This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Winawer SJ et al. (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329: 1977–1981
Rex DK et al. (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112: 24–28
Winawer SJ et al. (2006) Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin 56: 143–159
Rex DK et al. (2002) Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 1296–1308
Simmons DT et al. (2006) Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24: 965–971
Acknowledgements
The synopsis was written by Rachel Jones, Associate Editor, Nature Clinical Practice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collins, P., Watson, A. Is the rate of adenoma detection in colonoscopy influenced by the duration of colonoscope withdrawal?. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 4, 428–429 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0875
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0875