Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Designing ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells with reduced carrier recombination and a fill factor of 77%

Abstract

In recent years the concept of ternary blend bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells based on organic semiconductors has been widely used to achieve a better match to the solar irradiance spectrum, and power conversion efficiencies beyond 10% have been reported. However, the fill factor of organic solar cells is still limited by the competition between recombination and extraction of free charges. Here, we design advanced material composites leading to a high fill factor of 77% in ternary blends, thus demonstrating how the recombination thresholds can be overcome. Extending beyond the typical sensitization concept, we add a highly ordered polymer that, in addition to enhanced absorption, overcomes limits predicted by classical recombination models. An effective charge transfer from the disordered host system onto the highly ordered sensitizer effectively avoids traps of the host matrix and features an almost ideal recombination behaviour.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Absorption spectra, device architecture and energy diagrams of the materials used.
Figure 2: Optoelectrical characterizations of ternary devices.
Figure 3: Photo-CELIV measurements and recombination dynamics of ternary devices.
Figure 4: Morphological investigations of ternary films.
Figure 5: Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the ternary devices.

References

  1. 1

    Lu, L. et al. Recent advances in bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells. Chem. Rev. 115, 12666–12731 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Dou, L., Liu, Y., Hong, Z., Li, G. & Yang, Y. Low-bandgap near-IR conjugated polymers/molecules for organic electronics. Chem. Rev. 115, 12633–12665 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Liu, Y. et al. Aggregation and morphology control enables multiple cases of high-efficiency polymer solar cells. Nature Commun. 5, 5293 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Vohra, V. et al. Efficient inverted polymer solar cells employing favourable molecular orientation. Nature Photon. 9, 403–408 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Scharber, M. C. On the efficiency limit of conjugated polymer?: Fullerene-based bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 1994–2001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Chen, J.-D. et al. Single-junction polymer solar cells exceeding 10% power conversion efficiency. Adv. Mater. 27, 1035–1041 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Lucera, L. et al. Highly efficient, large area, roll coated flexible and rigid OPV modules with geometric fill factors up to 98.5% processed with commercially available materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 89–94 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    You, J. et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nature Commun. 4, 1446 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    He, Z. et al. Enhanced power-conversion efficiency in polymer solar cells using an inverted device structure. Nature Photon. 6, 593–597 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Ameri, T. et al. Performance enhancement of the P3HT/PCBM solar cells through nir sensitization using a small-bandgap polymer. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 1198–1202 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Yang, Y. M. et al. High-performance multiple-donor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nature Photon. 9, 190–198 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Lu, L., Xu, T., Chen, W., Landry, E. S. & Yu, L. Ternary blend polymer solar cells with enhanced power conversion efficiency. Nature Photon. 8, 716–722 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Zhang, Y. et al. Synergistic effect of polymer and small molecules for high-performance ternary organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 1071–1076 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Zhang, J. et al. Conjugated polymer-small molecule alloy leads to high efficient ternary organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8176–8183 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Min, J. et al. Two similar near-infrared (IR) absorbing benzannulated AZA-bodipy dyes as near-IR sensitizers for ternary solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 5609–5616 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Itskos, G. et al. Optical properties of organic semiconductor blends with near-infrared quantum-dot sensitizers for light harvesting applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 802–812 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Ameri, T., Khoram, P., Min, J. & Brabec, C. J. Organic ternary solar cells: a review. Adv. Mater. 25, 4245–4266 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Lu, L., Kelly, M. A., You, W. & Yu, L. Status and prospects for ternary organic photovoltaics. Nature Photon. 9, 491–500 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Spyropoulos, G. D. et al. Flexible organic tandem solar modules with 6% efficiency: combining roll-to-roll compatible processing with high geometric fill factors. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3284–3290 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Guo, F. et al. A generic concept to overcome bandgap limitations for designing highly efficient multi-junction photovoltaic cells. Nature Commun. 6, 7730 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Street, R. A., Davies, D., Khlyabich, P. P., Burkhart, B. & Thompson, B. C. Origin of the tunable open-circuit voltage in ternary blend bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 986–989 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ameri, T. et al. Morphology analysis of near IR sensitized polymer/fullerene organic solar cells by implementing low bandgap heteroanalogue C-/Si-PCPDTBT. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 19461–19472 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Liu, S. et al. Enhanced efficiency of polymer solar cells by adding a high-mobility conjugated polymer. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1463–1470 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Gasparini, N. et al. An alternative strategy to adjust the recombination mechanism of organic photovoltaics by implementing ternary compounds. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501527 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Bartesaghi, D. et al. Competition between recombination and extraction of free charges determines the fill factor of organic solar cells. Nature Commun. 6, 7083 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Gasparini, N. et al. Photophysics of molecular-weight-induced losses in indacenodithienothiophene-based solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 4898–4907 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Bartelt, J. A. et al. The importance of fullerene percolation in the mixed regions of polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 364–374 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Yin, W. & Dadmun, M. A new model for the morphology of P3HT/PCBM organic photovoltaics from small-angle neutron scattering: rivers and streams. ACS Nano 5, 4756–4768 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Sweetnam, S. et al. Characterization of the polymer energy landscape in polymer: fullerene bulk heterojunctions with pure and mixed phases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14078–14088 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Liu, F. et al. Understanding the morphology of PTB7:PCBM blends in organic photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1–9 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Liang, Y. et al. For the bright future-bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv. Mater. 22, 135–138 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Hou, J., Chen, H-Y., Zhang, S., Li, G. & Yang, Y. Synthesis, characterization, and photovoltaic properties of a low band gap polymer based on silole-containing polythiophenes and 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16144–16145 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Mollinger, S. a., Vandewal, K. & Salleo, A. Microstructural and electronic origins of open-circuit voltage tuning in organic solar cells based on ternary blends. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501335 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Leong, W. L., Cowan, S. R. & Heeger, A. J. Differential resistance analysis of charge carrier losses in organic bulk heterojunction solar cells: observing the transition from bimolecular to trap-assisted recombination and quantifying the order of recombination. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 517–522 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Mandoc, M. M., Kooistra, F. B., Hummelen, J. C., De Boer, B. & Blom, P. W. M. Effect of traps on the performance of bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 2005–2008 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Zhou, H. et al. High-efficiency polymer solar cells enhanced by solvent treatment. Adv. Mater. 25, 1646–1652 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Mihailetchi, V., Koster, L., Hummelen, J. & Blom, P. Photocurrent generation in polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 216601 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Gasparini, N. et al. Neat C70-based bulk-heterojunction polymer solar cells with excellent acceptor dispersion. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 21416–21425 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Koster, L. J. a., Mihailetchi, V. D. & Blom, P. W. M. Bimolecular recombination in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 052104 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Yang, L., Tumbleston, J. R., Zhou, H., Ade, H. & You, W. Disentangling the impact of side chains and fluorine substituents of conjugated donor polymers on the performance of photovoltaic blends. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 316–326 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Pivrikas, A., Sariciftci, N. S., Juška, G. & Österbacka, R. A review of charge transport and recombination in polymer/fullerene organic solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 15, 677–696 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Shuttle, C. G. et al. Experimental determination of the rate law for charge carrier decay in a polythiophene: fullerene solar cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 90–93 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Baumann, A. et al. Influence of phase segregation on recombination dynamics in organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 1687–1692 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Kirchartz, T. & Nelson, J. Meaning of reaction orders in polymer: fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 86, 165201 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Gann, E. et al. Soft x-ray scattering facility at the Advanced Light Source with real-time data processing and analysis. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 045110 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Ye, L. et al. 2D-conjugated benzodithiophene-based polymer acceptor: design, synthesis, nanomorphology, and photovoltaic performance. Macromolecules 48, 7156–7163 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Schubert, M. et al. Correlated donor/acceptor crystal orientation controls photocurrent generation in all-polymer solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4068–4081 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Steyrleuthner, R. et al. The role of regioregularity, crystallinity, and chain orientation on electron transport in a high-mobility n-type copolymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4245–4256 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Hexemer, A. et al. A SAXS/WAXS/GISAXS beamline with multilayer monochromator. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 247, 012007 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Zhang, Y., Dang, X.-D., Kim, C. & Nguyen, T.-Q. Effect of charge recombination on the fill factor of small molecule bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 610–617 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Ilavsky, J. Nika: software for two-dimensional data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 324–328 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement no 607585 project OSNIRO. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Engineering of Advanced Materials’ at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the framework of its ‘Excellence Initiative’, Synthetic Carbon Allotropes (SFB953) and Solar Technologies go Hybrid (SolTech). The authors also acknowledge the Solar Factory of the Future as part of the Energy Campus Nuremberg (EnCN), which is supported by the Bavarian State Government (FKZ 20-3043.5). X-ray and SIMS analysis by NCSU was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering under Contract DE-FG02-98ER45737. X-ray data were acquired at beamlines 11.0.1.2, 7.3.3 and 5.3.2.2 at the Advanced Light Source, which is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. A. L. D. Kilcoyne, E. Schaible, C. Zhu, A. Hexemer, C. Wang and A. Young of the ALS (DOE) assisted with the measurements and provided instrument maintenance. X.J. acknowledges the use of the Analytical Instrumentation Facility (AIF) at North Carolina State University, which is supported by the State of North Carolina and the National Science Foundation. S. Mukherjee and M. Ghasemi from NCSU are acknowledged for providing comments about the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.G., T.A. and C.J.B. conceived and developed the ideas. N.G. designed the experiments and performed device fabrication, electrical characterization and data analysis. N.G. performed Photo-CELIV, TPV and CE measurements under the supervision of G.J.M.; X.J. performed GIWAXS, R-SoXS and SIMS measurements and analysed the data under the supervision of H.A.; S.F. performed TEM measurements under the supervision of E.S.; N.G. and X.J. wrote the manuscript and T.H., D.B., C.J.B., H.A. and T.A. contributed to revisions of the manuscript. The projects were supervised by T.A., C.J.B. and H.A.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicola Gasparini, Christoph J. Brabec or Tayebeh Ameri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs 1–13, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, and Supplementary Methods (PDF 1228 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gasparini, N., Jiao, X., Heumueller, T. et al. Designing ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells with reduced carrier recombination and a fill factor of 77%. Nat Energy 1, 16118 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.118

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing