Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Jemal A et al. (2004) Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 54: 8–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Welch HG et al. (2005) Prostate-specific antigen levels in the United States: implications of various definitions for abnormal. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 1132–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein JI et al. (1998) Nonpalpable stage T1c prostate cancer: prediction of insignificant disease using free/total prostate specific antigen levels and needle biopsy findings. J Urol 160: 2407–2411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klotz L (2005) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: for whom? J Clin Oncol 23: 8165–8169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burnet KL et al. (2007) Does active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer carry psychological morbidity? BJU Int 100: 540–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choo R et al. (2002) Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. J Urol 167: 1664–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Albertsen PC et al. (2005) 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 293: 2095–2101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bill-Axelson A et al. (2005) Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 352: 1977–1984

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker C et al. (2006) A model of the natural history of screen-detected prostate cancer, and the effect of radical treatment on overall survival. Br J Cancer 94: 1361–1368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klotz, L. Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention. Nat Rev Urol 5, 2–3 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0993

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0993

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing