Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Clinical Advance
  • Published:

In the era of multislice CT, do we still need leg ultrasonography to diagnose pulmonary embolism?

Abstract

The results of a multicenter, randomized, prospective, noninferiority trial by Righini et al., together with the low prevalence of a positive CT venography (CTV) scan alone shown by many other investigators, indicate that leg studies after multislice CT angiography for thromboembolism are redundant. The proportion of diagnoses that are made on the basis of a positive CTV scan in patients with a negative multislice CT angiography scan, however, is 14% on average. The diagnostic yield of CTV and of compression ultrasound could be increased by their select use in patients who are likely to have deep-vein thrombosis. Radiation exposure from CTV can be reduced by eliminating imaging of the pelvic veins and by obtaining discontinuous axial images of the proximal leg veins. There are several valid reasons for recommending or not recommending leg studies in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism, and the choice of diagnostic tests should be individualized on a patient-by-patient basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Stein PD et al. for the PIOPED II Investigators (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 354: 2317–2327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein PD et al. for the PIOPED II Investigators (2006) Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators. Am J Med 119: 1048–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodman LR et al. (2007) CT venography for deep venous thrombosis: continuous images versus reformatted discontinuous images using PIOPED II data. Am J Roentgenol 189: 409–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Righini M et al. (2008) Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by multidetector CT alone or combined with venous ultrasonography of the leg: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 371: 1343–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van Belle A et al. for the Christopher Study Investigators (2006) Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA 295: 172–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perrier A et al. (2005) Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 352: 1760–1768

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein PD et al. (2006) Outcome studies of pulmonary embolism versus accuracy: they do not equate. Thromb Haemost 96: 107–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stein PD et al. (1995) Untreated patients with pulmonary embolism: outcome, clinical, and laboratory assessment. Chest 107: 931–935

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul D Stein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, P., Goodman, L. & Sostman, H. In the era of multislice CT, do we still need leg ultrasonography to diagnose pulmonary embolism?. Nat Rev Cardiol 5, 688–689 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1345

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio1345

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing