Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Drug Insight: immunomodulatory effects of statins—potential benefits for renal patients?

Abstract

Statins inhibit 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, an enzyme crucial to cholesterol synthesis. Drugs of this class reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and stroke, in large part through lipid modulation. Emerging evidence indicates that statins have additional modes of action. These actions, which encompass modification of endothelial function, plaque stability, thrombus formation and inflammatory pathways, are widely referred to as 'pleiotropic effects'. These pleiotropic effects indicate that the therapeutic potential of statins might extend beyond cholesterol lowering and cardiovascular disease to other inflammatory disorders or conditions such as transplantation, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and chronic kidney disease. Experimental and clinical data provide evidence to support these broader applications of statins; however, more large-scale trials are needed to clarify the therapeutic benefit.

Key Points

  • Statins reduce the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease by inhibiting cholesterol synthesis

  • Experimental and clinical evidence indicates that statins exert additional beneficial effects via modulation of immune processes

  • Statins improve clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis and heart transplantation, and reduce the number of inflammatory lesions in multiple sclerosis

  • Preliminary data indicate that statins might reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in people with chronic kidney disease or diabetic nephropathy, as well as slowing disease progression

  • There are conflicting data on the relevance of statins to graft and recipient survival following renal transplantation

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. LaRosa JC (2002) What do the statins tell us? Am Heart J 144 (Suppl): S21–S26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. LaRosa JC et al. (1999) Effect of statins on risk of coronary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 282: 2340–2346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Athyros VG et al. (2002) Treatment with atorvastatin to the National Cholesterol Educational Program goal versus 'usual' care in secondary coronary heart disease prevention. The GREek Atorvastatin and Coronary-heart-disease Evaluation (GREACE) study. Curr Med Res Opin 18: 220–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. [No authors listed] (1994) Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 344: 1383–1389

  5. [No authors listed] (1998) Prevention of cardiovascular events and death with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels: the Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) Study Group. N Engl J Med 339: 1349–1357

  6. [No authors listed] (2002) MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 360: 7–22

  7. Sacks FM et al. (1996) The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels: Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial investigators. N Engl J Med 335: 1001–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Serruys PW et al. (2002) Fluvastatin for prevention of cardiac events following successful first percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 287: 3215–3522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepherd J et al. (1995) Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia: West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 333: 1301–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kobashigawa JA et al. (1995) Effect of pravastatin on outcomes after cardiac transplantation. N Engl J Med 333: 621–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wenke K et al. (1997) Simvastatin reduces graft vessel disease and mortality after heart transplantation: a four-year randomized trial. Circulation 96: 1398–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson BA et al. (2003) Statin use is associated with improved function and survival of lung allografts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167: 1271–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katznelson S et al. (1996) The effect of pravastatin on acute rejection after kidney transplantation—a pilot study. Transplantation 61: 1469–1474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tuncer M et al. (2000) Comparison of the effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients. Transplant Proc 32: 622–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masterson R et al. (2005) Impact of statin treatment on 1-year functional and histologic renal allograft outcome. Transplantation 80: 332–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasiske BL et al. (2001) The effects of lipid-lowering agents on acute renal allograft rejection. Transplantation 72: 223–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Holdaas H et al. (2003) Effect of fluvastatin on cardiac outcomes in renal transplant recipients: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361: 2024–2031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sahu K et al. (2001) Effect of lovastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, on acute renal allograft rejection. Clin Transplant 15: 173–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Veillard NR and Mach F (2002) Statins: the new aspirin? Cell Mol Life Sci 59: 1771–1786

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein JL and Brown MS (1990) Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature 343: 425–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Istvan ES and Deisenhofer J (2001) Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 292: 1160–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wennerberg K et al. (2005) The Ras superfamily at a glance. J Cell Sci 118: 843–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Martin G et al. (2001) Statin-induced inhibition of the Rho-signaling pathway activates PPARalpha and induces HDL apoA-I. J Clin Invest 107: 1423–1432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Duez H et al. (2001) PPARS in inflammation, atherosclerosis and thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Risk 8: 187–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Delerive P et al. (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha negatively regulates the vascular inflammatory gene response by negative cross-talk with transcription factors NF-kappaB and AP-1. J Biol Chem 274: 32048–32054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanada T and Yoshimura A (2002) Regulation of cytokine signaling and inflammation. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 13: 413–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ortego M et al. (1999) Atorvastatin reduces NF-kappaB activation and chemokine expression in vascular smooth muscle cells and mononuclear cells. Atherosclerosis 147: 253–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zelvyte I et al. (2002) Modulation of inflammatory mediators and PPARgamma and NFkappaB expression by pravastatin in response to lipoproteins in human monocytes in vitro. Pharmacol Res 45: 147–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hansson GK (2005) Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 352: 1685–1695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ridker PM et al. (2005) C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. N Engl J Med 352: 20–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kent SM et al. (2003) Effect of atorvastatin and pravastatin on serum C-reactive protein. Am Heart J 145: e8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bickel C et al. (2002) Relation of markers of inflammation (C-reactive protein, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and leukocyte count) and statin therapy to long-term mortality in patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 89: 901–908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ridker PM (2003) Rosuvastatin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients with low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: rationale and design of the JUPITER trial. Circulation 108: 2292–2297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rezaie-Majd A et al. (2002) Simvastatin reduces expression of cytokines interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22: 1194–1199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Waehre T et al. (2003) Hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors down-regulate chemokines and chemokine receptors in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 1460–1467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Waehre T et al. (2004) Increased expression of interleukin-1 in coronary artery disease with downregulatory effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Circulation 109: 1966–1972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Inoue I et al. (2000) Lipophilic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor has an anti-inflammatory effect: reduction of mRNA levels for interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, cyclooxygenase-2, and p22phox by regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) in primary endothelial cells. Life Sci 67: 863–876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Veillard NR et al. (2005) Simvastatin modulates chemokine and chemokine receptor expression by geranylgeranyl isoprenoid pathway in human endothelial cells and macrophages. Atherosclerosis [doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.10.015]

  39. Nakashima Y et al. (1998) Upregulation of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 at atherosclerosis-prone sites on the endothelium in the ApoE-deficient mouse. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 18: 842–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chung HK et al. (2002) Statin inhibits interferon-gamma-induced expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Exp Mol Med 34: 451–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rezaie-Majd A et al. (2003) Simvastatin reduces the expression of adhesion molecules in circulating monocytes from hypercholesterolemic patients. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 23: 397–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Leung BP et al. (2003) A novel anti-inflammatory role for simvastatin in inflammatory arthritis. J Immunol 170: 1524–1530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Aktas O et al. (2003) Treatment of relapsing paralysis in experimental encephalomyelitis by targeting Th1 cells through atorvastatin. J Exp Med 197: 725–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Youssef S et al. (2002) The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, promotes a Th2 bias and reverses paralysis in central nervous system autoimmune disease. Nature 420: 78–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Walters CE et al. (2002) Inhibition of Rho GTPases with protein prenyltransferase inhibitors prevents leukocyte recruitment to the central nervous system and attenuates clinical signs of disease in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. J Immunol 168: 4087–4094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Greenwood J et al. (2003) Lovastatin inhibits brain endothelial cell Rho-mediated lymphocyte migration and attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. FASEB J 17: 905–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McCarey DW et al. (2004) Trial of Atorvastatin in Rheumatoid Arthritis (TARA): double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 363: 2015–2021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vollmer T et al. (2004) Oral simvastatin treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 363: 1607–1608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Abud-Mendoza C et al. (2003) Therapy with statins in patients with refractory rheumatic diseases: a preliminary study. Lupus 12: 607–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shimizu K et al. (2003) Direct anti-inflammatory mechanisms contribute to attenuation of experimental allograft arteriosclerosis by statins. Circulation 108: 2113–2120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kwak B et al. (2000) Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nat Med 6: 1399–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Weitz-Schmidt G et al. (2001) Statins selectively inhibit leukocyte function antigen-1 by binding to a novel regulatory integrin site. Nat Med 7: 687–692

