Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:

Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: three of the seven deadly sins

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Liebeskind DS et al. (2006) Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials. Neurology 67: 973–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scherer RW et al. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2 Art No.: MR000005. DOI:10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub3.

  3. Dickersin K et al. (1992) Factors influencing publication of research results: follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 267: 374–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan A-W et al. (2004) Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291: 2457–2465

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickersin K (2005) Publication bias: recognizing the problem, understanding its origins and scope, and preventing harm. In Publication Bias in Meta-analysis—Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments, 11–33 (Eds Rothstein HR et al.) New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  6. Olson CM et al. (2002) Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA 28: 2825–2828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lexchin J et al. (2003) Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. BMJ 326: 1167–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenberg RN et al. (2001) Reporting clinical trials: full access to all the data. Arch Neurol 59: 27–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Korn D and Ehringhaus S (2006) Principles for strengthening the integrity of clinical research. PloS Clin Trials 1: e1 [DOI.1371/journal.pctr.0010001]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dickersin K and Rennie D (2003) Registering clinical trials. JAMA 290: 516–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zarin D et al. (2005) Trial registration at between May and October 2005. N Engl J Med 353: 2779–2787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard T Johnson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, R., Dickersin, K. Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: three of the seven deadly sins. Nat Rev Neurol 3, 590–591 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing