This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Gleason DF (1966) Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother Rep 50: 125–128
Mosse CA et al. (2004) The prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 28: 394–398
Epstein JI et al. (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29: 1228–1242
Partin AW et al. (1997) Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA 277: 1445–1451
Di Blasio CJ et al. (2003) Predicting clinical end points: treatment nomograms in prostate cancer. Semin Oncol 30: 567–586
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Murphy, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Epstein, J. Does tertiary Gleason score 5 have prognostic significance in men with prostate cancer?. Nat Rev Urol 5, 250–251 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1099
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1099