Abstract
Background A 28-year-old man presented at hospital with persistent pain in his chest and left arm, a paced rhythm on electrocardiography and elevated levels of cardiac enzymes. He was known to have patent foramen ovale and a dual-chamber pacemaker, which had been implanted following electrophysiological ablation to treat supraventricular tachycardia 3 years previously. The patient did not have a history of cardiovascular risk factors, recent travel, immobilization or clinical features of infection, and he was not taking any medication.
Investigations Electrocardiography, cardiac enzyme studies, coronary angiography and transthoracic echocardiography.
Diagnosis Acute myocardial infarction, paradoxical coronary embolus and patent foramen ovale.
Management Coronary aspiration embolectomy and systemic anticoagulation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
van Rooden CJ et al. (2004) Incidence and risk factors of early venous thrombosis associated with permanent pacemaker leads. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15: 1258–1262
Wilkoff BL (2004) Lead-induced venous thrombosis: consequences? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15: 1263–1264
Wang HJ et al. (2002) Export aspiration catheter thrombosuction before actual angioplasty in primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57: 332–339
Burzotta F et al. (2005) Manual thrombus-aspiration improves myocardial reperfusion: the randomized evaluation of the effect of mechanical reduction of distal embolization by thrombus-aspiration in primary and rescue angioplasty (REMEDIA) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 46: 371–376
Buresly K et al. (2005) Bleeding complications associated with combinations of aspirin, thienopyridine derivatives, and warfarin in elderly patients following acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 165: 784–789
Massel D and Little SH (2001) Risks and benefits of adding anti-platelet therapy to warfarin among patients with prosthetic heart valves: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 569–578
Hagen PT et al. (1984) Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 59: 17–20
Overell JR et al. (2000) Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurology 55: 1172–1179
Martin F et al. (2002) Percutaneous transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism. Circulation 106: 1121–1126
Anzola GP et al. (2004) Does transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale really “shut the door?” A prospective study with transcranial Doppler. Stroke 35: 2140–2144
Wahl A et al. (2005) Transcatheter treatment of atrial septal aneurysm associated with patent foramen ovale for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 45: 377–380
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, A., Ardehali, R., Brinton, T. et al. Successful removal of a paradoxical coronary embolus using an aspiration catheter. Nat Rev Cardiol 3, 633–636 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0681
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0681