Article | Published:

Designing ternary blend bulk heterojunction solar cells with reduced carrier recombination and a fill factor of 77%

Nature Energy volume 1, Article number: 16118 (2016) | Download Citation


In recent years the concept of ternary blend bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells based on organic semiconductors has been widely used to achieve a better match to the solar irradiance spectrum, and power conversion efficiencies beyond 10% have been reported. However, the fill factor of organic solar cells is still limited by the competition between recombination and extraction of free charges. Here, we design advanced material composites leading to a high fill factor of 77% in ternary blends, thus demonstrating how the recombination thresholds can be overcome. Extending beyond the typical sensitization concept, we add a highly ordered polymer that, in addition to enhanced absorption, overcomes limits predicted by classical recombination models. An effective charge transfer from the disordered host system onto the highly ordered sensitizer effectively avoids traps of the host matrix and features an almost ideal recombination behaviour.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Recent advances in bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells. Chem. Rev. 115, 12666–12731 (2015).

  2. 2.

    , , ,  & Low-bandgap near-IR conjugated polymers/molecules for organic electronics. Chem. Rev. 115, 12633–12665 (2015).

  3. 3.

    et al. Aggregation and morphology control enables multiple cases of high-efficiency polymer solar cells. Nature Commun. 5, 5293 (2014).

  4. 4.

    et al. Efficient inverted polymer solar cells employing favourable molecular orientation. Nature Photon. 9, 403–408 (2015).

  5. 5.

    On the efficiency limit of conjugated polymer?: Fullerene-based bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 28, 1994–2001 (2016).

  6. 6.

    et al. Single-junction polymer solar cells exceeding 10% power conversion efficiency. Adv. Mater. 27, 1035–1041 (2014).

  7. 7.

    et al. Highly efficient, large area, roll coated flexible and rigid OPV modules with geometric fill factors up to 98.5% processed with commercially available materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 89–94 (2015).

  8. 8.

    et al. A polymer tandem solar cell with 10.6% power conversion efficiency. Nature Commun. 4, 1446 (2013).

  9. 9.

    et al. Enhanced power-conversion efficiency in polymer solar cells using an inverted device structure. Nature Photon. 6, 593–597 (2012).

  10. 10.

    et al. Performance enhancement of the P3HT/PCBM solar cells through nir sensitization using a small-bandgap polymer. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 1198–1202 (2012).

  11. 11.

    et al. High-performance multiple-donor bulk heterojunction solar cells. Nature Photon. 9, 190–198 (2015).

  12. 12.

    , , ,  & Ternary blend polymer solar cells with enhanced power conversion efficiency. Nature Photon. 8, 716–722 (2014).

  13. 13.

    et al. Synergistic effect of polymer and small molecules for high-performance ternary organic solar cells. Adv. Mater. 27, 1071–1076 (2015).

  14. 14.

    et al. Conjugated polymer-small molecule alloy leads to high efficient ternary organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 8176–8183 (2015).

  15. 15.

    et al. Two similar near-infrared (IR) absorbing benzannulated AZA-bodipy dyes as near-IR sensitizers for ternary solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 5609–5616 (2013).

  16. 16.

    et al. Optical properties of organic semiconductor blends with near-infrared quantum-dot sensitizers for light harvesting applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 802–812 (2011).

  17. 17.

    , ,  & Organic ternary solar cells: a review. Adv. Mater. 25, 4245–4266 (2013).

  18. 18.

    , ,  & Status and prospects for ternary organic photovoltaics. Nature Photon. 9, 491–500 (2015).

  19. 19.

    et al. Flexible organic tandem solar modules with 6% efficiency: combining roll-to-roll compatible processing with high geometric fill factors. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3284–3290 (2014).

  20. 20.

    et al. A generic concept to overcome bandgap limitations for designing highly efficient multi-junction photovoltaic cells. Nature Commun. 6, 7730 (2015).

  21. 21.

    , , ,  & Origin of the tunable open-circuit voltage in ternary blend bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 986–989 (2013).

  22. 22.

    et al. Morphology analysis of near IR sensitized polymer/fullerene organic solar cells by implementing low bandgap heteroanalogue C-/Si-PCPDTBT. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 19461–19472 (2014).

  23. 23.

    et al. Enhanced efficiency of polymer solar cells by adding a high-mobility conjugated polymer. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 1463–1470 (2015).

  24. 24.

    et al. An alternative strategy to adjust the recombination mechanism of organic photovoltaics by implementing ternary compounds. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501527 (2015).

  25. 25.

    et al. Competition between recombination and extraction of free charges determines the fill factor of organic solar cells. Nature Commun. 6, 7083 (2015).

  26. 26.

    et al. Photophysics of molecular-weight-induced losses in indacenodithienothiophene-based solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 4898–4907 (2015).

  27. 27.

    et al. The importance of fullerene percolation in the mixed regions of polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 364–374 (2013).

  28. 28.

     & A new model for the morphology of P3HT/PCBM organic photovoltaics from small-angle neutron scattering: rivers and streams. ACS Nano 5, 4756–4768 (2011).

  29. 29.

    et al. Characterization of the polymer energy landscape in polymer: fullerene bulk heterojunctions with pure and mixed phases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 14078–14088 (2014).

  30. 30.

    et al. Understanding the morphology of PTB7:PCBM blends in organic photovoltaics. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1–9 (2014).

  31. 31.

    et al. For the bright future-bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells with power conversion efficiency of 7.4%. Adv. Mater. 22, 135–138 (2010).

  32. 32.

    , , ,  & Synthesis, characterization, and photovoltaic properties of a low band gap polymer based on silole-containing polythiophenes and 2,1,3-benzothiadiazole. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 16144–16145 (2008).

  33. 33.

    ,  & Microstructural and electronic origins of open-circuit voltage tuning in organic solar cells based on ternary blends. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501335 (2015).

  34. 34.

    ,  & Differential resistance analysis of charge carrier losses in organic bulk heterojunction solar cells: observing the transition from bimolecular to trap-assisted recombination and quantifying the order of recombination. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 517–522 (2011).

  35. 35.

    , , ,  & Effect of traps on the performance of bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 2005–2008 (2007).

  36. 36.

    et al. High-efficiency polymer solar cells enhanced by solvent treatment. Adv. Mater. 25, 1646–1652 (2013).

  37. 37.

    , ,  & Photocurrent generation in polymer-fullerene bulk heterojunctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 216601 (2004).

  38. 38.

    et al. Neat C70-based bulk-heterojunction polymer solar cells with excellent acceptor dispersion. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6, 21416–21425 (2014).

  39. 39.

    ,  & Bimolecular recombination in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 052104 (2006).

  40. 40.

    , , ,  & Disentangling the impact of side chains and fluorine substituents of conjugated donor polymers on the performance of photovoltaic blends. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 316–326 (2013).

  41. 41.

    , ,  & A review of charge transport and recombination in polymer/fullerene organic solar cells. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 15, 677–696 (2007).

  42. 42.

    et al. Experimental determination of the rate law for charge carrier decay in a polythiophene: fullerene solar cell. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 90–93 (2008).

  43. 43.

    et al. Influence of phase segregation on recombination dynamics in organic bulk-heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 1687–1692 (2011).

  44. 44.

     & Meaning of reaction orders in polymer: fullerene solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 86, 165201 (2012).

  45. 45.

    et al. Soft x-ray scattering facility at the Advanced Light Source with real-time data processing and analysis. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 045110 (2012).

  46. 46.

    et al. 2D-conjugated benzodithiophene-based polymer acceptor: design, synthesis, nanomorphology, and photovoltaic performance. Macromolecules 48, 7156–7163 (2015).

  47. 47.

    et al. Correlated donor/acceptor crystal orientation controls photocurrent generation in all-polymer solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4068–4081 (2014).

  48. 48.

    et al. The role of regioregularity, crystallinity, and chain orientation on electron transport in a high-mobility n-type copolymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4245–4256 (2014).

  49. 49.

    et al. A SAXS/WAXS/GISAXS beamline with multilayer monochromator. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 247, 012007 (2010).

  50. 50.

    , ,  & Effect of charge recombination on the fill factor of small molecule bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 610–617 (2011).

  51. 51.

    Nika: software for two-dimensional data reduction. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 45, 324–328 (2012).

Download references


This project has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under Grant Agreement no 607585 project OSNIRO. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Cluster of Excellence ‘Engineering of Advanced Materials’ at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, which is funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the framework of its ‘Excellence Initiative’, Synthetic Carbon Allotropes (SFB953) and Solar Technologies go Hybrid (SolTech). The authors also acknowledge the Solar Factory of the Future as part of the Energy Campus Nuremberg (EnCN), which is supported by the Bavarian State Government (FKZ 20-3043.5). X-ray and SIMS analysis by NCSU was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and Engineering under Contract DE-FG02-98ER45737. X-ray data were acquired at beamlines, 7.3.3 and at the Advanced Light Source, which is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. A. L. D. Kilcoyne, E. Schaible, C. Zhu, A. Hexemer, C. Wang and A. Young of the ALS (DOE) assisted with the measurements and provided instrument maintenance. X.J. acknowledges the use of the Analytical Instrumentation Facility (AIF) at North Carolina State University, which is supported by the State of North Carolina and the National Science Foundation. S. Mukherjee and M. Ghasemi from NCSU are acknowledged for providing comments about the manuscript.

Author information


  1. Institute of Materials for Electronics and Energy Technology (I-MEET), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Martensstraße 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

    • Nicola Gasparini
    • , Thomas Heumueller
    • , Gebhard J. Matt
    • , Stefanie Fladischer
    • , Christoph J. Brabec
    •  & Tayebeh Ameri
  2. Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, 2401 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA

    • Xuechen Jiao
    •  & Harald Ade
  3. Department of Chemistry and Centre for Plastic Electronics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

    • Derya Baran
  4. Center for Nanoanalysis and Electron Microscopy (CENEM), Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

    • Stefanie Fladischer
    •  & Erdmann Spiecker
  5. Bavarian Center for Applied Energy Research (ZAE Bayern), Haberstrasse 2a, 91058 Erlangen, Germany

    • Christoph J. Brabec


  1. Search for Nicola Gasparini in:

  2. Search for Xuechen Jiao in:

  3. Search for Thomas Heumueller in:

  4. Search for Derya Baran in:

  5. Search for Gebhard J. Matt in:

  6. Search for Stefanie Fladischer in:

  7. Search for Erdmann Spiecker in:

  8. Search for Harald Ade in:

  9. Search for Christoph J. Brabec in:

  10. Search for Tayebeh Ameri in:


N.G., T.A. and C.J.B. conceived and developed the ideas. N.G. designed the experiments and performed device fabrication, electrical characterization and data analysis. N.G. performed Photo-CELIV, TPV and CE measurements under the supervision of G.J.M.; X.J. performed GIWAXS, R-SoXS and SIMS measurements and analysed the data under the supervision of H.A.; S.F. performed TEM measurements under the supervision of E.S.; N.G. and X.J. wrote the manuscript and T.H., D.B., C.J.B., H.A. and T.A. contributed to revisions of the manuscript. The projects were supervised by T.A., C.J.B. and H.A.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicola Gasparini or Christoph J. Brabec or Tayebeh Ameri.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Figs 1–13, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, and Supplementary Methods

About this article

Publication history





Further reading