Introduction

The worldwide demand for flexible electronics continues to grow rapidly because of their special advantages such as being lightweight, bendable, rugged, portable, rollable and potentially foldable, which have revolutionized several industries ranging from consumer products to the automotive, aerospace and medical industries1,2,3,4,5. To achieve a ‘flexible electronics’ society, well-matched flexible energy storage/conversion devices are recognized as one of the key required components. However, current conventional power sources are too rigid and bulky to be integrated into flexible devices. Several inspirational prototypes have been developed in response including flexible lithium-ion batteries6,7,8,9,10, supercapacitors11,12,13,14,15 and solar cells16,17,18,19. However, the low theoretical energy density of these components intrinsically limits their application in next-generation flexible devices. Fortunately, rechargeable lithium–oxygen (Li–O2) batteries have emerged as one of the most promising electrochemical energy storage technologies because of their exceptionally high theoretical energy density of 3,600 Wh kg−1 (refs 20, 21, 22, 23, 24). Although the development of a flexible Li–O2 battery could theoretically meet the urgent demand for a high energy density battery in flexible devices, because this technology is still in its early stages, numerous scientific and technological challenges must first be overcome for the conventional Li–O2 battery, much less the flexible type. First, the carbon cathode is problematic because the decomposition of carbon material and its promotional effect on electrolyte decomposition leads to carbon cathode passivation and premature battery death25,26. Second, the highly conductive current collector, which includes metal foam and carbon paper, is inflexible. Finally, the cell configuration of conventional Li–O2 batteries (either the coin cell or Swagelok design) is exclusively packed with bulky and rigid stainless steel or engineering plastic. Therefore, there is an urgent need to first design and fabricate mechanically robust, electrochemically stable and highly effective components, as well as create a preferable cell configuration and structural design on the path toward flexible Li–O2 batteries.

We report a strategy to fabricate a flexible, free-standing and recoverable cathode by the seeds-assisted construction of unique hierarchical rutile TiO2 nanowire arrays (TiO2 NAs) grown onto carbon textiles (CT). A highly flexible Li–O2 battery with excellent mechanical strength and superior electrochemical performance, including a high round-trip efficiency, good rate capability and cycling stability, was fabricated by employing TiO2 NAs/CT as both a new class of cathode and current collector to replace the conventional rigid and bulky counterparts. Furthermore, we found that TiO2 NAs/CT exhibits excellent recoverability by simply rinsing after it loses function. This represents a new strategy to significantly extend the cycle life of Li–O2 batteries, which is still strongly limited by the instability of the electrolyte.

Results

Synthesis and analysis of TiO2 NAs grown onto CT

Figure 1a shows the synthesis strategy for producing TiO2 NAs/CT. First, to protect the CT surface effectively, the TiO2 seeds are deposited densely and homogenously onto the carbon fibre of the CT. Then, to accommodate more discharge products in the Li–O2 cell, the TiO2 NAs are grown in situ by the TiO2 seeds-directed coordination self-assembly method. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images show that the pristine–CT is woven by carbon fibre with diameter of ca. 10 μm (Fig. 1b) and that the TiO2 NAs are vertically and homogenously grown onto the skeleton of the CT without the help of any additional binder or solvent (Fig. 1c,d). This ensures the formation of a free-standing structure and a favourable low-resistance pathway for electron transportation. The average diameter of the nanorods is ca. 50 nm (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy image collected at the surface of the TiO2 NAs reveals lattice fringes of 0.32 nm in the (110) planes, corresponding to the rutile TiO2 phase (Supplementary Fig. 1b), which were also confirmed by X-ray diffraction (Fig. 1e). Our measured Raman spectra reveal that both the D- (1,336 cm−1) and G-band (1,597 cm−1) of the pristine–CT nearly vanish from the TiO2 NAs/CT sample (Fig. 1f,g), demonstrating the effective protection of the CT surface by TiO2 NAs16. The SEM image of TiO2 NAs/CT and the corresponding elemental mapping images of C, O and Ti demonstrate the core-shell configuration of TiO2 NAs/CT (Supplementary Fig. 2). More importantly, the obtained TiO2 NAs/CT cathode is high flexible (Supplementary Fig. 3). Compared with its traditional counterpart, this novel cathode features several tailored properties. First, the TiO2 NAs/CT as a free-standing cathode without any polymeric binder can facilitate the high flux of electron transportation throughout the cathode and also avoid the parasitic reaction caused by non-conductive polymeric binder27. Second, the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode effectively avoids a series of issues caused by the carbon cathode, as described in many other reports, such as the degradation of carbon itself and electrolyte decomposition promoted by carbon material25. Finally, the TiO2 NAs/CT is flexible, which is crucial for the assembly of a flexible Li–O2 battery. All of these advantages benefit the electrochemical performance of the flexible Li–O2 battery.

Figure 1: Scheme for fabrication and structure of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode.
figure 1

(a) Schematic representations for the design and preparation of the TiO2 NAs/CT. (b) Scanning electron microscope image and photograph (inset) of pristine–CT (scale bar, 10 μm). (c) SEM image and photograph (inset) of the obtained TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (scale bar, 10 μm). (d) Enlarged image of c with 500-nm scale bars. (e) X-ray diffraction patterns of the obtained TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. The asterisk is indexed to carbon textiles. (f) Raman spectra of the pristine–CT cathode. (g) Raman spectra of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode.

Properties of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode

We constructed a flexible Li–O2 battery device that contained a flexible pristine–CT or TiO2 NAs/CT cathode, a glass fibre separator, and a lithium foil anode (Fig. 2a). Lithium triflate (LiCF3SO3) in tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME) was employed as the electrolyte because of its reported relatively high stability towards superoxide (O2) (refs 28, 29, 30). The first discharge and charge voltage of the Li–O2 battery can be significantly improved with the help of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. This cathode enhances the round-trip efficiency, which is vital for electrochemical energy storage devices (Fig. 2b). Specifically, compared with the Li–O2 cell with a pristine–CT cathode, the discharge voltage and charge voltage of that with a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode is higher by 160 mV and lower by 495 mV, respectively. This result is further supported by the cyclic voltammograms of Li–O2 cells with either a pristine–CT or TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (Fig. 2c). The cell with a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode has a higher peak potential compared with the cell with a pristine–CT cathode, suggesting that TiO2 NAs/CT exhibits better ORR catalytic activity. However, the peak current of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode is lower than that of the pristine–CT cathode, which might be due to the lower conductivity of TiO2 compared with that of pristine–CT. In addition, the Li–O2 cell with a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode exhibits a much higher discharge capacity than that with a pristine–CT cathode (3,000 mAh g−1 versus 770 mAh g−1) (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, to exclude possible electrochemical contributions from the intercalation of lithium ions (Li+) into pristine–CT or TiO2 NAs/CT materials, the initial discharge curves of Li–O2 cells with pristine–CT and TiO2 NAs/CT cathodes under an argon (Ar) atmosphere were also obtained for comparison (Supplementary Fig. 4). Clearly, the background discharge capacity is negligible within the voltage range, which suggests that the above obtained enhanced discharge capacities of the Li–O2 cells are derived from the oxygen reduction. Our rate performance investigations show that the discharge voltage plateau of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode is higher than that of pristine–CT at each current density (Fig. 2e, consistent with Fig. 2b). Furthermore, the cell with the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode can discharge/charge for >356 cycles with a discharge terminal voltage >2.0 V, which is ca. 30 times longer than the cell with the pristine–CT cathode, that is, 12 cycles (Fig. 2f, Supplementary Fig. 5). All of these improvements, including the cyclic stability with the capacity limit of 1,000 mAh g−1 (Supplementary Fig. 6), further confirm the advantages of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode, which may be attributed to the synergistic effect of the high catalytic activity and the tailored free-standing structure of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. TiO2 NAs provides enough void volume for the deposition of discharge products, therefore, resulting in a much enhanced discharge capacity. In general, although charge transfer is the rate-determining process at low current densities, when the current density increases, the mass transfer of lithium ions and oxygen can become the rate-determining process. A uniform oxygen and lithium-ion distribution inside the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode is required to improve the rate capability, especially, at very high current densities31. Furthermore, the morphology and crystallinity of the discharge product in TiO2 NAs/CT cathode also contributes positively to the high specific capacity, rate capability and cycling stability of Li–O2 cells (vide infra).

Figure 2: Cell structure and electrochemical performance.
figure 2

(a) Schematic illustration of the cell assembly composed of TiO2 NAs/CT (cathode), glass fibre (separator) and lithium foil (anode). (b) First discharge–charge curves of the Li–O2 cells with a pristine–CT cathode and a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode at a current density of 100 mA g−1.The specific capacity was limited to 500 mAh g−1. (c) CVs of Li–O2 cells with the two types of cathodes at a constant scan rate of 0.05 mV s−1. (d) Full range test of the Li–O2 cells with a pristine–CT cathode and a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode at a current density of 100 mA g−1. These tested cathodes were discharged with the cutoff voltage limited to 2.2 V and then recharged with the equivalent discharge capacity. (e) The rate capability of the Li–O2 cells with the two types of cathodes at different current densities. (f) Voltage versus cycle number on the discharge terminal of the Li–O2 cell with a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode.

Bending and twisting properties

To demonstrate its potential application in flexible electronics, the as-fabricated flexible Li–O2 battery with a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was used to power a commercial red light-emitting diode display screen (Fig. 3). The terminal discharge voltage of the devices after being bent to 180° (Fig. 3b) and 360° (Fig. 3c) were 2.55 and 2.52 V after 100 cycles, respectively, which was even slightly better than that without bending (2.49 V, Fig. 3a). Even under more stringent conditions, the terminal discharge voltages after 100 cycles were 2.54, 2.51 and 2.52 V at torsion angles of 90° (Fig. 3d), 180° (Fig. 3e) and 360° (Fig. 3f), respectively. Furthermore, it can be seen that the terminal discharge–charge voltage versus cycle number of the device remained almost constant even after 100 cycles, revealing that the electrochemical stability of the fabricated flexible Li–O2 battery is hardly affected by external bending or twisting strains (Supplementary Fig. 7). In addition, the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode also possesses good mechanical integrity even after twisting for 1,000 cycles (Supplementary Fig. 8). These results collectively demonstrate the excellent flexibility of this newly constructed flexible Li–O2 device, and no structural failure was observed after various bending and twisting tests.

Figure 3: The bending and twisting properties of the Li–O2 battery device.
figure 3

(ac) The bending properties with the device bent to 0°, 180° and 360°, respectively. (df) The twisting properties with the device twisted to 90°, 180° and 360°, respectively. The corresponding variation of terminal discharge voltage versus cycle number of the Li–O2 cells with TiO2 NAs/CT cathode is shown in each panel.

Analysis of the discharge products

The discharge products of the Li–O2 battery with a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Fig. 4a,b) The peaks positioned at 55.5 and 531.9 eV can be assigned to the Li–O bond of lithium peroxides (Li2O2)32, which is supported by the equilibrium potential of the Li–O2 battery of ca. 2.9 V (theoretical formation potential of Li2O2) obtained using the galvanostatic intermittent titration technique (Fig. 4c)33. However, when compared with X-ray diffraction patterns of the discharged pristine–CT cathode (Fig. 4d), the characteristic peaks of Li2O2 were not observed in the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode, demonstrating the amorphous nature of Li2O2 formed in the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. It has been reported that TiO2 NAs may possess a suitable oxygen binding energy and high affinity for oxygen coverage. This would lead to stronger oxygen adsorption on the TiO2 NAs surface than that of the CT, which may facilitate the formation of amorphous Li2O2 (ref. 34). Furthermore, in sharp contrast to the conventional toroidal morphology of the discharge product obtained on the pristine–CT cathode (Fig. 4h)35,36, amorphous Li2O2 films are homogenously coated onto TiO2 NAs (Fig. 4g). This amorphous Li2O2 film may contain many defects (for example, lithium vacancies) that provide channels for electron and especially ion conduction, thus enhancing the electrode kinetics during the charge process towards a reduced charge overpotential (Fig. 2b)37,38. In addition, it should be noted that recent theoretical calculations have demonstrated that polycrystalline grain boundaries of Li2O2 can also significantly influence the charging overpotential of a Li–O2 battery39. Therefore, because Li–O2 batteries are still relatively new, additional research efforts including in situ transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations should be devoted to clarifying the effect of the crystallinity of Li2O2 on the charging process of Li–O2 batteries. Although the toroidal products decorated on the CT are mostly decomposed after subsequent recharging processes (Supplementary Fig. 9a), the surface of CT becomes rough and many holes appear on the pristine–CT cathode (Supplementary Fig. 9b) compared with the original one (Fig. 1b). This indicates the existence of serious parasitic reactions between the CT and Li2O2 and/or nascent O2 (ref. 31), which was confirmed by the large amount of CO2 gas generated (2.12 μl) during the charging process (Supplementary Figs 10 and 11, and Supplementary Table 1). In sharp contrast, for the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode, the TiO2 NAs recovered to its initial state, with the surface becoming smooth again (Supplementary Fig. 9d), which was confirmed by a trace amount of CO2 gas generated (0.04 μl; Fig. 4f, Supplementary Fig. 12, Supplementary Table 1), wherein the reaction mechanism during discharge/charge processes are proposed to be investigated by in situ differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy in the future. Unexpectedly, the smooth surface of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was retained even after multiple cycles (10th, 50th and 100th cycle) of the Li–O2 cell, which demonstrates the good rechargeability of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode and the stability of TiO2 NAs (Supplementary Figs 13 and 14).

Figure 4: Characterization of discharge products.
figure 4

(a) O1s X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the discharged TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. (b) Li1s XPS spectra of the discharged TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. (c) GITT discharge voltage profile obtained from the Li–O2 cell with a pristine–CT cathode (red) and (a) TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (blue) at first discharge with a current density of 100 mA g−1. Both curves show an equilibrium potential of the Li–O2 cell of near 2.9 V regardless of the state of discharge, which is in accordance with the formation potential of Li2O2. (d) Corresponding X-ray diffraction patterns of the two types of discharged cathodes. (e) Gas chromatography (GC) signals of O2 released after charging the Li–O2 cells with a pristine–CT cathode (black) and a TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (red), which were obtained with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). (f) GC signal of CO2 released. (g) SEM images of the discharged TiO2 NAs/CT cathode with a current density of 100 mA g−1 (white scale bar, 10 μm, green scale bars: 500 nm). (h) SEM images of the discharged pristine–CT cathode with a current density of 100 mA g−1 (white scale bar, 10 μm, green scale bar, 500 nm).

Discussion

Electrolyte decomposition, which is due to the continuous accumulation of the side products such as Li2CO3 and Li alkyl carbonates on the cathode surface (Supplementary Fig. 15), still inevitably resulted in premature death of the Li–O2 battery. Currently, these cathodes can only be abandoned due to serious damage of the structure and chemical composition. Inspired by the rather high structural and chemical stability of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode, we simply rinsed the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (even after 100 discharge/charge cycles) with 2 M HCl to remove the residual carbonates. Interestingly, the free-standing structure and chemical composition of the disabled TiO2 NAs/CT cathode were restored after washing, demonstrating the excellent recoverability of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (Fig. 5c). Unexpectedly, the rebuilt cell exhibits almost the same voltage profiles (Fig. 5d) as the fresh one (Fig. 5b), even after 100 cycles. To further demonstrate its superior recoverability, the 3rd-, 5th-, and 10th-recovered TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was also investigated, as shown in Fig. 5e,f and Supplementary Fig. 16. Although the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was recovered 10 times, there was no obvious degradation of the structure or electrochemical performance of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (Fig. 5e,f).

Figure 5: Recoverable performance.
figure 5

(a) SEM images of the pristine TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. (scale bar, 5 μm). The inset in a is the corresponding X-ray diffraction pattern. (b) The variation of the terminal discharge voltage of the pristine TiO2 NAs/CT cathode with a current density of 100 mA g−1. (c) SEM images of the first-recovered TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (scale bar, 5 μm). The inset in c is the corresponding X-ray diffraction pattern. (d) The variation of the terminal discharge voltage of the first-recovered TiO2 NAs/CT cathode with a current density of 100 mA g−1. (e) SEM images of the 10th-recovered TiO2 NAs/CT cathode (scale bar, 5 μm). The inset in e is the corresponding X-ray diffraction pattern. (f) The variation of the terminal discharge voltage of the tenth recovered TiO2 NAs/CT cathode with a current density of 100 mA g−1.

In conclusion, we have shown that a highly flexible Li–O2 battery can be constructed by employing a free-standing and recoverable TiO2 NAs/CT cathode. Superior electrochemical performances in terms of round-trip efficiency, rate capability and cycling stability, even under harsh bending and twisting conditions, have been achieved. These characteristics may be attributable to the tailored properties of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode, which include high mechanical and chemical stability as well as high catalytic activity. Furthermore, the excellent recoverability of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode can significantly extend the cycle life (at least 1,000 cycles) and decrease the whole-life cycle cost of Li–O2 batteries. However, if the same benefits could be extended to a more highly efficient cathode (Supplementary Figs 17–19) and coupled with a next-generation stable electrolyte, an advanced flexible Li–O2 battery could be expected to dominate the upcoming field of flexible electronics. Hence, the results obtained here will hopefully encourage further studies on flexible Li–O2 cells, although numerous challenges precluding their use in practical devices remain.

Methods

Chemicals and materials

Titanium n-butoxide (C16H36O4Ti), isopropanol (C3H8O), ethanol (EtOH), hydrochloric acid (HCl) and acetone (C3H6O) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China. Tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether, lithium triflate (LiCF3SO3) and sodium tetrachloropalladate (Na2PdCl4) were purchased from Aladdin Reagent. Carbon textiles were purchased from Torray.

TiO2 NAs/CT cathode preparation

The TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was synthesized using a seed-assisted method. The CT were ultrasonically cleaned with C3H6O and distilled water several times and then dried at 60 °C in a vacuum oven. The clean CT were immersed in a 0.075 M titanium n-butoxide isopropanol solution, rinsed with ethanol, and then dried in an air oven at 60 °C three times. The dried CT were subsequently heated in air at 500 °C for 1 h, forming TiO2 nanoparticles coated on the CT. Next, 0.66 ml titanium n-butoxide isopropanol was added into a solution of 15 ml concentrated hydrochloric acid and 15 ml deionized water. The mixture was stirred for >6 h and a clear solution was obtained. This clear solution together with the CT-coated TiO2 nanoparticles were transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave (50 ml volume) and heated in an oven at 150 °C for 12 h. When the oven cooled down, the CT were removed from the autoclave and rinsed with deionized water several times and dried in an air oven at 60 °C. Finally, the sample was annealed in air at 550 °C for 2 h.

Fabrication of Pd decorated TiO2 NAs/CT cathode

The obtained TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was directly immersed into Na2PdCl4 aqueous solution (5 mM) and exposed to light for 30 min. The cathode was finally rinsed with deionized water several times and dried in an air oven at 60 °C.

Characterization

The morphologies and structures of the materials were characterized using various physiochemical techniques, including X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, TEM, and Raman spectral analysis. The discharge and recharge products were characterized using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy , X-ray diffraction, gas chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Assembling of the flexible Li–O2 battery device

The flexible Li–O2 battery device was assembled in an argon-filled glove box using a commercial lithium belt anode, a glass fibre separator, an oxygen cathode and a 1-M LiCF3SO3 in TEGDME electrolyte. The as-fabricated TiO2 NAs/CT (6 × 2 cm) was directly used as the air cathode without any polymeric binder.

Recovery of the TiO2 NAs/CT cathode

TiO2 NAs/CT cathode was disassembled from the Li–O2 battery device after multiple cycles, rinsed with 2 M HCl, washed with distilled water several times and subsequently dried in air oven at 60 °C for utilization.

Instrumentation

SEM was performed on a Hitachi S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope operating with an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. Samples for SEM were prepared by directly placing the electrode sample onto an SEM brass stub. The X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on a Bruker D8 Focus X-ray diffractometer using Cu radiation. TEM was performed using an FEI Tecnai G2 S-Twin transmission electron microscope with a field emission gun operating at 200 kV. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements were performed on an ESCA-LAB 250 photoelectron spectrometer. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and CV measurements were performed on a BioLogic VMP3 electrochemical workstation. The Li–O2 battery device measurements were cycled on a LAND CT2001A multichannel battery testing system. For the gas chromatography (Techcomp GC-7900) measurements, a glass chamber containing the Li–O2 battery following discharging was flooded with Ar. The gas was then collected for analyses after the battery was charged. O2 and CO2 were analysed with a thermal conductivity detector using Ar as the carrier gas (detection limit: 10 p.p.m.). Mass analysis of the generated gases was performed using an OmniStar GSD 320 system (Pfeiffer Vacuum) mass spectrometry, wherein argon gas was chosen as the carrier gas. A xenon light source (PLS-SXE300C) was employed for the photochemical deposition of Pd nanoparticles.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Liu, Q.-C. et al. Flexible lithium–oxygen battery based on a recoverable cathode. Nat. Commun. 6:7892 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8892 (2015).