Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

East meets the West—portal pressure predicts outcome of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract

Surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is a safe treatment if proper selection criteria and state-of-the-art surgical techniques are applied. In surgical candidates with the same Child–Pugh classification, long-term outcome after resection depends on the presence of portal hypertension and multifocality of the tumor. Best outcomes are achieved in patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma and no portal hypertension, the presence of which can be accurately established by hepatic vein catheterization or indirectly inferred by findings such as low platelet count, splenomegaly and esophageal varices. Patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinoma and/or portal hypertension have, by contrast, a significantly lower survival rate. Results from the study by Ishizawa et al. carried out in a Japanese institution ultimately validate Western studies. East and West can now share criteria to select the best candidates for surgery, and consider for the nonoptimal cases those other options that might offer better outcomes (transplantation) or similar outcomes to surgery with lower invasiveness and cost (ablation).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Bruix J et al. (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35: 421–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruix J and Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42: 1208–1236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzaferro V et al. (1996) Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 334: 693–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Livraghi T et al. (2008) Sustained complete response and complications rates after radiofrequency ablation of very early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: is resection still the treatment of choice? Hepatology 47: 82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaugrand M et al. (2005) Local/regional and systemic treatments of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis 25: 201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishizawa T et al. (2008) Neither multiple tumors nor portal hypertension are operative contraindications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 134: 1908–1916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Llovet JM et al. (1999) Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology 30: 1434–1440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Varela M et al. (2007) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 46: 474–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

CIBEREHD is funded by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Bruix.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forner, A., Bruix, J. East meets the West—portal pressure predicts outcome of surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6, 14–15 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1300

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep1300

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing