Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Macroscopic quantum tunnelling in spin filter ferromagnetic Josephson junctions

Abstract

The interfacial coupling of two materials with different ordered phases, such as a superconductor (S) and a ferromagnet (F), is driving new fundamental physics and innovative applications. For example, the creation of spin-filter Josephson junctions and the demonstration of triplet supercurrents have suggested the potential of a dissipationless version of spintronics based on unconventional superconductivity. Here we demonstrate evidence for active quantum applications of S-F-S junctions, through the observation of macroscopic quantum tunnelling in Josephson junctions with GdN ferromagnetic insulator barriers. We show a clear transition from thermal to quantum regime at a crossover temperature of about 100 mK at zero magnetic field in junctions, which present clear signatures of unconventional superconductivity. Following previous demonstration of passive S-F-S phase shifters in a phase qubit, our result paves the way to the active use of spin filter Josephson systems in quantum hybrid circuits.

Introduction

Superconductor (S)/Ferromagnet (F) interfaces are a special class of hybrid systems where different ordered phases meet and generate new nanoscale phenomena and new forms of global order1,2. A ferromagnetic barrier in a Josephson junction (JJ) generates novel physics3,4 and represents a technological key for advances in weak superconductivity, spintronics and quantum computation5,6,7. Recent interest in ultra-low-power, high-density cryogenic memories has spurred new efforts to simultaneously exploit superconducting and magnetic properties so as to create novel switching elements having these two competing orders8. S-F-S junctions are expected to shed light on several aspects of unconventional superconductivity, including transport through spin-aligned triplet Cooper pairs4,9,10,11,12,13,14.

The NbN-GdN-NbN junctions investigated in these experiments are spin filter devices15 with an unconventional predominant second harmonic current-phase relation (CPR)16. By changing the thickness of the GdN ferromagnetic insulator (FI) barrier it is possible to change its magnetic properties and hence the spin filter efficiency (SFE)16,17. In this paper we report measurements on NbN-GdN-NbN junctions for very low and very high SFE values, from almost a few percent up to 90%, with an intermediate value of 60%. By increasing the thickness of GdN we also obtain junctions with lower values of the IcRn product, where Ic is the critical current and Rn the normal state resistance. Following the previous demonstration by Feofanov et al.18 of passive S-F-S phase shifters in a phase qubit, the experiment reported here demonstrates the active quantum potential of S-F-S JJs via the occurrence of macroscopic quantum tunnelling (MQT) in spin filter devices.

Results

Transport properties of spin filter JJs

The hallmark of the spin filter effect is the decrease in resistance in the R vs T curves below the ferromagnetic transition, as shown in Fig. 1a (TCurie33 K for GdN). SFE is defined as the percentage difference in the tunnelling probability for up/down spin electrons owing to the difference in barrier heights of the up/down spin channel in the FI caused by exchange splitting, so that 100% SFE corresponds to pure tunnelling of one spin sign. See Methods for details concerning the calculation of SFE. Table 1 collects the parameters of the measured junctions. All the NbN-GdN-NbN JJs present hysteresis >90% in the current–voltage (IV) characteristics, in a wide range of Josephson coupling energies EJ=Ic0φ0/2π (where Ic0 is the critical current in the absence of thermal fluctuations and φ0=h/2e is the quantum flux). For all the measured devices the junction area is about 7 μm × 7 μm50 μm2.

Figure 1: Spin filter Josephson junctions.
figure1

(a) Thermal behaviour of the resistance is a hallmark of spin filter NbN-GdN-NbN Josephson junctions (JJs). Semiconducting behaviour has been observed at high temperatures, while below the Curie temperature of GdN (33 K) the resistance decreases when decreasing the temperature. In non spin filter NbN-GdN-NbN JJs a semiconducting behaviour has been observed down to the transition temperature of NbN. In panel b a picture of the device area is shown. The black arrow is the scale bar, 10 μm. (c) Magnetic field pattern of a spin filter JJ in the range (−5 mT, 5 mT), measured at 4 K. The blue curve is measured after nominal zero field cooling, the black and red curves are the magnetic pattern in the downward and upward direction of the magnetic field sweep, respectively, as indicated by the coloured dashed arrows. Blue squares indicate the values of the magnetic field, for which we present the measurements of switching current distributions. (d) Current–voltage characteristics of the same junction are shown as a function of the temperature, along with the voltage threshold (grey line) used for the switching current measurements.

Table 1 Device parameters.

In Fig. 1d, IV curves, measured as a function of temperature T for the junction with the highest SFE, are reported. The dependence of Ic as a function of H at T=4 K is reported in Fig. 1c. The blue curve is the first measurement of the magnetic pattern, after nominal zero-field cooling. Ic(H) has then been measured both in the downward direction of the magnetic field sweep and in the upward direction (black and red curves, respectively). The black and red curves show a distinctive shift of the absolute maximum of Ic from −1 mT to +1 mT, respectively, arising from the hysteretic reversal of the FI barrier19. The period of Ic(H) in non-spin filter junctions for the same geometry is twice as large (3 mT), pointing to a largely predominant second harmonic in the CPR in spin filter JJs, as discussed in ref. 16.

Measurements of switching current distributions

We have studied the escape rate of the superconducting phase ϕ as a function of temperature and for different values of the magnetic field, through standard switching current distribution (SCD) measurements20,21,22,23. SCDs have been performed for all the samples reported in Table 1. According to the Resistively and Capacitively Shunted Junction (RCSJ) model 24,25, for a JJ with a conventional CPR the dynamics is equivalent to that of a particle of mass mϕ moving in a washboard potential U(ϕ)=−EJ(cosϕ+γϕ). The particle mass is given by mϕ=C(φ0/2π)2 with C the capacitance of the junction. The normalized bias current γ=I/Ic0 determines the tilt of the potential.

The second harmonic component in the CPR, I=I1sinϕ+I2sin2ϕ, leads to a modified washboard potential , E1=I1/2e, which may assume the form of a double well for values of g=I2/I1 larger than 0.5 (refs 26, 27, 28, 29 (see Fig. 2a). The presence of two wells in the washboard potential may result in the observation of two critical currents in the IV characteristics, since when tilting back the washboard potential the phase particle may be retrapped in one of the potential wells with finite probability27; the case of ‘ϕ JJs’ with g <−1/2 has been recently studied28,29. Measurements of two-well distinguished critical currents constitute a very direct criterion to estimate the g factor27,28. Although spin filter JJs have a strong second harmonic component in the CPR16 we have not found evidence of two critical currents, and hence the case of ϕ junction with negative values of g is not considered in this work.

Figure 2: Phase dynamics with strong second harmonic component.
figure2

Washboard potential in the case of a strong second harmonic component in the current-phase relation, for different values of the bias current γ. Both a and b refer to the case g=2, for which two potential wells are present. A and B indicate the lower and the higher potential well, respectively. The blue rectangle in a is magnified in panel b, in which thermal activation (TA; black arrow) and macroscopic quantum tunnelling processes (MQT; red arrow) from the well B at γ=0.9 are shown. ωp (γ, g) and ΔU (γ, g) are the plasma frequency and the height of the potential barrier, respectively.

The sin2ϕ term in the CPR on average lowers the barrier height of the washboard potential without significantly altering the asymptotic expression of the potential barrier for γ close to one. The height of the potential barrier is given by: , where , and the plasma frequency is given by: . In addition, the second harmonic component does not modify the power law of ΔU. As a consequence in the thermal regime the s.d. σ of the SCDs is expected to scale as T2/3, as in the case of the standard CPR20,21.

The motion of the particle is subject to damping given by Q−1, where Q=ωpRC is the quality factor and R is the resistance of the junction. When the bias current is ramped from γ =0 to γ <1, the junction is in the zero voltage state in absence of thermal and quantum fluctuations, corresponding to the particle being localized in a potential well. At finite temperature the junction may switch into the finite voltage state for a bias current γ <1. This corresponds to the particle escaping from the well either by thermally activated processes or by tunnelling through the barrier potential (see Fig. 2b). In the thermal activation regime, the escape rate for weak to moderate damping (Q>1) is determined by30 , where the thermal prefactor is (ref. 31). The escape rate will be dominated by MQT at low enough temperatures32. For Q>1 and γ close to 1 the escape rate in the quantum regime is: , where . The crossover temperature between the thermal and quantum regimes is given by33

The experimental probability density of switching is related to the escape rate through the following equation 34:

where ΔIt is the current ramp rate.

The measurements have been performed in a dilution refrigerator, which reaches a base temperature of 20 mK. A full description of the apparatus is given in detail in the Methods section. The bias current of the junction is ramped at a constant sweep rate ΔIt=2 mA s−1 and at least 104 switching events have been recorded using a standard technique35.

Figure 3a shows a set of SCDs as a function of temperature for the high-SFE JJ reported in Fig. 1. The thermal behaviour of the SCDs is typical of underdamped JJs and the s.d. σ, which is proportional to the width of the switching histograms, increasing with temperature as expected. Figure 3b shows the SCDs measured below 1 K (black circles). The dependence of the s.d. σ on temperature is reported in Fig. 4a (right axis), along with the thermal behaviour of the mean value of the SCDs, Imean, below 0.5 K (left axis). When decreasing the temperature, Imean increases while σ decreases and both saturate at a crossover temperature of about 100 mK. Below this crossover the histograms overlap and the escape process is no longer regulated by thermal fluctuations, indicating the transition to the MQT regime20,21.

Figure 3: Switching current distributions.
figure3

(a) Measurements of switching current distributions (SCDs) from 4 K down to 0.3 K. When increasing the temperature, the histograms move to lower values of switching currents Isw and the s.d. σ increases. Each histogram collects 104 switching events. (b) Thermal behaviour of the SCDs from 0.9 K down to 20 mK. The red lines are fits of the probability density of switching, according to equation (2) in the case of a dominant second harmonic component in the current-phase relation (CPR). Below 100 mK the histograms overlap, indicating the transition to the quantum regime, definitely confirmed by the their dependence in magnetic field. In panel c the function a(g) is plotted (black curve) and the red line is the value of the function in the limiting case of a pure second harmonic (CPR).

Figure 4: MQT in spin filter S-F-S Josephson junctions.
figure4

(a) Thermal behaviour of the mean switching current Imean (green up triangles, left axis) and of the s.d. σ (violet circles, right axis) in the absence of magnetic field. The red dashed line indicates the crossover temperature between macroscopic quantum tunnelling (MQT) regime (dark yellow background) and thermal activation (pink background). In the MQT regime both Imean and σ saturate. (b) Comparison between thermal dependences of σ at 0 mT (violet circles) and at 1.1 mT (orange right triangles). In the presence of magnetic field, lower values of σ have been measured and Tcross is reduced, according to equation (1). Tcross has been determined by the intersection of the T2/3 curve in the thermal activation regime (dashed green lines) and the mean value of σ in the MQT regime (black full lines). In (a) and in (b) the error bars have been determined by using the theory for propagation of statistical errors, from the equations defining the mean and the s.d. of the switching histograms.

A further confirmation of the observation of MQT comes from measurements of SCDs in magnetic field. The behaviour of σ(T) at H=1.1 mT is shown in Fig. 4b. At this value of the magnetic field, which reduces Ic to half of the value measured at zero field (see the blue squares in Fig. 1c), lower values of σ have been measured and Tcross is reduced by a factor , down to about 70 mK, in agreement with MQT theory33. In both cases of 0 and 1.1 mT, Tcross has been determined by the intersection of the T2/3 curve in the thermal activation regime (dashed green lines in Fig. 4b) and the mean value of σ in the MQT regime (black full lines in Fig. 4b). The measurements in presence of magnetic field prove that the flattening of σ at H=0 mT is a quantum effect and is not due to noise or heating in the measurement set-up20,21,22,23.

Discussion

In the literature there are no measurements of SCDs on junctions with a dominant second harmonic component in the CPR. Numerical simulations of the phase dynamics as a function of the damping parameter Q, the g factor and the temperature T give the conditions for which a double-well potential effectively behaves in the escape process as a single well (for details see Supplementary Figs 1 and 2 and Supplementary Note 1). Namely, for values of Q10 SCDs with a single peak have been obtained for g ≤2 or in the limiting case of pure second harmonic CPR (I1=0). In this case the washboard potential changes its periodicity but assumes the form of a single-well potential. Instead, for g2, two critical currents should be observed. In fact, the heights of the two barriers approach each other when increasing the g factor, and the phase may be retrapped in both the potential wells with a finite probability, resulting in a bimodal switching distribution when counting many escape events27,28,29 (see Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Discussion). As this is not observed, a pure second harmonic is the only possible explanation consistent with both measurements of magnetic field pattern16 (see Fig. 1c) and SCDs.

Ic0 can be obtained by fitting the probability density of switching P(I) (red lines in Fig. 3b) in the thermal and quantum regime, Ic0=30.41±0.05 μA. A quite accurate value of the capacitance C can be obtained from the crossover temperature Tcross, which depends on Q, C and Ic0, see equation (1). By inserting the values of Ic0 and Q in the expression for Tcross we get C=4.5±0.9 pF. These values lead to ωp≈14 GHz. Nevertheless, as shown in Fig. 3c, the function a(g) in the equations for ΔU and ωp is a slowly varying function for g>>1; thus, the junction parameters weakly depend on the g factor for high values of g.

We expect in future additional insights coming from a comparative analysis with samples with lower SFE. For junction cross-sections of about 50 μm2 the Ic values for such junctions are too high to be in the conditions to observe unambiguously the transition from the thermal to the quantum regime as commonly occurring also in standard S-Insulator-S junctions20,21,36,37,38,39. Only further advances in fabrication able to insert S-FI-S junctions in cavities, and qubit architectures will give more refined feedback on the modes of the dissipative domains of the junction and on the triplet component. However, we can infer that the Q values of spin filter junctions are relatively higher than one would naively expect on the basis of the properties of the low-SFE samples, which are characterized by higher values of Ic. Concerning the Q values of spin filter JJs, the reduction in Ic is compensated by the increase of Rn, as reported in Table 1.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated the occurrence of MQT in NbN-GdN-NbN spin filter JJs. Spin filtering drives the S-F-S junction in the underdamped regime and in the appropriate window of junction parameters to observe MQT. The SCDs, together with the period of Ic(H) modulation, provide direct evidence for a pure second harmonic CPR in the junction where MQT was observed. This is clear evidence of unconventional superconductivity, and it is possible that transport occurs by means of a pair of spin-aligned triplet Cooper pairs16, which may suppress magnetic sources of decoherence40,41. Demonstration of macroscopic quantum phenomena in spin filter devices gives promise for their application in quantum hybrid circuits18 and also possibly as quiet memories.

Methods

Determination of SFE

SFE at a particular temperature is calculated from the R vs T curve. SFE at any temperature below the Curie temperature (TCurie) of GdN and above the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) of NbN is calculated by defining SFE where σ↑, σ↓ are current densities of the up and down spin channels, respectively. By invoking WKB approximation, we can derive where R* is the measured value of resistance, and R is the value of resistance in the absence of spin filtering. R is estimated by fitting an exponential to the R vs T curve to temperatures above 50 K, and extrapolating the exponential to temperatures below the TCurie of GdN. For calculating SFE below Tc of NbN, an exponential is fitted to the temperature dependence of SFE between TCurie and Tc, and the fitted exponential is extrapolated to lower temperatures to obtain an estimate of SFE.

Set-up for SCDs

The SCDs have been measured by thermally anchoring the samples to the mixing chamber of He3/He4 Oxford dilution refrigerator. The bias current is ramped at a constant sweep rate ΔIt of about 2 mA s−1, the voltage is measured using a low-noise differential amplifier and is fed into a threshold detector, which is set to generate a pulse signal when the junction switches from the superconducting state to the finite voltage state. This signal is used to trigger a fast volt meter to record the value of the switching current. This procedure is repeated at least 104 times at each temperature, which allows to compile a histogram of the switching currents. Filtering is guaranteed by a room temperature electromagnetic interference filter stage followed by low-pass RC filters with a cutoff frequency of 1.6 MHz anchored at 1.5 K, and by a combination of copper powder and twisted pair filters thermally anchored at the mixing chamber of the dilution refrigerator.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Massarotti, D. et al. Macroscopic quantum tunnelling in spin filter ferromagnetic Josephson junctions. Nat. Commun. 6:7376 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8376 (2015).

References

  1. 1

    Buzdin, A. I. Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935–976 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Bergeret, F. S., Volkov, A. F. & Efetov, K. B. Odd triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321–1373 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Ryazanov, V. V. et al. Coupling of two superconductors through a ferromagnet: Evidence for a π junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2427–2430 (2001).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Robinson, J. W. A., Witt, J. D. S. & Blamire, M. G. Controlled injection of spin-triplet supercurrents into a strong ferromagnet. Science 329, 59–61 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Golubov, A. A., Kupriyanov, M. & Il'Ichev, E. The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 411–469 (2004).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Buzdin, A. I. Peculiar properties of the Josephson junction at the transition from 0 to π state. Phys. Rev. B 72, 100501 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Kawabata, S., Kashiwaya, S., Asano, Y., Tanaka, Y. & Golubov, A. A. Macroscopic quantum dynamics of π junctions with ferromagnetic insulators. Phys. Rev. B 74, 180502 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Baek, B., Rippard, W. H., Benz, S. P., Russek, S. E. & Dresselhaus, P. D. Hybrid superconducting-magnetic memory device using competing order parameters. Nat. Commun. 5, 3888 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Bergeret, F. S., Volkov, A. F. & Efetov, K. B. Long-range proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4096–4099 (2001).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Fominov, Y. V., Golubov, A. A. & Kupriyanov, M. Y. Triplet proximity effects in FSF trilayers. JETP Lett. 77, 510–515 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Halász, G. B., Blamire, M. G. & Robinson, J. W. A. Magnetic-coupling dependent spin-triplet supercurrents in helimagnet/ferromagnet Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. B 84, 024517 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Khaire, T. S., Khasawneh, M. A., Pratt, W. P. Jr. & Birge, N. O. Observation of spin-triplet superconductivity in Co-based Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 137002 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Sprungmann, D., Westerholt, K., Zabel, H., Weides, M. & Kohlstedt, H. Evidence for triplet superconductivity in Josephson junctions with barriers of the ferromagnetic Heusler alloy Cu2MnAl. Phys. Rev. B 82, 060505 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Anwar, M. S., Veldhorst, M., Brinkman, A. & Aarts, J. Long range supercurrents in ferromagnetic CrO2 using a multilayer contact structure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 052602 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Senapati, K., Blamire, M. G. & Barber, Z. H. Spin-filter Josephson junctions. Nat. Mater. 10, 849–852 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Pal, A., Barber, Z. H., Robinson, J. W. A. & Blamire, M. G. Pure second harmonic current-phase relation in spin-filter Josephson junctions. Nat. Commun. 5, 3340 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Pal, A., Senapati, K., Barber, Z. H. & Blamire, M. G. Electric field dependent spin polarization in GdN spin filter tunnel junctions. Adv. Mater. 25, 5581–5585 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Feofanov, A. K. et al. Implementation of superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor π-shifters in superconducting digital and quantum circuits. Nat. Phys. 6, 593–597 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Blamire, M. G., Smiet, C. B., Banerjee, N. & Robinson, J. W. A. Field modulation of the critical current in magnetic Josephson junctions. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 055017 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Devoret, M. H., Martinis, J. M. & Clarke, J. Measurements of macroscopic quantum tunneling out of the zero-voltage state of a current-biased Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1908–1911 (1985).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Experimental tests for the quantum behavior of a macroscopic degree of freedom: the phase difference across a Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. B 35, 4682–4698 (1987).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Bauch, T. et al. Macroscopic quantum tunneling in d-wave YBaCuO Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 087003 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Longobardi, L. et al. Direct transition from quantum escape to a phase diffusion regime in YBaCuO biepitaxial Josephson junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050601 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Barone, A. & Paternò, G. Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect John Wiley and Sons (1982).

  25. 25

    Likharev, K. K. Superconducting weak links. Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 101–159 (1979).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Tzalenchuk, A. Y. et al. Mesoscopic Josephson junctions of high-T c superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 68, 100501(R) (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Goldobin, E., Koelle, D., Kleiner, R. & Buzdin, A. I. Josephson junctions with second harmonic in the current-phase relation: Properties of ϕ junctions. Phys. Rev. B 76, 224523 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Sickinger, H. et al. Experimental evidence of a ϕ Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 107002 (2012).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Goldobin, E., Kleiner, R., Koelle, D. & Mints, R. G. Phase retrapping in a pointlike ϕ Josephson junction: the butterfly effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057004 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Kramers, H. A. Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica 7, 284–304 (1940).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Büttiker, M., Harris, E. P. & Landauer, R. Thermal activation in extremely underdamped Josephson-junction circuits. Phys. Rev. B. 28, 1268–1275 (1983).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Caldeira, A. O. & Leggett, A. J. Influence of dissipation on quantum tunneling in macroscopic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 211–214 (1981).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Grabert, H. & Weiss, U. Crossover from thermal hopping to quantum tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1787–1790 (1984).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Fulton, T. A. & Dunkleberger, L. N. Lifetime of the zero-voltage state in Josephson tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 9, 4760–4768 (1974).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Longobardi, L. et al. Thermal hopping and retrapping of a Brownian particle in the tilted periodic potential of a NbN/MgO/NbN Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. B 84, 184504 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Washburn, S., Webb, R. A., Voss, R. F. & Farris, S. M. Effects of dissipation and temperature on macroscopic quantum tunneling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2712–2715 (1985).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Li, S. X. et al. Quantitative study of macroscopic quantum tunneling in a dc SQUID: a system with two degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 098301 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Martinis, J. M., Nam, S., Aumentado, J. & Urbina, C. Rabi oscillations in a large Josephson-junction qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 117901 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Berkley, A. J. et al. Entangled macroscopic quantum states in two superconducting qubits. Science 300, 1548–1550 (2003).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Richard, C., Houzet, M. & Meyer, J. S. Superharmonic long-range triplet current in a diffusive Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217004 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Trifunovic, L. Long-range superharmonic Josephson current. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 047001 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge financial support from COST Action MP1201 [NanoSC COST], by Progetto FIRB HybridNanoDev RBFR1236VV001 and by Regione Campania through POR Campania FSE 2007/2013, progetto MASTRI CUP B25B09000010007.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.M., A.P., L.L., M.G.B. and F.T. conceived the experiments, A.P. and M.G.B. designed and realized the junctions; D.M. carried out the measurements; D.M., G.R. and F.T. worked on the theoretical modelling and data analysis; D.M., M.G.B. and F.T. co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to D. Massarotti or F. Tafuri.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures 1-3, Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary References (PDF 502 kb)

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Massarotti, D., Pal, A., Rotoli, G. et al. Macroscopic quantum tunnelling in spin filter ferromagnetic Josephson junctions. Nat Commun 6, 7376 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8376

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing