Abstract
Photoelectrochemical hydrogen production from solar energy and water offers a clean and sustainable fuel option for the future. Planar III/V material systems have shown the highest efficiencies, but are expensive. By moving to the nanowire regime the demand on material quantity is reduced, and new materials can be uncovered, such as wurtzite gallium phosphide, featuring a direct bandgap. This is one of the few materials combining large solar light absorption and (close to) ideal band-edge positions for full water splitting. Here we report the photoelectrochemical reduction of water, on a p-type wurtzite gallium phosphide nanowire photocathode. By modifying geometry to reduce electrical resistance and enhance optical absorption, and modifying the surface with a multistep platinum deposition, high current densities and open circuit potentials were achieved. Our results demonstrate the capabilities of this material, even when used in such low quantities, as in nanowires.
Introduction
Semiconductor photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells present a promising option for direct conversion of solar energy to fuels1,2,3. To reach a high efficiency, it is important that the semiconductor has an optimum bandgap energy4 (a bandgap of 1.7–2.2 eV is required2), and band-edge position with respect to the redox system5,6. In addition, the semiconductor should have a good chemical stability7 to ensure long-term operation. Most semiconductors are limited to one side of the reaction8,9 (Fig. 1a), due to their electronic band structure, or require an external bias to achieve water splitting10,11,12,13. Materials such as Fe2O3 and TiO2 appear promising, and have been studied in great detail, as their bandgaps straddle the redox potentials of water (as shown in Fig. 1a). Unfortunately, the large bandgap limits the maximum solar light absorption14,15. Smaller bandgap semiconductors like Si13,16 and InP17, show larger solar light absorption, resulting in higher currents for nanowire arrays combined with platinum or ruthenium catalysts, but the reported VOC for water reduction is generally too low, limiting the possibilities for full water splitting with a single junction cell.
(a) Bandgaps and positions of several important semiconductors with respect to the reduction and oxidation potentials of water, the band-edge positions of ZB GaP and WZ GaP are calculated from Mott–Schottky plots (shown in Supplementary Information Fig. 1). (b) Scanning electron microscopy image of a typical array of GaP nanowires defined by nano imprint lithography. Scale bar, 400 nm. (c) High-resolution TEM image of a typical p-type GaP nanowire with WZ crystal structure; scale bar, 5 nm. The inset shows the Fast Fourier Transform of the same area. (d) Linear sweep voltammograms for direct comparison of nanowire (red) and planar (black) samples with molybdenum sulphide catalyst, performed under chopped 100 mW cm−2 AM1.5 illumination, in aqueous solution pH 0 with HClO4 as supporting electrolyte. Also showing open circuit potential (VOC), short circuit current (ISC) and fill factor ff (filled square/empty square).
There are, however, few semiconductor materials that come close to overcoming these limitations, such as cobalt oxide (CoO), copper oxide (Cu2O) and gallium phosphide (GaP). CoO nanoparticles have already demonstrated unbiased solar water splitting18; however, the large bandgap (2.6 eV) will limit the light absorption and, due to the nanoparticle form, gas separation will become an issue. The long-term stability of Cu2O in aqueous solutions is an issue, as it is difficult to control the stoichiometry, and even with precious metal catalysts the highest reported output currents are limited to ∼50% of the theoretical maximum19, and perhaps more importantly, the oxidation reaction has not been reported on Cu2O. B GaP, which conventionally has the zincblende (ZB) crystal structure, on the other hand has reasonable stability in aqueous solution20, can be grown with high stoichiometric control, and zinc blende (ZB) p-GaP photocathodes20,21,22 and n-GaP photoanodes23,24 have been demonstrated in the past. A recently reported heterojunction of p-GaP and n-TiO2 reported a record high VOC of 0.71 V (versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) for ZB GaP21, and an ISC of 1.5 mA cm−2 under AM1.5 (100 mW cm−2) illumination. This ISC value is, however, far from the theoretical maximum current of 8.9 mA cm−2, calculated for a semiconductor with a bandgap of 2.3 eV, illuminated by one sun (AM1.5) solar radiation. The low currents reported are a direct consequence of the indirect bandgap of ZB GaP, leading to poor light absorption.
GaP nanowires can be grown with the wurtzite (WZ) crystal structure, which features a direct bandgap (2.1 eV)25. The direct bandgap will decrease the absorption depth of solar photons, allowing more of the absorbed charge carriers to reach the electrolyte, therefore increasing the measured current. The slightly decreased bandgap will allow more of the solar spectrum to be absorbed resulting in an increased current output of up to the theoretical maximum of 12.5 mA cm−2. The bandgap of the WZ GaP nanowires is well positioned with respect to the ZB GaP substrate for the reduction reaction, as seen in Fig. 1a. The valence band offset has been calculated as only 135 meV (ref. 26), and has been measured to be less, presenting little or no barrier for hole transport between the p-doped WZ GaP nanowire base and the p-doped ZB-GaP substrate. The conduction band of the ZB is higher than that of the WZ, providing an electric field, driving any excited electrons from the substrate into the nanowires. The bandgap also remains reasonably well aligned to the water reduction and oxidation potentials (Fig. 1a), theoretically maintaining GaP’s ability to catalyse the oxidation reaction, and it is expected to produce the voltage required for water splitting27. The nanowire geometry should also improve the PEC properties as it allows decoupling of the length scales for light absorption (axial) and charge-carrier separation (radial)28. Periodic nanowire arrays offer the opportunity to have almost 100% light absorption across all wavelengths due to photonic effects29,30, providing light concentration in each nanowire, as well as lowering the average refractive index leading to decreased reflection losses when compared with planar samples29,31. A further possible benefit of the nanowire system is that the increased surface area decreases the current density, relaxing the requirements for electrocatalysts, meaning that earth-abundant materials should show catalytic activities similar to those of precious metals32. This increased surface area, however, also introduces detrimental factors. The increased junction area between the semiconductor and electrolyte will cause a decrease in photovoltage13,33, although this voltage loss is limited, as discussed further in Supplementary Note 1. There is also an increased chance of surface recombination when the surface is larger, which will decrease the concentrations of useable charge carriers34, and therefore also the rate of reaction.
Pure WZ p-GaP nanowires are grown in ordered arrays, on a p-GaP ZB wafer (Zn-doped (111)B GaP, AXT Inc.), for use as photocathodes for the production of hydrogen from water. We show that with optimized nanowire geometry (length, diameter) and with our newly developed catalyst deposition, we reach high PEC efficiencies, with a VOC of >0.75 V (versus RHE) and an ISC of >10 mA cm−2. The reported VOC is higher than the current record for a ZB p-GaP photocathode, and is close to the flat band potential, calculated as 1.04 V (versus RHE) from Mott–Schottky plots (Supplementary Fig. 1). For a purely p-type photocathode with no surface modification, the flat band potential is the theoretical maximum VOC. The ISC is higher than the theoretical maximum current for ZB GaP and close to the theoretical maximum current of 12.5 mA cm−2 for WZ GaP, showing the advantages of the direct bandgap nanowire system.
Results
WZ gallium phosphide nanowires
Figure 1b shows a scanning electron microscopy image of a typical nanowire array. The WZ GaP nanowires are grown from a nanoimprint-patterned array of gold particles; this gives an ordered array of nanowires with 495 nm pitch and 90 nm diameter. The wires are grown with optimized parameters for the WZ crystal structure (see Methods section for more details). Figure 1c shows a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of an as-grown p-GaP wire. The GaP wires have an almost perfect WZ crystal structure with a very low stacking fault density of <1 μm−1. Figure 1d compares the current density–voltage (I–V) behaviour of ZB planar (100)-oriented p-GaP single-crystalline substrate and WZ nanowire p-GaP electrodes. The nanowires used in this experiment are of optimized geometry, with lengths and diameters of ∼2.0 μm and ∼150 nm, respectively. The nanowire length is controlled by adjusting the growth time of the core. The diameter is adjusted by the growth of a shell on the nanowire surface (see Methods section for more details), as this growth method enables the shell to maintain the WZ crystal structure forming single-crystal nanowires. The planar ZB GaP surface is not insulated during experiments; however, it is expected from absorption measurements performed on nanowires, after transfer onto a poly-dimethyl-siloxane (PDMS) film (Supplementary Figs 3 and 4), that <15% of the current is due to the substrate. An amorphous molybdenum sulfide (MoSx) catalyst35,36,37 is deposited on both planar and nanowire samples, the catalyst will enhance transfer of charges from the semiconductor to the electrolyte, and stabilize reaction intermediates, which will reduce surface recombination. The MoSx catalyst is deposited on the samples before all following experiments (unless stated otherwise). The VOC; fill factor (ff); ISC; and energy conversion-efficiency (η%) measured for the ZB GaP planar and nanowire-array WZ p-GaP electrodes with and without the MoSx catalyst are listed in Table 1. We note that our reference planar ZB GaP sample already shows similar VOC and ISC values compared with recently reported best values for planar ZB GaP21. The WZ GaP nanowire sample has a higher VOC, ISC and ff than the planar sample, resulting in a much higher efficiency of 1.4%. This is due to the direct bandgap of WZ GaP decreasing the absorption depth; and the nanowire geometry, decreasing reflection and bulk recombination losses29.
In the following sections, the steps involved in the optimization of the GaP nanowires will be discussed. This includes the study of nanowire geometry, an electrochemically produced passivation layer and a new scheme for platinum catalyst deposition.
Nanowire geometry
In Fig. 2, we show that the nanowire geometry is strongly influencing the attainable ISC in a PEC cell. We independently varied both the nanowire length and the nanowire diameter by switching between vapour–liquid–solid growth, which mainly increases the nanowire length and vapour–solid growth, which mainly increases the nanowire diameter (Fig. 2a,b). A larger nanowire length increases the solar light absorption, but if length increases too far it becomes detrimental due to an increased series resistance, which we independently measured by impedance measurements as is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. The effect of an increased series resistance is a decrease in both VOC and ISC. As is shown in Supplementary Fig. 3, the solar light absorption in our WZ GaP nanowires saturates below a 2-μm length, due to the direct bandgap decreasing the absorption depth, resulting in an optimum nanowire length of 2 μm. The optimum nanowire diameter is found to be 150 nm, which is determined by a trade-off between a decreasing series resistance, an increased solar light absorption and an increasing reflection loss (because of an increasing average refractive index of the layer) as nanowire diameter increases. In addition, we expect that when the nanowire diameter starts to exceed twice the space charge region thickness, calculated as 30 nm at 0 V (versus RHE) in Supplementary Fig. 1, bulk recombination starts to decrease the overall efficiency. A more detailed study of nanowire length and diameter can be found in the Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Figs 2 and 4.
(a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of WZ GaP nanowires grown for 6, 14 and 22 min with lengths of 0.73, 1.65 and 2.16 μm, respectively. Scale bar, 200 nm for all images. (b) SEM images of zinc-doped WZ GaP nanowires grown for 16 min (2 μm), with an additional shell grown for 5, 10 and 30 min with diameters of 120, 150 and 215 nm, respectively. Scale bar, 200 nm for all images. (c) The trend observed in the short circuit current (ISC) when length is changed. (d) The trend observed in the ISC when diameter is changed. Data were collected by linear sweep voltammetry, performed under chopped 100 mW cm−2 AM1.5 illumination, in aqueous solution pH 0 with HClO4 as supporting electrolyte. The error bars were calculated as two s.d. away from the average value taken from three or more experiments carried out on separate samples with the same specifications. (The data point for length 0 is for a planar (111) p-GaP ZB substrate).
Molybdenum sulfide catalyst
To fully realize the potential of GaP for water reduction, a suitable catalyst is required to promote charge transfer, thereby suppressing charge-carrier recombination. As previously mentioned, nanowires have a large surface area, and therefore a low current density, meaning that an earth-abundant catalyst such as MoSx (refs 35, 36, 37, 38) should yield promising results. Figure 3a shows the I–V characteristics for nanowires without catalyst (black line, top panel), with MoSx as catalyst (blue line, middle panel) and with platinum as catalyst (red line, bottom panel). Before this MoSx deposition, an electrochemically produced oxide (EPO) passivation layer is formed. This EPO layer has been shown to improve the ISC of uncatalysed nanowires from 1.5 to 4.1 mA cm−2 (see Table 1, Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 5). The MoSx catalyst is deposited for an optimum deposition time of 30 s (Supplementary Fig. 6). The reaction of the precursor with the semiconductor surface also results in the formation of sulfide, which is widely known to passivate III–V semiconductors39,40,41. Even so, the presence of the EPO improves the overall efficiency from 1.37% (Fig. 1d) to 1.5% (Fig. 3a, middle panel), demonstrating that the EPO is a more effective passivation layer than sulfide, and will be much more important for other catalysts (that are not produced with their own passivation layer). VOC, ISC, ff and η% values for the nanowires, catalysed by MoSx, with and without the EPO can be found in Table 1. This combination of nanowire, oxide and catalyst has already achieved the current record in VOC of 0.71 V (versus RHE) for GaP, and has achieved a much higher ISC (6.4 mA cm−2) than has yet been reported for GaP.
(a) Linear sweep voltammograms of nanowire samples with no catalyst (black), Molybdenum sulfide deposited photochemically (blue) and platinum deposited photochemically (red), (b) TEM images of a section of a single nanowire, of optimized geometry, after platinum has been deposited PEC for 3 × 60 s; scale bar, 50 nm, and a zoomed-in image of the same wire, with the Platinum particles, Gallium oxide and GaP nanowire clearly labelled; scale bar, 20 nm. (c) The trend of the short circuit current when consecutive platinum depositions are performed on the same nanowire sample (black points) and when a single long deposition is performed on a nanowire sample (red point). The error bars were calculated as two s.d. away from the average value taken from three or more experiments carried out on separate samples with the same specifications. (d) Long-term chronoamperometric measurement performed on nanowires after platinum catalyst deposition performed under 100 mW cm−2 AM1.5 illumination, in aqueous solution pH 0 with HClO4 as supporting electrolyte.
Platinum catalyst
As platinum is well known to be the best catalyst for water reduction, this catalyst is implemented to explore the full potential of WZ GaP. The best performance should be achieved with a uniform particle distribution, and an average particle size of 2–5 nm (refs 42, 43). We have achieved this by a simple and cheap electroless photodeposition method (as outlined in the Methods section). Longer deposition times, as expected, result in larger platinum particles, but remarkably the number of platinum particles decreases as deposition time is increased. When the deposition time is increased from 60 to 180 s, the number of particles per 0.01 μm2 decreases from 100 to 34 (Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Note 3). This shows that the platinum deposition is a dynamic process in which larger particles are growing while smaller particles are dissolved, typical for Ostwald ripening. By interrupting the deposition process, and performing chronopotentiometry on the sample, the platinum particles are exposed to hydrogen gas, which adsorbs onto their surface44, changing the properties of the platinum particles, and therefore the Ostwald ripening effect during the following deposition step. Multiple deposition steps lead to a, close to optimum, particle size of 5±3 nm and a uniform particle distribution over the wire, as can be seen in Fig. 3b. There is also the added benefit in the multi-deposition case of a slightly thicker EPO layer, produced during the chronoampeometry step, improving surface passivation, as discussed in Supplementary Note 3. The trend in ISC achieved by the interrupted deposition process is shown in Fig. 3c (black points). By performing three depositions of 60 s, a high ISC of up to 10.9 mA cm−2 can be achieved. The same deposition time, without the interruptions, results in a lower ISC of only 6.7 mA cm−2 (Fig. 3c red point). This is due to the poor uniformity and large particle size caused by the long continuous deposition (Supplementary Table 1). When more than three 60 s depositions are performed, the platinum particles no longer have optimum size and coverage, leading to light scattering and a decrease in current. The I–V characteristics for nanowires with the optimum platinum catalyst deposition can be seen in Fig. 3a (red line, bottom panel). With this deposition procedure, record high ISC and VOC values of 9.78 and 0.76 V (versus RHE), respectively, are obtained. However, the ff remains relatively low, below 0.4 for all samples, due to the large surface area of the nanowires. The best sample, with a ff of 0.39, nevertheless resulted in a record efficiency of 2.90% for a GaP large bandgap PEC cell. Higher ISCs of up to 10.9 mA cm−2 were recorded for other samples (Supplementary Fig. 8); however, the overall efficiency was best in the sample used for the data in Fig. 3a. The measured ISC of >10 mA cm−2 corresponds to >80% of the theoretical maximum current of 12.5 mA cm−2. For this high efficiency WZ p-GaP device, with this level of platinum coverage, merely tens of milligrams of platinum are required for every square metre of device area. III/V devices have been shown to work well under >10 times concentrated light2, by combining our device geometry with light concentrators, the amount of platinum catalyst can be cut even further.
Stability measurement
Figure 3c shows a 7 hour chronoampeometry measurement on nanowires catalysed by platinum in the presence of the EPO layer. The current starts to decreases after 5 hours, most likely due to the loss of catalyst particles as is observed by others21, demonstrating the promising capabilities of this system. Several gas samples were taken during this experiment, and measured by gas chromatography, giving a 97±3% Faradaic efficiency (Supplementary Fig. 9) for the hydrogen evolution reaction. This stability is not as high as is required for a commercial device, but is already higher than others have reported for unpassivated III/V PEC devices2,17 due to the conformal coverage of the EPO and catalyst particles.
Discussion
We have found that WZ p-GaP nanowires act as an effective photocathode, due to the direct bandgap allowing for increased light absorption and the geometry allowing for good charge-carrier separation. The easy production and use of the EPO allows reasonable stabilities to be achieved. More importantly, the combination of the platinum catalyst, using the correct deposition procedure, with the WZ GaP nanowires achieves new records in VOC and ISC, for GaP. We note here that an additional advantage of a nanowire device is that it will use only a fraction of the semiconductor material that a thin film device would use. By transferring the nanowire arrays from the growth substrate into a flexible polymer film45, substrate costs can be removed, and a flexible device with minimal material usage (1 g of GaP m−2) can be produced46. Nanoimprint and PDMS sample transfer are scalable technologies, which will allow for the production of large-area devices in the future. To further improve the efficiency, the doping in the core and the shell could be studied in more detail. By introducing a doping profile and an electric field, driving electrons to the nanowire surface, the ff should be improved1. Further improvement of the ff may also be achieved with other passivation layers, such as Al2O3 or TiO2 (ref. 21). These more chemically stable passivation layers should also improve the device stability21,23,47,48. We finally emphasize that direct bandgap WZ GaP is a good candidate for the wide bandgap cell in a tandem PEC device49,50.
Methods
Soft nanoimprint lithography
The soft PDMS stamp used here is moulded from a silicon master pattern, which contains arrays of holes fabricated by e-beam lithography. First a 300-nm poly-methyl-methacrylate (PMMA) with low element weight (35 K) is applied on cleaned 2-inch GaP (Zn-doped (111)B GaP, AXT Inc.) wafer by spin-coating and followed by a 150 °C bake. A silica sol-gel layer is then spun over the PMMA. Within 1 min after sol-gel spin-coating, the PDMS stamp is carefully applied on to the sol-gel. The structure on the PDMS stamp will be moulded to the silica sol-gel layer by capillary force. The sol-gel reacts to form silica glass in 2 h. Finally, the PDMS is removed carefully from the sol-gel layer by peeling and the pattern of an array of holes with a diameter of ∼100 nm is left. The ∼20 nm-thick silica residual between the bottom of the features and the PMMA layer is etched away by reactive ion etching with pure CHF3 for 50 s. Then O2 reactive ion etching is used to transfer the structure in the sol-gel layer into the underlying PMMA layer. The PMMA is heavily over-etched in this step to get a larger feature size in PMMA compared with sol-gel layer. After removing the oxide layer, an 8 nm-thick gold layer is deposited by evaporation. Lift off is carried out at room temperature using acetone. After spin-drying, the patterned Au particles with controlled diameter and thickness are precisely positioned.
VLS-growth
The nanowires vapour–liquid–solid growth was performed in a low-pressure (50 mbar) Aixtron CCS-MOVPE reactor according to the procedure in ref. 22. The gold nanoparticles were patterned over the GaP (111)B substrate via nanoimprint lithography (100 nm diameter/500 nm pitch). Pre-growth annealing of the substrates under Phosphine (PH3) flow at 750 °C to was used to remove the oxide on the surface and the organic residuals of the lithographic process. The WZ wire growth was performed at 750 °C using tri-methyl gallium and Phosphine (PH3) as precursor gases at molar fractions of 7.4 × 10−5 and 1.7 × 10−3, respectively, with a total flow of 8.2 l min−1 using hydrogen as carrier gas. HCl flow (molar fraction 1.2 × 10−4) was introduced to suppress the radial overgrowth of the wires. The shell growth was performed at 700 °C using tri-methyl gallium and PH3 molar fractions of 5.4 × 10−5 and 1.1 × 10−2, without any HCl flow. To induce a p-type doping, a Di-Ethyl Zinc (DEZn) flow (molar fraction 3.4 × 10−4) was used during both the core and the shell growths.
The NW samples used in Fig. 2 were grown for 6–10–14–18–22 min. In the samples used in Fig. 3, the GaP core was grown for 16 min, followed by the shell growth of 5–10–20–30 min.
Electrode fabrication
To make an ohmic back contact, layers of Ti/Au (50/100 nm) are evaporated onto the back of the p-GaP substrate and annealed at 250 °C for 10 min. The p-GaP samples are then cleaved into small pieces and fitted into a PEEK holder with 0.07 cm2 hole exposed to the electrolyte.
Photochemical electroless MoSx deposition
The cleaned GaP samples are immersed into a 1-mM (NH4)2[MoS4] solution, which is freshly prepared. The sample is then illuminated for 30 s by a 400-nm LED under 1.4 mW cm−2 intensity, the generated electrons in the conduction band of the p-GaP reduce [MoS4]2− at the surface to form amorphous MoSx and the generated holes in the valence band oxidize sulfide. Increasing the deposition time up to 5 min has little effect on the catalytic behaviour of the MoSx.
Photochemical electroless platinum deposition
The cleaned GaP samples are immersed into a 50-mM H2PtCl6, 2 M HCl aqueous solution. The sample is then illuminated for a set time by a 400-nm LED under 1.4 mW cm−2 intensity, the generated electrons in the conduction band of the p-GaP reduce the Pt4+ at the surface to form platinum metal and the generated holes in the valence band oxidize the [H2Cl6]4− to HCl and Cl2. For consecutive depositions a chronopotentiometry step of 5 min, under chopped AM1.5 1 sun illumination, was performed between depositions. Optimum performance was found for three consecutive 60 s deposition steps, with a decrease in performance seen after further depositions.
PEC measurements
The PEC measurements are performed in a three-electrode electrochemical cell with a saturated calomel reference electrode and a Pt foil counter electrode in 1 M HClO4 (Sigma-Aldrich) electrolyte. The reference potentials reported here are converted to the RHE potential for convenience. The current–potential curves are measured by Autolab 302 N (Eco Chemie, Metrohm). 100 mW cm−2 AM 1.5G illumination is provided by a 300-W Xenon Lamp (Newport 67005) with AM 1.5 G filter (Newport 81094). The spectrum and intensity of the lamp is calibrated by a spectroradiometer (IL90 International Light).
The ISC is defined as the photocurrent magnitude at 0 V versus RHE. The VOC is defined as the potential where the measured current is 0 A. The ff is defined as the ratio of where imax and Vmax are the photocurrent, and potential at the maximum power point of the system.
The efficiency is calculated as:

Where Pin is the intensity of the light incident on the sample (mW cm−2), and A is the sample area (cm2)51. The efficiency calculated for the photocathode is referenced to a hypothetical cathode with no overpotential losses at 0 V versus RHE52.
Absorption measurements
The absorption data were derived from wavelength-dependent separate total transmittance (T(λ)) and total reflectance (R(λ)) measurements. The GaP nanowires were embedded in PDMS using the procedure described by Standing et al.45. The PDMS film with nanowires was stuck onto an aperture of a Thorlabs integrating sphere on which a silicon photodetector was mounted. An Energetiq EQ-99 lamp combined with a Princeton Instruments monochromator and chopper produced a light beam to illuminate the sample, while the lock-in amplified silicon photodetector was used to detect the light integrated in the sphere. For the transmittance measurement, the sample was mounted on the only open aperture of the sphere, to integrate all light transmitted through the sample. For the reflectance measurement, the sample was mounted on one side of the sphere under a small oblique angle (<6°, to collect also the specular reflection) and illuminated through the opposite aperture of the integrating sphere, to integrate all light reflected by the sample. Both measurements were corrected for the background and divided over a reference measurement. The references were measured without a sample mounted in the transmittance configuration, and with a piece of perfectly reflecting integrating sphere material mounted in the reflectance configuration, respectively. The wavelength range of the incident light, limited by the signal-to-noise ratio of the measurement, was set from 407 to 720 nm, with a 0.5-nm step size. The absorptance fraction A(λ) was derived by using A(λ)=1−T(λ)−R(λ). The absorbed power of the AM1.5G solar spectrum was calculated by multiplication of the absorptance fraction by this AM1.5G, and integrated over the used wavelength range.
Characterization
Scanning electron microscopy images are obtained with a Zeiss Sigma microscope. TEM studies were performed using a JEOL JEM200 ARM probe corrected TEM, operated at 200kV.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Standing, A. et al. Efficient water reduction with gallium phosphide nanowires. Nat. Commun. 6:7824 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8824 (2015).
References
Abdi, F. F. et al. Efficient solar water splitting by enhanced charge separation in a bismuth vanadate-silicon tandem photoelectrode. Nat. Commun. 4, 2195 (2013).
Khaselev, O. & Turner, J. A. A Monolithic Photovoltaic-Photoelectrochemical Device for Hydrogen Production via Water Splitting. Science (80-. ) 280, 425–427 (1998).
Cho, I. S. et al. Branched TiO2 nanorods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Nano Lett. 11, 4978–4984 (2011).
Tamboli, A. C., Malhotra, M., Kimball, G. M., Turner-Evans, D. B. & Atwater, H. Conformal GaP layers on Si wire arrays for solar energy applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 221914 (2010).
Fujii, K. et al. Photoelectrochemical properties of the p−n junction in and near the surface depletion region of n-type GaN. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 22727–22735 (2010).
Nozik, A. & Memming, R. Physical chemistry of semiconductor-liquid interfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 3654, 13061–13078 (1996).
Chen, Z. et al. Accelerating materials development for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production: standards for methods, definitions, and reporting protocols. J. Mater. Res. 25, 3–16 (2011).
Huang, Q., Kang, F., Liu, H., Li, Q. & Xiao, X. Highly aligned Cu2O/CuO/TiO2 core/shell nanowire arrays as photocathodes for water photoelectrolysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 2418–2425 (2013).
Chakrapani, V., Thangala, J. & Sunkara, M. K. WO3 and W2N nanowire arrays for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 34, 9050–9059 (2009).
Chen, H. M. et al. A new approach to solar hydrogen production: a ZnO-ZnS solid solution nanowire array photoanode. Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 742–747 (2011).
AlOtaibi, B. et al. High efficiency photoelectrochemical water splitting and hydrogen generation using GaN nanowire photoelectrode. Nanotechnology 24, 175401 (2013).
Tran, P. D. et al. Novel assembly of an MoS2 electrocatalyst onto a silicon nanowire array electrode to construct a photocathode composed of elements abundant on the earth for hydrogen generation. Chemistry 18, 13994–13999 (2012).
Sim, U., Jeong, H.-Y., Yang, T.-Y. & Nam, K. T. Nanostructural dependence of hydrogen production in silicon photocathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 5414–5422 (2013).
Sivula, K. Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production 102, (Springer (2012).
Ling, Y., Wang, G., Wheeler, D. A., Zhang, J. Z. & Li, Y. Sn-doped hematite nanostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett. 11, 2119–2125 (2011).
Boettcher, S. W. et al. Energy-conversion properties of vapor-liquid-solid-grown silicon wire-array photocathodes. Science 327, 185–187 (2010).
Gao, L. et al. Photoelectrochemical hydrogen production on InP nanowire arrays with molybdenum sulfide electrocatalysts. Nano Lett. 14, 3715–3719 (2014).
Liao, L. et al. Efficient solar water-splitting using a nanocrystalline CoO photocatalyst. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 69–73 (2014).
Tilley, S. D., Schreier, M., Azevedo, J., Stefik, M. & Graetzel, M. Ruthenium oxide hydrogen evolution catalysis on composite cuprous oxide water-splitting photocathodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 303–311 (2014).
Tomkiewicz, M. & Woodall, J. M. Photoassisted electrolysis of water by visible irradiation of a p-type gallium phosphide electrode. Science 196, 990–991 (1977).
Malizia, M., Seger, B., Chorkendorff, I. & Vesborg, P. C. K. Formation of a p–n heterojunction on GaP photocathodes for H2 production providing an open-circuit voltage of 710 mV. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 6847–6853 (2014).
Liu, C., Sun, J., Tang, J. & Yang, P. Zn-doped p-type gallium phosphide nanowire photocathodes from a surfactant-free solution synthesis. Nano Lett. 12, 5407–5411 (2012).
Hu, S. et al. Amorphous TiO2 coatings stabilize Si, GaAs, and GaP photoanodes for efficient water oxidation. Science 344, 1005–1009 (2014).
Nakato, Y., Ohnishi, T. & Tsubomura, H. Photo-electrochemical behaviors of semiconductor electrodes coated with thin metal films. Chem. Lett. 4, 883–886 (1975).
Assali, S. et al. Direct band gap wurtzite gallium phosphide nanowires. Nano Lett. 13, 1559–1563 (2013).
Belabbes, A., Panse, C., Furthmüller, J. & Bechstedt, F. Electronic bands of III-V semiconductor polytypes and their alignment. Phys. Rev. B-Condens. Matter Phys. 86, 075208 (2012).
Lu, X. et al. Wide band gap gallium phosphide solar cells. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2, 214–220 (2012).
Foley, J. M., Price, M. J., Feldblyum, J. I. & Maldonado, S. Analysis of the operation of thin nanowire photoelectrodes for solar energy conversion. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5203–5220 (2012).
Kelzenberg, M. D. et al. Enhanced absorption and carrier collection in Si wire arrays for photovoltaic applications. Nat. Mater. 9, 239–244 (2010).
Krogstrup, P. et al. Single-nanowire solar cells beyond the Shockley–Queisser limit. Nat. Photonics 7, 1–5 (2013).
Lee, M. H. et al. p-Type InP nanopillar photocathodes for efficient solar-driven hydrogen production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 10760–10764 (2012).
Walter, M. G. et al. Solar water splitting cells. Chem. Rev. 110, 6446–6473 (2010).
Maiolo, J. R., Atwater, H. a. & Lewis, N. S. Macroporous silicon as a model for silicon wire array solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 6194–6201 (2008).
Osterloh, F. E. Inorganic nanostructures for photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 2294–2320 (2013).
Merki, D., Fierro, S., Vrubel, H. & Hu, X. Amorphous molybdenum sulfide films as catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen production in water. Chem. Sci. 2, 1262–1267 (2011).
Seger, B. et al. Hydrogen production using a molybdenum sulfide catalyst on a titanium-protected n(+)p-silicon photocathode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9128–9131 (2012).
Laursen, A. B., Kegnæs, S., Dahl, S. & Chorkendorff, I. Molybdenum sulfides—efficient and viable materials for electro - and photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 5577–5591 (2012).
Benck, J. D., Chen, Z., Kuritzky, L. Y., Forman, A. J. & Jaramillo, T. F. Amorphous molybdenum sulfide catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen production: insights into the origin of their catalytic activity. ACS Catal. 2, 1916–1923 (2012).
Mariani, G. et al. Hybrid conjugated polymer solar cells using patterned GaAs nanopillars. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 013107 (2010).
Mariani, G., Scofield, A. C., Hung, C.-H. & Huffaker, D. L. GaAs nanopillar-array solar cells employing in situ surface passivation. Nat. Commun. 4, 1497 (2013).
Zhernokletov, D. M., Dong, H., Brennan, B., Kim, J. & Wallace, R. M. Optimization of the ammonium sulfide (NH4)2S passivation process on InSb(111)A. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 30, 04E103 (2012).
Greeley, J., Rossmeisl, J., Hellmann, A. & Norskov, J. K. Theoretical trends in particle size effects for the oxygen reduction reaction. Z. Phys. Chem. 221, 1209–1220 (2007).
Wilson, O. M., Knecht, M. R., Garcia-Martinez, J. C. & Crooks, R. M. Effect of Pd nanoparticle size on the catalytic hydrogenation of allyl alcohol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 4510–4511 (2006).
Hoffmannová, H. et al. Surface stability of Pt3Ni nanoparticulate alloy electrocatalysts in hydrogen adsorption. Langmuir 29, 9046–9050 (2013).
Standing, a. J., Assali, S., Haverkort, J. E. M. & Bakkers, E. P. a M. High yield transfer of ordered nanowire arrays into transparent flexible polymer films. Nanotechnology 23, 495305 (2012).
Weisse, J. M., Lee, C. H., Kim, D. R. & Zheng, X. Fabrication of flexible and vertical silicon nanowire electronics. Nano Lett. 12, 3339–3343 (2012).
Panda, J., Roy, A., Gemmi, M. & Husanu, E. Electronic band structure of wurtzite GaP nanowires via resonance raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1057–1064 (2013).
Paracchino, A., Laporte, V., Sivula, K., Grätzel, M. & Thimsen, E. Highly active oxide photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction. Nat. Mater. 10, 456–461 (2011).
Hu, S., Xiang, C., Haussener, S., Berger, A. D. & Lewis, N. S. An analysis of the optimal band gaps of light absorbers in integrated tandem photoelectrochemical water-splitting systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 2984–2993 (2013).
Döscher, H. et al. Epitaxial III-V films and surfaces for photoelectrocatalysis. Chemphyschem. 13, 2899–2909 (2012).
Parkinson, B. On the efficiency and stability of photoelectrochemical devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 17, 431–437 (1984).
Boettcher, S. W. et al. Photoelectrochemical hydrogen evolution using Si microwire arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1216–1219 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This project was carried out within the research programme of BioSolar Cells, co-financed by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs. This work is part of the research programme of the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), which is part of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). We acknowledge Solliance, a solar energy R&D initiative of ECN, TNO, Holst, TU/e, imec and Forschungszentrum Jülich, and the Dutch province of Noord-Brabant for funding the TEM facility.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.S. and L.G. performed the electrochemical experiments and analysed the data, S.A. has grown the nanowires, D.v.D. has modelled the optical absorption of nanowire arrays, M.A.V. has analysed the NWs with TEM. Y.C. provided the nanoimprint patterns for NW growth. P.H.L.N., J.E.M.H. and E.P.A.M.B. conceived the idea and supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-9, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Notes 1-3 and Supplementary References (PDF 528 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Standing, A., Assali, S., Gao, L. et al. Efficient water reduction with gallium phosphide nanowires. Nat Commun 6, 7824 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8824
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8824
This article is cited by
-
Novel octa-graphene-like structures based on GaP and GaAs
Journal of Molecular Modeling (2023)
-
Recent Advancements in Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting for Hydrogen Production
Electrochemical Energy Reviews (2023)
-
Observation of polarity-switchable photoconductivity in III-nitride/MoSx core-shell nanowires
Light: Science & Applications (2022)
-
Organic ligand mediated evolution from aluminum-based superalkalis to superatomic molecules and one-dimensional nanowires
Nano Research (2022)
-
Thermodynamics Controlled Sharp Transformation from InP to GaP Nanowires via Introducing Trace Amount of Gallium
Nanoscale Research Letters (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.