Abstract
Closure of wounds and gaps in tissues is fundamental for the correct development and physiology of multicellular organisms and, when misregulated, may lead to inflammation and tumorigenesis. To re-establish tissue integrity, epithelial cells exhibit coordinated motion into the void by active crawling on the substrate and by constricting a supracellular actomyosin cable. Coexistence of these two mechanisms strongly depends on the environment. However, the nature of their coupling remains elusive because of the complexity of the overall process. Here we demonstrate that epithelial gap geometry in both in vitro and in vivo regulates these collective mechanisms. In addition, the mechanical coupling between actomyosin cable contraction and cell crawling acts as a large-scale regulator to control the dynamics of gap closure. Finally, our computational modelling clarifies the respective roles of the two mechanisms during this process, providing a robust and universal mechanism to explain how epithelial tissues restore their integrity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Gaps in multicellular tissue naturally occur during the lifetime of an organism, from developmental stages to adult life. Holes within tissues may be natural consequences of physiological processes such as development, organ remodelling and extrusion of apoptotic cells1,2,3,4. Alternatively, they may be the outcome of pathological or injurious events and result in ulcers and wounds5,6. In both cases, gaps need to be promptly closed to re-establish the physiological functions of the tissue7. To this end, cells surrounding a void engage in coordinated movement in order to close gaps and wounds using two main distinct mechanisms: crawling of cells on the substratum and constriction of a supracellular actomyosin cable at the edge of the gap in a purse-string-like mechanism4,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15. In the presence of the extracellular matrix (ECM), cell crawling with lamellipodia protrusion16,17 seems to be the predominant mechanism used to close the voided area, particularly when the gap is a large one. Owing to the stochastic nature of lamellipodia formation, this closure mechanism is characterized by a ‘rough’ edge8. Often it has been observed that one cell takes the lead and drags the neighbouring cells along17. On the other hand, purse-string closure involves the coordinated movement of all the cells at the edge due to ATP-dependent constriction of the actomyosin cable. Supracellular coordination of this motion induces the shape of the gap to become rounder and with ‘smooth’ edges1,18,19. This mechanism has been observed to be involved in closure of small gaps such as those left behind by apoptotic cells4,20 and in closure of gaps in epithelia with poorly developed ECM, as in the case of embryonic epithelia and corneal epithelium in adults21,22. However, the two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and, depending on the biochemical and biophysical properties of the environment, they may contribute to different extents to the closure of the void19,21,22,23,24,25,26. A number of factors have been proposed to regulate the closure mechanisms including ECM coating, cell type, substrate stiffness and gap size9,10,27,28. These factors may contribute to alter the roughness of the edge leading to the coexistence of large lamellipodia formation together with the formation of discontinuous contractile actin cables9. At the cell–substrate interface, our recent study showed that not only do lamellipodia extensions towards the gap contribute to epithelial closure, but also the compression of the underlying substrate by discontinuous contractile actin cables connected to focal adhesions promotes efficient wound closure29.
The intrinsic complexity of this picture has fuelled a long-lasting debate on the relative contribution of crawling and purse-string to re-establish integrity of the epithelium. Indeed, the variability of the experimental settings used to create the voids—damage versus damage-free gaps, in vitro versus in vivo experiments—and the environmental conditions within the gap, for example, presence of ECM, are likely to lead to only partial conclusions. In this work, we used microfabrication techniques to create damage-free gaps of geometries containing both convex and concave features. This allowed us to determine the importance of tissue shape in epithelial gap closure and to decipher the role of curvature in this process. An essential difference between the two closure mechanisms is that cell crawling always pulls the edge of the tissue forward (that is, towards the gap) while purse string pulls the edge forward or backwards depending on the local geometry. Our study demonstrates how the interplay between these two mechanisms is crucial for closing gaps and wounds, which naturally come in arbitrary shapes.
Results
Closure of gaps of varying geometries
Undamaged gaps with different initial shapes were formed in confluent epithelia by growing MDCK (Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells for 12–18 h around polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) stencils of well-defined geometries (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). Closure of gaps started immediately after removal of the PDMS block (Fig. 1b) and the area of the gap decreased in a near-linear manner irrespective of the initial shape (Fig. 1c). Since poorly developed ECM modifies cell–substrate adhesion, hindering crawling and favouring actin bundle assembly, we tested different concentrations of fibronectin. Consistent with previous findings showing increased migration of single cells with higher amounts of ECM on the substrate30, we found that collective migration of MDCK cells in a wound model experiment was increased by incremental amounts of fibronectin (Supplementary Fig. 2). Importantly, the response to fibronectin dosage was sigmoidal with the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) observed at ∼20 μg ml−1 loading concentration. We chose this concentration to perform our gap-closure experiments.
Despite these common features, local regulation of the closure velocity was evident from our experiments: concave edges (protruding into the gap)—that is, positively curved edges—clearly advanced at a slower pace compared with convex—that is, negatively curved—or flat edges (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Movie 1). Furthermore, prominent positive regions remained on halt until neighbouring negative regions reached up to the same level and only then did the edge advance (recalling theoretical study31). To systematically verify these observations, we combined semicircles and semiellipses to produce moon-shaped gaps of increasing curvatures, both positive and negative (Fig. 1d). The higher the negative curvature, the faster the edge moved (Fig. 1d, top). Conversely, the higher the positive curvature, the slower the movement (Fig. 1d, bottom). Our data showed that the local curvature was a major regulator of the gap edge velocity for all shapes tested, with velocity decreasing with increasing curvature (Fig. 1d–h).
Local regulation of crawling and purse-string mechanisms
Crawling and purse-string, the two major mechanisms contributing to gap closure, are both promoted by actin structures. Indeed, immunofluorescence staining for actin cytoskeleton, lamellipodia (cortactin) and purse-string (phosphomyosin light chain) revealed the presence of both structures at the free edge of the epithelium (Fig. 2a). An actomyosin cable of varying intensity could be detected in all cells surrounding the gap with the highest intensity of both actin and phosphomyosin detected at negative curvatures (Fig. 2b, top). Importantly, the cable structure was continuous between adjacent negative and positive regions, demonstrating that they are mechanically connected. Lamellipodia also appeared to be distributed along the whole edge, with a preference for the tip of the positive regions32 where the cable appeared to be weaker (Fig. 2b, bottom). This result is in agreement with recent findings showing that weakening of the cable is a stimulus for lamellipodia formation17. To further investigate the universality of the relationship between actin organization and tissue curvature, we analysed the distribution of actomyosin cables and lamellipodia in a model wound assay10,33. Immunofluorescence for actin structures in spontaneously formed curvatures revealed conserved features as in our gap-closure experiments with purse-sting predominant in negative curvatures and lamellipodia in positive curvatures (Supplementary Fig. 3). MDCK cells stably transfected with GFP (green fluorescent protein)–Actin were used to investigate how closure dynamics at different curvatures related to crawling and purse-string mechanisms (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Movie 2). Clear morphological variation as well as differences in cell dynamics were noted: lamellipodia were visibly less pronounced and less persistent in fast-moving negative regions compared with slow-moving positive ones (Fig. 2d,g). This was confirmed by the analysis of lamellipodium distribution (Fig. 2e), which was significantly more pronounced in positive regions (21.9±5% lamellipodium edge occupancy for negative regions n=26, 39.2±6.5% for positive, n=16, mean±s.e.m., P<0.05 in unpaired Student’s t-test). On the other hand, negative curvature regions exhibited prominent and uninterrupted actomyosin cables at the gap edge, whereas discontinuous cables at the back of the protrusive lamellipodia were observed at the tip of positive curvature regions. Taken together, these results showed that negative curvatures stabilized the formation of contractile actin bundles, which are not perturbed by the appearance of small and transient lamellipodia. Conversely, positive curvatures favoured the assembly of persistent lamellipodial extensions, which may perturb the continuity of the actomyosin cable in particular at the positive regions (Fig. 2d, right panel and Fig. 2g, top panels).
In vivo closure of non-convex wounds
The relevance of our in vitro studies of epithelial gap closure was confirmed by the study of non-convex wounds on the notum epithelium of Drosophila melanogaster (Fig. 2f–h and Supplementary Movie 3). Interestingly, closure of in vivo wounds showed a similar dependence between edge movement and local curvature as observed in vitro (Fig. 2f,g), with wound closure starting and progressing faster at negatively curved regions than positive ones. Consistent with in vitro observations, positive curvatures promoted a crawling mechanism while negative curvatures favoured the appearance of thick actomyosin cables (Fig. 2h and Supplementary Fig. 4). Altogether, results obtained in these highly complementary systems suggest an underlying universal and conserved mechanism relating epithelial closure and tissue geometry.
Focal adhesions and mechanical force distribution
To further investigate the mechanical coupling between both mechanisms, we analysed cell–substrate interactions through focal adhesion (FA) distribution and traction forces. FAs appear as mechanosensitive units whose dynamics and orientation are regulated by traction forces34,35,36. In the case of wound healing, our recent findings showed that FAs were not only coupled to protrusive extensions towards the gap but also to actin contractile bundles29. We first analysed how the local curvature affected the distribution and the orientation of FAs. Large and mature FAs could be detected close to the edge of the gap, whereas a few microns away from the edge they were generally smaller and less dense (Fig. 3a, left). Furthermore, analysis of the FA orientation (Fig. 3a, right) revealed that the majority of them aligned tangentially to the gap edge in negative curvature regions (69.5% with their major axis oriented between 10° and 30° with respect to the edge). In positive regions, more FAs were perpendicularly oriented with respect to the edge (44.8% between 70° and 90°). This was confirmed using live-cell imaging of fluorescently labelled paxillin (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Movie 4). We then investigated the relationship between traction forces and gap curvature. Flexible micropillar substrates37 were used to measure traction forces exerted by cells on the substrate during gap closure (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Movie 5). In agreement with the FA localization, the highest forces were concentrated at the gap edge (average force magnitude per pillar=19.98±0.82 nN, n=56 mean±s.e.m.), as compared with regions spaced >15 μm from the edge (10.25±1.01 nN, n=306, mean±s.e.m., P<0.05 in unpaired Student’s t-test; Fig. 3d) as previously described37,38. Differences in force magnitude and orientation between positively and negatively curved regions could be noted (Fig. 3c,e). Analysis of the orientation of the forces showed that negative curvature promoted the formation of transient force dipoles parallel to the edge (mean=9.74±0.31 nN, n=1021, mean±s.e.m., maximum (max) value=56.01 nN; Fig. 3c,f). This force distribution can be attributed to purse-string mechanism with the cable coupled to the substrate through FAs and pulling inwardly from two sides as previously shown29. In contrast, the largest forces in positively curved regions were directed perpendicular to the edge (mean=17.78±0.4 nN, n=332, mean±s.e.m., max value=76.77 nN; Fig. 3c,g). To confirm the results obtained with flexible micropillars, we performed gap-closure experiments in MDCK cells using traction force microscopy on continuous deformable silicon substrates38,39,40. Similar force patterns were observed in such conditions including force dipoles at negatively curved regions and backward-pulling forces at positively curved ones (Supplementary Movie 6). Overall, these force distributions confirmed that a predominant crawling mechanism with perpendicular forces was observed in regions of positive curvature, whereas a purse-string mechanism with tangential forces with respect to the cell boundary was favored in negative regions (sustaining theoretical conjectures31,41,42).
Large-scale mechanical coupling through actin cables
Immunostaining of the actomyosin cable demonstrated continuity in actin organization along the edge of the monolayer from regions of negative to more positive curvatures, suggesting the existence of a mechanical coupling over multiple cells along the gap (Fig. 2a). To probe how tension forces were distributed at the edge, we used laser ablation to locally disrupt the actin cable at different regions (Fig. 4a). As a first approximation, tension of the cable could be assessed by measuring the recoil speed of the cable in response to the ablation (Fig. 4b). Analysis of the recoil speed (Fig. 4c) revealed that tension within the cable decreased as curvature increased from negative to positive, consistent with the observation of a thinner cable in positive regions, both in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4).
In addition, we employed laser microsurgery to test the mechanical connection between neighbouring regions of opposite curvature (Fig. 4d). Release of tension within the cable at the side of positive regions allowed the crawling mechanism to effectively move forward the whole finger-like structure (Fig. 4d–f, top) in a manner similar to leader cell-driven migration22,37. At the same time, displacement of negatively curved regions did not change as compared with control experiments (Fig. 4f, bottom). Our experiments show that crawling forces always point outwards from the tissue (that is, into the gap), thus helping closure at all curvatures, but particularly in positively curved regions. On the contrary, forces due to cable constriction drive the advancement of the edge in negatively curved regions, where they point outside of the tissue, but hinder forward movement in positively curved regions since they point backwards (away from the gap). Thus, our findings demonstrate that both mechanisms add up in negatively curved regions, making them advance faster than positively curved ones that are subjected to a tug-of-war between the two mechanisms.
Effect of fibronectin and inhibition of motility mechanisms
To further explore the mechanical coupling between crawling and purse-string mechanisms, we experimentally changed the strength of crawling and purse-string in our test system. First, we altered the cell-crawling mechanism by varying the amount of fibronectin absorbed on the substrate (Supplementary Fig. 2). At higher amounts of fibronectin (40 μg ml−1), a large number of lamellipodia drove a fast closure of the gap characterized by rough edges (Fig. 5a, top and Supplementary Movie 8). Importantly, the tip of the positive edge moved forward under the effect of enhanced crawling. Conversely, lower amounts of fibronectin (5 μg ml−1) slowed down the process. Smooth edges and the rounding of the gap indicated reduced crawling with the purse-string mechanism driving the closure. Finally, an intermediate situation could be noted at our standard conditions (20 μg ml−1), suggesting both mechanisms acting together in a balanced manner. In general, increasing strength of crawling was reflected by reduced curvature dependence. Furthermore, higher crawling induced a near constant velocity increase at all curvatures (Fig. 5a, bottom). Taken together, these results indicate that the crawling mechanism is weakly dependent on curvature. We then used pharmacological treatments to perturb either cell crawling or actin purse-string contractility. The inhibition of myosin II by blebbistatin decreased the tension within the cable and thus the cell-crawling mechanism becomes dominant for gap closure (Fig. 5b). Under these conditions, we observed that the slope of the velocity–curvature relationship for negative curvatures is greatly reduced as compared with control conditions (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, an increase in fibronectin concentration under myosin II inhibition induced a similar trend of the curvature–velocity relationship with higher velocity values at all curvatures. As consequence of a reduced mechanical coupling between negative and positive regions through the actomyosin cable, inhibition of myosin induced the tip of the positive region to crawl forward (Fig. 5b, inset) similar to that in our laser ablation experiments (Fig. 4d–f). Overall, we observed that reduced purse-string contractility released the crawling motion of the positive regions. Finally, we examined the role of the purse-string on epithelial gap closure. To do so, we inhibited cell crawling by hampering actin polymerization with the Arp2/3 inhibitor CK666. As expected, such inhibition prevented cell-crawling leading to a smoothing and rounding of the gap shape (Fig. 5c, inset). Under these conditions, we observed that in negative regions the front edge velocity depended more on the curvature (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, the velocity of highly negative regions was less affected by Arp2/3 inhibition, indicating once again that the purse-string was the most important mechanism in these regions. Conversely, we did not observe any displacement of the tissue towards the gap at zero curvature (flat regions) and a retraction at positive curvatures leading to negative velocities. These motions should be a direct consequence of hindering lamellipodia-driven crawling, which is dominant for positive curvature regions. Altogether, these experiments indicate that the edge speed due to purse-string depends on the curvature of the tissue edge, whereas the one due to cell crawling is nearly constant at different curvatures.
Mathematical model
To have a deeper understanding of the underlying mechanisms, we constructed and simulated a mathematical model based on the experimental results. The homophilic interaction of cells within the tissue was modelled as a viscous interaction that exerts a drag on the movement of the gap. The constitutive equation of the monolayer can be written as:
where η is the viscosity; D(v)=1/2(∇v+∇vT) is the symmetrized part of the velocity gradient. The interaction of the cells with the substrate is considered as a frictional resistance to the movement proportional to the velocity. The momentum balance expresses the balance between cell–cell and cell–substrate interactions in the bulk of the tissue:
Where Cf is a friction coefficient. Finally, inspired by the theoretical assumptions of our previous models26,42 and using information obtained from our experimental results, we considered the force pulling on the gap boundary as the sum of two independent components: the crawling and the purse-string (Fig. 6a)24,25. Thus, the normal forces acting on the moving boundary (∂W) of the tissue are modelled as a boundary condition for the stress tensor:
Where n is the local normal vector on the boundary, directed towards the exterior of the tissue, fL is the density of forces exerted by the lamellipodia (per unit length), κ is the local curvature whose sign is defined so that circular gaps have negative curvature and finally γ is the tension exerted by the actomyosin cable (purse-string). The negative sign in front of the tension term means that in positively curved regions the purse-string pulls the edge backwards (towards the interior of the tissue) and thus works against cell crawling. This makes these regions move slower than negatively curved ones where the two mechanisms add up to make the edge advance into the gap.
For simplicity and in agreement with our previous theoretical models26, we suppose that neither the cable tension nor the cell-crawling force depend on curvature, leaving a more detailed and complex description for the future. This enables us to have few parameters to fit and to separate in a clear way the contribution of the two mechanisms. Numerical solution of the system of equations (1) and (2) coupled with the boundary conditions (3) on the gap edge was performed by finite element analysis. The initial contour of the edge was extracted from segmentation of particular experiments. Numerical simulations performed as described in the Supplementary material were sufficiently accurate in recapitulating the evolution of the edge (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Movie 10) and the velocity–curvature relation reflected the one that was observed in in vitro experiments (Fig. 6c). Figure 1e shows a good linear fit with slope directly proportional to the cable tension24, which is valid close to zero curvature. However, speed is lower than that predicted by this linear fit at more negative curvatures, where the cells suffer the nonlinear effect of the tissue viscous drag. The resulting velocity–curvature relation could be empirically represented by a logarithmic decay (Fig. 6c). Solution of the simulation for zero crawling or zero purse-string shows the behaviour of advancement of the edge if one or the other mechanism acts alone (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Movie 11).
Apart from the remarkable agreement between simulations and experimental observations (Fig. 6c), our modelling approach allows us not only to clearly separate the relative contributions of the two mechanisms but also to determine how they act in synergy to yield the overall movement of the edge (Fig. 6d).
Discussion
Epithelial tissues are subjected to large-scale reorganization during morphogenesis, wound closure or epithelial–mesenchymal transition43. Such remodelling involves ‘epithelial plasticity’ in which cell–cell interactions play a major role and border cells may become motile44,45. In this context, the closure of epithelia is of particular interest since it recapitulates these different scenarios. Classical views of epithelial gap closure involve either lamellipodium crawling or actomyosin-based purse-string contraction depending on the biochemical and physical properties of the environment7. In agreement with previous observations10,19,27, our study shows that these two mechanisms do not exclude each other but, on the contrary, largely coexist. Furthermore, our investigation demonstrates that the two mechanisms can mechanically influence each other and are tightly regulated through the geometry of the tissue. As such, cell movement at the gap edge relies on a universal coupling between local curvature and actin organization, which drives a large-scale process linking cell crawling and actin-based purse-string mechanisms. Positively curved regions show high lamellipodia activity and exerted forces on the substrate perpendicular to the edge that may promote a net forward movement of the cells. However, these forces are counteracted by rearward forces because of the contractility of actomyosin bundles, thus hindering cell advancement in the presence of backward-pulling purse-string cables. Importantly, once the tension within this actomyosin cable is released by either inhibition of myosin II or laser ablation, cell crawling is enhanced independently of the curvature. Negative regions are characterized by thick actomyosin cables that exert tangential force dipoles (purse-string mechanism). Within these regions, purse-string contraction positively pairs with cell-crawling, resulting in high velocities. These curvature-specific closure phenotypes and the general organization of actin structures are reproduced in vivo for wounds in the notum epithelia of Drosophila pupae, indicating that the mechanisms driving gap closure are universal. Furthermore, our experimental results proved that crawling is present at all curvatures but is most effective at flat and positive curvatures. Conversely, purse-string dominated the advancement of highly negative curvatures, but was ineffective at zero curvature and counterproductive at positive ones because of its rearward direction.
These experimental results are well recapitulated by in silico simulation. Our model’s decomposition of the two mechanisms shows that the speed of edge advancement due to crawling is nearly constant at all curvatures with a slight tendency to increase with curvature. On the other hand, the velocity due to purse-string contraction decreases with increasing curvature (that is, high velocity at more negative curvatures). As a result of the mechanical coupling between the two mechanisms, the overall advancement of the edge also decreases with curvature.
The relative value of the contributing mechanisms reflects the observation that purse-string and crawling are contributing to different extents at differently curved edges (Fig. 6e). Interestingly, actin structures driving the two mechanisms (that is, branched actin and actin fibres, respectively) have been observed to self-assemble in response to the curvature of the cell membrane in cytoplasm fragments46, suggesting that curvature of the cell–tissue boundary and type of motility mechanism are fundamentally correlated. Furthermore, such actin structures at the base of lamellipodia crawling and purse-string constriction seem to be antagonistic through a mechanism controlled by Rho and Rac17,47. However, in our experiments, we observe the coexistence of such structures, suggesting for a regulatory mechanism, which unfortunately remains elusive at this point. To better understand the interaction and regulation occurring between the two mechanisms, we use our mathematical model. Indeed, the decomposed contribution of the two mechanisms suggests that cells have evolved to select the mechanism that drives the closure in an efficient way31,41,42. This representation explains the prevalence of one or the other closure mechanism depending on the local curvature and, more generally, on the size of the gap. As small gaps (for example, cell extrusion3,4,20) are highly curved, they may predominantly close by purse-string constriction. Similarly, gaps of subcellular scale on the plasma membrane typically close via constriction of an actomyosin ring6,48. This mechanism loses importance as the radius of the gap increases and, if enough ECM is present, large gaps close by crawling on the substrate9. Generally, in vitro assays to study wound closure—scratch and wound model assays—generate very large gaps with nearly flat edges that indeed have been reported to advance by crawling16,38. This can be explained by the purse-string being ineffective in flat regions since it does not produce normal forces to help cells advance into the gap. Interestingly, lamellipodial crawling at local regions of positive curvature helps to create an unstable front, and finger-like protrusions form in this scenario19,49,50. Cells at the tip of these protrusions show enhanced crawling capacity and are thought to drag neighbouring cells using actin bundles analogous to the two continuous actomyosin cables we observed (Fig. 2d) extending behind tip cells through the flat edge of the gap17. In fingers and tip structures, this should generate a tug-of-war between the crawling and the purse-string mechanisms, with purse-string forces resisting the advancement of the ‘leader’ cell. Indeed, this was observed in migratory tissue in model wound experiments (Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Movie 12). When crawling forces are sufficiently large, this tension may result in pulling forces dragging the connected neighbouring ‘follower’ cells. Similarly, positive curvatures, which characterize expanding tissues, are likely to perceive a force balance between the two mechanisms. However, we have observed that the cable is apparently weaker and might become unstable at positive curvatures, and at high positive curvatures this cable may break down. Thus, in the long term this instability and the proliferation of cells within the tissue may direct this equilibrium in favour of the crawling mechanism28,32. Importantly, this type of equilibrium can be seen in colonies of cancer cells. Once the equilibrium is broken, for example, by reduction of cell–cell junctions and the consequent decrease in tension within the cable, cells at the boundary are free to ‘crawl away’ and metastatically invade the surrounding tissues18,51. At even higher curvatures that distinguish small groups of cells advancing under the effect of a chemoattractant or even single cells, the purse string is not present leaving crawling as the sole mechanism of motility52. Overall, our data and analysis provide a general interpretation of the relation between epithelial tissue motility and its geometrical cues.
Methods
Cell culture and reagents
MDCK cells were cultured in DMEM (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Life Technologies). MDCK cells stably expressing GFP-Actin were kindly provided by J.W. Nelson. Stably transfected cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS and Geneticin (100 μg ml−1; Life Technologies). Cells were cultured at 37° C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2 and subcultured every 2/3 days using the Trypsin/EDTA (Life Technologies) method. Blebbistatin (Sigma-Aldrich) and CK666 (Sigma-Aldrich) were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at a concentration of 1 mM before being added to the media. Fibronectin (Sigma) was reconstituted in deionized water at a concentration of 1 mg ml−1. Dilution to working solution was also performed in deionized water. Transient transfection with mApple-paxillin (generated in the laboratory of M.W. Davidson) on stable GFP-Actin MDCK cells was performed using electroporation (Neon Transfection system; Life Technologies).
Preparation of PDMS stencils
Stencils made of PDMS (Dow-Corning) to create gaps in the epithelium have been produced by a two-step molding process as previously described9,40 with minor variations. Briefly, shapes of desired dimensions and geometries were transferred from a mask on a silicon wafer by photolithography. Deep reactive ion etching technique was used to create pillars of desired height (∼100 μm) emerging from the wafer. After silanization of the wafer by vapour deposition (1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-Perfluorooctyl-trichlorosilane; Sigma), PDMS at a ratio 1/10 (curing agent/base) was crosslinked on the wafer (80° C for 2 h) to produce a mold having holes on its surface. After removal from the wafer, this second mold was silanized and the PDMS crosslinking (80° C for 2 h) was repeated to produce stencils in place of the holes.
Preparation of wound-free gaps in the MDCK-confluent epithelium
In all, 600 μl of varying concentration of fibronectin solution was incubated for 1 h at 37° C on a glass-bottom Petri dish (IBIDI, Sciencewerke Pte Ltd). Thereafter, excess of protein still in solution or weakly bound was washed away three times with deionized water. The solution was removed and the substrate was allowed to dry. A PDMS cut with stencils emerging from its surface was carefully placed upside-down on the glass-bottom Petri dish and incubated for 1 h at 37° C and 100% rH. Thereafter, 7 μl of 0.2% pluronic acid solution (Sigma) were flown in between the PDMS stencils by capillarity to passivate the sides of the stencils. After 1 h incubation at 37° C, pluronic acid was washed away three times with deionized water. The device was again dried to allow cell suspension (7 μl with ∼100,000 cells) to flow by capillarity underneath the PDMS block in between the stencils. To prevent washout, cells were allowed to adhere to the substrate for 30–45 min in a cell culture incubator. DMEM media (400 μl) supplemented with 10% FBS were added to supplement cell with sufficient nutrients. Cells were grown for 12–18 h under appropriate culture conditions to permit formation of a mature epithelium around the stencils. Homogenous distribution of protein on the substrate at the onset of the experiment was verified by mixing fluorescently labelled fibronectin with unlabelled one (ratio 1/10 w/w; Supplementary Fig. 3). Previous report demonstrated that fibronectin concentration remains unaltered during the experimental time9.
