Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

How does extended lymphadenectomy influence practical care for patients with gastric cancer?

Abstract

The recurrence and survival rates in patients with curable gastric cancer remain suboptimal. Debate on the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for the surgical treatment of these patients is, therefore, still ongoing. A randomized, controlled trial by Sasako et al. has examined whether addition of para-aortic nodal dissection to D2 lymphadenectomy improves survival in patients with gastric cancer. The study included 523 patients who were randomly assigned either D2 lymphadenectomy or D2 lymphadenectomy and para-aortic nodal dissection. The results from this trial, whose primary end point was overall survival, demonstrated no additional benefit of lymphadenectomy beyond D2 resection. Management strategies should focus on optimal lymphadenectomy in high-volume hospitals, with evaluation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, to achieve low surgery-related morbidity and mortality, optimal locoregional control and improved survival rates for patients with curable gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hartgrink HH et al. (2004) Extended lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: who may benefit? Final results of the randomized Dutch gastric cancer group trial. J Clin Oncol 22: 2069–2077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cuschieri A et al. (1999) Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group. Br J Cancer 79: 1522–1530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu CW et al. (2006) Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 7: 309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sasako M et al. (2008) D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 359: 453–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hundahl SA et al. (2007) Improved regional control and survival with “low Maruyama Index” surgery in gastric cancer: autopsy findings from the Dutch D1-D2 Trial. Gastric Cancer 10: 84–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. MacDonald JS et al. (2001) Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med 345: 725–730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bilimoria KY et al. (2008) Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 26: 4626–4633

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelis JH van de Velde.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Songun, I., van de Velde, C. How does extended lymphadenectomy influence practical care for patients with gastric cancer?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6, 66–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1300

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1300

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing