Musculoskeletal problems are very common, and clinical assessment is central to their appropriate management; however, many clinicians are not sufficiently competent to carry out this assessment. A standardized approach to the clinical assessment of a musculoskeletal problem is, therefore, necessary, whether the patient is presenting to primary care, rheumatology or orthopedics. Such a standardized approach gives a benchmark for this competency and can also be used as a teaching aid. As doctors become increasingly competent in clinical assessment and reach into training programs within musculoskeletal specialities, more detailed information will be required from the medical history of the patient, in addition to the use of special tests on clinical examination. These clinical skills need to be taught and also assessed.
Assessment of the musculoskeletal system should be as thorough as that of other organ systems
Assessment of the musculoskeletal system needs to be systematic and sequential; look, feel and move—active and passive
Clinical examination of the musculoskeletal system involves many specific tests, but only a limited number needs to be mastered (except by a specialist)
A rapid screening assessment should be included in all standard clinical examinations of any patient
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Woolf AD and Pfleger B (2003) Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Organ 81: 646–656
Woolf AD et al. (2004) Global core recommendations for a musculoskeletal undergraduate curriculum. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 517–524
Woolf AD (2007) What healthcare services do people with musculoskeletal conditions need? The role of rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 281–282
Wadey VM et al. (2007) Canadian multidisciplinary core curriculum for musculoskeletal health. J Rheumatol 34: 567–580
European Action Towards Better Musculoskeletal Health (2004) [http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_projects/2000/promotion/ fp_promotion_2000_exs_15_en.pdf] (accessed 17 October 2007)
Ahern MJ et al. (1991) The musculo-skeletal examination: a neglected clinical skill. Aust N Z J Med 21: 303–306
Doherty DA et al. (2001) Lifetime and five-year age-specific risks of first and subsequent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12: 16–23
Freedman KB and Bernstein J (1998) The adequacy of medical school education in musculoskeletal medicine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 1421–1427
Lynch JR (2006) Important demographic variables impact the musculoskeletal knowledge and confidence of academic primary care physicians. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88: 1589–1595
Woolf AD et al. (2004) Musculoskeletal pain in Europe: its impact and a comparison of population and medical perceptions of treatment in eight European countries. Ann Rheum Dis 63: 342–347
Åkesson K et al. (2003) Improved education in musculoskeletal conditions is necessary for all doctors. Bull World Health Organ 81: 677–683
Coady DA et al. (2004) Teaching medical students musculoskeletal examination skills: identifying barriers to learning and ways of overcoming them. Scand J Rheumatol 33: 47–51
The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (2005) CanMEDS 2005 Framework [http://meds.queensu.ca/medicine/obgyn/pdf/CanMEDS_2005_Framework.pdf] (accessed 17 October 2007)
van der Heijde DM (1993) Development of a disease activity score based on judgment in clinical practice by rheumatologists. J Rheumatol 20: 579–581
Bellamy N et al. (1997) Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol 24: 2413–2415
World Health Organization (2001) The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
Doherty M et al. (1992) The 'GALS' locomotor screen. Ann Rheum Dis 51: 1165–1169
Saleh K et al. (2004) Development and evaluation of an integrated musculoskeletal disease course for medical students. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 1653–1658
Badcock LJ et al. (2006) Meeting the needs of increasing numbers of medical students—a best practice approach. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45: 799–803
Bideau M et al. (2006) Benefits of a programme taking advantage of patient-instructors to teach and assess musculoskeletal skills in medical students. Ann Rheum Dis 65: 1626–1630
Hendry GD et al. (1999) Patients teach students: partners in arthritis education. Med Educ 33: 674–677
Smith MD et al. (2000) Evaluation of patient partners in the teaching of the musculoskeletal examination. J Rheumatol 27: 1533–1537
Woolf AD et al. (2006) Improving patient care by involving people with arthritis as educators of primary care physicians: the revised Patient Partner Programme. Ann Rheum Dis 65 (Suppl 2): 620
Biggs J (2003) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: what the student does (Society for Research into Higher Education), edn 2. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Woolf, A., Åkesson, K. Primer: history and examination in the assessment of musculoskeletal problems. Nat Rev Rheumatol 4, 26–33 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncprheum0673
Medical Science Educator (2020)
Rheumatology International (2015)
Teaching musculoskeletal examination skills to UK medical students: A comparative survey of Rheumatology and Orthopaedic education practice
BMC Medical Education (2014)
Sensitivity of standardised musculoskeletal examination of the hand and wrist joints in detecting arthritis in comparison to ultrasound findings in patients attending rheumatology clinics
Clinical Rheumatology (2012)
Musculoskeletal education in US medical schools: lessons from the past and suggestions for the future
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine (2011)