Live-cell imaging
Samples prepared as described in the previous section were placed on microscope stage. After careful removal of the stencils and replenishment of media with fresh DMEM pre-equilibrated for temperature and CO2, dynamics of gap’s closure were visualized with phase contrast microscopy using BioStation IM-Q imaging system (Nikon) equipped with × 20 phase objective. Dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and brightfield fluorescence as well as force measurements have been performed using a fully automated IX81 inverted microscope (Olympus) equipped with oil-immersion objectives ( × 20 and × 40), appropriate filter sets, lamp and camera. All live-cell experiments have been conducted at 37˚ C and 5% CO2. For inhibition experiments, samples were pre-incubated with the drugs at the reported concentration for 1 h. Drug concentrations were kept constant also during washing and the entire experimental time.
Image segmentation and analysis of gap-closure experiments
The image segmentation of phase contrast and DIC images was performed using the in-house MATLAB software. The algorithm applies a range filter on the raw image. The range filter gives high response at region with large intensity variations and low response at region with homogeneous intensity. In our image, the homogeneous region corresponds to the epithelial gap, while large variation arose from cellular components. The size of the window used varied from 7 × 7 to 13 × 13 pixels. The range-filtered image was then thresholded and refined by morphological operations to generate a binary mask corresponding to the gap. After segmentation, the contour of the epithelial gap was extracted from the binary mask. Randomly selected points along the contour were analysed for curvature and velocity. Between 6 and 8 points per gap were selected to cover the whole spread of curvatures within the gap. For each point, local curvature was computed with respect to neighbouring points spaced 15 μm away on both sides.
Immunofluorescence
After careful removal of the stencils, samples were washed with media equilibrated for temperature and CO2 and placed back in the incubator for specified times to allow cell migration. Thereafter, samples were washed with PBS with calcium (Life Technologies) and fixed for 15 min with paraformaldehyde (4% in PBS with calcium). Paraformaldehyde was inactivated by incubating the samples with NH4Cl (10 mM in PBS) for 15 min. Following three washes with PBS, samples were incubated with 1% BSA (Sigma) and Triton X-100 (0.1%; Sigma) for other 15 min. For staining of phosphomyosin light chain, samples were incubated with primary antibody against phosphomyosin light chain 2 (Ser19; Cell Signalling Technology; cat. no. 3675) raised in rabbit (1:50 dilution) and cortactin (P80/85; Millipore; cat. no. 05–180) raised in mouse (1:100), washed with PBS and incubated for 1 h with Alexa fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:100 dilution; Life Technologies) and Alexa fluor 568 donkey anti-mouse (1:100 dilution; Life Technologies). For staining of paxillin, samples were incubated with primary antibody against paxillin raised in mouse (1:100 dilution; Abcam; cat. no. ab3127), washed with PBS and incubated for 1 h with Alexa 488 goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:100 dilution, Life Technologies). For both immunofluorescence, samples were then washed and stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1 μM; Sigma), and for actin they were stained with phalloidin Alexa fluor 647 (1:100; Life Technologies) or TRITC-phalloidin (1:50; Sigma). Images were acquired using confocal microscopy (LSM710, Zeiss or Nikon A1R, Nikon) with oil-immersion × 100 objective. For high-resolution images of focal adhesion orientation (Paxillin)-structured illumination microscopy in the total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) mode was employed (N-SIM, Nikon) using an oil-immersion × 100 objective.
Force measurements
Traction forces exerted on the substrate have been accessed by two independent methods: deflection of pillars made of elastomeric silicon (elastic micropillar experiments)37,53 and by deformation of a soft elastic substrate (traction force microscopy)29,38,39,40. Pillars made of PDMS have been produced by soft lithography and their top functionalized with fibronectin54. PDMS cut with stencils on top was carefully placed upside-down on top of the pillars. Passivation of sides of pillars and stencils was achieved by addition of 10 μl of pluronic acid (0.2%) at the side of the PDMS’ cuts. Pluronic solution was allowed to enter by capillarity in the space between the pillars and the stencils. After multiple washing with water and once with medium, cell suspension was added on the sides of the PDMS. With gentle pipetting, cells could diffuse in the space between the two PDMS cuts. Traction force microscopy was performed by detecting displacement of beads embedded on the surface of a soft silicon elastomer. Briefly, CyA and CyB (Dow-Corning) components were mixed in a 1:1 ratio, spin-coated on a glass-bottom dish at 500 r.p.m. for 1 min and cured at 80 °C for 2 h (elastic modulus ∼8 kPa). The substrate was silanized using a 5% solution of (3-Aminopropyl) trimethoxysilane (Sigma) in ethyl alcohol for 5 min. Subsequently, carboxylated green fluorescent beads (100 nm, Invitrogen) were diluted in deionized water (1:500) and added to the substrate. After incubation for 5 min, the substrates were washed with deionized water to remove loosely bound beads. Substrates were coated with fibronectin at a concentration of 20 μg ml−1 for 30 min at 37° C. Stencils were incubated in pluronic solution (0.2%) to avoid adherence to the soft silicon surface. After washing with deionized water, stencils were carefully placed on the soft surface. Thereafter, cells were injected by capillarity in between the stencils. Cells were grown for 12–18 h under appropriate conditions to permit formation of a mature epithelium around the stencils. After removal of the stencils, live-cell imaging of closure of the gap and simultaneous detection of deflection of pillars (elastic micropillar experiments) or displacement of beads (traction force microscopy) using a fully automated Olympus IX81 inverted microscope equipped with oil-immersion × 20 and × 40 objectives. Analysis of forces by pillar deflection or bead displacement was performed as previously described29,53.
Laser microsurgery of actomyosin cable in MDCK cells
Laser microsurgery of the actomyosin cable at the gaps’ edge was performed using an ultraviolet laser (355 nm; 300 ps; PowerChip, Teem Photonics) mounted on a Nikon A1R confocal microscope with a × 60 oil-immersion objective. Ablation of the actomyosin cable was performed by moving the laser beam at low power (10 nW at the back aperture of the objective) with low vectorial speed perpendicularly to the edge. Integrity of the cell after ablation was visually verified with brightfield illumination. Images were acquired every 1.1 s and analysis of speed of recoil55 and movement of the gaps’ edge was performed in ImageJ.
Laser ablation of Drosophila melanogaster’s notum epithelium
The in vivo experiments were performed in D. melanogaster. Flies were maintained on standard conditions and kept at 25° C. The UAS/GAL4 system56 was used to follow the dynamics of wound closure. Flies with w;; pnr-GAL4 (ref. 57) were recombined with w;; UAS-mCherry-Moesin58 to obtain w;; pnr-GAL4, UAS-mCherry-Moesin/TM6b. Flies with w;spaghetti-sqh-GFP were used to follow myosin dynamics59,60. Pupae with these genotypes were staged at 13 h after puparium formation and their notum epithelium was imaged at 25° C on an Andor Revolution XD spinning disk imaging system (Nikon Eclipse Ti-E and Yokogawa CSU-x1) with a × 60 oil-immersion objective. Pupa-mounting procedure and visualization were performed as previously described59. Complex laser wound shapes were achieved using a MicroPoint (Andor Technology) ultraviolet nitrogen-pumped dye laser (435 nm). To ablate the desired shape, xy coordinates (11 coordinates) were manually selected on the iQ 2.5 controller software (Andor Technology). Laser was triggered manually on each coordinate with 15 pulses at maximum power. Imaging started immediately after the wounding protocol. Actin cable intensity was obtained by manually selecting regions of interest of ∼2.5 mm at the gap edge.
In silico model
The continuum mechanics framework provides the set of partial differential equations to describe the system with respect to time and space as follows:
The tissue is modelled as a viscous material: its stress tensor σ is given by =2η D(v)−pI, where η is the viscosity; D(v)=1/2(∇v+∇vT) is the symmetrized part of the velocity gradient, p is a pressure and I is the identity matrix. Cells are considered as a tridimensional incompressible material; however, in the bidimensional configuration studied here, where the height of cells is negligible compared with the size of the monolayer, cells can adjust their height by spreading or contracting: as a two-dimensional (2D) material, the tissue is compressible and any vertical deformation is compensated by the pressure term. The 2D constitutive equation of the monolayer can be written with effective viscosity (still denoted as η for the sake of simplicity): σ=2η D(v).
Cell–substrate interaction forces are modelled as an external friction force proportional to velocity; the momentum balance expresses the balance between cell–cell and cell–substrate interactions. It leads to the following formula: −∇.σ=−Cfv, where Cf is a friction coefficient.
The closing mechanisms acting on the border ∂W of the tissue are modelled as a boundary condition for the stress tensor: σ.n=−(fL−γκ)n, on ∂W, where n is the normal vector on the boundary, directed towards the exterior of the tissue, κ is the local curvature, by convention negative in case of a circular gap for instance, γ is the tension exerted by the actomyosin structure and finally, fL is the lineic density of forces exerted by the lamellipodia.
In the present set-up, the difficulty is to take into account the moving edge of the tissue and the fact that the motion is driven by forces exerted on it. Moreover, the expression of the forces depends on the geometrical properties of the edge. Such a situation is reminiscent of multiphase fluid modelling, for example, gas bubbles in a liquid, where the interface between two phases evolves in time according to their mechanical properties and the surface tension characteristic of this interface. The resulting partial differential equations can be numerically solved with appropriate methods such as the Level-set methods61, where the moving boundary is implicitly represented as the zero level-set of a function. The motion of the interface is described by the transport of the level-set function by the velocity field of the phases26; geometrical properties such as curvature and normal vectors can be extracted from the expression of the level-set function. For this study, we have set up a numerical framework inspired by works such as ref. 62, in which the computational domain is fixed, and the forces on the boundary appear as a source term in the momentum balance equation.
In our implementation, the time is discretized with a time step, Δt, and the space is discretized with a triangular mesh that is adapted to the contour of the tissue at each time step; this mesh adaptation is essential to compute precisely the forces on the edge. The numerical algorithm is implemented as follows: at the initial step t=0, the initial contour of the tissue is extracted by hand from an image using the software ImageJ, with ∼50 points. A first level-set function is computed from it and an initial mesh is constructed with an adaptation criterion based on the level-set function63 with the use of the BAMG software ( https://www.ljll.math.upmc.fr/lehyaric/freesoft/bamg.htm). Then, in the following steps, and as long as the area of the gap is not zero, we compute the local curvature from the level-set function, the forces on the moving edge and the velocity field resulting from the momentum balance equation (solving this equation using a finite element method with the C++ library RHEOLEF64). Using the matlab toolbox ToolboxLS65, we transport the level-set function on the time interval [t,t+Δt] along this velocity field and renormalize it. We then construct a mesh adapted to the new level-set function with the same method as in the initialization and, finally, the time step (t←t+Δt) is incremented.
Image analysis and statistics
Images were analysed with the in-house MATLAB software and ImageJ. Data analysis, statistics, graph plotting and fitting were performed using the MS Excel (Microsoft) and Prism (GraphPad) software. Statistical analysis was performed by unpaired Student’s t-test. The significance threshold was set for the t-test as P<0.05. For all data sets, experiments were repeated in independent triplicates or more. Graphs display mean±s.e.m. unless otherwise specified. Mathematical modelling and in silico simulation were performed in-house using MATLAB and C++ codes as described in the Supplementary Material.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Ravasio, A. et al. Gap geometry dictates epithelial closure efficiency. Nat. Commun. 6:7683 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8683 (2015).
References
Jacinto, A., Martinez-Arias, A. & Martin, P. Mechanisms of epithelial fusion and repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, E117–E123 (2001).
Jacinto, A., Woolner, S. & Martin, P. Dynamic analysis of dorsal closure in Drosophila: from genetics to cell biology. Dev. Cell 3, 9–19 (2002).
Marinari, E. et al. Live-cell delamination counterbalances epithelial growth to limit tissue overcrowding. Nature 484, 542–545 (2012).
Rosenblatt, J., Raff, M. C. & Cramer, L. P. An epithelial cell destined for apoptosis signals its neighbors to extrude it by an actin- and myosin-dependent mechanism. Curr. Biol. 11, 1847–1857 (2001).
Shaw, T. J. & Martin, P. Wound repair at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3209–3213 (2009).
Bement, W. M., Mandato, C. A. & Kirsch, M. N. Wound-induced assembly and closure of an actomyosin purse string in Xenopus oocytes. Curr. Biol. 9, 579–587 (1999).
Sonnemann, K. J. & Bement, W. M. Wound repair: toward understanding and integration of single-cell and multicellular wound responses. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 237–263 (2011).
Abreu-Blanco, M. T., Verboon, J. M., Liu, R., Watts, J. J. & Parkhurst, S. M. Drosophila embryos close epithelial wounds using a combination of cellular protrusions and an actomyosin purse string. J. Cell Sci. 125, 5984–5997 (2012).
Anon, E. et al. Cell crawling mediates collective cell migration to close undamaged epithelial gaps. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10891–10896 (2012).
Klarlund, J. K. Dual modes of motility at the leading edge of migrating epithelial cell sheets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15799–15804 (2012).
Tamada, M., Perez, T. D., Nelson, W. J. & Sheetz, M. P. Two distinct modes of myosin assembly and dynamics during epithelial wound closure. J. Cell Biol. 176, 27–33 (2007).
Hutson, M. S. et al. Forces for morphogenesis investigated with laser microsurgery and quantitative modeling. Science 300, 145–149 (2003).
Almeida, L., Bagnerini, P., Habbal, A., Noselli, S. & Serman, F. A mathematical model for dorsal closure. J. Theor. Biol. 268, 105–119 (2011).
Kim, J. H. et al. Propulsion and navigation within the advancing monolayer sheet. Nat. Mater. 12, 856–863 (2013).
Vedula, S. R. K. et al. Mechanics of epithelial closure over non-adherent environments. Nat. Commun. 6, 6111 (2015).
Poujade, M. et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15988–15993 (2007).
Reffay, M. et al. Interplay of RhoA and mechanical forces in collective cell migration driven by leader cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 217–223 (2014).
Tsuji, T., Ibaragi, S. & Hu, G. F. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell cooperativity in metastasis. Cancer Res. 69, 7135–7139 (2009).
Bement, W. M., Forscher, P. & Mooseker, M. S. A novel cytoskeletal structure involved in purse string wound closure and cell polarity maintenance. J. Cell Biol. 121, 565–578 (1993).
Florian, P., Schoneberg, T., Schulzke, J. D., Fromm, M. & Gitter, A. H. Single-cell epithelial defects close rapidly by an actinomyosin purse string mechanism with functional tight junctions. J. Physiol. 545, 485–499 (2002).
Martin, P. & Lewis, J. Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing. Nature 360, 179–183 (1992).
Danjo, Y. & Gipson, I. K. Actin 'purse string' filaments are anchored by E-cadherin-mediated adherens junctions at the leading edge of the epithelial wound, providing coordinated cell movement. J. Cell Sci. 111, 3323–3332 (1998).
Nobes, C. D. & Hall, A. Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 Gtpases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell 81, 53–62 (1995).
Gov, N. S. in: Cell and Matrix Mechanics eds Kaunas R., Zemel A. 219–238(CRC Press (2014).
Cochet-Escartin, O., Ranft, J., Silberzan, P. & Marcq, P. Border forces and friction control epithelial closure dynamics. Biophys. J. 106, 65–73 (2014).
Almeida, L., Bagnerini, P. & Habbal, A. Modeling actin cable contraction. Comput. Mathod Appl. 64, 310–321 (2012).
Grasso, S., Hernandez, J. A. & Chifflet, S. Roles of wound geometry, wound size, and extracellular matrix in the healing response of bovine corneal endothelial cells in culture. Am. J. Physiol. 293, C1327–C1337 (2007).
Rolli, C. G. et al. Switchable adhesive substrates: revealing geometry dependence in collective cell behavior. Biomaterials 33, 2409–2418 (2012).
Brugues, A. et al. Forces driving epithelial wound healing. Nat. Phys. 10, 684–691 (2014).
Mccarthy, J. B., Palm, S. L. & Furcht, L. T. Migration by haptotaxis of a schwann-cell tumor line to the basement-membrane glycoprotein laminin. J. Cell Biol. 97, 772–777 (1983).
Almeida, L., Chambolle, A. & Novaga, M. Mean curvature flow with obstacles. Ann. I. H. Poincare-AN 29, 667–681 (2012).
Rausch, S. et al. Polarizing cytoskeletal tension to induce leader cell formation during collective cell migration. Biointerphases 8, 32 (2013).
Nikolic, D. L., Boettiger, A. N., Bar-Sagi, D., Carbeck, J. D. & Shvartsman, S. Y. Role of boundary conditions in an experimental model of epithelial wound healing. Am. J. Physiol. 291, C68–C75 (2006).
Riveline, D. et al. Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1175–1186 (2001).
Grashoff, C. et al. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466, 263–266 (2010).
Plotnikov, S. V., Pasapera, A. M., Sabass, B. & Waterman, C. M. Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151, 1513–1527 (2012).
du Roure, O. et al. Force mapping in epithelial cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2390–2395 (2005).
Trepat, X. et al. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nat. Phys. 5, 426–430 (2009).
Mertz, A. F. et al. Cadherin-based intercellular adhesions organize epithelial cell-matrix traction forces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 842–847 (2013).
Vedula, S. R. K. et al. Epithelial bridges maintain tissue integrity during collective cell migration. Nat. Mater. 13, 87–96 (2014).
Almeida, L. & Demongeot, J. Predictive power of "a minima" models in biology. Acta Biotheor. 60, 3–19 (2012).
Almeida, L. & Bagnerini, P. in Hyperbolic problems: Theory, numerics, applications eds Ancona F., Bressan A., Marcati P., Marson A. AIMS Series on Applied Mathematics 8, 293–300 (2014).
Thiery, J. P. & Sleeman, J. P. Complex networks orchestrate epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 131–142 (2006).
Kim, J. H., Dooling, L. J. & Asthagiri, A. R. Intercellular mechanotransduction during multicellular morphodynamics. J. R Soc. Interface 7, S341–S350 (2010).
Rodriguez-Fraticelli, A. E. & Martin-Belmonte, F. Picking up the threads: extracellular matrix signals in epithelial morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 30, 83–90 (2014).
Verkhovsky, A. B., Svitkina, T. M. & Borisy, G. G. Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm. Curr. Biol. 9, 11–20 (1999).
Ory, S., Munari-Silem, Y., Fort, P. & Jurdic, P. Rho and Rac exert antagonistic functions on spreading of macrophage-derived multinucleated cells and are not required for actin fiber formation. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1177–1188 (2000).
Abreu-Blanco, M. T., Verboon, J. M. & Parkhurst, S. M. Coordination of Rho family GTPase activities to orchestrate cytoskeleton responses during cell wound repair. Curr. Biol. 24, 144–155 (2014).
Mark, S. et al. Physical model of the dynamic instability in an expanding cell culture. Biophys. J. 98, 361–370 (2010).
Tarle, V. et al. Modeling the finger instability in an expanding cell monolayer. Integrative Biology DOI: 10.1039/C5IB00092K (2015).
Friedl, P., Locker, J., Sahai, E. & Segall, J. E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 777–783 (2012).
Lauffenburger, D. A. & Horwitz, A. F. Cell migration: a physically integrated molecular process. Cell 84, 359–369 (1996).
Ravasio, A., Vaishnavi, S., Ladoux, B. & Viasnoff, V. High-resolution imaging of cellular processes across textured surfaces using an indexed-matched elastomer. Acta Biomater. 14, 53–60 (2014).
Vedula, S. R. K. et al. Emerging modes of collective cell migration induced by geometrical constraints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12974–12979 (2012).
Kumar, S. et al. Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics. Biophys. J. 90, 3762–3773 (2006).
Brand, A. H. & Perrimon, N. Targeted gene-expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118, 401–415 (1993).
Calleja, M., Moreno, E., Pelaz, S. & Morata, G. Visualization of gene expression in living adult Drosophila. Science 274, 252–255 (1996).
Millard, T. H. & Martin, P. Dynamic analysis of filopodial interactions during the zippering phase of Drosophila dorsal closure. Development 135, 621–626 (2008).
Antunes, M., Pereira, T., Cordeiro, J. V., Almeida, L. & Jacinto, A. Coordinated waves of actomyosin flow and apical cell constriction immediately after wounding. J. Cell Biol. 202, 365–379 (2013).
Royou, A., Sullivan, W. & Karess, R. Cortical recruitment of nonmuscle myosin II in early syncytial Drosophila embryos: its role in nuclear axial expansion and its regulation by Cdc2 activity. J. Cell Biol. 158, 127–137 (2002).
Osher, S. & Sethian, J. A. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed - algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J. Comput. Phys. 79, 12–49 (1988).
Sussman, M., Smereka, P. & Osher, S. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible 2-phase flow. J. Comput. Phys. 114, 146–159 (1994).
Ducrot, V. & Fray, P. Contrôle de l’approximation géométrique d’une interface par une métrique anisotrope. C. R Acad. Sci. Paris 345, 537–542 (2007).
Saramito, P. Efficient C++ Finite Element Computing with Rheolef DEA 161 (Grenoble (2012).
Mitchell, I. M. The flexible, extensible and efficient toolbox of level set methods. J. Sci. Comput. 35, 300–329 (2008).
Acknowledgements
We thank group members from MBI René-Marc Mège and W.J. Nelson for helpful discussions. We also thank MBI Microfabrication (Gianluca Grenci and Mohammed Asraf), MBI Science Communication Core (Larisa Bulavina, Andrew Wong and Steven Wolf) and MBI Microscopy Core (Felix Margadant) for continuous support. We are grateful to S. Yonemura and W.J. Nelson for their generous gift of MDCK cell lines and to Michael W. Davidson and Pakorn Kanchanawong for mApple-paxillin plasmid. Financial supports from the Human Frontier Science Program (grant RGP0040/2012), the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement no. 617233, Agence Nationale pour la Recherche project REGENR (grant ANR-11-BSV5-0021), Pessoa programme (project 30920XM) and the Mechanobiology Institute are gratefully acknowledged. XT acknowledges Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BFU2012-38146), the Generalitat de Catalunya (2014-SGR-927), and the European Research Council (CoG-616480). B.L. acknowledges the Institut Universitaire de France and T.C. the USPC-NUS agreement for his fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.R., L.N.d.A. and B.L. designed research, A.R., T.C., T.P., C.B. and Y.T. performed experiments, I.C. conceived and implemented the numerical method and did the in silico simulations, A.R., I.C., H.T.O., A.B., A.J., X.T, A.J.K., N.G., L.N.d.A. and B.L. contributed new reagents, modelling and computational tools, A.R., L.N.d.A. and B.L. wrote the paper, L.N.d.A. and B.L. supervised the project. All authors read the manuscript and commented on it.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Figures 1-6 (PDF 588 kb)
Supplementary Movie 1
Closure of in-vitro gaps of different shapes. Life cell imaging of gap closure experiments shown in Fig. 1 B. Tracking over time of randomly chosen point and the edge of the gap are used to illustrate the different speed at different curvatures. Frame rate = 1 frame every 5 minutes. (MOV 1346 kb)
Supplementary Movie 2
Live cell imaging of GFP-actin transfected cells. DIC (left) and brightfield fluorescence (right) of an exemplary gap closure experiment shown in Fig. 2 C. Frame rate = 1 image every 30 sec. (MOV 7499 kb)
Supplementary Movie 3
Closure of wounds with varying geometries. Exemplary illustrating the laser microsurgery experiments of notum epithelium shown in Fig. 1 I. Frame rate = 1 image every 5 min. (MOV 2538 kb)
Supplementary Movie 4
Live cell imaging of GFP-actin and m-cherry paxilin transfected cells. Brightfield fluorescence of actin (green) and TIRF of m-cherry paxilin illustrate the evolution of foal adhesion during a gap closure. Frame rate = 1 image every 5 min. (MOV 873 kb)
Supplementary Movie 5
Exemplary gap closure experiment combined with micropillar force measurements. Live cell imaging and traction force measurement shown in Fig. 3 B. Left, merged image of GFP-actin (green) and Cy3 fibronectin (red) staining the top of the pillars shows the advancement of the epithelium and simultaneous displacement of the top of the pillars. Middle, Cy3 fibronectin is shown separately to fully appreciate the displacement of the pillars. Right, vectorial representation of forces demonstrates the evolution of their orientation and magnitude over time. Frame rate = 1 image every 5 min. (MOV 930 kb)
Supplementary Movie 6
Traction force microscopy during gap closure. Merge of DIC image with vectorial representation of the deformation of a continuous soft substrate (Traction Force Microscopy). Frame rate = 1 image every 5 min (MOV 2514 kb)
Supplementary Movie 7
Laser ablation of the actomyosin cable releases the tension and allows crawling forward of positive regions. Live imaging of GFP-actin shows the laser ablation of the cable at the two sides of the positive regions. During ablation (first part of the movie), the frame rate is 1 image every 1.1 sec. During the second part of the movie, gap closure is followed for 1 h at the frame rate of 1 image every 5 min. Frame rates are indicated in the movie. Site of ablation are highlighted by a white circle. (MOV 3790 kb)
Supplementary Movie 8
Exemplary gap closure at different amounts of fibronectin. Phase contrast of exemplary gap closure experiments at the indicated concentration of fibronectin. Frame rate = 1 image every 5 minutes. (MOV 1258 kb)
Supplementary Movie 9
Myosin and Arp2/3 inhibition experiments. Phase contrast of exemplary gap closure experiments at the indicated inhibitory conditions. Frame rate = 1 image every 5 minutes. (MOV 1653 kb)
Supplementary Movie 10
Comparison between in-vitro gap closure experiment and simulation based on mathematical model. The two movies correspond to Fig. 6 in the article. Parameters of the model were chosen so that both the closing time and the overall shape would match. (MOV 1044 kb)
Supplementary Movie 11
Comparison between different analytical solutions of mathematical model. These movies illustrate two limits of the model: either crawling dominant (middle) where the edges are advancing faster than the corners which eventually leads to sharpen the shape of the gap; or conversely pursestring dominant (right) where the corners are advancing faster, resulting in a much smoother shape. An intermediate scenario is seen when both mechanisms are set with similar magnitudes (left). (MOV 2203 kb)
Supplementary Movie 12
Migration of MDCK in a model wound experiment. Movie showing tug-of-war between crawling and purse-string mechanism in a wound model experiment (see Suppl. Fig. 6). Substrate was coated with 20 μg/ml fibronectin. Frame rate = 1 image every 30 min. (MOV 1602 kb)
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ravasio, A., Cheddadi, I., Chen, T. et al. Gap geometry dictates epithelial closure efficiency. Nat Commun 6, 7683 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8683
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8683
This article is cited by
-
Spontaneous rotations in epithelia as an interplay between cell polarity and boundaries
Nature Physics (2024)
-
How multiscale curvature couples forces to cellular functions
Nature Reviews Physics (2024)
-
Homeotic compartment curvature and tension control spatiotemporal folding dynamics
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Computational modeling and simulation of epithelial wound closure
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Mesh-Informed Neural Networks for Operator Learning in Finite Element Spaces
Journal of Scientific Computing (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.