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lentine KL and Brennan DC (2004) Statin use after renal transplantation: a systematic quality review of trial-based evidence. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 2378–2386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Aull MJ (2004) Chronic allograft nephropathy: pathogenesis and management of an important posttransplant complication. Prog Transplant 14: 82–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Johnson DW et al. (1999) In vitro effects of simvastatin on tubulointerstitial cells in a human model of cyclosporin nephrotoxicity. Am J Physiol 276: F467–F475

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rogler G et al. (1995) Effects of fluvastatin on growth of porcine and human vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Am J Cardiol 76: 114A–116A

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Laufs U et al. (1998) Upregulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase by HMG CoA reductase inhibitors. Circulation 97: 1129–1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hernandez-Perera O et al. (1998) Effects of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, atorvastatin and simvastatin, on the expression of endothelin-1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular endothelial cells. J Clin Invest 101: 2711–2719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Laufs U (2003) Beyond lipid-lowering: effects of statins on endothelial nitric oxide. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58: 719–731

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Harris KP et al. (1990) Lovastatin ameliorates the development of glomerulosclerosis and uremia in experimental nephrotic syndrome. Am J Kidney Dis 15: 16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Usui H et al. (2003) HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by its pleiotropic effects in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18: 265–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Wanner C et al. (2000) Impact of dyslipidaemia in renal transplant recipients. Curr Opin Urol 10: 77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Remuzzi G et al. (1997) Understanding the nature of renal disease progression. Kidney Int 51: 2–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Keane WF (2000) The role of lipids in renal disease: future challenges. Kidney Int Suppl 75: S27–S31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fried LF et al. (2001) Effect of lipid reduction on the progression of renal disease: a meta-analysis. Kidney Int 59: 260–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cantarovich F and Rangoonwala B (2003) Therapeutic effects of angiotensin II inhibition or blockade on the progression of chronic renal disease. Int J Clin Pract 57: 801–822

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Zoja C et al. (2002) Effect of combining ACE inhibitor and statin in severe experimental nephropathy. Kidney Int 61: 1635–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zoja C et al. (2002) How to fully protect the kidney in a severe model of progressive nephropathy: a multidrug approach. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 2898–2908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Wilson SH et al. (2003) Lipid-lowering-independent effects of simvastatin on the kidney in experimental hypercholesterolaemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18: 703–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Christensen M et al. (2006) Simvastatin protection against acute immune-mediated glomerulonephritis in mice. Kidney Int 69: 457–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Danesh FR et al. (2002) 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase inhibitors prevent high glucose-induced proliferation of mesangial cells via modulation of Rho GTPase/p21 signaling pathway: implications for diabetic nephropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 8301–8305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Zeng L et al. (2005) HMG CoA reductase inhibition modulates VEGF-induced endothelial cell hyperpermeability by preventing RhoA activation and myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation. FASEB J 19: 1845–1847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Gueler F et al. (2002) Postischemic acute renal failure is reduced by short-term statin treatment in a rat model. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 2288–2298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Yokota N et al. (2003) Protective effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor on experimental renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Nephrol 23: 13–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Sabbatini M et al. (2004) Atorvastatin improves the course of ischemic acute renal failure in aging rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 901–909

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Zuk A et al. (2001) Expression of fibronectin splice variants in the postischemic rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F1037–F1053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Xing Z et al. (1998) IL-6 is an antiinflammatory cytokine required for controlling local or systemic acute inflammatory responses. J Clin Invest 101: 311–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Campese VM et al. (2005) Are 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors renoprotective? J Am Soc Nephrol 16 (Suppl 1): S11–S17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Ezekowitz J et al. (2004) The association among renal insufficiency, pharmacotherapy, and outcomes in 6,427 patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 44: 1587–1592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Tonelli M et al. (2005) Effect of pravastatin in people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 3748–3754

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vidt DG et al. (2004) Rosuvastatin-induced arrest in progression of renal disease. Cardiology 102: 52–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Tonelli M et al. (2003) Effect of pravastatin on loss of renal function in people with moderate chronic renal insufficiency and cardiovascular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 1605–1613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Tonelli M et al. (2005) Biomarkers of inflammation and progression of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 68: 237–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Tonelli M et al. (2005) Effect of pravastatin on rate of kidney function loss in people with or at risk for coronary disease. Circulation 112: 171–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Athyros VG et al. (2004) The effect of statins versus untreated dyslipidaemia on renal function in patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study. J Clin Pathol 57: 728–734

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Collins R et al. (2003) MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 361: 2005–2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bianchi S et al. (2003) A controlled, prospective study of the effects of atorvastatin on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 565–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. McTaggart F (2003) Comparative pharmacology of rosuvastatin. Atheroscler Suppl 4: S9–S14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Scott LJ et al. (2004) Rosuvastatin: a review of its use in the management of dyslipidemia. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 4: 117–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Olsson GO (2004) Safety and efficacy of rosuvastatin. Lancet 364: 135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Wolfe SM (2004) Dangers of rosuvastatin identified before and after FDA approval. Lancet 363: 2189–2190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Davidson MH (2004) Rosuvastatin safety: lessons from the FDA review and post-approval surveillance. Expert Opin Drug Saf 3: 547–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Cohen JS (2004) Should rosuvastatin be withdrawn from the market? Lancet 364: 1579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Brewer HB Jr (2003) Benefit–risk assessment of rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams. Am J Cardiol 92: 23K–29K

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Alsheikh-Ali AA et al. (2005) The safety of rosuvastatin as used in common clinical practice: a postmarketing analysis. Circulation 111: 3051–3057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Wanner C et al. (2004) Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes on hemodialysis (4D study): demographic and baseline characteristics. Kidney Blood Press Res 27: 259–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Fellstrom BC et al. (2003) Why do we need a statin trial in hemodialysis patients? Kidney Int Suppl: S204–S206

  98. Baigent C and Landry M (2003) Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP). Kidney Int Suppl: S207–S210

  99. Eto M et al. (2002) Statin prevents tissue factor expression in human endothelial cells: role of Rho/Rho-kinase and Akt pathways. Circulation 105: 1756–1759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Wassmann S et al. (2001) HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors improve endothelial dysfunction in normocholesterolemic hypertension via reduced production of reactive oxygen species. Hypertension 37: 1450–1457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Nickenig G et al. (1999) Statin-sensitive dysregulated AT1 receptor function and density in hypercholesterolemic men. Circulation 100: 2131–2134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Weisstuch JM and Dworkin LD (1992) Does essential hypertension cause end-stage renal disease? Kidney Int Suppl 36: S33–S37

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhou MS et al. (2004) Atorvastatin prevents end-organ injury in salt-sensitive hypertension: role of eNOS and oxidant stress. Hypertension 44: 186–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Glorioso N et al. (1999) Effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension and primary hypercholesterolemia. Hypertension 34: 1281–1286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Prasad GV et al. (2003) Blood pressure reduction with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in renal transplant recipients. Kidney Int 63: 360–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Lee TM et al. (2002) Effect of pravastatin on proteinuria in patients with well-controlled hypertension. Hypertension 40: 67–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Lee TM et al. (2005) Add-on and withdrawal effect of pravastatin on proteinuria in hypertensive patients treated with AT receptor blockers. Kidney Int 68: 779–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Cannon CP et al. (2004) Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 350: 1495–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Mach.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steffens, S., Mach, F. Drug Insight: immunomodulatory effects of statins—potential benefits for renal patients?. Nat Rev Nephrol 2, 378–387 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0217

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0217

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing