Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Chimerism and microchimerism of the human heart: evidence for cardiac regeneration

Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine volume 4, pages S40–S45 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

For decades, it has been widely accepted that the heart is a terminally differentiated organ that is unable to regenerate. Studies of recipients of hearts donated by other humans have shed light on the regenerative potential of the human heart. Investigators have been able to trace the Y chromosome by fluorescence in situ hybridization or polymerase chain reaction, or both, in sex-mismatched heart recipients. Cardiac chimerism has been reported, with concentrations of chimeric cells ranging from 0.04% to 10.0%. Cardiac chimerism after bone marrow or progenitor cell transplantation has also been reported to a low extent (∼0.20%), suggesting that a fraction of the extracardiac cells that colonize the myocardium are of bone marrow origin. Cardiac chimerism after pregnancy with male offspring (fetal cell microchimerism) has also been demonstrated. Cells of fetal origin have been shown to be capable of differentiating into myocardial cells. Collectively, we show that chimerism studies provide a proof of concept of a process that it is likely to be part of normal cardiac homeostasis in humans but apparently insufficient for cardiac repair in diseased hearts.

Key Points

  • Cardiac chimerism occurs after heart transplantation to a small extent, but this effect is unable to meet long-term demand for organ repair

  • A percentage of chimeric cells that home to the myocardium are of bone marrow origin

  • Cardiac chimerism after pregnancy with a male offspring (fetal cell microchimerism) has also been demonstrated

  • Future studies must address unresolved issues, such as the mechanisms responsible for myocardial differentiation of primitive cells

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Cardiac chimerism after heart transplantation
Figure 2: Cardiac chimerism after bone marrow or progenitor cell transplantation
Figure 3: Fetal cell cardiac microchimerism after pregnancy

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kajstura J et al. (1998) Myocyte proliferation in end-stage cardiac failure in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 8801–8805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Beltrami AP et al. (2001) Evidence that human cardiac myocytes divide after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 344: 1750–1757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Orlic D et al. (2001) Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature 410: 701–705

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jackson KA et al. (2001) Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin Invest 107: 1395–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tomita S et al. (1999) Autologous transplantation of bone marrow cells improves damaged heart function. Circulation 100: II247–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Quaini F et al. (2002) Chimerism of the transplanted heart. N Engl J Med 346: 5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Laflamme MA et al. (2002) Evidence for cardiomyocyte repopulation by extracardiac progenitors in transplanted human hearts. Circ Res 90: 634–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Muller P et al. (2002) Cardiomyocytes of noncardiac origin in myocardial biopsies of human transplanted hearts. Circulation 106: 31–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bayes-Genis A et al. (2002) Host cell-derived cardiomyocytes in sex-mismatch cardiac allografts. Cardiovasc Res 56: 404–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glaser R et al. (2002) Smooth muscle cells, but not myocytes, of host origin in transplanted human hearts. Circulation 106: 17–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor DA et al. (2002) Cardiac chimerism as a mechanism for self-repair: does it happen and if so to what degree? Circulation 106: 2–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deb A et al. (2003) Bone marrow-derived cardiomyocytes are present in adult human heart: A study of gender-mismatched bone marrow transplantation patients. Circulation 107: 1247–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bayes-Genis A et al. (2004) Cardiac chimerism in recipients of peripheral-blood and bone marrow stem cells. Eur J Heart Fail 6: 399–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Orlic D et al. (2001) Mobilized bone marrow cells repair the infarcted heart, improving function and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 10344–10349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ince H et al. (2005) Preservation from left ventricular remodeling by front-integrated revascularization and stem cell liberation in evolving acute myocardial infarction by use of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (FIRSTLINE-AMI). Circulation 112: 3097–3106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zohlnhöfer D et al. (2006) Stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 295: 1003–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dimmeler S et al. (2005) Unchain my heart: the scientific foundations of cardiac repair. J Clin Invest 115: 572–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmorl G (1893) Pathologisch-anatomische Untersuchungen ueber Puerperal-Eklampsie. Leipzig: Verlag von FCW Vogel

    Google Scholar 

  19. Evans PC et al. (1999) Long-term fetal microchimerism in peripheral blood mononuclear cell subsets in healthy women and women with scleroderma. Blood 93: 2033–2037

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bianchi DW et al. (2001) Significant fetal-maternal hemorrhage after termination of pregnancy: implications for development of fetal cell microchimerism. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184: 703–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Khosrotehrani K et al. (2003) The influence of fetal loss on the presence of fetal cell microchimerism: a systematic review. Arthritis Rheum 48: 3237–3241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khosrotehrani K and Bianchi DW (2005) Multi-lineage potential of fetal cells in maternal tissue: a legacy in reverse. J Cell Sci 118: 1559–1563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bianchi DW et al. (1996) Male fetal progenitor cells persist in maternal blood for as long as 27 years postpartum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 705–708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson KL et al. (2001) Fetal cell microchimerism in tissue from multiple sites in women with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Rheum 44: 1848–1851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Srivatsa B et al. (2001) Microchimerism of presumed fetal origin in thyroid specimens from women: a case-control study. Lancet 358: 2034–2038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bayes-Genis A et al. (2005) Identification of male cardiomyocytes of extracardiac origin in the hearts of women with male progeny: male fetal cell microchimerism of the heart. J Heart Lung Transpl 24: 2179–2183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beltrami AP et al. (2003) Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell 114: 763–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Oh H et al. (2003) Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 12313–12318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Balsam LB et al. (2004) Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature 428: 668–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Murry CE et al. (2004) Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts. Nature 428: 664–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Nygren JM et al. (2004) Bone marrow-derived hematopoietic cells generate cardiomyocytes at a low frequency through cell fusion, but not transdifferentiation. Nat Med 10: 494–501

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Eisenberg CA et al. (2006) Bone marrow cells transdifferentiate to cardiomyocytes when introduced into the embryonic heart. Stem Cells 24: 1236–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenzweig A (2006) Cardiac cell therapy–mixed results from mixed cells. N Engl J Med 355: 1274–1277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alvarez-Dolado M et al. (2003) Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature 425: 968–973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ausoni S et al. (2005) Host-derived circulating cells do not significantly contribute to cardiac regeneration in heterotopic rat heart transplants. Cardiovasc Res 68: 394–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the valuable help of Jose Montiel and Prous Science with the artwork. Grant support was provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education (SAF 2004-08044-C03-01), Novartis, BMS, and Fundación Bravo Andreu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. A Bayes-Genis is a cardiologist and translational researcher, S Roura is a postdoctoral fellow in biochemistry, C Prat-Vidal and C Soler-Botija are postdoctoral fellows in biological sciences, J Farré is studying for a PhD in biotechnology, A Bayes de Luna is a cardiologist and clinical researcher, and J Cinca is a cardiologist and translational researcher in the Cardiology Service at the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Institut Català de Ciencies Cardiovasculars, Barcelona, Spain.,

    Antoni Bayes-Genis, Santiago Roura, Cristina Prat-Vidal, Jordi Farré, Carolina Soler-Botija, Antoni Bayes de Luna & Juan Cinca

Authors
  1. Antoni Bayes-Genis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Santiago Roura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cristina Prat-Vidal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jordi Farré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carolina Soler-Botija
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antoni Bayes de Luna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Juan Cinca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoni Bayes-Genis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bayes-Genis, A., Roura, S., Prat-Vidal, C. et al. Chimerism and microchimerism of the human heart: evidence for cardiac regeneration. Nat Rev Cardiol 4 (Suppl 1), S40–S45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0748

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing