Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancers: why a standard in Europe and not in the US?

Nature Clinical Practice Oncology volume 1, pages 56–57 (2004)Cite this article

Although surgery is considered the most important part of treating patients with rectal cancer, the additional use of radiotherapy has changed treatment policy dramatically during the last three decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Glimelius B et al. (2003) A systematic overview of radiation therapy effects in rectal cancer. Acta Oncol 42. 476–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Påhlman L and Glimelius B (1990) Pre- or postoperative radiotherapy in rectal and rectosigmoid carcinoma. Report from a randomized multicentre trial. Ann Surg 211: 187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roh MS et al. (2001) Phase III randomized trial of preoperative versus postoperative multimodality therapy in patients with carcinoma of the rectum (NSABP R-03) [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 20: 123

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sauer R et al. (2003) Adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: the German trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Colorectal Dis 5: 406–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Beets-Tan RGH et al. (2001) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margins in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 357: 497–504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med 336: 980–987

  7. Kapiteijn E et al. (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345: 638–646

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bosset JF et al. (2000) Preoperative radiochemotherapy versus preoperative radiotherapy with or without postoperative chemotherapy: progress report of the EORTC 22921 trial [abstract]. Radiother Oncol 56: s52

    Google Scholar 

  9. Conroy T et al. (2004) Preoperative (preop) radiotherapy (RT) + 5FU/folinic acid (FA) in T3,4 rectal cancers: preliminary results of the FFCD 9203 randomized trial. [abstract] Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 23: a3626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Francois Y et al. (1999) Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17: 2396–2402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bujko K et al. (2004) Sphincter preservation following preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: report of a randomised trial comparing short-term radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiochemotherapy. Radiother Oncol 72: 15–2475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Colorectal Unit at the Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

    Lars Påhlman

  2. Uppsala University,

    Lars Påhlman

Authors
  1. Lars Påhlman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Påhlman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Påhlman, L. Preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancers: why a standard in Europe and not in the US?. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 1, 56–57 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0039

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncponc0039

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing