Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

High rates of anaerobic methane oxidation in freshwater wetlands reduce potential atmospheric methane emissions


The role of anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in wetlands, the largest natural source of atmospheric methane, is poorly constrained. Here we report rates of microbially mediated AOM (average rate=20 nmol cm−3 per day) in three freshwater wetlands that span multiple biogeographical provinces. The observed AOM rates rival those in marine environments. Most AOM activity may have been coupled to sulphate reduction, but other electron acceptors remain feasible. Lipid biomarkers typically associated with anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea were more enriched in 13C than those characteristic of marine systems, potentially due to distinct microbial metabolic pathways or dilution with heterotrophic isotope signals. On the basis of this extensive data set, AOM in freshwater wetlands may consume 200 Tg methane per year, reducing their potential methane emissions by over 50%. These findings challenge precepts surrounding wetland carbon cycling and demonstrate the environmental relevance of an anaerobic methane sink in ecosystems traditionally considered strong methane sources.


Freshwater wetlands (FWW) are characterized by high rates of methanogenesis, and although they occupy a small fraction of the Earth’s surface, they represent one of the largest natural sources of methane to the atmosphere1. Few studies have examined anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in FWW2,3,4,5 and AOM was largely regarded as inconsequential in these environments until recently. Instead, aerobic methane oxidation was assumed to be the dominant mode of methane consumption in FWW6. The reasoning for this assumption is simple: sulphate was long considered the sole oxidant for methane7 in anoxic environments and sulphate is scarce in freshwater. In marine environments, where sulphate is available in much higher concentrations, AOM exerts a strong control over methane fluxes from the seabed8. Yet, despite low sulphate concentrations, FWW support a dynamic sulphur cycle and high rates of sulphate reduction9 (SR) are maintained by rapid recycling of reduced sulphur species10. Moreover, studies of freshwater AOM have indicated several electron acceptors for methane oxidation, including sulphate11, nitrate/nitrite5,12,13,14,15, iron16 and manganese17. Geochemical profiles4,18,19, stable isotope geochemistry16,18,19, potential methane oxidation assays2,4,5,20 and long-term enrichments4 have provided tantalizing evidence of AOM in FWW, but environmentally relevant, in vitro, rate measurements are rare9. This study provides the first constraints on both the magnitude and extent of AOM in FWW, a critical first step to understanding the role of this process in freshwater environments.

We investigated AOM in three FWW across distinct biogeographical provinces: the freshwater peat soils of the Florida Everglades, a coastal organic-rich wetland in Acadia National Park, Maine, and a tidal FWW in coastal Georgia (Table 1). All three sites were sampled in at least two different seasons. This suite of sampling sites captured a range of in situ conditions (average temperature, climate conditions, organic matter content and so on) to illustrate the broad relevance of AOM in FWW. We employed in vitro radiotracer assays to quantify rates of AOM and SR, and quantified porewater chemistry and stable carbon isotope geochemistry, including that of microbial lipid biomarkers, to evaluate the magnitude of AOM, its role in wetland carbon cycling, and the microbial community potentially involved in AOM.

Table 1 Geochemical characterization and microbial activities in freshwater wetland sediment and peat.


Rates of AOM

Considerable reservoirs of porewater methane were present in these FWW pore fluids, all of which supported high rates of biological methane production21 (Table 1). The anoxic, permanently water-saturated surface soils (see Methods) exhibited the highest rates of AOM (Fig. 1), although AOM was detected at all depths examined (down to 40 cm). Maximal rates (>265±9 nmol cm−3 per day) of AOM were observed in Georgia (Fig. 1), with lower, more similar AOM rates observed in Maine and Florida (maxima of 16±4 and 54±3 nmol cm−3 per day, respectively). Substantial AOM rates were sustained across a range of in situ temperatures and seasons (Supplementary Table 1). Surprisingly, AOM rates in the sediments and peat are comparable to those reported for deep-sea methane seeps22 and coastal marine sediments7. These in vitro rate measurements provide some of the first concrete evidence of AOM in FWW9 (Fig. 1).

Figure 1: Geochemistry and microbial activity with depth in freshwater wetland sediment and peat.

Data are a mean (n=3)±s.e.m. (a–c) Profiles of methane (purple circles) and sulphate (red diamonds) in Florida, Georgia and Maine (left to right). (d–f) Rates of AOM (fuschia circles) and SR (yellow diamonds). The inset on d shows the full scale for SR in the same units as the primary panel. (g–i) Stable carbon isotopic signatures (δ13C) of DIC (grey diamonds) and of methane (sky blue circles). Data from Florida collected in January 2010, from Georgia in August 2008 and from Maine in March 2009. AOM, anaerobic oxidation of methane; DIC, dissolved inorganic carbon; SR, sulphate reduction.

Sulphate reduction and sulphur cycling

The wide range of SR rates measured during this study fell within the range of values reported for FWW23. The combination of high SR rates and low sulphate concentrations (78–247 μM on average; Fig. 1) led to short turnover times for sulphate (2–5 days), and thus required rapid reoxidation of reduced sulphur species, as observed in other wetlands10. This reoxidation may have occurred in the uppermost mm of peat/sediment24, which were exposed to oxygenated bottom waters and to the atmosphere by diurnal tides at the site in Georgia, or via anaerobic oxidation coupled to nitrate25, oxidized trace metals26, humic substances27, or nanowires28, any of which could serve as electron sinks. Dissolved hydrogen sulphide (HS) concentrations were undetectable in Georgia and low (0.3–7.8 μM) in Maine and Florida (Table 1), suggesting that HS is either quickly reoxidized or scavenged via precipitation of reduced metal, likely iron29 sulphides, as Fe oxides are abundant in these wetlands, especially in Georgia (Supplementary Table 2). This precipitation, in addition to rapid oxidation of free sulphides by poorly crystalline iron and manganese30, likely account for the low to undetectable HS concentrations despite high SR rates.

Possible electron acceptors for AOM

In marine habitats the majority of AOM is mediated by methanotrophic archaea (ANME) that oxidize methane with sulphur in association with sulphate-reducing bacteria7,31,32. In contrast, a dominant electron acceptor for freshwater AOM has not been identified. Experimental evidence suggest sulphate is not the sole electron acceptor for AOM in freshwater sediments and peat2,9,15,20, and AOM in low-sulphate environments has been linked to the reduction of nitrate, nitrite, iron and manganese4,5,12,13,16,33. The geochemical and rate profiles in the wetlands studied here support a linkage between SR and AOM. The upper sediment/peat horizons at all three sites supported maximal activities of AOM and SR (Fig. 1). Rates of AOM were significantly correlated with rates of SR at all sites (r=0.78; P<0.01) as well as with sulphate concentrations in Georgia and Maine (r=0.9; P<0.01). In most samples, SR rates were sufficient to support AOM; SR in excess of AOM was likely fuelled through hydrogenotrophic or heterotrophic mechanisms34.

Previous studies compared the magnitude of AOM and SR rates to determine how closely the two processes are coupled22,35. At depth (>9 cm) in Georgia sediments, AOM rates were significantly (P<0.05) higher than SR. Thus, while AOM in Maine and Florida may be coupled to SR, at least some fraction of AOM activity in Georgia must be supported by alternative electron acceptor(s). Such alternative electron acceptors (for example, nitrate, nitrite, iron oxides or manganese oxides) were readily available in these sediments (Table 1; Supplementary Table 2) and may support AOM in FWW5,9,13. The production of reduced iron at depth in Georgia (Supplementary Fig. 1e) could suggest Fe-oxide-fuelled AOM rates in excess of SR, as previously documented in long-term incubations with these sediments9. Profiles of reduced iron concentrations were highly correlated with AOM in Florida (r=0.80; P<0.05), which could reflect either rapid reoxidation of AOM-derived HS by iron oxides or direct coupling of AOM and iron reduction (Supplementary Figs 1a and 2d). However, in long-term incubations with sediment from Georgia the addition of sulphate elicited higher rates of potential AOM than did the addition of iron, manganese or nitrate9 and maximal AOM rates were observed in slurries without any added electron acceptors. This and other evidence of AOM in FWW without anthropogenically-enhanced nitrogen levels indicate an as-yet-unidentified electron acceptor2,20.

While nitrite has been shown to support AOM in some nitrogen enriched wetlands5,36, the evidence for nitrate-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation (n-damo) in this study is weak. AOM was not significantly correlated with nitrite concentrations in Florida or Georgia. In Maine, the correlation between nitrite and AOM (r=0.83; P<0.05) was weaker than the correlation of AOM and sulphate (r=0.98; P<0.01) or SR (r=0.97; P<0.01).

Humic substances, which are plentiful in these organic-rich wetlands, are a possible candidate3. Humic acids can serve as electron acceptors/shuttles in other anaerobic metabolisms and the addition of humic acids lowered methane emissions from a peatland, possibly through stimulation of AOM37. Their importance has only yet been implied where the addition of inorganic electron acceptors has dampened AOM rates9,20. The results of this study do not necessarily advance this theory, as rates of AOM were not correlated with concentrations of dissolved organic carbon or with soil organic content. Still, a connection between AOM and humic acid reduction remains a tantalizing possibility.

Possible impacts on methane emissions

Direct consumption of methane via AOM-limited methane emissions from these FWW. AOM rates in excess of methane production from hydrogen and acetate highlights the effectiveness of AOM in reducing methane emissions within the sedimentary horizon examined (Supplementary Fig. 2). Additional methane to support the measured oxidation rates may have been produced from alternative substrates38 and/or supplied via vertical advection from depths >40 cm or lateral advection21 in the tidally-influenced sites (Georgia and Florida).

In addition to AOM, competitive limitation of methanogenesis by other terminal metabolisms may also contribute to reductions in methane fluxes in these FWW. The ratio of SR to methanogenesis (Table 1) and the suppression of methanogenesis in the zones of maximum SR activity in Florida and Georgia (Supplementary Fig. 2) suggest that SR limited methane production in horizons where sulphate was present, further limiting methane emissions through thermodynamic energetic restrictions on methane production39.

Isotopic evidence of AOM

In addition to quantifying rates of AOM and SR, we evaluated the impact of AOM on microbial carbon flow in these wetlands by measuring the stable carbon isotopic composition (δ13C) of methane, dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and intact microbial lipids. Biological consumption results in 13C enrichment of residual methane through the preferential consumption of isotopically light methane40. The zone of maximum AOM activity (0–3 cm) corresponded to the lowest δ13C-DIC values and the highest δ13C-CH4, a clear geochemical signature of AOM (Fig. 1) that corroborated the radiotracer results. This pronounced porewater isotopic signal, along with AOM measurements made during other seasons (Supplementary Table 1), indicate sustained AOM activity at these sites.

In the marine environment, lipid biomarkers are robust indicators of metabolic coupling between methane-oxidizing archaea and their sulphate-reducing bacterial partners: both groups of microorganisms exhibit lipids that are highly depleted in 13C relative to methane, indicating assimilation of methane-derived carbon through AOM7,41. However, results from freshwaters are inconsistent: some evidence of extreme depletion of 13C in microbial lipids14 has been noted while others report little to no depletion in lipid isotopic signatures11,16. Despite the clear importance of AOM in these wetlands, as established by the δ13C profiles of DIC and methane and the measured rates of AOM (Fig. 1), a classic methanotrophic signal was absent in the isotopic signature of microbial lipids (Fig. 2).

Figure 2: Stable isotopic composition of microbial lipids in freshwater wetlands.

Displayed is the range of the stable carbon isotopic signature (δ13C) of selected archaeal (black squares) and bacterial (grey diamonds) intact-derived core lipids compared against the δ13C of methane (CH4; green line), particulate organic carbon (POC; brown line), and dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2; blue line) in the zone of maximum activity of anaerobic oxidation of methane (0–3 cm). Isotope values are an average based on n=1–2 measurements for lipids and n=3 for geochemical species which were derived from triplicate cores. (a) Data from Florida in January 2010. (b) Data from Georgia in August 2008. (c) Data from Maine in March 2009. Archaeal core lipids were analysed as phytanes derived from archaeol and hydroxyarchaeol and biphytanes with 0–3 rings derived from glyceroldialkylglycercol-tetraethers. The most depleted bacterial core lipids detected at all three sites (16:1ω5 and 16:1ω7) are also shown. *The concentration of biphytane 3 was not sufficient to generate a robust isotopic signal in Georgia (b) or Maine (c).

Generally, the greatest 13C depletions were observed in lipids within the surface sediment/peat horizons, where maximal AOM activities were observed (Fig. 2; for example Fig. 1). The most diagnostic lipids were archaeal mono- and bi-cyclic biphytanes (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 3), as reported previously for deep anoxic waters in the Black Sea42. These compounds are derived from polar glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers with one to three cyclopentane moieties and are particularly abundant in marine sediments hosting AOM communities43, while they are not observed in known (cultured isolates) methanogens44. The δ13C values of these lipids (−60.6 to −36.8‰) are still within the range considered diagnostic of AOM in marine settings7,42; however, they are relatively heavy given that they are enriched in 13C relative to porewater methane at all the three sites (Fig. 2). The isotopic enrichment of archaeal lipids relative to methane is best explained by additional biological sources of these compounds, for example, from heterotrophic archaea45 or autotropic archaea such as ammonium-oxidizing thaumarcharchaea46. Alternatively, the incorporation of DIC rather than methane into methane-oxidizing archaeal lipids47 could explain the observed 13C-enriched values. Notably, the archaeal biphytanes are 13C-depleted relative to CO2 by −42 to −17‰, consistent with a predominant origin from autotrophic, methane-oxidizing archaea47.

The most strongly 13C-depleted bacterial lipids detected in all three FWW (minimum value −49.5‰) were C16:1ω5 and C16:1ω7 (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 3). These lipids are typically associated with sulphate-reducing bacteria at methane-rich seeps where their 13C-depletion signals an association with sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) involved in sulphate-dependent AOM41. Their lower δ13C values compared with the other fatty acids in these FWW suggest a methanotrophic influence. 10-Methyl-hexadecanoic acid, a characteristic lipid for ‘Methylomirabilis oxyfera’, a freshwater bacterium capable of oxidizing methane with nitrite33, was either not detected at these sites or found in rather low abundance (<1.5% of all fatty acids; data not shown). This proposed biomarker for n-damo48 was not sufficiently depleted in 13C to unambiguously support a relationship with AOM (Supplementary Table 3); a conclusive relationship of this biomarker to AOM is complicated by the evidence for chemoorganoautotrophy of M. oxyfera49, in analogy to some ANME archaea47, and additional sources of this biomarker such as sulphate-reducing50 and anammox bacteria51. The other proposed diagnostic lipid for M. oxyfera, 10-methyl-hexadec-7-enoic acid48, was not detected in any sample.


The anaerobic oxidation of methane serves as a major methane sink in marine environments and effectively limits fluxes of this greenhouse gas from the oceans to the atmosphere8. While the body of evidence for AOM in FWW is growing, direct rate measurements are rare9. This is the first comprehensive study of methanotrophy in FWW to document actual (versus potential) rates of AOM. We measured activity down to a depth of 40 cm (the deepest horizon sampled) in 270 samples. Rates were sustained over a range of in situ temperatures (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1), suggesting this process is widespread in FWW systems throughout the year. Strikingly, the FWW rates are comparable in magnitude with those documented in marine systems35,52. AOM rates were similar to or exceeded rates of methane production from acetate and hydrogen (the two major methanogenic substrates53) within the depth range assayed (Table 1). These results, along with previous experimental results9,20, highlight the potentially large role AOM plays in wetland methane cycling. Further attention to this topic is justified in order to better constrain the global methane budget and the role of FWW in past and present climate dynamics.

In marine settings, AOM is widespread and believed to be coupled largely to SR7,32,35. In comparison, there is no convergence on the dominant mechanism for AOM in freshwater environments3,5,9,16,17. The available empirical evidence is contradictory. Many experiments with FWW soils have shown that the addition of sulphate, iron, nitrate or manganese does not enhance AOM activity relative to a control2,5,9,20. Recent studies have found high abundances of Ca. M. oxyfera and affiliated members of this phylum in FWW4,5. However, to date evidence for n-damo originated in freshwater environments with high nitrogen loading and most published rates are from long-term enrichments5,36,54,55. The conditions of such experiments do not fully mimic in situ conditions, as they are often conducted after prolonged preincubation phases, with additions of methane and electron acceptors, and with slurried material. It is therefore difficult to determine how these results translate to natural settings.

Thus, while there is a growing body of literature supporting an important role of n-damo in methane biogeochemistry of FWW and rice paddies, there are several lines of evidence that suggest n-damo was not the dominant process of methane oxidation in the FWW examined here. For one, the wetlands of this study are fairly pristine with very low nitrite concentrations and maximum nitrate concentrations of 80 μM (Supplementary Fig. 1). The porewater profiles of methane and nitrate were distinct and uncorrelated. Furthermore, peak AOM activity occurred in the surface sediments of these wetlands, while n-damo has been detected in deeper depths where nutrient-laden porewaters dominate (at least 20 cm and typically between 50 and 80 cm depth)36,54. The lipid biomarker data also does not support a strong influence of n-damo. And finally, long-term incubations with slurried sediment from Georgia and amended with nitrate resulted in lower rates of AOM than compared with additions of sulphate, iron or the control9.

The concomitant rate maxima for SR and AOM in the same depth horizons, along with significant correlations between the rates of these two processes (r=0.85, P<0.01) indicate that sulphate may support the bulk of the AOM measured in this study. However, alternative electron acceptors remain feasible. Sulphate-independent AOM is clearly indicated at some depth horizons in Georgia where rates of AOM exceeded rates of SR. On the basis of previous, long-term incubations with this soil9, we posit that iron and/or humic substances may play a role. Experimental additions of humic substances may prove useful in future investigations.

Wetlands are highly dynamic settings that receive large inputs of organic matter and support diverse metabolic activities. While we detected some imprint of AOM on the isotopic composition of microbial lipids, representative ‘superlight’ lipids that typify deep-sea hotspots of AOM were absent in these three FWW (Supplementary Table 3). The breakdown of organic matter from a myriad of sources (for example, grasses, trees and other allochthonous sources) likely leads to an admixture of isotopic signals in the pools of carbon dioxide, acetate and other low-molecular weight substrates in these wetlands. This is in contradiction to marine methane seeps where methane is the dominant organic carbon source, thus generating a more uniform signal. A methanotrophic signal in microbial lipids may also have been obscured by autotrophic and heterotrophic activities (for example, nitrate, sulphate, iron, and manganese reduction and methanogenesis) which utilize carbon substrates more enriched in 13C than methane and produce less 13C-depleted lipids56. Alternatively, freshwater anaerobic methanotrophs may be metabolically distinct from their deep-sea counterparts, which may exhibit metabolic plasticity depending on environmental conditions57.

Elucidating the microorganism(s) involved in AOM in these systems is not possible based on biomarker and δ13C values alone. Some have argued the extreme isotopic depletions in archaeal lipids attributed to AOM in vent and seep communities may be entirely due to autotrophic methanogenesis58. Recent isotope-based inquiries, however, have demonstrated that microorganisms involved in AOM assimilate carbon dioxide47,57 in addition to methane57. Phylogenetic analyses indicate variable AOM pathways likely occur, possibly within a single group of archaea in response to environmental factors57. The failure to detect ‘superlight’ archaeal lipids does not exclude methanotrophic or methanogenic activity, both of which are important in these wetlands9. Furthermore, microorganisms mediating AOM in FWW may be utilizing unrecognized metabolic pathways, thus producing lipids with distinct isotopic compositions.

Using an average areal AOM rate within the top 40 cm from the three sites across multiple years and seasons (Table 1; Supplementary Table 1) and an estimated global wetland area59 of 5.69 × 1012 m2, AOM is estimated to consume around 200 Tg methane per year, or nearly as much methane as is emitted from global FWW on an annual basis1. While this estimate is derived from only three wetlands, these sites represent three distinct biogeographical provinces that were sampled multiple times across different seasons. Limiting the comparison to temperate wetlands60 (0.6–1.1 × 1012 m2), AOM may consume between 20 and 40 Tg methane per year, or 1–30 times the estimated annual methane flux from these environments60,61. In a direct comparison, atmospheric methane flux measurements21 were roughly twice the magnitude of areally-integrated AOM rates in Georgia in August 2008.

Clearly, AOM serves as a crucial gatekeeper that modulates methane emissions from both freshwater and marine environments8. Coastal wetlands are vulnerable to sea-level rise and increased sulphate availability via saltwater intrusion is likely to decrease methane production and dampen methane emissions from these ecosystems39. As sea levels rise, increased sulphate loading may further reduce methane fluxes by limiting methane production and stimulating AOM. As FWW ecosystems are responsible for a major portion of global emissions, a better constraint of methane cycling in wetlands is paramount to understanding past and future global methane budgets and the role of FWW in the global methane cycle.


Site descriptions

Sediment/peat cores were collected from wetlands within three distinct biogeographical provinces: Caribbean (Florida), Carolinian (temperate; Georgia) and Acadian (cold-temperate; Maine). The study site in Florida is located within the Florida Coastal Everglades LTER at Shark River Slough (25° 49′ N, 80° 41′ W). The peat was 1 m thick, lay atop a bed of marl, and contained an average of 81% organic material with an average carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N; by weight) of 15. The marsh at Shark River Slough was dominated by Cladium jamaicense interspersed with Eleocharis and Panicum, though no living macrophytes were present in the peat sampled. While the Everglades are typified by a distinct wet (May to November) and dry (December to April) season, this site remains inundated throughout the year. Anoxic peat samples were collected from Florida in September 2009 and January 2010.

The site in coastal Georgia was located along Hammersmith Creek (31° 20′ N, 81° 28′ W), a tidal, freshwater creek that feeds into the Altamaha River. Adjacent to the creek bank is a marsh dominated by Zizaniopsis miliacea. The sediments in Georgia are fine-grained silt and clays with an average organic content of 17% and an average C:N of 12. Maximum water depths at high tide range from about 0.5 (neap) to 2 m (spring) and oxygen is consumed within the top 3 mm of sediment (personal observations). Anoxic sediments were collected in January, April and August 2008 and in February and November 2009.

The study site in Maine was located on the north side of Mount Desert Island in Acadia National Park. Samples were collected in Aunt Betsey’s Brook (44° 24′ N 68° 18′ W), a freshwater creek which runs into the Fresh Meadow and eventually into Thomas Bay. The site was visited in late winter (March 2009) and again in late summer (August 2009). Anoxic sediments were collected from the unvegetated creek bed, which is permanently inundated with freshwaters. A 3–10 cm layer of ice, which had formed over the brook in the winter of 2009, was manually removed from the sampling area before cores were taken. The surrounding marsh is dominated by Spartina pectinata, Scirpus acutus and Typha. The organic-rich soil in Maine contained an average organic matter content of 33% with an average C:N of 17.

Sample collection and geochemical analysis

At least six sediment or peat cores were collected within a 2–3 m2 area of unvegetated peat or sediment. This number afforded a minimum of three replicate cores for all analyses. Cores were processed under a stream of argon either in the field or within 24 h on return to the laboratory, where they were sectioned at 3–5 cm intervals to a depth of 40 cm and processed for geochemical analyses and rate assays.

Triplicate cores were processed for geochemical analyses. For methane analysis, a 6 cm3 peat/sediment sample was taken from each sub-core with a cutoff plastic syringe. These plugs were preserved in a helium-purged serum vial containing 3 ml 2 N sodium hydroxide (final pH<13) and sealed with a blue, butyl-rubber stopper and a crimp seal. Samples were stored at room temperature until analysis on a Shimadzu GC-2014 gas chromatograph (GC) equipped a flame-ionization detector (FID) and a Carbosphere column. A 1 cm3 sample was collected into tared glass vials for porosity and loss-on-ignition determination35. The porewaters in each sediment/peat horizon were extracted into an argon-purged syringe using a mechanical squeezer and argon-purged squeezer cups35. A portion of this extracted porewater was preserved for DIC analysis by injecting 5 ml of porewater into a helium-purged gas vial containing 200 μL of 6 N hydrochloric acid and fitted with a blue, butyl-rubber stopper and crimp seal. The liberated carbon dioxide in the headspace was analysed using a GC-FID outfitted with a methanizer after the vial was shaken vigorously. A 10 ml aliquot of the porewater was 0.2 μm filtered (to halt microbial activity) and stored frozen for acetate, nitrite and nitrate analysis. Another 10 ml aliquot was 0.2 μm filtered and preserved for sulphate, iron (II) and manganese (II) by addition of 100 μl 16 M trace-metal grade nitric acid. A 2 ml sample for HS was preserved by adding 200 μl 20% zinc acetate to 2 ml of porewater. Concentrations of nitrate, nitrite, sulphate, dissolved iron (II), manganese (II) and HS were determined using standard, previously published protocols (as described by Segarra et al.9). Concentrations of total solid-phase iron and manganese were determined by subjecting the peat/sediment to a hot 6 N hydrochloric acid extraction62 followed by analysis on a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Concentrations of acetate were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography63 (HPLC).

Microbial activity assays

Three additional cores were processed for microbial rate measurements of AOM, methanogenesis and SR. Using the same depth horizons as those sub-sampled for geochemistry, subcores of peat/sediment for each rate measurement from each horizon were collected in to a cut-end glass Hungate tubes and sealed with a moveable black butyl-rubber stopper at one end and a black butyl-rubber septa and open-hole screw cap at the other. These airtight tubes were stored at in situ temperature for 24 h before beginning radiotracer incubations. This acclimation period served to allow the microbial population to recover from any possible transport and handling disturbance as well as to scavenge any available oxygen. Microbial activities were calculated as volume-specific (nmol cm−3 per day) and as depth-integrated (mmol m−2 per day) rates (via trapezoidal integration of the volume-specific rates in the top 40 cm of sediment). All rates were porosity corrected when appropriate. Base-killed controls (pH>13) were incubated in parallel for each process within each depth interval so that live samples could be corrected for this ‘background’ activity. To assure robust rate data, we evaluated the linearity of the targeted process over time in radiotracer assays (data not shown). Short incubation times in this linear period were used to minimize tracer turnover.

Methods for determining rates of AOM were published previously9. Briefly, 11.7 kBq of 14CH4 tracer was injected and live samples were incubated for 24 h alongside killed controls for each depth interval. The tracer added <6 nmol methane which increased the extant methane concentration by 3% or less. To terminate activity and preserve produced 14CO2 as carbonate, 5 ml of 2 N sodium hydroxide was injected through the rubber septum. The product (14CO2) was recovered by acid digestion and the activity of both the product and tracer were determined via liquid scintillation counting64. The recovery rate of labelled 14CO2 was >97% and limit of detection for AOM assays was 0.1 nmol cm−3 per day.

Rates of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis (14CH4 from H14CO3) and acetoclastic methanogenesis (14CH4 from 2-14CH3COO) were performed, processed and calculated using previously published methods52. The recovery rate of labelled methane was >95%. The average activity of the H14CO3 tracer was 380 kBq. The average activity of the added 2-14CH3COO was 160 kBq with a specific activity of 1.7–2.2 GBq mmol−1.

Methods for the SR rate measurements were identical to those of Segarra et al.9. The limit of detection for SR was 2.0 × 10−3nmol cm−3 per day.

Lipid extraction

For lipid analysis, between 3 and 33 g of frozen sediment or peat were homogenized by hand with a solvent-cleaned Teflon spatula. Larger amounts of material were extracted from greater depths than the surface due to the generally lower lipid yields with depth. Lipids were extracted using a modified Bligh-Dyer extraction protocol65,66. The total lipid extract was separated into a polar, intact lipid fraction and a non-polar fraction using preparative HPLC with a fraction collector, similar to the methods in Kellermann et al.67 except that only two fractions were collected: polar and apolar. Proper separation of these two fractions was validated by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (see protocol below).

Stable isotope analyses

Stable carbon isotope (13C) measurements were performed on porewater methane and DIC, particulate organic carbon, and microbial core lipids and reported in δ13C notation (‰) relative to the Vienna Peedee Belemnite Standard. Stable carbon isotope compositions of methane (δ13C-CH4) and δ13C-DIC were analysed at the Center for Applied Isotope Studies at the University of Georgia with a Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS). Before isotopic analysis, methane and carbon dioxide were separated with an Agilent HP 6,890 GC on a Carboxen 1,006 Plot column with a helium carrier at 100 °C interfaced with a Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus GC combustion module. Measurements were performed in duplicate on each triplicate sub-sample. The δ13C of carbon dioxide was calculated from δ13C-DIC with the in situ temperature according to Mook et al.68

For isotopic analysis of particulate organic carbon, replicate (n=3) sediment horizons were dried, homogenized and combined before removal of inorganic carbon via fuming with hydrochloric acid and analysis with an elemental analyser coupled to an IRMS. The stable carbon isotopic composition of apolar derivatives of intact polar lipids were analysed with a ThermoFinnigan Trace GC coupled to a ThermoFinnigan Delta-plus XP IRMS via GC-combustion interface III to a HP Series GC69. The precision of replicate analysis (n=2) of selected samples was better than 1‰. Before compound-specific δ13C analysis, apolar derivatives of the intact polar lipids were produced using standard protocols; the methods used for each lipid class are briefly described below. Polar lipid fatty acids (PLFAs) and polar neutral lipids were obtained via saponfication of an aliquot of the polar total lipid extract using methods described previously41,69. The PLFA and neutral products were stored in n-hexane at −20 °C until derivatization and analysis by GC-FID. The PLFA products were derivatized with methanolic BF3 and analysed as fatty acid methyl esters with GC-FID70. The neutral lipid fractions (containing alcohols and ether lipids, such as monoalkyl glycerol ethers and dialkyl glycerol ethers) were derivatized with bis-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide at 70 °C for 1 h. Apolar derivatives of ether-bound intact polar archaeal lipids were obtained using a protocol for ether cleavage involving BBr3 and subsequent reduction of the resulting alkylbromides69,70. The ether-based products (phytanes and biphytanes) were stored in n-hexane at −20 °C until analysis on the GC-IRMS without derivatization.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Segarra, K. E. A. et al. High rates of anaerobic methane oxidation in freshwater wetlands reduce potential atmospheric methane emissions. Nat. Commun. 6:7477 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8477 (2015).


  1. 1

    Brook, E., Archer, D., Dlugokencky, E., Frolking, S. & Lawrence, D. in U.S. Climate Change Science Program Synthesis and Assessment Product 3.4: Abrupt Climate Change. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research 360–452U.S. Geological Survey (2008).

  2. 2

    Smemo, K. A. & Yavitt, J. B. Evidence for anaerobic CH4 oxidation in freshwater peatlands. Geomicrobiol. J. 24, 583–597 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Smemo, K. A. & Yavitt, J. B. Anaerobic oxidation of methane: an underappreciated aspect of methane cycling in peatland ecosystems? Biogeosciences 8, 779–793 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Zhu, B. et al. Anaerobic oxidization of methane in a minerotrophic peatland: enrichment of nitrite-dependent methane-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 8657–8665 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Hu, B. et al. Evidence for nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation as a previously overlooked microbial methane sink in wetlands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4495–4500 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Topp, E. & Pattey, E. Soils as sources and sinks for atmospheric methane. Can. J. Soil Sci. 77, 167–177 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Hinrichs, K. U. & Boetius, A. The anaerobic oxidation of methane: new insights in microbial ecology and biogeochemistry. Ocean Margin Syst. 457–477 (2002).

  8. 8

    Reeburgh, W. S. in Microbial Growth on C1 Compounds. (eds Lindstrom M. E., Tabita F. F. 334–342Kluwer Academic Publishers (1996).

  9. 9

    Segarra, K. E. A., Comerford, C., Slaughter, J. & Joye, S. B. Impact of electron acceptor availability on the anaerobic oxidation of methane in coastal freshwater and brackish intertidal sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 115, 15–30 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Wieder, R. & Lang, G. Cycling of inorganic and organic sulfur in peat from Big Run Bog, West Virginia. Biogeochemistry 5, 221–242 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Schubert, C. J. et al. Evidence for anaerobic oxidation of methane in sediments of a freshwater system (Lago di Cadagno). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 76, 26–38 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Deutzmann, J. S., Stief, P., Brandes, J. & Schink, B. Anaerobic methane oxidation coupled to denitrification methane sink in a deep lake. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18273–18278 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Haroon, M. F. et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 500, 567–570 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Raghoebarsing, A. A. et al. A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature 440, 918–921 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Deutzmann, J. S. & Schink, B. Anaerobic oxidation of methane in sediments of an oligotrophic freshwater lake (Lake Constance). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4429–4436 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Sivan, O. et al. Geochemical evidence for iron-mediated anaerobic oxidation of methane. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 1536–1544 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Zehnder, A. J. B. & Brock, T. D. Anaerobic methane oxidation: occurrence and ecology. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39, 194–204 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Crowe, S. A. et al. The methane cycle in ferruginous Lake Matano. Geobiology 9, 61–78 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Eller, G., Känel, L. & Krüger, M. Cooccurrence of aerobic and anaerobic methane oxidation in the water column of lake Plußsee. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 8925–8928 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Gupta, V. et al. Stable isotopes reveal widespread anaerobic methane oxidation across latitude and peatland type. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 8273–8279 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Segarra, K. E. A., King, E., Meile, C. D. & Joye, S. B. Seasonal variations of methane fluxes from an unvegetated tidal freshwater mudflat (Hammersmith Creek, GA). Biogeochemistry 115, 349–361 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Bowles, M. W., Samarkin, V. A., Bowles, K. M. & Joye, S. B. Weak coupling between sulfate reduction and the anaerobic oxidation of methane in methane-rich seafloor sediments during ex situ incubation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 500–519 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Watson, A. & Nedwell, D. B. Methane production and emission from peat: the influence of anions (sulphate, nitrate) from acid rain. Atmos. Environ. 32, 3239–3245 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Knorr, K.-H. & Blodau, C. Impact of experimental drought and rewetting on redox transformations and methanogenesis in mesocosms of a northern fen soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1187–1198 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Brunet, R. C. & Garcia-Gil, L. J. Sulfide-induced dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia in anaerobic freshwater sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 21, 131–138 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lovley, D. R. & Phillips, E. J. P. Novel processes for anaerobic sulfate production from elemental sulfur by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 2394–2399 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Scott, D. T., McKnight, D. M., Blunt-Harris, E. L., Kolesar, S. E. & Lovley, D. R. Quinone moieties act as electron acceptors in the reduction of humic substances by humics-reducing microorganisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 2984–2989 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Nielsen, L. P., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Fossing, H., Christensen, P. B. & Sayama, M. Electric currents couple spatially separated biogeochemical processes in marine sediment. Nature 463, 1071–1074 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Gary, M.,K. Effects of added manganic and ferric oxides on sulfate reduction and sulfide oxidation in intertidal sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 73, 131–138 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Canfield, D. E. Reactive iron in marine sediments. Geochm. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 619–632 (1989).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Milucka, J. et al. Zero-valent sulphur is a key intermediate in marine methane oxidation. Nature 491, 541–546 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Orphan, V. J., House, C. H., Hinrichs, K.-U., McKeegan, K. D. & DeLong, E. F. Multiple archaeal groups mediate methane oxidation in anoxic cold seep sedimen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci USA 99, 7663–7668 (2002).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Ettwig, K. F. et al. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 464, 543–548 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Lovley, D. R. & Klug, M. J. Sulfate reducers can outcompete methanogens at freshwater sulfate concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 187–192 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Joye, S. B. et al. The anaerobic oxidation of methane and sulfate reduction in sediments from Gulf of Mexico cold seeps. Chem. Geol. 205, 219–238 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Zhu, B. et al. Anaerobic oxidization of methane in a minerotrophic peatland: enrichment of nitrite-dependent methane-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 8657–8665 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Blodau, C. & Deppe, M. Humic acid addition lowers methane release in peats of the Mer Bleue bog, Canada. Soil Biol. Biochem. 52, 96–98 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    King, G. M. Utilization of hydrogen, acetate, and ‘noncompetitive’; substrates by methanogenic bacteria in marine sediments. Geomicrobiol. J. 3, 275–306 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Dise, N. & Verry, E. Suppression of peatland methane emission by cumulative sulfate deposition in simulated acid rain. Biogeochemistry 53, 143–160 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Whiticar, M. J. Carbon and hydrogen isotope systematics of bacterial formation and oxidation of methane. Chem. Geol. 161, 291–314 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Elvert, M., Boetius, A., Knittel, K. & Jørgensen, B. B. Characterization of specific membrane fatty acids as chemotaxonomic markers for sulfate-reducing bacteria involved in anaerobic oxidation of methane. Geomicrobiol. J. 20, 403–419 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Wakeham, S. G., Lewis, C. M., Hopmans, E. C., Schouten, S. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Archaea mediate anaerobic oxidation of methane in deep euxinic waters of the Black Sea. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 1359–1374 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Liu, X., Lipp, J. S. & Hinrichs, K.-U. Distribution of intact and core GDGTs in marine sediments. Org. Geochem. 42, 368–375 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Koga, Y., Morii, H., Akagawa-Matsushita, M. & Ohga, M. Correlation of polar lipid composition with 16S rRNA phylogeny in methanogens. Further analysis of lipid component parts. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 62, 230–236 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Biddle, J. F. et al. Heterotrophic Archaea dominate sedimentary subsurface ecosystems off Peru. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3846–3851 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Leininger, S. et al. Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils. Nature 442, 806–809 (2006).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Kellermann, M. Y. et al. Autotrophy as a predominant mode of carbon fixation in anaerobic methane-oxidizing microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19321–19326 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Kool, D. M. et al. Rare branched fatty acids characterize the lipid composition of the intra-aerobic methane oxidizer ‘Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera’. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 8650–8656 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Rasigraf, O., Kool, D. M., Jetten, M. S. M., Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. & Ettwig, K. F. Autotrophic carbon dioxide fixation via the Calvin-Benson-Bassham cycle by the denitrifying methanotroph ‘Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera’. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 2451–2460 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Kohring, L. L. et al. Comparison of phylogenetic relationships based on phospholipid fatty acid profiles and ribosomal RNA sequence similarities among dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 119, 303–308 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. et al. Linearly concatenated cyclobutane lipids form a dense bacterial membrane. Nature 419, 708–712 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Orcutt, B., Boetius, A., Elvert, M., Samarkin, V. & Joye, S. B. Molecular biogeochemistry of sulfate reduction, methanogenesis and the anaerobic oxidation of methane at Gulf of Mexico cold seeps. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 69, 4267–4281 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Winfrey, M. R. & Zeikus, J. G. Microbial methanogenesis and acetate metabolism in a meromictic lake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37, 213–221 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Shen, L. et al. Distribution and diversity of nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane-oxidising bacteria in the sediments of the Qiantang River. Microb. Ecol. 67, 341–349 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Ettwig, K. F., van Alen, T., van de Pas-Schoonen, K. T., Jetten, M. S. M. & Strous, M. Enrichment and molecular detection of denitrifying methanotrophic bacteria of the NC10 phylum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 3656–3662 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Hayes, J. M. Fractionation of carbon and hydrogen isotopes in biosynthetic processes. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 43, 225–277 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Bowles, M. W. et al. Extreme rates of anaerobic oxidation of methane, decoupling from sulfate reduction, and novel metabolic modes at high in situ methane concentration. Nat. Geosci (In the press, 2015).

  58. 58

    Alperin, M. J. & Hoehler, T. M. Anaerobic methane oxidation by archaea/sulfate-reducing bacteria aggregates: 2. Isotopic constraints. Am. J. Sci. 309, 958–984 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Anselman, I. & Crutzen, P. J. Global distribution o f natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J. Atmos. Chem. 307–359 (1989).

  60. 60

    Mitra, S., Wassmann, R. & Vlek, P. L. G. An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Curr. Sci. 88, 25–35 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Bartlett, K. B. & Harriss, R. C. Review and assessment of methane emissions from wetlands. Chemosphere 26, 261–320 (1993).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Poulton, S. W. & Canfield, D. E. Development of a sequential extraction procedure for iron: implications for iron partitioning in continentally derived particulates. Chem. Geol. 214, 209–221 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Albert, D. B. & Martens, C. S. Determination of low-molecular-weight organic acid concentrations in seawater and pore-water samples via HPLC. Mar. Chem. 56, 27–37 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Joye, S. B., Connell, T. L., Miller, L. G., Oremland, R. S. & Jellison, R. S. Oxidation of ammonia and methane in an alkaline, saline lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 178–188 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Sturt, H. F., Summons, R. E., Smith, K., Elvert, M. & Hinrichs, K.-U. Intact polar membrane lipids in prokaryotes and sediments deciphered by high-performance liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization multistage mass spectrometry—new biomarkers for biogeochemistry and microbial ecology. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 18, 617–628 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Lipp, J. S. & Hinrichs, K.-U. Structural diversity and fate of intact polar lipids in marine sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 73, 6816–6833 (2009).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    Kellermann, M. Y. et al. Symbiont–host relationships in chemosynthetic mussels: a comprehensive lipid biomarker study. Org. Geochem. 43, 112–124 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68

    Mook, W. G., Bommerson, J. C. & Staverman, W. H. Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon dioxide. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 22, 169–176 (1974).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69

    Schubotz, F., Lipp, J. S., Elvert, M. & Hinrichs, K.-U. Stable carbon isotopic compositions of intact polar lipids reveal complex carbon flow patterns among hydrocarbon degrading microbial communities at the Chapopote asphalt volcano. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 4399–4415 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70

    Jahnke, L. L., Embaye, T. & Summons, R. E. Lipid biomarkers for methanogens in hypersaline cyanobacterial mats for Guerro Negro, Baja California Sur. Report no. ID 20030014742, 1–2 (NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA 2002).

Download references


We thank E. King, D. Saucedo, C. Culbertson, F. Tobias, E. Gaiser, J. Shalack and the GCE and FCE LTERs for support in the field. Analytical assistance was provided by J. Lipp, X. Prieto, M. Elvert, K. Hunter and R. Culp. External methane isotope standards were kindly provided by J. Chanton. This work was supported by an award from the National Science Foundation (DEB 0717189 to SBJ); additional financial support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via the Research Center/Cluster of Excellence MARUM.

Author information




K.E.A.S., V.S. and S.B.J. planned the research; K.E.A.S. conducted field and lab experiments and laboratory analysis along with V.S., F.S., M.Y.Y., and K.-U.H.; K.E.A.S. and S.B.J. wrote the paper and critical feedback was provided by all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. B. Joye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-2, Supplementary Tables 1-3 and Supplementary References (PDF 427 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Segarra, K., Schubotz, F., Samarkin, V. et al. High rates of anaerobic methane oxidation in freshwater wetlands reduce potential atmospheric methane emissions. Nat Commun 6, 7477 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing