Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

A commercialization strategy for carbon-negative energy

Nature Energy volume 1, Article number: 15002 (2016) Cite this article

Subjects

Climate change mitigation requires gigatonne-scale CO2 removal technologies, yet few examples exist beyond niche markets. The flexibility of thermochemical conversion of biomass and fossil energy, coupled with carbon capture and storage, offers a route to commercializing carbon-negative energy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Flow diagrams for carbon capture and storage processes.
Figure 2: Lifecycle GHG carbon intensity for IGCC-CCS facilities.

References

  1. Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration (The National Academies Press, 2015).

  2. Sanchez, D. L., Nelson, J. H., Johnston, J., Mileva, A. & Kammen, D. M. Nature Clim. Change 5, 230–234 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuss, S. et al. Nature Clim. Change 4, 850–853 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Finley, R. J. Greenhouse Gases Sci. Technol. 4, 571–579 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll, A. & Somerville, C. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60, 165–182 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, G., Larson, E. D., Williams, R. H., Kreutz, T. G. & Guo, X. Energy Fuels 25, 415–437 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boerrigter, H. & van der Drift, A. Biosyngas: Description of R&D Trajectory Necessary to Reach Large-scale Implementation of Renewable Syngas from Biomass (Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, 2004); http://go.nature.com/TRoR9k

  8. Floudas, C. A., Elia, J. A. & Baliban, R. C. Comput. Chem. Eng. 41, 24–51 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, G., Larson, E. D., Williams, R. H. & Guo, X. Energy Fuels 29, 1845–1859 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Agrawal, R., Singh, N. R., Ribeiro, F. H. & Delgass, W. N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4828–4833 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenhouse Gas Reductions in the Power Industry Using Domestic Coal and Biomass: Volume 1: IGCC (National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2012).

  12. Milne, J. L. & Field, C. B. Assessment Report from the GCEP Workshop on Energy Supply with Negative Carbon Emissions (GCEP, 2012); http://go.nature.com/FhfDS4

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trancik, J. E. Environ. Res. Lett. 1, 014009 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Damen, K. et al. Energy Procedia 4, 1214–1221 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Scott, V., Haszeldine, R. S., Tett, S. F. B. & Oschlies, A. Nature Clim. Change 5, 419–423 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sathaye, K. J., Hesse, M. A., Cassidy, M. & Stockli, D. F. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15332–15337 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lomax, G., Workman, M., Lenton, T. & Shah, N. Energy Policy 78, 125–136 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott, V., Gilfillan, S., Markusson, N., Chalmers, H. & Haszeldine, R. S. Nature Clim. Change 3, 105–111 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato, E. & Yamagata, Y. Earth's Future 2, 421–439 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Model (Argonne National Laboratory, 2014); http://go.nature.com/TjSsWx

  21. Youngs, H. & Somerville, C. Science 344, 1095–1096 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, 94305, California, USA

    Daniel L. Sanchez

  2. Energy and Resources Group, 310 Barrows Hall #3050, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-3050, USA, and at the Richard & Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, 2607 Hearst Avenue, Room 308, Berkeley, California 94720-7320, USA.,

    Daniel M. Kammen

Authors
  1. Daniel L. Sanchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel M. Kammen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel L. Sanchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanchez, D., Kammen, D. A commercialization strategy for carbon-negative energy. Nat Energy 1, 15002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2015.2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2015.2

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing