Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

VTE and mortality associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer-associated anemia

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary examines a recent systematic review by Bennett et al. that summarized 51 controlled trials of the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) darbepoetin and epoetin in patients with cancer. The review focused exclusively on the safety of this class of drugs. Key findings included an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (previously reported) and poorer overall survival (a new finding) in patients who received ESAs, compared with controls. This commentary discusses the evolving safety concerns regarding ESAs, and highlights the uncertainties about which groups of patients are at risk and whether some administration strategies are safer than others. The regulatory and reimbursement environments for these compounds are in flux, and until additional data are available, a conservative treatment approach is appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bennett CL et al. (2008) Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoetin administration for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia. JAMA 299: 914–924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rizzo JD et al. (2008) Use of epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with cancer: 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 26: 132–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohlius J et al. Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews 2006 Issue 2 Art No.: CD003407. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub4

  4. Wilson J et al. (2007) A systematic review and economic evaluation of epoetin alpha, epoetin beta and darbepoetin alpha in anaemia associated with cancer, especially that attributable to cancer treatment. Health Technol Assess 11: 1–202, iii–iv

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. FDA (online 13 March 2008) FDA briefing document. Oncologic Drugs Advisory Board. [http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/08/briefing/2008-4345b2-01-FDA.pdf] (accessed 24 April 2008)

  6. Phurrough S et al. (2007) Decision memo for erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) for non-renal disease indications (CAG-00383N). [https://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?from2= viewdecisionmemo.asp&id=203&] (accessed 24 April 2008)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David P Steensma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dronca, R., Steensma, D. VTE and mortality associated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in cancer-associated anemia. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 5, 504–505 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1202

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc1202

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing