Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Therapy Insight: management of hepatorenal syndrome

Abstract

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), a feared complication of advanced cirrhosis, is characterized by functional renal failure, secondary to renal vasoconstriction in the absence of underlying kidney pathology. Extreme underfilling of the arterial circulation, caused by arterial vasodilation of the splanchnic circulation, activates vasoconstrictor systems, which lead to intense renal vasoconstriction and HRS. Factors predictive for the development of HRS include intense urinary sodium retention, dilutional hyponatremia, low blood pressure, decreased cardiac output, and increased activity of systemic vasoconstrictors. The prognosis for patients with HRS is extremely poor, especially for those with the acute, progressive (type 1) form. Liver transplantation is the best treatment for suitable candidates and should always be the management option considered first. Pharmacologic therapies are aimed at improving renal function to enable patients to survive until transplantation is possible. These therapies are based on plasma expansion with albumin, combined with the use of either vasopressin analogs or α-adrenergic agonists. Other nonpharmacologic therapies, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and albumin dialysis show promise, but experience with these treatments is limited. For prevention of HRS, albumin infusion is recommended in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and pentoxifylline treatment is recommended in patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis.

Key Points

  • Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is at the end of a spectrum of functional renal abnormalities caused by a severe vasoconstriction of the renal circulation

  • Splanchnic vasodilation causing arterial underfilling, a compensatory neurohormonal response that leads to renal vasoconstriction, and a reduction in cardiac output seem to be the main factors responsible for the development of HRS

  • Type 1 HRS is an acute and rapidly progressive form with a very poor prognosis; type 2 HRS is a more stable form with a slightly better prognosis

  • HRS that develops in patients with cirrhosis after spontaneous bacterial peritonitis can be prevented by intravenous albumin and antibiotic therapy

  • Patients with HRS who are transplant candidates should be given high priority for liver transplantation

  • Therapy of HRS should be aimed at reversing the intense splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation with splanchnic vasoconstrictors and plasma expansion as a bridge to liver transplantation; the use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt also seems to be effective in selected cases of HRS

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The pathogenesis of hepatorenal syndrome and its precipitating factors.
Figure 2: Probability of survival of patients with cirrhosis according to the type of hepatorenal syndrome.
Figure 3: Therapeutic options and the aim of therapy for hepatorenal syndrome.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arroyo V et al. (1996) Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology 23: 164–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginès P et al. (2004) Management of cirrhosis and ascites. N Engl J Med 350: 1646–1654

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akriviadis E et al. (2000) Pentoxifylline improves short-term survival in severe acute alcoholic hepatitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology 119: 1637–1648

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore K (1999) Renal failure in acute liver failure. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11: 967–975

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gines A et al. (1993) Incidence, predictive factors, and prognosis of hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 105: 229–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alessandria C et al. (2005) MELD score and clinical type predict prognosis in hepatorenal syndrome: relevance to liver transplantation. Hepatology 41: 1282–1289

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sort P et al. (1999) Effect of intravenous albumin on renal impairment and mortality in patients with cirrhosis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. N Engl J Med 5: 403–409

    Google Scholar 

  8. Epstein M et al. (1970) Renal failure in the patient with cirrhosis. The role of active vasoconstriction. Am J Med 49: 175–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schrier RW et al. (1988) Peripheral arterial vasodilation hypothesis: a proposal for the initiation of renal sodium and water retention in cirrhosis. Hepatology 8: 1151–1157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwakiri Y and Groszmann R (2006) The hyperdynamic circulation of chronic liver diseases: from the patient to the molecule. Hepatology 43 (Suppl 1): S121–S131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernardi M and Domenicali M (2005) The renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system in cirrhosis. In Ascites and renal dysfunction in liver disease, 43–53 (Eds Ginès P et al.) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dudley F and Esler M (2005) The sympathetic nervous system in cirrhosis. In Ascites and renal dysfunction in liver disease, 54–72 (Eds Ginès P et al.) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ishikawa S and Schrier RW (2003) Pathophysiological roles of arginine vasopressin and aquaporin-2 in impaired water excretion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 58: 1–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Arroyo V and Colmenero J (2003) Ascites and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: pathophysiological basis of therapy and current management. J Hepatol 38 (Suppl 1): S69–S89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Terra C et al. (2005) Renal failure in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis unrelated to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Value of MELD score. Gastroenterology 129: 1944–1953

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruiz-del-Arbol L et al. (2005) Circulatory function and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepatology 42: 439–447

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruiz-del-Arbol W et al. (2003) Systemic, renal, and hepatic hemodynamic derangement in cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology 38: 1210–1218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenz K (2005) Hepatorenal syndrome—is it central hypovolemia, a cardiac disease, or part of gradually developing multiorgan dysfunction? Hepatology 42: 263–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cárdenas A and Ginès P (2005) Management of hyponatremia in cirrhosis. In Ascites and renal dysfunction in liver disease, 305–314 (Eds Ginès P et al.) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  20. Caregaro L et al. (1994) Limitations of serum creatinine level and creatinine clearance as filtration markers in cirrhosis. Arch Intern Med 154: 201–205

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sherman D et al. (2003) Assessing renal function in cirrhotic patients: problems and pitfalls. Am J Kidney Dis 41: 269–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cárdenas A (2005) Hepatorenal syndrome: a dreaded complication of end-stage liver disease. Am J Gastroenterology 100: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ginès P et al. (1998) Randomized comparative study of therapeutic paracentesis with and without intravenous albumin in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 94: 1493–1502

    Google Scholar 

  24. Follo A et al. (1994) Renal impairment after spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: incidence, clinical course, predictive factors and prognosis. Hepatology 20: 1495–1501

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Angeli P et al. (2006) Switch therapy with ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis: similar efficacy at lower cost. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23: 75–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cárdenas A et al. (2001) Renal failure after upper gastrointestinal bleeding in cirrhosis. Incidence, clinical course, predictive factors and short-term prognosis. Hepatology 34: 671–676

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Guevara M et al. (2004) Effects of contrast media on renal function in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective study. Hepatology 40: 646–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Watt K et al. (2002) Hepatorenal syndrome: diagnostic accuracy, clinical features, and outcome in a tertiary care center. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 2046–2050

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Servin-Abad L et al. (2005) Retrospective analysis of 140 patients labeled as hepatorenal syndrome in a referral center [abstract]. Hepatology 42: 543A

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fernandez J et al. (2005) A randomized unblinded pilot study comparing albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Hepatology 42: 627–634

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rimola A et al. (2005) Liver transplantation for patients with cirrhosis and ascites. In Ascites and renal dysfunction in liver disease, 271–285 (Eds Ginès P et al.) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cárdenas A and Ginès P (2005) Management of complications of cirrhosis in patients awaiting liver transplantation. J Hepatol 42 (Suppl 1): S124–S133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Restuccia T et al. (2004) Effects of treatment of hepatorenal syndrome before transplantation on posttransplantation outcome. A case–control study. J Hepatol 40: 140–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Testino G et al. (2003) Type-2 hepatorenal syndrome and refractory ascites: role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent–shunt in eighteen patients with advanced cirrhosis awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 50: 1753–1755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Brensing KA et al. (2000) Long-term outcome after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent–shunt in non-transplant cirrhotics with hepatorenal syndrome: a phase II study. Gut 47: 288–295

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Alessandria C et al. (2002) Renal failure in cirrhotic patients: role of terlipressin in clinical approach to hepatorenal syndrome type 2. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14: 1363–1368

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Arroyo V et al. (2005) Hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. In Ascites and renal dysfunction in liver disease, 341–359 (Eds Ginès P et al.) Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  38. Angeli P et al. (1999) Reversal of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome with the administration of midodrine and octreotide. Hepatology 29: 1690–1697

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fevery J et al. (1990) Reversal of hepatorenal syndrome in four patients by peroral misoprostol (prostaglandin E1 analogue) and albumin administration. J Hepatol 11: 153–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gines A et al. (1993) Oral misoprostol or intravenous prostaglandin E2 do not improve renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites with hyponatremia or renal failure. J Hepatol 17: 220–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Soper CP et al. (1996) Amelioration of hepatorenal syndrome with selective endothelin-A antagonist. Lancet 347: 1842–1843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holt S et al. (1999) Improvement in renal function in hepatorenal syndrome with N-acetylcysteine. Lancet 353: 294–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guevara M et al. (1998) Reversibility of hepatorenal syndrome by prolonged administration of ornipressin and plasma volume expansion. Hepatology 27: 35–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gulberg V et al. (1999) Long-term therapy and retreatment of hepatorenal syndrome type 1 with ornipressin and dopamine. Hepatology 30: 870–875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hadengue A et al. (1998) Beneficial effects of the 2-day administration of terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and hepatorenal syndrome. J Hepatol 29: 565–570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Uriz J et al. (2000) Terlipressin plus albumin infusion: an effective and safe therapy of hepatorenal syndrome. J Hepatol 33: 43–48

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moreau R et al. (2002) Terlipressin in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: a retrospective multicenter study. Gastroenterology 122: 923–930

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ortega R et al. (2002) Terlipressin therapy with and without albumin for patients with hepatorenal syndrome. Results of a prospective, non-randomized study. Hepatology 36: 41–48

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mulkay JP et al. (2001) Long-term terlipressin administration improves renal function in cirrhotic patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: a pilot study. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 64: 15–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Halimi C et al. (2002) Effect of terlipressin (glypressin) on hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhotic patients: results of a multicentre pilot study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14: 153–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Colle I et al. (2002) Clinical course, predictive factors and prognosis in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome treated with terlipressin: a retrospective analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17: 882–888

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Solanki P et al. (2003) Beneficial effects of terlipressin in hepatorenal syndrome: a prospective, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18: 152–156

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Saner F et al. (2004) Terlipressin and gelafundin: safe therapy of hepatorenal syndrome. Eur J Med Res 9: 78–82

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Saner FH et al. (2003) Terlipressin plus hydroxyethyl starch infusion: an effective treatment for hepatorenal syndrome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 15: 925–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gluud LL et al. (2005) Terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews J Hepatol 42 (Suppl 2): 81

    Google Scholar 

  56. Wong F et al. (2004) Midodrine, octreotide, albumin, and TIPS in selected patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome. Hepatology 40: 55–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Duvoux C et al. (2002) Effects of noradrenaline and albumin in patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: a pilot study. Hepatology 36: 374–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Arroyo V et al. (2005) Circulatory dysfunction in cirrhosis. In Update in Treatment of Liver Disease, 19–28 (Eds Arroyo V et al.) Barcelona: Ars Medica

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pomier-Layrargues G et al. (2003) Octreotide in hepatorenal syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Hepatology 38: 238–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Boyer TD and Haskal Z (2005) The role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the management of portal hypertension. Hepatology 41: 386–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Guevara M et al. (1998) Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in hepatorenal syndrome: effects on renal function and vasoactive systems. Hepatology 28: 416–422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. D'Amico G et al. (2005) Uncovered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 129: 1282–1293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Albillos A et al. (2005) A meta-analysis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus paracentesis for refractory ascites. J Hepatol 43: 990–996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kapling RK and Bastani B (2004) The clinical course of patients with type 1 hepatorenal syndrome maintained on hemodialysis. Ren Fail 26: 563–568

    Google Scholar 

  65. Keller F et al. (1995) Risk factors and outcome of 107 patients with decompensated liver disease and acute renal failure (including 26 patients with hepatorenal syndrome): the role of hemodialysis. Ren Fail 17: 135–146

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Mitzer SR et al. (2000) Improvement of hepatorenal syndrome with extracorporeal albumin dialysis MARS: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Liver Transpl 6: 277–286

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rifai K et al. (2005) The Prometheus device for extracorporeal support of combined liver and renal failure. Blood Purif 23: 298–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pere Ginès.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cárdenas, A., Ginès, P. Therapy Insight: management of hepatorenal syndrome. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 3, 338–348 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0517

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpgasthep0517

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing