Abstract
Liquid drops on soft solids generate strong deformations below the contact line, resulting from a balance of capillary and elastic forces. The movement of these drops may cause strong, potentially singular dissipation in the soft solid. Here we show that a drop on a soft substrate moves by surfing a ridge: the initially flat solid surface is deformed into a sharp ridge whose orientation angle depends on the contact line velocity. We measure this angle for water on a silicone gel and develop a theory based on the substrate rheology. We quantitatively recover the dynamic contact angle and provide a mechanism for stick–slip motion when a drop is forced strongly: the contact line depins and slides down the wetting ridge, forming a new one after a transient. We anticipate that our theory will have implications in problems such as selforganization of cell tissues or the design of capillaritybased microrheometers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Capillary interactions of soft materials are ubiquitous in nature and play a major role in selforganization of cell tissues^{1}, in embryotic development^{2,3}, in wound healing^{4}, and in controlling the spreading of cancer cells^{5,6}. Not least motivated by this, soft wetting^{7,8,9} recently came to the attention of both physicists and biologists. Despite its potential for applications, such as the patterning of cells^{10} or droplets^{11} onto soft surfaces, or the optimization of condensation processes^{12}, our fundamental understanding of the dynamics of soft wetting lags behind by far of what is known about rigid surfaces^{13}.
Partial wetting of a liquid on a rigid (smooth) substrate is controlled by intermolecular interactions, whose strength is characterized by surface energies^{13}. The motion of the threephase contact line is governed by the viscous dissipation in the liquid. A dissipation singularity arises at the moving contact line^{14} and its regularization at the nanoscopic scale can result from various processes^{13,15}. When the substrate is deformable, a sharp ridge forms below the contact line at the edge of the droplet^{7,8,9}. The ridge geometry (Fig. 1a) originates from the coupling between elasticity and surface energy^{16,17,18,19,20}. The problem is inherently multiscale and nonlocal, even at equilibrium, due to the long range of elastic interactions^{21,22,23}.
Pioneering experiments have shown that the softness drastically slows down the wetting dynamics^{24,25} in comparison to rigid solids. This viscous braking in the wetting of soft solids has been attributed to a viscoelastic force, as discussed in several recent experimental articles^{11,26}. The theoretical description of moving contact lines over soft solids is so far limited to global dissipation arguments^{17}, which, at least for wetting of rigid solids, are known not to capture the entire physics behind the process.
In this paper, the physical mechanism that governs soft wetting dynamics is revealed. We measure the dynamical wetting of small water droplets on a rheologically characterized silicone gel and discover a saturation of the dynamical contact angle for large speeds, associated with a maximum friction force. Driving the contact line motion beyond this maximal force eventually leads to a dynamical depinning where the contact line surfs down the wetting ridge, providing a mechanism for recently observed stick–slip motion^{26}. We develop a theoretical framework for dynamical soft wetting, suitable for any substrate rheology. The dynamic wetting angle is calculated from the velocitydependent shape of the deformed solid (Fig. 1c). The experimental results are matched quantitatively, including saturation/dynamical depinning. The latter arises from an upper limit of the viscoelastic braking effect, which, by exploring different rheologies, is found to be a robust, universal feature of soft wetting and should thus be relevant far beyond droplets on silicone gels. In addition, the analysis captures recent Xray measurements on the slow growth of wetting ridges when a drop is deposited on a substrate^{27} (Fig. 1b).
Results
Experiments
Experiments were performed using water drops on a silicone gel (cf. Methods section for details). This system was previously used in static^{28} and transient^{27} experiments. Figure 2a shows the rheology of this gel; similar data were reported in ref. 29. The storage G′ and loss G′′ moduli are related by Kramers–Kronig relation: they originate from the same relaxation function Ψ(t). More precisely, the complex shear modulus obey the relation . A silicone gel is a reticulated polymer formed by polymerizing small multifunctional prepolymers: contrarily to other types of gels, there is no liquid phase trapped inside. Such crosslinked polymer networks exhibit scale invariance that yields powerlaw response of the form ^{17,30,31}:
where G is a static shear modulus and Γ is the gamma function. The associated complex modulus reads μ=G′+iG′′=G[1+(iτω)^{n}]. The value of n is not universal but depends on the stoichiometric ratio r between reticulant and prepolymer, with n typically between 2/3 and 1/2 (ref. 32). The best fit in Fig. 2a gives an exponent n=0.55. Note that the associated effective viscosity G′′/ω∼G(τ/ω)^{n} is very large, beyond 10 Pa.s, over the entire frequency domain. This will imply that the dissipation mainly occurs in the solid, not in the liquid.
Figure 2b shows the dynamical angle as a function of velocity, both of which are measured while the droplet slowly relaxes over time towards its equilibrium shape (after the injection phase). The resulting versus v is not sensitive to the history of the relaxation process, and the dynamics can thus be considered quasisteady. The log–log plot reveals a powerlaw relation between and v at small velocities, with an exponent equal to the rheological value of n=0.55, within error bars. Such a powerlaw dependence is similar to previously obtained results^{24,25}. For large velocities, we report a striking saturation of the dynamical contact angle. Neither the smallv power law nor the saturation can be explained by dissipation mechanisms in the liquid, and one needs to account for the dissipation within the solid. Long et al.^{17} addressed this using a global dissipation argument based on the solid rheology, but this argument fails to capture key features such as the saturation.
When the drop is kept inflating with a large overpressure, we observe a ‘depinning’ of the wetting front, with a sudden increase of its velocity, as the dynamical angle reaches a value . This compares well to the saturation of 37° observed during relaxation (after injection), as indicated in Fig. 2. When forcing the contact angle beyond this angle, the contact line dynamically depins from the wetting ridge, surfing it, until a new ridge forms. Note that such a depinning, leading to stick–slip motions, had already been reported in refs 26, 33. Our current measurements show that this is a direct consequence of the saturation of the dynamic contact angle.
Theoretical framework
A liquid drop deposited on a substrate exerts a capillary traction on the surface^{7,34,35,36,37}. While the resulting elastic deformation has been computed and measured for static situations^{8,9,18,20,23,28}, the traction becomes time dependent in the case of dynamical wetting. Here we consider a single straight contact line, for which the elastic problem is twodimensional. Our goal is to find the deformation of the solid, h(x, t), resulting from the timedependent capillary traction, T(x, t). For simplicity, we consider the same surface energy γ_{s} for the wet and the dry parts of the substrate, and assume that there is no Shuttleworth effect, i.e. that γ_{s} does not depend on strain^{16,19}. The resulting traction on the solid is then purely normal, and reads T(x, t)+γ_{s} ∂_{xx}h, the latter term being the solid Laplace pressure^{9,23,38,39}. The theory is rigorous for small slopes (∂_{x}h)^{2}<<1, but can be extended in a semiquantitative way to finite slopes.
The shape of the deformed substrate h(x, t) follows from the normal substrate displacements. Inside a purely elastic material, the displacements adapt instantaneously to changes in the capillary traction; the problem is therefore essentially static. For realistic soft materials, however, the displacements are delayed with respect to the imposed forcing. For small deformations, this is captured by a linear stress–strain rate relation
where Ψ is the relaxation function previously introduced (see equation (1)) and p is the pressure. Like ref. 17, we apply a Fourier transform with respect to time (noted by ‘^’):
The mathematical problem defined by mechanical equilibrium, , the constitutive relation (equation (3)) and the traction at the free surface is identical to the static problem, but features dependences on the frequency ω. The timedependent traction can therefore be solved analogously to (refs 9, 22, 23), by an additional spatial Fourier transformation (noted by ‘∼’):
where q is the wavenumber. The Green's function is the product of the time kernel μ(ω)^{−1} by the space kernel K(q). For an incompressible layer of thickness h_{0} (ref. 40) it is
Left–right symmetry and volume conservation are reflected by K(q)=K(−q) and K(0)=0. Sharp features in the solid profile, like the solid contact angle, are found in the largeq asymptotics for which K(q)≃qual;(2q)^{−1}.
The moving contact line
We now apply our theory to a contact line moving at a constant velocity v, which induces a traction
This reflects the normal force per unit contact line that is exerted by the liquid on the solid, while θ is the liquid angle at the location of the cusp. For simplicity we consider that the drop size is much larger than the substrate thickness, in which case the Laplace pressure inside the liquid can be neglected^{28}. We indeed verified that the finite drop size has a negligible influence on the resulting motion: the relevant scale for the dynamics is the size of the ridge γ_{s}/G, which is much smaller than the drop size. This also justifies a twodimensional model. Another important simplification comes from the quasisteady nature of the droplet relaxation: temporal changes of contact angle and contact line velocity are small in our experiments (dθ/dt<<τ^{−1}), so that the process can be modelled by a constant velocity.
According to equation (4), the capillary traction induces a wetting ridge moving at a velocity v (see Methods section):
in the comoving frame. In real space this gives profiles such as shown in Fig. 1c. The motion induces a left–right symmetry breaking: the asymmetric deformation of the solid results in a tilt angle of the cusp. Since the liquid is close to equilibrium, the change in the solid angle induced by the dissipation taking place inside the solid directly yields a change in the liquid angle θ (Fig. 1d). Hence , where θ_{eq} is the equilibrium liquid angle by Neumann’s law. The liquid contact angle θ gets deviated away from θ_{eq} due to the viscoelastic forces in the substrate.
Figure 2b shows the calculated tilt curve for the gel used in experiments. It predicts not only the powerlaw behaviour at low velocity but also presents a saturation of the tilt angle. The tilt angle quantifies the velocitydependent viscoelastic force between the solid and liquid phases. For a wellestablished moving ridge, it behaves as a resistive force increasing with the velocity. When the drop is forced to inflate with a driving force larger than the maximal braking force, the contact line can no longer remain ‘pinned’ to the steadily moving solid ridge and surfs the gel wave. To investigate further the relation between the tilt and the substrate constitutive relation, we use the gel rheology (equation (1)), and expand (equation (7)) in the smallv asymptotics (and hence small , that is, sinθ≈sinθ_{eq}), which gives (see Methods section):
where the characteristic velocity scale emerges as v*=γ_{s}/(Gτ). Note that the outer length scale (thickness of substrate) does not appear. This expression can be simply interpreted. At vanishing response time τ, a deformation matching the static ridge would propagate at a velocity v, pushing the substrate material up and down at a characteristic frequency ω equal to the velocity v divided by the characteristic width of the ridge ∼γ_{s}/G. The perturbation introduced by a finite τ is encoded by the loss modulus G′′(ω). As the characteristic strain is set by the slope of the ridge ∼γsinθ/γ_{s}, one obtains dimensionally equation (8). The scaling law thus simply carries over the low frequency behaviour G′′(ω)∝ω^{n}, which is a robust mechanism valid beyond the smallslope approximation of our theory. At small v (small ω), dissipation will dominantly occur in the solid because n<1, while the loss modulus of a Newtonian liquid .
In contrast to the tilt angle , we find that that the solid angle θ_{s} does not depend on v. This result can be derived analytically from the largeq asymptotics of equation (7), , valid for all v and arbitrary μ(ω). In real space, this implies a slope discontinuity
which is the smallslope limit (γ/γ_{s}<<1) of Neumann’s contact angle law. Physically, equation (9) reflects that θ_{s} is determined by surface tensions only^{9,18,41}: bulk viscoelastic stresses are not singular enough to contribute to the contact angle selection. This feature remains true for arbitrary angles^{23}. To match Neumann’s law quantitatively, our theory must be corrected at large slopes to take geometric nonlinearities into account. This can be achieved phenomenologically in equation (4) by replacing . Indeed, the Neumann condition for θ=90° reads 2γ_{s} sin α=γ, where α is the angle of the solid interface with the horizontal. Smallslope theory gives , and hence lacks a factor .
For the first time, we reveal that the exponent of the dynamical contact angle directly originates from the gel rheology. The rheological parameters being calibrated independently, the dynamic contact angle can be fitted to the model to extract the solid surface tension. Using equation (8), which is valid for small slopes, we find γ_{s}=16 mN m^{−1}. This is a reasonable value, though a bit lower than the value previously derived from Neumann’s law^{28}. We think this difference can be attributed to the smallslope nature of our theory: condering the phenomenological correction for large slopes gives a value γ_{s}=39 mN m^{−1}, in close agreement with ref. 28. The solid line in Fig. 2b shows the prediction from equation (7), providing an excellent description over the full range of velocities. The model captures also the saturation, though the value for is slightly overestimated.
Depinning and growth of a new wetting ridge
How can the contact line escape pinning, without dragging the capillary wedge along with it? To answer this question, let us consider the recent experiments investigating the growth of a wetting ridge after depositing a droplet on a silicone gel^{27}. The substrate was observed to only very slowly establish the final shape of the wetting ridge—such a delay in growth (or decay) of wetting ridges would explain how a sufficiently rapid contact line could escape from the ridge. However, the solid angle θ_{s} (cf. Fig. 1a) appeared very quickly and remained constant during the entire growth of the ridge^{27}.
These features of ridge growth can all be explained by considering our theory for a traction that is suddenly imposed at the time of deposition (t=0), so that
where θ is the liquid contact angle and Θ(t) is the Heaviside step function. Combining this traction with equation (4), one can compute the resulting h(x, t) for any rheology μ(ω). An example of the evolution of the wetting ridge is shown in Fig. 1b. A movie is given in Supplementary Movie 1.
First, the theory recovers the experimental finding that θ_{s} is constant at all times. As for the moving contact line, this result can be derived analytically from the largeq asymptotics of equation (4), which again results in equation (9): the asymptotics are independent of the rheology and the history of the traction, but entirely governed by the surface tensions.
Second, the theory explains why, contrarily to the rapid appearance of θ_{s}, the global shape of the ridge evolves much more slowly. Figure 3 shows the evolution of the central height of the ridge, h(x=0), towards its static value h_{∞}, for the two idealized rheological models. The relaxation towards the equilibrium height is algebraic for the gel model, with an exponent directly following that of rheological relaxations (Fig. 3a, as t^{−1/2} for n=1/2). This clarifies the complex evolution of the wetting ridge of the silicone gel in ref. 27: smallscale characteristics such as θ_{s} are dominated by surface tension and relax quickly, while largescale features inherit the relaxation dynamics from the bulk rheology. This means that immediately after depinning, where the contact line exhibits a rapid motion, the solid cusp cannot adapt quickly. The liquid will slide down the wetting ridge, which appears frozen on the timescale of the depinning. During this phase it is clear that the liquid dynamics will be important—still, the onset of the depinning can be explained quantitatively without invoking the fluid dynamics inside the liquid, because the saturation angle coincides with the observed depinning angle (Fig. 2b).
Robustness and interpretation
The theory can be applied to any viscoelastic substrate, assuming that it is probed in the linear regime. Generic reticulated polymer networks possess a longtime entropic elasticity^{42,43}, that is characterized by a static shear modulus G. Such networks become viscoelastic when excited over timescales shorter than a certain response time τ. To investigate the robustness of the phenomenology that was observed experimentally and reproduced quantitatively by our model, we will consider a different rheological limit. When crosslinking long polymer chains, one forms an elastomer rather than a gel. Assuming a single (Rouse) timescale τ to characterize the onset of entanglements, the rheology can be idealized as^{17,31,43}:
This single timescale response is also referred to as standard linear model and has frequently been used to describe the transition from rubber to glass behaviours. In general, several relaxation times must be introduced to capture quantitatively the rheology of actual elastomers.
The wetting ridge relaxation, which follows the rheological relaxation, becomes exponential for the standard linear model (Fig. 3b). The case of a moving contact line with the rheology (equation (11)) is given by the solid lines in Fig. 4, showing the tilt curves for various parameters β. As for the gel case, the tilt has an upper bound and this therefore appears a robust feature of soft wetting. Note that the maximum depends on γ/γ_{s} and β (or n for the gel case), illustrating that the value of will in general depend on the details of the rheology (for example, in ref. 26 is much smaller than that in the presented experiments). The dynamic contact angle for a standard linear solid can actually be captured in a simple analytical form. For this we consider the limit β→∞ while keeping τ′≡βτ constant—this corresponds to the Kelvin–Voigt model with a frequencyindependent effective viscosity η=Gτ′. Intriguingly, this limit turns out to be singular: the highfrequency behaviour of equation (11) becomes purely viscous and gives a nonintegrable singularity of the dissipation. This singularity could already be anticipated from equation (8), since the Kelvin–Voigt rheology has G′′∼ω^{1}, while equation (8) presents a divergence for n=1.
In fact, this viscoelastic singularity is the softsolid analogue of the classical Huh and Scriven paradox for viscous contact line motion^{14}. This is demonstrated from the largeq asymptotics of equation (7) in the Kelvin–Voigt limit, giving a slope close to the contact line (see the Methods section):
with γE=Euler’s constant and v*=γ_{s}/(Gτ′). This expression reveals a logarithmic divergence of the slope, in perfect analogy to the Cox–Voinov result for liquid contact lines^{44,45}.
Contrarily to the viscousliquid singularity, the presence of an instantaneous elastic response, that is, a finite value of β, is sufficient to regularize the divergence. This is illustrated in Fig. 5, which shows the slope ahead of the moving contact line as a function of the distance to the contact line. The dashed line corresponds to the Kelvin–Voigt limit equation (12), showing the logarithmic steepening of the slope. For finite β, the slope saturates on approaching the moving contact line. The saturation wavenumber is found q′∼(vτ)^{−1}, which corresponds to a length
where is a dynamical regularization length that depends linearly on the velocity of the contact line; for this scale is still much smaller than the substrate thickness, by a factor β^{−1}. The physical origin of the regularization lies in the instantaneous elasticity in the highfrequency limit, which applies at frequencies beyond ∼βτ.
Inserting the regularization length into the Kelvin–Voigt limit equation (12), we identify the tilt and get an analytical expression of the dynamic liquid contact angle (the strict validity of the analysis requires small slopes, that is, small ; we therefore replaced ):
This result is analogous to the Cox–Voinov law^{44,45} in partial wetting of viscous fluids. In that case, a similar logarithmic factor linking microscopic and macroscopic scales appears, for arbitrary contact angles^{45}, and the resulting expression for small Ca is of the form equation (14). Interestingly, the analysis reveals that the relevant dimensionless velocity for soft wetting is not the classical liquid capillary number , based on the liquid viscosity , but the ‘solid capillary number’
Equation (14) closely follows the numerical results (Fig. 5, dashed and solid lines, respectively). The moving contact line singularity is avoided altogether when G′′ has an exponent n<1, as was the case for the powerlaw gel, in perfect analogy to shearthinning fluids moving on a rigid substrate.
Discussion
We have shown how contact lines can surf on a wetting ridge, and that this governs the remarkable spreading of drops on viscoelastic substrates. We have quantified this dynamics by measuring the dynamic contact angle of water on a silicone gel for a wide range of velocities and described, for the first time, a saturation of the dynamical angle for large velocities. This saturation is in harsh contrast to wetting dynamics of rigid solids and leads to depinning, where the contact line slides down the ridge until a new wetting ridge has had time to grow and sustain a steady motion—hence, explaining the remarkable stick–slip motion^{26} found recently on soft solids. We develop a theory that identifies a robust maximum in viscous braking force that correctly predicts the onset of dynamical depinning. In addition, our theory captures the unsteady growth of a wetting ridge^{27}. This work provides a framework for viscoelastocapillary dynamics valid beyond droplets, and should be applicable, for example, within a biological context. It also opens a new perspective where droplets can be used as microrheometers, since the length scales probed by the droplets are given by the elastocapillary length (that is, a few microns), and the tilt saturation occurs at velocities that are directly related to the relaxation timescale.
Methods
Wetting experiments
The silicone gels (Dow Corning CY52276) are prepared by curing the mixed components onto glass slides, yielding 0.8mm thick substrates. The rheology was determined using a MCR 501 rheometer (Anton Paar). Dynamic contact angles were measured using droplets of MilliQ water dispensed from a clean Hamilton syringe. First, a small droplet (2–20 μl) was placed onto the substrate, leaving the syringe needle attached to the droplet. Then, the contact angle of the droplet was increased by quickly injecting water (3–20 μl with 2–8 μl s^{−1}) into it. After the injection phase the drop relaxes quasistatically, causing the contact line velocity to decay slowly. The advancing motion of the contact line and the relaxation of the contact angle were imaged at 50 Hz with a longdistance video microscope. The droplet contour was extracted with subpixel resolution, and velocities down to ∼nm s^{−1} could be detected. The measured contact angles were translated to tilt angles by subtracting θ_{eq}≈106°±1°.
The moving contact line
Fourier transforming equation (6) from x to q and from t to ω preserves the δshape of the traction:
Inserting the above into equation (4), the inverse transform to the time domain yields
The only explicit time dependence appears in the phase factor that shifts the profile in xdirection linearly with time. The transformation to the comoving frame is done by multiplication with e^{−iqvt}, which cancels the only explicit time dependence, and one obtains equation (7).
The slopes are evaluated by multiplication with −iq before the inverse transform (in the comoving frame):
h′(x) is a real function because and . h′(x) can be split into a symmetric and an antisymmetric part, where the symmetric part is given by the inverse transform of the real part of :
The antisymmetric part is obtained form the imaginary part:
The solid angle θ_{s} is given by the (antisymmetric) slope discontinuity at x=0 and is thus encoded in the backward transform of the imaginary part. The discontinuity is caused by the largeq asymptotics alone. If , which is the case for the exponential and powerlaw (n<1) relaxation (but not for the Kelvin–Voigt model), it is independent of rheology:
The rotation of the wetting ridge is given by the symmetric part of h′(x) and thus obtained by the backward transform of the real part, evaluated at x=0:
With the symmetry property K(q)=K(−q) and with small, positive v, equation (22) simplifies to (primes omitted):
In the limit of thick elastic layers, K(q)=(2q)^{−1}. After nondimensionalizing the integration variable as , one obtains (primes omitted):
where v*=γ_{s}/(Gτ) is the characteristic velocity.
Growth of a wetting ridge
Here we give the full derivation of the timedependent wetting ridge shape after the deposition of a droplet. We only discuss the result for the exponential relaxation model. An analogous calculation can be performed for the powerlaw relaxation.
In the following, we nondimensionalize x with h_{0}, q with , t with βτ, ω with (βτ)^{−1} and h with γ sinθ/G. With this scaling, the Fourier transform of the time kernel for exponential relaxation (equation (11)) reads
The space kernel in scaled variables is
The traction equation (10) is transformed to
equations (16)–(18), , are inserted into the general expression equation (3), which yields:
with the dimensionless parameter α_{s}=γ_{s}/(Gh_{0}). α_{s} compares the elastocapillary length for the solid surface tension to the layer thickness h_{0}. The inverse Fourier transform to the time domain yields
Fourier transformation to real space is performed numerically.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Karpitschka, S. et al. Droplets move over viscoelastic substrates by surfing a ridge. Nat. Commun. 6:7891 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8891 (2015).
References
Manning, M. L., Foty, R. A., Steinberg, M. S. & Schoetz, E.M. Coaction of intercellular adhesion and cortical tension specifies tissue surface tension. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12517–12522 (2010).
Trinkhaus, J.P. & Groves, P. Differentiation in cultures of mixed aggregates of dissociated tissue cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 41, 787–795 (1955).
Steinberg, M. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Science 141, 401–408 (1963).
Armstrong, M. & Armstrong, P. Mechanisms of epibolic tissue spreading analyzed in a model morphogenetic system—roles for cellmigration and tissue contractility. J. Cell. Sci. 102, 373–385 (1992).
Douezan, S., Dumond, J. & BrochardWyart, F. Wetting transitions of cellular aggregates induced by substrate rigidity. Soft Matter 8, 4578–4583 (2012).
Sabari, J. et al. Fibronectin matrix assembly suppresses dispersal of glioblastoma cells. PLoS ONE 6, e24810 (2011).
Shanahan, M. The influence of solid microdeformation on contactangle equilibrium. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 20, 945–950 (1987).
PericetCamara, R., Best, A., Butt, H.J. & Bonaccurso, E. Effect of capillary pressure and surface tension on the deformation of elastic surfaces by sessile liquid microdrops: an experimental investigation. Langmuir 24, 10565–10568 (2008).
Jerison, E. R., Xu, Y., Wilen, L. A. & Dufresne, E. R. Deformation of an elastic substrate by a threephase contact line. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 186103 (2011).
Discher, D., Janmey, P. & Wang, Y. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310, 1139–1143 (2005).
Style, R. W. et al. Patterning droplets with durotaxis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12541–12544 (2013).
Sokuler, M. et al. The softer the better: fast condensation on soft surfaces. Langmuir 26, 1544–1547 (2010).
Bonn, D., Eggers, J., Indekeu, J., Meunier, J. & Rolley, E. Wetting and spreading. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 739–805 (2009).
Huh, C. & Scriven, L. E. Hydrodynamic model of steady movement of a solid/liquid/fluid contact line. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 35, 85–101 (1971).
Snoeijer, J. H. & Andreotti, B. Moving contact lines: scales, regimes, and dynamical transitions. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45, 269–292 (2013).
Shuttleworth, R. The surface tension of solids. Proc. Phys. Soc. A 63, 444–457 (1950).
Long, D., Ajdari, A. & Leibler, L. Static and dynamic wetting properties of thin rubber films. Langmuir 12, 5221–5230 (1996).
Limat, L. Straight contact lines on a soft, incompressible solid. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 134 (2012).
Weijs, J. H., Andreotti, B. & Snoeijer, J. Elastocapillarity at the nanoscale: on the coupling between elasticity and surface energy in soft solids. Soft Matter 9, 8494–8503 (2013).
Bostwick, J., Shearer, M. & Daniels, K. Elastocapillary deformations on partiallywetting substrates: rival contactline models. Soft Matter 10, 7361–7369 (2014).
White, L. The contact angle on an elastic substrate. 1. The role of disjoining pressure in the surface mechanics. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 258, 82–96 (2003).
Style, R. W. & Dufresne, E. R. Static wetting on deformable substrates, from liquids to soft solids. Soft Matter 8, 7177–7184 (2012).
Lubbers, L. A. et al. Drops on soft solids: free energy and double transition of contact angles. J. Fluid. Mech. 747, R1 (2014).
Shanahan, M. & Carre, A. Viscoelastic dissipation in wetting and adhesion phenomena. Langmuir 11, 1396–1402 (1995).
Carre, A., Gastel, J. & Shanahan, M. Viscoelastic effects in the spreading of liquids. Nature 379, 432–434 (1996).
Kajiya, T. et al. Advancing liquid contact line on viscoelastic gel substrates: stickslip vs. continuous motions. Soft Matter 9, 454–461 (2013).
Park, S. et al. Visualization of asymmetric wetting ridges on soft solids with xray microscopy. Nat. Commun. 5, 4369 (2014).
Style, R. W. et al. Universal deformation of soft substrates near a contact line and the direct measurement of solid surface stresses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 066103 (2013).
Style, R. W. et al. Traction force microscopy in physics and biology. Soft Matter 10, 4047–4055 (2014).
Winter, H. & Chambon, F. Analysis of linear viscoelasticity of a crosslinking polymer at the gel point. J. Rheol. 30, 367–382 (1986).
de Gennes, P.G. Soft adhesives. Langmuir 12, 4497–4500 (1996).
Scanlan, J. C. & Winter, H. H. Composition dependence of the viscoelasticity of endlinked poly(dimethylsiloxane) at the gel point. Macromolecules 24, 47–54 (1991).
Kajiya, T. et al. A liquid contact line receding on a soft gel surface: dipcoating geometry investigation. Soft Matter 10, 8888–8895 (2014).
Lester, G. Contact angles of liquids at deformable solid surfaces. J. Colloid Sci. 16, 315–326 (1961).
Rusanov, A. Theory of wetting of elastically deformed bodies.1. Deformation with a finite contactangle. Colloid J. USSR 37, 614–622 (1975).
Rusanov, A. Thermodynamics of deformable solidsurfaces. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 63, 330–345 (1978).
de Gennes, P.G., BrochardWyart, F. & Quere, D. Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena: Drops, Bubbles, Pearls, Waves Springer (2004).
Mora, S., Phou, T., Fromental, J.M., Pismen, L. M. & Pomeau, Y. Capillarity driven instability of a soft solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 214301 (2010).
Marchand, A., Das, S., Snoeijer, J. H. & Andreotti, B. Capillary pressure and contact line force on a soft solid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 094301 (2012).
Xu, Y. et al. Imaging inplane and normal stresses near an interface crack using traction force microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 14964 (2010).
Marchand, A., Das, S., Snoeijer, J. H. & Andreotti, B. Contact angles on a soft solid: from Young’s law to Neumann’s law. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 236101 (2012).
Flory, P. & Rehner, J. Statistical mechanics of crosslinked polymer networks I: Rubberlike elasticity. J. Chem. Phys. 11, 512–520 (1943).
Rubinstein, S. & Panyukov, M. Elasticity of polymer networks. Macromolecules 35, 6670–6686 (2002).
Voinov, O. V. Hydrodynamics of wetting [English translation]. Fluid Dyn. 11, 714–721 (1976).
Cox, R. G. The dynamics of the spreading of liquids on a solid surface. Part 1. Viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 168, 169–194 (1986).
Acknowledgements
We thank T. Baumberger, A. Eddi and E. Raphael for fruitful discussions. S.K. acknowledges financial support from NWO through VIDI Grant No. 11304. J.S. acknowledges financial support from ERC (the European Research Council) Consolidator Grant No. 616918.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.H.S. and B.A. designed the research; S.K., J.H.S. and S.D. developed the theory; M.G. and S.K. performed and analysed the wetting experiments; H.P. performed the rheological measurements; B.A. and J.H.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented for the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Movie 1
The velocity dependent shape of the wetting ridge. (MOV 1108 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Karpitschka, S., Das, S., van Gorcum, M. et al. Droplets move over viscoelastic substrates by surfing a ridge. Nat Commun 6, 7891 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8891
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8891
This article is cited by

Direct force measurement of microscopic droplets pulled along soft surfaces
Nature Communications (2022)

Fluid separation and network deformation in wetting of soft and swollen surfaces
Communications Materials (2021)

Wetting ridge assisted programmed magnetic actuation of droplets on ferrofluidinfused surface
Nature Communications (2021)

Wetting transitions in droplet drying on soft materials
Nature Communications (2019)

Elastocapillaritybased transport of liquids in flexible confinements and over soft substrates
Microfluidics and Nanofluidics (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.