et al. Understanding the anchoring effect of two-dimensional layered materials for lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 3780–3786 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zhou, G. et al. Fibrous hybrid of graphene and sulfur nanocrystals for high-performance lithium–sulphur batteries. ACS Nano 7, 5367–5375 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Pascal, T. A. et al. X-ray absorption spectra of dissolved polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries from first-principles. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 1547–1551 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Pang, Q., Kundu, D., Cuisinier, M. & Nazar, L. F. Surface-enhanced redox chemistry of polysulphides on a metallic and polar host for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Commun. 5, 4759 (2014). This paper demonstrated that the metallic and polar qualities of Ti4O7 lead to optimal surface interactions the controlled deposition of Li2S and thus extended cycling.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Raccichini, R., Varzi, A., Passerini, S. & Scrosati, B. The role of graphene for electrochemical energy storage. Nat. Mater. 14, 271–279 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Ji, L. et al. Graphene oxide as a sulfur immobilizer in high performance lithium/sulfur cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18522–18525 (2011). Graphene oxide sulphur hosts were identified as being very effective at immobilizing polysulfides, thus improving conductivity and Li–S battery capacity retention.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Zhang, L. et al. Electronic structure and chemical bonding of a graphene oxide–sulfur nanocomposite for use in superior performance lithium–sulphur cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 13670–13675 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Song, M. K., Zhang, Y. & Cairns, E. J. A long-life, high-rate lithium/sulfur cell: a multifaceted approach to enhancing cell performance. Nano Lett. 13, 5891–5899 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wang, H. et al. Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium–sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. Nano Lett. 11, 2644–2647 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Rong, J., Ge, M., Fang, X. & Zhou, C. Solution ionic strength engineering as a generic strategy to coat graphene oxide (GO) on various functional particles and its application in high-performance lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries. Nano Lett. 14, 473–479 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    He, G., Hart, C. J., Liang, X., Garsuch, A. & Nazar, L. F. Stable cycling of a scalable graphene-encapsulated nanocomposite for lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 10917–10923 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Song, J. et al. Nitrogen-doped mesoporous carbon promoted chemical adsorption of sulfur and fabrication of high-areal-capacity sulfur cathode with exceptional cycling stability for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 1243–1250 (2014). One of the first papers to demonstrate the excellent properties of nitrogen-doped carbons as Li–S cathode hosts using both experiment and theory.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Qiu, Y. et al. High-rate, ultralong cycle-life lithium/sulphur batteries enabled by nitrogen-doped graphene. Nano Lett. 14, 4821–4827 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Zhou, G., Zhao, Y. & Manthiram, A. Dual-confined flexible sulfur cathodes encapsulated in nitrogen-doped double-shelled hollow carbon spheres and wrapped with graphene for Li–S batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1402263 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Zhou, W. et al. Tailoring pore size of nitrogen-doped hollow carbon nanospheres for confining sulphur in lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401752 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Song, J. et al. Strong lithium polysulfide chemisorption on electroactive sites of nitrogen-doped carbon composites for high-performance lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 4325–4329 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Zhang, S. S. Heteroatom-doped carbons: synthesis, chemistry and application in lithium/sulfur batteries. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2, 1059–1069 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Zhang, S., Tsuzuki, S., Ueno, K., Dokko, K. & Watanabe, M. Upper limit of nitrogen content in carbon materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 1302–1306 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Liu, J. et al. A graphene-like oxygenated carbon nitride material for improved cycle-life lithium/sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 5137–5142 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Pang, Q. & Nazar, L. F. Long-life and high-areal-capacity Li–S batteries enabled by a light-weight polar host with intrinsic polysulfide adsorption. ACS Nano 10, 4111–4118 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Zhou, G., Paek, E., Hwang, G. S. & Manthiram, A. Long-life Li/polysulphide batteries with high sulphur loading enabled by lightweight three-dimensional nitrogen/sulphur-codoped graphene sponge. Nat. Commun. 6, 7760 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Pang, Q. et al. A nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon derived from polyrhodanine@cellulose for advanced lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 6021–6028 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Ma, L. et al. Tethered molecular sorbents: enabling metal–sulfur battery cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1400390 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Wang, Z. et al. Enhancing lithium–sulphur battery performance by strongly binding the discharge products on amino-functionalized reduced graphene oxide. Nat. Commun. 5, 5002 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Zheng, G. et al. Amphiphilic surface modification of hollow carbon nanofibers for improved cycle life of lithium sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 13, 1265–1270 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Park, K. et al. Trapping lithium polysulfides of a Li/S battery by forming lithium bonds in a polymer matrix. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 2389–2395 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Li, W. et al. Understanding the role of different conductive polymers in improving the nanostructured sulfur cathode performance. Nano Lett. 13, 5534–5540 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Seh, Z. W. et al. Facile synthesis of Li2S–polypyrrole composite structures for high-performance Li2S cathodes. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 672–676 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Bucur, C. B., Muldoon, J., Lita, A. A layer-by-layer supramolecular structure for a sulfur cathode. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 992–998 (2016). A multilayer approach to creating polyelectrolyte coatings on sulfur particles was described, leading to very stable cycling behaviour.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Ji, X., Evers, S., Black, R. & Nazar, L. F. Stabilizing lithium–sulphur cathodes using polysulphide reservoirs. Nat. Commun. 2, 325 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Kim, H. et al. Plasma-enhanced atomic layer deposition of ultrathin oxide coatings for stabilized lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 1308–1315 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Wei Seh, Z. et al. Sulphur–TiO2 yolk–shell nanoarchitecture with internal void space for long-cycle lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Commun. 4, 1331 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Evers, S., Yim, T. & Nazar, L. F. Understanding the nature of absorption/adsorption in nanoporous polysulfide sorbents for the Li–S battery. J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 19653–19658 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Xiao, Z. et al. A lightweight TiO2/graphene interlayer, applied as a highly effective polysulphide absorbent for fast, long-life lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 27, 2891–2898 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Seh, Z. W. et al. Two-dimensional layered transition metal disulphides for effective encapsulation of high-capacity lithium sulphide cathodes. Nat. Commun. 5, 5017 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Jiang, J. et al. Encapsulation of sulphur with thin-layered nickel-based hydroxides for long-cyclic lithium–sulphur cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 8622 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Yao, H. et al. Improving lithium–sulphur batteries through spatial control of sulphur species deposition on a hybrid electrode surface. Nat. Commun. 5, 3943 (2014). Selective Li2S deposition on micropatterned indium tin oxide wires revealed the importance of conductivity and polysulfide adsorptivity in achieving spatial control of Li2S growth.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Tao, X. et al. Strong sulfur binding with conducting Magneli-phase TinO2(n−1) nanomaterials for improving lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 14, 5288–5294 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Zheng, J. et al. Lewis acid–base interactions between polysulfides and metal organic framework in lithium sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 14, 2345–2352 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Demir-Cakan, R. et al. Cathode composites for Li–S batteries via the use of oxygenated porous architectures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 16154–16160 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Zhao, Z. et al. Graphene-wrapped chromium-MOF(MIL-101)/sulfur composite for performance improvement of high-rate rechargeable Li–S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 13509–13512 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Zhou, J. et al. Rational design of a metal–organic framework host for sulfur storage in fast, long-cycle Li–S batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2715–2724 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Wang, Z. et al. Mixed-metal−organic framework with effective Lewis acidic sites for sulfur confinement in high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 7, 20999–21004 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Naguib, M., Mochalin, V. N., Barsoum, M. W. & Gogotsi, Y. Mxenes: a new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv. Mater. 26, 992–1005 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Liang, X., Garsuch, A. & Nazar, L. F. Sulfur cathodes based on conductive MXene nanosheets for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. 54, 3907–3911 (2015). This paper reported that the exfoliated MXene family of 2D materials chemically bind polysulfides via Lewis acid–base metal–sulfur bonding.

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Zhao, M. Q. et al. Synthesis of carbon/sulfur nanolaminates by electrochemical extraction of titanium from Ti2SC. Angew. Chem. 54, 4810–4814 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Pang, Q., Kundu, D. & Nazar, L. F. A graphene-like metallic cathode host for long-life and high-loading lithium–sulfur batteries. Mater. Horiz. 3, 130–136 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Yuan, Z. et al. Powering lithium–sulfur battery performance by propelling polysulfide redox at sulfiphilic hosts. Nano Lett. 16, 519−527 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Zhang, S. S. & Tran, D. T. Pyrite FeS2 as an efficient adsorbent of lithium polysulfide for improved lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 4371–4374 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Lin, Z., Liu, Z., Fu, W., Dudney, N. J. & Liang, C. Lithium polysulfidophosphates: a family of lithium-conducting sulfur-rich compounds for lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7460–7463 (2013). This paper was the first to demonstrate that sulfur catenation in Li3PS4 produces ionically conductive lithium polysulfidophosphates, enabling fabrication of all solid state sulfur batteries.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Liang, X. et al. A highly efficient polysulphide mediator for lithium–sulphur batteries. Nat. Commun. 6, 5682 (2015). This paper, along with ref. 70, described a universal mechanism for polysulfide mediation based on redox reaction with the host surface.

    Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Liang, X. et al. Tuning transition metal oxide–sulfur interactions for long life lithium sulfur batteries: the “Goldilocks” principle. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501636 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71

    Liang, X., Nazar, L. F. In situ reactive assembly of scalable core–shell sulfur–MnO2 composite cathodes. ACS Nano 10, 4192–4198 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72

    Seh, Z. W. et al. Stable cycling of lithium sulfide cathodes through strong affinity with a bifunctional binder. Chem. Sci. 4, 3673–3677 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73

    Chen, H. et al. Rational design of cathode structure for high rate performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Lett. 15, 5443–5448 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74

    Peng, H.-J. et al. Strongly coupled interfaces between a heterogeneous carbon host and a sulfur-containing guest for highly stable lithium–sulfur batteries: mechanistic insight into capacity degradation. Adv.Mater. Interfaces 1, 1400227 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75

    Kamphaus, E. P. & Balbuena, P. B. Long-chain polysulfide retention at the cathode of Li–S batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 4296–4305 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76

    Elazari, R., Salitra, G., Garsuch, A., Panchenko, A. & Aurbach, D. Sulfur-impregnated activated carbon fiber cloth as a binder-free cathode for rechargeable Li–S batteries. Adv. Mater. 23, 5641–5644 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77

    Miao, L., Wang, W., Yuan, K., Yang, Y. & Wang, A. A lithium–sulfur cathode with high sulfur loading and high capacity per area: a binder-free carbon fiber cloth–sulfur material. Chem. Comm. 50, 13231–13234 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78

    Zhou, G. et al. A graphene foam electrode with high sulfur loading for flexible and high energy Li–S batteries. Nano Energy 11, 356–365 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79

    Yuan, Z. et al. Hierarchical free-standing carbon-nanotube paper electrodes with ultrahigh sulfur-loading for lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 6105–6127 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80

    Qie, L. & Manthiram, A. A facile layer-by-layer approach for high-areal-capacity sulfur cathodes. Adv. Mater. 27, 1694–1700 (2015). This paper along with ref. 79, demonstrated a facile approach of stacking carbon nanotube paper to fabricate multi-layered 3D electrodes and achieving high areal sulfur loading.

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81

    Sun, Q. et al. An aligned and laminated nanostructured carbon hybrid cathode for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Angew. Chem. 54, 10539–10544 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82

    Zhou, W., Guo, B., Cao, H. & Goodenough, J. B. Low-cost higher loading of a sulfur cathode. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1502059 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83

    Lv, D. et al. High energy density lithium–sulfur batteries: challenges of thick sulfur cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1402290 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84

    Cao, R., Xu, W., Lv, D., Xiao, J. & Zhang, J. G. Anodes for rechargeable lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1402273 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85

    Gofer, Y., Einely, Y & Aurbach, D. Surface chemistry of lithium in 1,3-dioxolane. Electrochim. Acta 37, 1897–1899 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  86. 86

    Park, J.-W. et al. Solvent effect of room temperature ionic liquids on electrochemical reactions in lithium–sulfur batteries,. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 4431–4440 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  87. 87

    Barghamadi, M. et al. Lithium–sulfur batteries — the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution? Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3902–3920 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88

    Rosenman, A. et al. The effect of interactions and reduction products of LiNO3, the anti-shuttle agent, in Li–S battery systems. J. Electrochem. Soc. 162 A470–A473 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89

    Lin, Z., Liu, Z., Fu, W., Dudney, N. & Liang, C. Phosphorus pentasulfide as a novel additive for high-performance lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 1064–1069 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  90. 90

    Wu, F. et al. Lithium iodide as a promising electrolyte additive for lithium–sulfur batteries: mechanisms of performance enhancement. Adv. Mater. 27, 101–108 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91

    Meini, S., Elazari, R., Rosenman, A., Garsuch, A. & Aurbach, D. The use of redox mediators for enhancing utilization of Li2S cathodes for advanced Li–S battery systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 915–918 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92

    Geber, L. C. H. et al. Three-dimensional growth of Li2S in lithium–sulfur batteries promoted by a redox mediator. Nano Lett. 16, 549–554 (2015). This paper and ref. 91 were the first studies to employ redox mediators to facilitate either discharge or charge in the Li–S cell.

    Google Scholar 

  93. 93

    Park, J.-W. et al. Ionic liquid electrolytes for lithium–sulfur batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 20531–20541 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94

    Tachikawa, N. et al. Reversibility of electrochemical reactions of sulfur supported on inverse opal carbon in glyme–Li salt molten complex electrolytes. Chem. Commun. 47, 8157–8159 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  95. 95

    Suo, L. et al. A new class of solvent-in-salt electrolyte for high-energy rechargeable metallic lithium batteries,. Nat. Commun. 4, 1481 (2013). This paper along with refs 96 and 97, described ‘poor-solvent’ electrolyte approaches that inhibit the dissolution of polysulfides in Li–S batteries.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96

    Cuisinier, M. et al. Unique behaviour of nonsolvents for polysulfides in lithium–sulfur batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2697–2705 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  97. 97

    Dokko, K. N. et al. Solvate ionic liquid electrolyte for Li–S batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 A1304–A1310 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98

    Cuisinier, M., Hart, C., Balasubramanian, M., Garsuch, A. & Nazar, L. F. Radical or not radical: revisiting lithium–sulfur electrochemistry in nonaqueous electrolytes. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401801 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  99. 99

    Xiao, J. et al. Following the transient reactions in lithium–sulfur batteries using an in situ nuclear magnetic resonance technique. Nano Lett. 15, 3309–3316 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100

    Wujcik, K. H. et al. Characterization of polysulfide radicals present in an ether-based electrolyte of a lithium–sulfur battery during initial discharge using in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy experiments and first-principles calculations. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500285 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


L.F.N very gratefully acknowledges BASF SE for generous funding through their International Scientific Network for Electrochemistry and Batteries (and BASF Canada). We thank Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for support via its Discovery and Research Chair programmes, and Natural Resources Canada. We kindly thank M. Cuisinier for the graphics in Fig. 1. Partial support (to Q.P.) is now provided by the Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR), an Energy Innovation Hub funded by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda F. Nazar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pang, Q., Liang, X., Kwok, C. et al. Advances in lithium–sulfur batteries based on multifunctional cathodes and electrolytes. Nat Energy 1, 16132 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing