Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly metastatic disease, but no effective strategies to target this process are currently available. Here, an integrative computational analysis of the Cancer Genome Atlas OC data set and experimental validation identifies a zinc finger transcription factor ZNF304 associated with OC metastasis. High tumoral ZNF304 expression is associated with poor overall survival in OC patients. Through reverse phase protein array analysis, we demonstrate that ZNF304 promotes multiple proto-oncogenic pathways important for cell survival, migration and invasion. ZNF304 transcriptionally regulates β1 integrin, which subsequently regulates Src/focal adhesion kinase and paxillin and prevents anoikis. In vivo delivery of ZNF304 siRNA by a dual assembly nanoparticle leads to sustained gene silencing for 14 days, increased anoikis and reduced tumour growth in orthotopic mouse models of OC. Taken together, ZNF304 is a transcriptional regulator of β1 integrin, promotes cancer cell survival and protects against anoikis in OC.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ovarian carcinoma (OC) has the highest mortality rate among gynecologic malignancies. In the United States in 2014, over 21,000 patients will be diagnosed with OC, and more than 14,000 will die1. The most common histological subtype is high-grade serous OC (HGSOC), which is associated with poor survival most likely due to the advanced stage of disease and widespread metastases at presentation, related to lack of early symptoms and detection. The rapid spread of HGSOC is based on its propensity to seed the peritoneal cavity, leading to ascites formation2,3; this highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate OC growth and progression. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) is paving the way for new target identification that may influence pathophysiology and patient outcome. This data set provides a comprehensive genomic, epigenomic and a number of other analysis, which will assist in the detection of biological and clinically relevant information on HGSOC samples4.
To identify new therapeutic targets and strategies, we carried out an integrative analysis of TCGA HGSOC data set4 and gene profiles of ovarian and breast tumours to identify genes that are important for cancer metastasis. Among the genes identified, zinc finger protein 304 (ZNF304) was found to be the most highly associated with overall survival in HGSOC patients. ZNF304 is a transcription factor that belongs to the C2H2 zinc finger family. The member genes of this family represent the largest class of transcription factors in humans and, indeed, one of the largest gene families in mammals5. ZNF304 can be upregulated by activated Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) in KRAS-positive colorectal cancer cells and binds at the promoters of INK4-ARF and other CpG island methylator phenotype genes in colorectal cancer cells and in human embryonic stem cells6. However, the role of ZNF304 in metastasis and its downstream effectors are not well understood.
This study demonstrates that ZNF304 regulates inside-out anoikis through the regulation of β1 integrin in OC cells, resulting in increased migration, proliferation and decreased anoikis. Using dual assembly nanoparticles (DANP) loaded with ZNF304 short interfering RNA (siRNA), we achieved long-term silencing after a single administration in orthotopic models of OC, which led to reduced tumour weight and number of nodules, recapitulating the in vitro findings. Thus, ZNF304 is an attractive target for OC therapy.
Results
ZNF304 in human HGSOC
We first carried out an integrative computational analysis to identify genes that are important for cancer metastasis and that are upregulated in OC. As N-cadherin has been reported to play a critical role in invasion and anoikis resistance of cancer cells7,8, we first identified gene signatures in tumours with high N-cadherin expression in TCGA HGSOC data set. Of 16,869 genes that were upregulated in OC, 493 genes had a positive correlation with tumoral N-cadherin expression (Fig. 1a). Of these 493 genes, ciliary neurotrophic factor receptor (CNTFR); melanoma antigen family D, 1 (MAGED1); nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 2 (NR2F2) and ZNF304 were upregulated in invasive ovarian and breast tumour epithelium compared with normal ovarian9and breast epithelium10, respectively.
We then assessed the effect of tumoral expression on patient survival for these four genes using TCGA HGSOC data set (Supplementary Fig. 1). For each gene, we randomly split the entire OC patient population into training (two-third of cases) and validation cohorts (one-third of cases). In both cohorts, patients were divided into sextiles according to mRNA expression, and the first and last sextiles were contrasted. Importantly, the relationships between overall survival and known prognostic factors such as age or residual disease were examined in both the training and the validation cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model. Only ZNF304 was a significant factor in this analysis (Fig. 1b,c). In contrast, CNTFR (Training and validation sets; Supplementary Fig. 1a,b, respectively), MAGED1 (Training and validation sets; Supplementary Fig. 1c,d, respectively) and NR2F2 (Training and validation sets; Supplementary Fig. 1e,f, respectively) expression levels were not correlated with patient survival. Patients with high tumoral ZNF304 expression had significantly lower median overall survival than patients with low tumoral ZNF304 expression, Fig. 1b (training set, 22.2 versus 48.7 months, P=0.031, Log-rank test) and Fig. 1c (validation set, 40.4 versus 26.9 months, P=0.039, Log rank test). Based on these results, ZNF304 was selected for additional studies.
Next, we examined protein expression levels of ZNF304 (75 kDa) by western blot analysis in six OC tumour cell lines and in HIO180 non-transformed ovarian epithelial cells (Fig. 1d). ZNF304 protein was highly expressed in all OC cells tested, but a lower expression was observed in the HIO180 cells. ZNF304 mRNA basal levels were high in four of the six OC cell lines (Fig. 1e). In addition, we analysed ZNF304 mRNA levels in patient normal distal fallopian tubes versus HIO180 and SKOV3IP1 cancer cells (Supplementary Fig. 2). ZNF304 mRNA levels were similar between fallopian tube and HIO180; however, ZNF304 levels were significantly higher in SKOV3IP1 cells.
Silencing ZNF304 inhibits migration and proliferation in OC cells
Given the potential role of ZNF304 in cancer metastasis, we next investigated whether silencing this target would affect invasion and migration. We first tested the knockdown efficiency of three siRNA sequences of ZNF304 in HeyA8 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3). Two of the three siRNA sequences tested (ZNF304 siRNA-1 and ZNF304 siRNA-3) showed more than 65% inhibition of ZNF304 in HeyA8 cells. Therefore, these two siRNA sequences were selected for further studies. Next, we performed invasion and migration assays in HeyA8 and SKOV3IP1 cell lines with the selected siRNA sequences, resulting in 40% inhibition of invasion and 45% inhibition of migration in HeyA8 cells (Fig. 2a,b, respectively) and 27% inhibition of migration in SKOV3IP1 cells (Fig. 2c).
To determine the potential signalling pathways in which ZNF304 is involved, we performed a reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analysis of control siRNA-treated and ZNF304 siRNA-treated HeyA8 cells. Samples were probed with 214 validated antibodies to total proteins and the respective phospho-proteins. Silencing ZNF304 led to reduced expression of caveolin-1, fibronectin, MYH9 (myosin II) and the effectors of the Ras signalling pathway (BRAF, RAF1; Supplementary Fig. 4). This last finding guided us to further analyse the link between ZNF304 and integrin signalling (Supplementary Table 1). ZNF304 mRNA expression was highly correlated with β1 integrin expression in HGSOC samples (r=0.20, P=0.0015; Spearman’s rank-order correlation test, Supplementary Fig. 5).
To further understand the role of ZNF304, we validated the RPPA data and determined the levels of focal adhesion complex members after ZNF304 siRNA transfection in HeyA8 cells. Silencing ZNF304 decreased phosphorylation of Src and FAK, which are adaptor proteins of focal adhesion and major markers of cell migration (Fig. 2d,e, respectively). To further analyse pathways related to migration and invasion, we investigated the effects of ZNF304 silencing on paxillin and β1 integrin (Fig. 2f). ZNF304 silencing inhibited both paxillin phosphorylation at tyrosine sites 31 and 118 and β1 integrin expression in the cell lines tested.
In the RPPA results, forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) and cyclin B1 levels were also decreased in ZNF304-silenced samples, suggesting that ZNF304 might play a role in the cell cycle. To determine the effects of ZNF304 silencing on proliferation, we performed cell-cycle analysis in HeyA8, SKOV3IP1, A2780PAR and A2780CP20 cell lines after 72 h of ZNF304 siRNA transfection (Fig. 2g–j, respectively). All cell lines treated with ZNF304 siRNA showed significant arrest in the G2 phase, confirming the decreases in cyclin B1 and FOXM1 levels found in the RPPA analysis.
ZNF304 transcriptionally regulates β1 integrin
The ZNF304 gene is located at chromosome 19q13.43 ( http://www.genome.ucsc.edu). The ZNF304 protein consists of a Kruppel-associated box domain and 16 zinc finger proteins (UniProt; Supplementary Fig. 6). To explore the mechanism by which ZNF304 silencing downregulates migration, we determined protein and mRNA levels of β1 integrin upon ZNF304 siRNA treatment in HeyA8 and SKOV3IP1 cells. We first performed reverse transcription–PCR (RT–PCR) and real-time RT–PCR to determine the effects of the selected ZNF304 siRNA sequences on ZNF304 mRNA levels; the results showed the downregulation of ZNF304 mRNA in these cells (Supplementary Fig. 7a,b, respectively). We also determined reduced β1 integrin mRNA levels after ZNF304 silencing using real-time RT–PCR (Supplementary Fig. 7c,d). We determined the basal protein levels of β1 integrin and observed that it was expressed in the cell lines tested (Fig. 3a).
We next investigated whether ZNF304 transcriptionally regulates β1 integrin. ZNF304-DNA-binding sites were predicted on the basis of support vector machines11. We identified ten possible ZNF304-binding sites in the β1 integrin promoter by using support vector machine scores that ranged from 24.25 to 18.9 (Supplementary Fig. 8). The transcription start site was predicted by the ensemble and was compared with the β1 integrin transcript sequence and the binding locations in the β1 integrin promoter region (Fig. 3b). Six primer sets containing the segments for the ten binding sites were designed (Fig. 3c). DNA segments were amplified, cloned, sequenced and confirmed with a standard nucleotide–nucleotide basic local alignment search tool (National Center for Biotechnology Information). To determine whether ZNF304 binds to the β1 integrin promoter, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in HeyA8 cells with ZNF304 antibody. Subsequent PCR results confirmed the interaction of β1 integrin promoter and five of the six predicted ZNF304-binding sites (BS1, BS2, BS3, BS5 and BS6; Fig. 3d). A densitometric analysis of the inputs and immunoprecipitation results for each binding site revealed that BS1, BS2 and BS3 had an affinity of >50% (Fig. 3e). Owing to their affinity, BS1, BS2 and BS3 were selected for further studies.
To identify the role of ZNF304 in the regulation of β1 integrin gene transcription, we developed three constructs that each contained one of the binding sites and inserted them into pGL3-basic vector. HeyA8 cells were transfected with the constructs, and the activity of each binding site was determined by a dual-luciferase reporter assay in cells with basal ZNF304 expression and in cells in which ZNF304 had been knocked down by siRNA. As shown in Fig. 3f, overall luciferase activity increased in cells transfected with the binding site constructs compared with cells transfected with the empty vector. Cells transfected with BS1-vector had two times more luciferase expression than empty vector cells, whereas BS2-vector-transfected cells had six times more luciferase expression than did the empty vector cells. Cells transfected with BS3-vector showed the highest luciferase activity (∼70 times more expression than empty vector cells). ZNF304 silencing led to a decrease in luciferase activity in all three binding sites. The most significant was BS2-transfected cells, which had a 40.3% inhibition of luciferase activity (P=0.02; Fig. 3f). We found a 13.8% decrease in luciferase activity for cells transfected with BS1-vector and a 7.8% decrease for cells transfected with BS3-vector, compared with control cells (P=0.0173 and P=0.2630, respectively). Co-transfection of ZNF304-expressing vector significantly induced the luciferase activity of BS1-, BS2- and BS3-vector-transfected cells (Fig. 3g). These results indicate that ZNF304 is a positive regulator of the active β1 integrin promoter and that ZNF304 increases its transcription by binding to BS2.
ZNF304 protects tumour cells from anoikis
β1 integrin confers a survival advantage to tumour cells12. As a regulator of β1 integrin, ZNF304 can also inhibit anoikis through β1 integrin downregulation. Therefore, we examined the anoikis rates at 24, 48 and 72 h in detached HeyA8 cells in vitro using polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate-coated tissue culture plates that promote anchorage-independent cell growth13. The anoikis rates in ZNF304 siRNA-transfected cells were significantly higher than control siRNA-transfected cells at each time point tested (at 24, 48 and 72 h; Supplementary Fig. 9). The highest anoikis rate and induction of poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) cleavage were observed at 72 h; therefore all subsequent experiments were conducted at this time point. Cells transfected with the ZNF304 siRNAs for 72 h had a significantly higher ([ZNF304 siRNA-1, P<0.0001]; [ZNF304 siRNA-3, P<0.0005]) rate of anoikis (75–80%), than control untreated or control siRNA-treated cells (60%; Fig. 4a). Consistent with these results, immunoblotting from these samples showed that silencing ZNF304 also increased PARP cleavage (Fig. 4b), which supports our observation of increased anoikis in cells transfected with ZNF304 siRNA.
To determine the link between ZNF304-mediated β1 integrin and anoikis, we also performed a rescue experiment. HeyA8 and SKOV3IP1 cells were transfected with either control siRNA or ZNF304 siRNA. Next, cells were transiently transfected with either empty vector or β1 integrin-expressing vector and transferred to anoikis plates. Both HeyA8 and SKOV3IP1 cells that were transfected with β1 integrin-expressing vector showed increased survival and decreased anoikis rates (Fig. 4c left and right, respectively). Furthermore, silencing ZNF304 increased the anoikis sensitivity and death rate of HeyA8 cells even in the presence of high β1 integrin expression. In addition, we generated mutations (5 bp deletion on the binding site) on the ZNF304-overexpressing vector that led to insensitivity for ZNF304 siRNA-1 (Supplementary Fig. 10). We performed the rescue experiment using the ZNF304 overexpressing vector and mutant ZNF304-overexpressing vector. Immunoblotting showed that overexpression of mutant ZNF304 (insensitive for ZNF304 siRNA-1) led to a decrease in PARP cleavage, indicating the lack of anoikis in these cells (Supplementary Fig. 10).
Sustained in vivo ZNF304 gene silencing
On the basis of our in vitro findings, we next investigated whether ZNF304 gene silencing would be effective in treating orthotopic murine models of OC. For the in vivo experiments, we developed and characterized a novel delivery system designed for sustained and prolonged gene silencing. DANPs were prepared by using a chitosan core coated with polylactic acid. These particles had a diameter of 150–200 nm and a zeta potential of −10 mV, which corresponded to a neutral range (Fig. 5a,b, respectively). Atomic force microscopy images demonstrated the spherical morphology and size distribution of the DANP (Fig. 5c). This optimized nanoparticle formulation was used for all subsequent experiments owing to their small size, slight negative charge and high efficiency at incorporating siRNA. We incorporated siRNA in the chitosan core by using chitosan/tripolyphosphate at a 3:1 ratio, which yielded more than 75% loading efficiency, as previously described14. We next determined the tissue distribution of the DANP by labelling the particles with rhodamine 6G and administering these red fluorescence-labelled particles as a single dose intravenously to HeyA8 tumour-bearing mice. Twenty-four hours later, the mice were euthanized, and their major organs and the tumours were removed, processed and sectioned. The number of particles in each field was assessed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5d).
In our first set of experiments, we determined the duration of in vivo DANP-mediated ZNF304 silencing in an orthotopic HeyA8 mouse model. DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (300 μg kg−1 body weight) was administered as a single intravenous injection 2 weeks after tumour inoculation. Groups of mice were euthanized on day 3, 7 and 14 after injection. Tumours were collected and analysed by immunoblotting to determine ZNF304 protein expression levels. We demonstrated that ZNF304 protein silencing started at day 3 and continued up to 14 days after a single administration of DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (Fig. 5e).
Next, inflammatory cytokine responses were assessed in the serum of C57 black mice. Mice were treated with single i.v. injections of DANP alone (n=6), DANP-Control siRNA (n=6), DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (n=6) or no treatment (n=2; Fig. 5f), and serum was collected after 72 h using cardiac puncture. A Luminex assay designed to detect 12 pro-inflammatory cytokines (LIX, MIP-2, KC, interleukin (IL)-10, IL-6, IL-2, IL-1β, IL-1α, macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF), tumour-necrosis factor α, granulocyte–macrophage CSF, granulocyte-CSF) was used. The results obtained did not show any significant increase in these cytokines. Tissue samples were also obtained for post-mortem histopathology studies (brain, spleen, liver and kidney). Haematoxylin and eosin staining of the various tissues were analysed by our Histopathology Core’s veterinary pathologist; no inflammatory changes were observed in the tissues studied (Supplementary Fig. 12). Blood chemistries to assess liver (ALT and Alk Phosp) and kidney function (BUN and S. Creatinine) were also conducted (Supplementary Fig. 11); haematologic profile was conducted (Complete Blood Counts, with differential and platelets: Hgb, Hct including red blood cell parameters are shown in Supplementary Table 2). All parameters studied were within normal range. Furthermore, tissue assessment using haematoxylin and eosin did not disclose any toxicity.
ZNF304 gene silencing leads to antitumour activity
On the basis of these findings, we examined the antitumour activity of weekly or biweekly ZNF304 silencing in two orthotopic OC mouse models, HeyA8 and SKOV3IP1. In the first model, mice were injected with HeyA8 cells to induce tumours and 1 week later they were randomly assigned to six treatment groups (ten mice in each group): DANP alone, DANP-Control siRNA, DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (150 μg kg−1 body weight) administered weekly, DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (300 μg kg−1 body weight) administered biweekly, as paclitaxel is commonly used for OC treatment and combines effectively with many biologically targeted agents, paclitaxel only or a combination of paclitaxel plus DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (300 μg kg−1 body weight, biweekly administration; Fig. 6a). Significant reductions in tumour weight were observed in the groups treated with DANP-ZNF304 siRNA weekly or biweekly. Mice treated with DANP-ZNF304 siRNA had a significantly lower tumour burden (62% reduction in tumour weight; P<0.01; Fig. 6a, left panel) and had 50% fewer nodules than did mice treated with DANP-Control siRNA (P<0.05; Fig. 6a, right panel). Moreover, the DANP-ZNF304 siRNA treatment group had significantly fewer nodules than did the control group (P=0.0001, weekly administration; P=0.0001, biweekly administration; Student’s t-test).
In the second orthotopic model (SKOV3IP1), the treatment groups were (i) DANP-Control siRNA, (ii) DANP-ZNF304 siRNA, (iii) DANP-Control siRNA plus paclitaxel and (iv) DANP-ZNF304 siRNA plus paclitaxel (n=10 per group). DANP-siRNA was administered intravenously every 2 weeks in all treatment groups. Tumours removed from mice treated with DANP-ZNF304 siRNA alone weighed 60% less than those of mice treated with DANP-control siRNA (Fig. 6b, left panel). Number of nodules was dramatically reduced in mice treated with either DANP-ZNF304 siRNA or DANP-ZNF304 siRNA plus paclitaxel (Fig. 6b, right panel). The greatest reduction was observed in the group treated with both DANP-ZNF304 siRNA and paclitaxel. None of the groups in either mouse model showed decreased body weight, which indicates that the treatments were not toxic (Supplementary Fig. 13). These data indicate that inhibiting ZNF304 results in antitumour activity in mouse models of OC and that the DANP delivery system is an efficient tool for in vivo gene silencing.
Given the in vitro effects of ZNF304 silencing, we performed Ki67 and CD31 staining to examine the biological effects of silencing ZNF304 on tumour cell proliferation and angiogenesis, respectively. Mice treated with DANP-ZNF304 siRNA showed significant reduction in cell proliferation compared with control group (P<0.0001; Fig. 6c). Given that ZNF304 transcriptionally regulates β1 integrin, which is required for endothelial cell adhesion, migration and survival 16,17, we also examined the effects of ZNF304 siRNA treatment on angiogenesis. The DANP-ZNF304 siRNA treatment group had significantly reduced microvessel density compared with the control (P=0.0252, Students’s t-test; Supplementary Fig. 14). These data showed that downregulation of ZNF304 was highly associated with decreased cell proliferation and decreased microvessel density.
On the basis of efficacy data, we next examined the effects of DANP-ZNF304 siRNA treatment on tumour-bearing mice survival. For these experiments, mice inoculated with OVCA-432 cells that represent HGSOC18. Luciferase-labelled OVCA-432 cells (3 × 106) were injected intraperitoneally to generate tumours in nude mice. The four groups (n=8 per group) were treated with either: (i) DANP-Control siRNA, (ii) DANP-ZNF304 siRNA, (iii) DANP-Control siRNA+cisplatin and (iv) DANP-ZNF304 siRNA+cisplatin. The treatment started 1 week after the tumour cell inoculation and the mice were monitored daily by three observers. Individual mice were euthanized on the day the core veterinarian recommended, based on moribund status. A Kaplan–Meier curve was generated based on the survival duration of mice (Fig. 6d). DANP-ZNF304 siRNA-based treatment significantly improved survival compared with DANP-Control siRNA treatment (n=8 per group, P=0.01, Log-rank test). Our analysis showed that the median survival for DANP-Control siRNA-treated group was 44 days, whereas it was not reached for the DANP-ZNF304 siRNA.
Next, we addressed whether ZNF304 silencing could directly increase the rates of anoikis in vivo. For this question, we use the OC MDAH 2774 cell line as it induces significant ascites in mice13. MDAH 2774 cells were implanted into the peritoneal cavity of nude mice, and ascites production was observed 4–6 weeks post inoculation. Next, we analysed the ascites for viable tumour epithelial cells using fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labelled anti-epithelial cellular adhesion molecule antibody followed by flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 6e). The control group showed 16% (mean±s.e.m.; 16.08±0.7280, n=3) epithelial cell death in ascites, whereas mice treated with intravenous DANP-ZNF304 siRNA had up to 30% (mean±s.e.m.; 30.77±1.040, n=3) epithelial cell death. These results show that silencing ZNF304 significantly decreased the ability of OC cells to survive in ascites (P<0.001, Student’s t-test).
Discussion
The key finding from this study is that ZNF304 is a novel transcriptional regulator of β1 integrin. Silencing ZNF304 resulted in antitumour activity and the induction of anoikis in malignant cells both in vitro and in vivo through β1 integrin downregulation. High ZNF304 mRNA expression was associated with worse survival in OC patients. Furthermore, silencing ZNF304 enhances the anoikis rate through inhibiting inside-out integrin signalling and accordingly blocking outside-in signalling (Fig. 7).
Integrins are crucial for normal functions of multicellular organisms and critical at each step of cancer: tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis19. Integrins are regulated and activated by conformational changes, clustering and trafficking20. These transmembrane proteins are an essential link between the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the cytoplasm, and the signalling can be in two directions: outside-in or inside-out through the cytoplasmic β tail20. For example, β1 integrin promotes cell survival and regulates focal adhesion, leading to tumour metastasis in many types of cancer including OC21,22,23,24. In a recent study, Schiller and colleagues demonstrated that expression of α5β1 integrins is essential to sense the stiffness of fibronectin-based ECM, which is also critical for tumour metastasis25,26. Furthermore, several β1 integrin-targeting strategies, such as monoclonal antibodies and peptide inhibitors, showed activity in clinical trials for cancer therapy19,27,28. However, targeting ZNF304—the regulator of β1 integrin expression—may offer greater efficacy than targeting only activation of β1 integrin.
β1 integrin is a subunit of heterodimeric membrane adhesion receptors, and it can form heterodimers with integrin α subunits. For example, α4β1, α8β1 and αvβ1 are fibronectin-binding integrins; α3β1, α6β1 and α7β1 interact with laminin and nectin; and α1β1, α2β1, α10β1 and α11β1 bind to collagens29,30. The first study showing the inside-out regulation of β1 integrin unraveled the control by R-Ras of the ligand-binding affinity of β1 integrin and fibronectin31. Thus, the regulation of integrin activation and affinity was known as a transcription-independent function of the Ras-linked mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway32,33. However, the transcriptional regulation of β1 integrin remained unknown. Here, we elucidated that the regulation of β1 integrin expression through ZNF304 is at transcriptional level.
Previous studies showed that fibronectin and β1 integrin ligation, followed by activation of cytoplasmic β subunit, promotes the invasive migration of OC cells through the ECM34. Myosin II and FAK mediate the phosphorylation of paxillin, reinforcing the cytoskeletal ECM linkage and driving focal adhesion maturation35. In addition, β1 integrin-FAK signalling directs the initial proliferation of micrometastatic cancer cells disseminated in the lungs, which indicates the role of integrin-FAK signalling in the metastatic cascade36. Thus, ZNF304 may be a regulator of this metastatic process. Correspondingly, we showed that silencing the key regulator ZNF304 decrease nodule formation, tumour growth and prolong survival in orthotopic mouse models of OC.
The functional crosstalk between cell adhesion receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases contributes to cancer cell survival22. The interaction between ErbB1 and β1 integrin induces tumour cell detachment, migration and metastatic potential. β1 integrin was also shown to regulate epidermal growth factor receptor signalling in lung cancer cells37 and to mediate epidermal growth factor-induced cell invasion in OC cells38. Furthermore, a recent study demonstrated an increased ErbB1-β1 integrin heteroassociation in high-grade astrocytomas and showed that this clinically relevant association can be targeted by molecular therapy39. Therefore, silencing ZNF304—the regulator of β1 integrin—may also inhibit epidermal growth factor receptor signalling, inhibiting cancer cell survival and slowing tumour progression.
Anoikis is a form of apoptosis in adherent nonmalignant cells caused by a lack of integrin-mediated survival signals from the ECM40,41. However, malignant cells develop resistance to anoikis, leading to increased metastatic potential42,43. A seminal mechanistic work on anoikis unraveled its contribution to human cancer metastasis in several different malignancies44,45,46. Integrins are crucial in anoikis mechanism as major mediators of adhesion between cells and ECM proteins47,48. A recent study showed that activated integrins enhance the metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells by decreasing their sensitivity to anoikis during tumour dissemination and by increasing their interactions with ECM ligands during extravasation49. This latter study suggested that in prostate cancer cells, β1 integrin is activated through an inside-out signalling, which also enhances its affinity for ligand binding. The interaction of β1 integrin with ECM ligands further activates β1 integrin through outside-in signalling.
RNA interference is a highly effective method for gene silencing owing to its sequence specificity; however, systemic delivery of RNA interference remains a challenge. Our group has previously developed and characterized chitosan nanoparticles for systemic delivery of siRNA14,50. Although chitosan nanoparticles is an efficient RNA interference delivery system, weekly administration is required as the target downregulation lasts only for 7 days after a single administration. Thus, DANP prolonged silencing is a more tolerable and promotes patient compliance.
Methods
Integrative computational analysis and patient data selection
Clinical and expression data (Level 3 Illumina HiSeqv2) for 260 patients were downloaded from TCGA portal and were used to analyse the relationship between expression of ZNF304 and overall survival as well as between expressions of ZNF304 and ITGB1. The Spearman’s rank-order correlation test was applied to measure the strength of the association between ZNF304 and ITGB1 levels in patient samples in TCGA data set.
Cell lines and culture
The immortalized non-transformed human ovarian surface epithelial cell line HIO-180 and the human epithelial OC cell lines HeyA8, MDAH 2774, SKOV3IP1, A2780PAR and A2780CP20 were maintained as described previously51,52,53,54,55. Taxane-resistant HeyA8MDR and SKOV3-TR cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.1% gentamicin sulfate (Gemini Bio-Products) with or without paclitaxel (300 ng ml−1 for HeyA8-MDR; 150 ng ml−1 for SKOV3-TR). The A2780CP20 cell line was developed by sequential exposure of the A2780 cell line to increasing concentrations of cisplatin. All of the cell lines are routinely screened for Mycoplasma species (Mycoalert Mycoplasma Detection Kit, Lonza). All in vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted when cells were 70–80% confluent.
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously reported56,57. All antibodies used in this study and vendors are listed in Supplementary Table 4. Uncropped scans of the western blot results are shown in Supplementary Figs 15–18.
SiRNA constructs and delivery
SiRNAs were purchased from Qiagen or Sigma-Aldrich. A non-silencing siRNA that did not share sequence homology with any known human mRNA was used as a control for target siRNA. In vitro transient transfection was performed as described previously56. The ZNF304 and control siRNA sequences are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
Invasion and migration assays
Cell migration and invasion assays have been described previously58,59. For migration/invasion assays, cells were treated with either control or ZNF304 siRNA for 48 h and incubated on migration wells for 24 h. Migrated cells on the bottom of the wells were collected, fixed, stained and counted by light microscopy. Cells were counted in ten random fields ( × 200 final magnification), and the average number of migrated cells was calculated; the percentage of migration was determined by setting control siRNA-treated samples as 100% migration/invasion.
RPPA
This study was conducted at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center RPPA Core Facility60. First step was to denature cellular proteins in 1% SDS lysis buffer containing β-mercaptoethanol. This was followed by serial dilutions (two- to fivefold serial dilutions). Next, the lysates were arrayed on the nitrocellulose-coated slides (Grace Bio-Labs). On each slide 5,080 spots were arranged. The spotted samples were arrayed with an Aushon 2,470 arrayer (Aushon BioSystems). Only validated primary antibodies with a correlation Pearson’s Coefficient of greater than 0.7 were used in the RPPA analysis. Signals were amplified using a Dako Cytomation-catalysed system (Dako) and visualized by diaminobenzidine colorimetric reaction. To generate the spot intensity, customized software was used (MicroVigene, VigeneTech Inc.). Dilution curves were fitted with a logistic model (‘Supercurve Fitting’ developed by the Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology in MD Anderson Cancer Center, ‘ http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/OOMPA’). Both observed and fitted curves were plotted on the y axis and the log2-concentration of proteins on the x axis. Protein concentrations for each set were normalized by Tukey’s median polish, corrected across samples by linear expression values using the median expression levels of all antibody experiments to calculate a loading correction factor for each sample.
Cell-cycle analysis
Cells were transfected with either control siRNA or ZNF304 siRNA, trypsinized and collected 72 h post transfection. Samples were washed in PBS solution and were fixed in 75% ethanol overnight. Cells were then centrifuged and reconstituted in PBS with propidium iodide (PI; 50 μg ml−1), as previously described61. PI fluorescence was assessed by flow cytometry, and the percentage of cells in each cycle was analysed by FlowJo software.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay
HeyA8 cells were cultured in 10% fetal bovine serum to ∼75% confluence, and cells were cross-linked with 37% formaldehyde for 20 min and were incubated with glycine (0.125 M) as previously described62. Cells were lysed, and chromatin was sonicated according to the protocol provided by the kit (EZ ChIP, Upstate Biotechnology; cat #17-371). Possible binding sites of ZNF304 in the ITGB1 promoter were predicted using an online tool ( http://compbio.cs.princeton.edu/zf/). Six primer pair sets were designed using basic local alignment search tool software (National Center for Biotechnology Information). Primers used for amplification of the DNA in quantitative PCR are shown in Supplementary Table 5. Anti-ZNF304 antibody (Supplementary Table 4) was used for the chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. The Bio-Rad DNA Engine Dyad Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) was used with the following cycling conditions: 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 58 °C and 1 min at 68 °C, followed by 1 min at 68 °C.
Plasmid construction and luciferase reporter assay
Fragments containing the predicted binding sites (BS1, BS2 and BS3) were amplified from HeyA8 cell genomic DNA by PCR using primers containing SacI or HindIII restriction enzyme sites. The PCR products were purified, digested and subsequently cloned into the same restriction site of the pGL3 control vector (Promega) downstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene. Sequences were analysed with a DNA BigDye Terminator sequencing kit, version 3.1 (Life Technologies). HeyA8 cells were plated in 24-well plates (60,000 cells per well) 24 h before transfection with either ZNF304 siRNA or ZNF304-expressing vector (Promega). Twenty-four hours after the first transfection, cells were transfected with the luciferase reporter vectors containing BS1, BS2 or BS3 together with Renilla luciferase construct, which was used as a normalization reference. Transfections were performed with Attractene transfection reagent (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were lysed 48 h after luciferase vector transfection, and activity was measured using a dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) in the Veritas microplate luminometer (Turner BioSystems). Three independent experiments were performed in technical triplicates. Wild-type vectors for ZNF304 (gene ID: 57343) and ITGB1 (gene ID: 16412) were purchased from Promega (San Luis Obispo, CA). ZNF304 vector was used to generate mutant vector (7-bp deletion) by using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies) using the primers in Supplementary Table 5.
In vitro anoikis
Cells were transfected with control or ZNF304 siRNA and transferred to six-well tissue culture plates that were coated with polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate, and cells were cultured in these plates for 72 h at 37 °C in a 5% carbon dioxide atmosphere. Cells were washed with PBS and were stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI solution (50 μg ml−1) containing RNase A (25 μg ml−1). After incubating the pellets for 30 min at 37 °C, we analysed cell viability by flow cytometry.
Preparation of DANP
DANPs were prepared via ionic gelation of anionic tripolyphosphate and siRNA. Briefly, predetermined tripolyphosphate (0.25%, weight/volume) and siRNA (1 μg μl−1) were added to chitosan solution, and the siRNA/chitosan nanoparticles spontaneously formed under constant stirring at room temperature. After incubating the nanoparticles at 4 °C for 40 min, we collected the siRNA/DANP by centrifugation (Heraus Biofuge Fresco) at 16,000g for 40 min at 4 °C. Chitosan nanoparticles were coated with polylactic acid polymer under probe sonication, and the organic solvent was evaporated. The pellet was washed in sterile water three times to isolate siRNA/DANP, which was stored at 4 °C until used. For the biodistribution study, DANPs were labelled with rhodamine 6G (Sigma-Aldrich). Rhodamine 6G (0.1%, weight/volume) was added to the polymer solution (chloroform) in the simple emulsion. The particles were collected and were washed three times to eliminate the nonencapsulated marker.
Orthotopic in vivo models of OC and tissue processing
Female athymic nude mice (NCr-nu; 8–12 weeks old) were purchased from the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, MD) and were maintained as previously described56. The MD Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved and supervised all animal studies. Mice were cared for in accordance with guidelines set forth by the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and the United States Public Health Service Policy on Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. To generate tumours, SKOV3IP1 cells (1 × 106), HeyA8 cells (2.5 × 105) or (3 × 106) OVCA-432 cells were injected into the peritoneal cavity, as previously described63. For therapy experiments, ten mice (eight mice per group for OVCA-432 in vivo study) were assigned randomly to each group. This sample size was sufficient to provide 80% power for a test at significance level of 0.05. Treatments with control or ZNF304 siRNA incorporated in DANP were intravenously administered either weekly (150 μg kg−1 body weight) or biweekly (300 μg kg−1 body weight). Paclitaxel (100 μg per mouse for the HeyA8 model and 75 μg per mouse for the SKOV3 model) was injected intraperitoneally once weekly. Mice were euthanized 6 weeks after first administration in SKOV3 model and 4 weeks after first administration in HeyA8 model. After euthanasia, we recorded mouse and tumour weight, number of nodules and distribution of tumours. Individuals who performed the necropsies were blinded to the treatment group assignments. Tissue specimens were fixed with either formalin or optimal cutting temperature medium (Miles) or were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For OVCA-432 survival study, the treatment started 1 week after the tumour cell inoculation and the mice were monitored daily by three observers. Individual mice were euthanized on the day the core veterinarian recommended, based on moribund status.
For the biodistribution study of DANP, mice were injected peritoneally with HeyA8 cells (2.5 × 105) for tumour inoculation. When tumours were detectable, rhodamine 6G-labelled particles that contained control siRNA (150 μg kg−1) were administered intravenously. After 24 h, mice were euthanized; tumours and the major organs (brain, heart, kidney, spleen, liver and lungs) were removed and fixed in optimal cutting temperature medium and sectioned. The organ and tumour distribution of particles were assessed by fluorescence microscopy.
In vivo anoikis
Viability of tumour cells from ascites fluid was determined by dual staining with PI and epithelial cell adhesion molecule tagged with FITC. MDAH 2,774 cells (2 × 106) were injected intraperitoneally into nude mice, and treatments started when mice developed detectable ascites. Mice were divided into two groups (n=3 per group), receiving a single administration of either DANP-control siRNA or DANP-ZNF304 siRNA (300 μg kg−1). After 7 days, ascites fluid was drawn from the peritoneal cavity and rapidly centrifuged at 500g for 10 min. Pellets were washed with a red blood cell lysis buffer and reconstituted in PBS. Suspended cells were then incubated with excited state absorption-FITC (1:30 dilution) for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, cells were washed and stained with a PI solution (50 μg ml−1). Cells were then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and analysed on a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).
Immunohistochemical analysis
Analyses of tumours cell proliferation and microvessel density were conducted by following procedures described previously14,64,65. Two investigators quantified the number of positive cells in a blinded manner. The antibodies used and the vendors are listed in Supplementary Table 4.
Statistical analysis
Unless specified otherwise, all data are presented as the mean values±the standard error of the mean from at least three independent experiments. Two-sided t-tests were used to test the relationships between the means of data sets, and P values indicate the probability of the means compared, being equal with *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. Student’s t-tests and analysis of variance were calculated with GraphPad software. Statistical analyses were performed in R (version 3.0.1; http://www.r-project.org/), and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. For the analysis of RPPA results, we used the Benjamini–Hochberg multiple testing correction66 to estimate the false discovery rate.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Aslan, B. et al. The ZNF304-integrin axis protects against anoikis in cancer. Nat. Commun. 6:7351 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8351 (2015).
References
Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 64, 9–29 (2014).
Naora, H. & Montell, D. J. Ovarian cancer metastasis: integrating insights from disparate model organisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 355–366 (2005).
Kipps, E., Tan, D. S. & Kaye, S. B. Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 273–282 (2013).
Vaughan, S. et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11, 719–725 (2011).
Tadepally, H. D., Burger, G. & Aubry, M. Evolution of C2H2-zinc finger genes and subfamilies in mammals: species-specific duplication and loss of clusters, genes and effector domains. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 176 (2008).
Serra, R. W., Fang, M., Park, S. M., Hutchinson, L. & Green, M. R. A KRAS-directed transcriptional silencing pathway that mediates the CpG island methylator phenotype. Elife 3, e02313 (2014).
Suyama, K., Shapiro, I., Guttman, M. & Hazan, R. B. A signaling pathway leading to metastasis is controlled by N-cadherin and the FGF receptor. Cancer Cell 2, 301–314 (2002).
Abdul Azis, T. in: Qatar Foundation Annual Research Conference (2013) doi:10.5339/qfarf.2013.BIOP-0135.
Bowen, N. J. et al. Gene expression profiling supports the hypothesis that human ovarian surface epithelia are multipotent and capable of serving as ovarian cancer initiating cells. BMC Med. Genomics 2, 71 (2009).
Casey, T. et al. Molecular signatures suggest a major role for stromal cells in development of invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 114, 47–62 (2009).
Persikov, A. V., Osada, R. & Singh, M. Predicting DNA recognition by Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. Bioinformatics 25, 22–29 (2009).
Vachon, P. H. Integrin signaling, cell survival, and anoikis: distinctions, differences, and differentiation. J Signal Transduct. 2011, 738137 (2011).
Sood, A. K. et al. Adrenergic modulation of focal adhesion kinase protects human ovarian cancer cells from anoikis. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 1515 (2010).
Lu, C. et al. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by EZH2. Cancer Cell 18, 185–197 (2010).
Schnell, M. A., Hardy, C., Hawley, M., Propert, K. J. & Wilson, J. M. Effect of blood collection technique in mice on clinical pathology parameters. Hum. Gene Ther. 13, 155–161 (2002).
Carlson, T. R., Hu, H., Braren, R., Kim, Y. H. & Wang, R. A. Cell-autonomous requirement for β1 integrin in endothelial cell adhesion, migration and survival during angiogenesis in mice. Development 135, 2193–2202 (2008).
Weis, S. M. & Cheresh, D. A. Tumor angiogenesis: molecular pathways and therapeutic targets. Nature Med. 17, 1359–1370 (2011).
Leung, C. S. et al. Calcium-dependent FAK/CREB/TNNC1 signalling mediates the effect of stromal MFAP5 on ovarian cancer metastatic potential. Nat. Commun. 5, 5092 (2014).
Desgrosellier, J. S. & Cheresh, D. A. Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 9–22 (2010).
Margadant, C., Monsuur, H. N., Norman, J. C. & Sonnenberg, A. Mechanisms of integrin activation and trafficking. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23, 607–614 (2011).
Caccavari, F., Valdembri, D., Sandri, C., Bussolino, F. & Serini, G. Integrin signaling and lung cancer. Cell Adh. Migr. 4, 124 (2010).
Guo, W. & Giancotti, F. G. Integrin signalling during tumour progression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 816–826 (2004).
Grzesiak, J. J. et al. Knockdown of the β1 integrin subunit reduces primary tumor growth and inhibits pancreatic cancer metastasis. Int. J. Cancer 129, 2905–2915 (2011).
Mitra, A. et al. Ligand-independent activation of c-Met by fibronectin and α5β1-integrin regulates ovarian cancer invasion and metastasis. Oncogene 30, 1566–1576 (2011).
Minton, K. Cell adhesion: Integrating the integrin response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 401–401 (2013).
Schiller, H. B. et al. β1-and αv-class integrins cooperate to regulate myosin II during rigidity sensing of fibronectin-based microenvironments. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 625–636 (2013).
Barkan, D. & Chambers, A. F. β1-integrin: a potential therapeutic target in the battle against cancer recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 7219–7223 (2011).
Jahangiri, A., Aghi, M. K. & Carbonell, W. S. β1 Integrin: critical path to antiangiogenic therapy resistance and beyond. Cancer Res. 74, 3–7 (2014).
Brakebusch, C. & Fässler, R. β 1 integrin function in vivo: adhesion, migration and more. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 24, 403–411 (2005).
Giancotti, F. G. Complexity and specificity of integrin signalling. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, E13–E14 (2000).
Zhang, Z., Vuori, K., Wang, H.-G., Reed, J. C. & Ruoslahti, E. Integrin activation by R-ras. Cell 85, 61–69 (1996).
Hughes, P. E. et al. Suppression of integrin activation: a novel function of a Ras/Raf-initiated MAP kinase pathway. Cell 88, 521–530 (1997).
Kinbara, K., Goldfinger, L. E., Hansen, M., Chou, F.-L. & Ginsberg, M. H. Ras GTPases: integrins' friends or foes? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 767–778 (2003).
Caswell, P. T. et al. Rab25 associates with α5β1 integrin to promote invasive migration in 3D microenvironments. Dev. Cell 13, 496–510 (2007).
Pasapera, A. M., Schneider, I. C., Rericha, E., Schlaepfer, D. D. & Waterman, C. M. Myosin II activity regulates vinculin recruitment to focal adhesions through FAK-mediated paxillin phosphorylation. J. Cell Biol. 188, 877–890 (2010).
Shibue, T. & Weinberg, R. A. Integrin β1-focal adhesion kinase signaling directs the proliferation of metastatic cancer cells disseminated in the lungs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10290–10295 (2009).
Morello, V. et al. β1 integrin controls EGFR signaling and tumorigenic properties of lung cancer cells. Oncogene 30, 4087–4096 (2011).
Lau, M.-T., So, W.-K. & Leung, P. C. Integrin β1 mediates epithelial growth factor-induced invasion in human ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 320, 198–204 (2012).
Petrás, M. et al. Molecular interactions of ErbB1 (EGFR) and integrin-β1 in astrocytoma frozen sections predict clinical outcome and correlate with Akt-mediated in vitro radioresistance. Neuro Oncol. 15, 1027–1040 (2013).
Frisch, S. M. & Francis, H. Disruption of epithelial cell-matrix interactions induces apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 124, 619–626 (1994).
Kim, Y.-N., Koo, K. H., Sung, J. Y., Yun, U.-J. & Kim, H. Anoikis resistance: an essential prerequisite for tumor metastasis. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 306879 (2012).
Simpson, C. D., Anyiwe, K. & Schimmer, A. D. Anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett. 272, 177–185 (2008).
Jenning, S., Pham, T., Kale Ireland, S., Ruoslahti, E. & Biliran, H. Bit1 in anoikis resistance and tumor metastasis. Cancer Lett. 333, 147–151 (2013).
Sakamoto, S., Schwarze, S. & Kyprianou, N. Anoikis disruption of focal adhesion-Akt signaling impairs renal cell carcinoma. Eur. Urol. 59, 734–744 (2011).
Reginato, M. J. et al. Integrins and EGFR coordinately regulate the pro-apoptotic protein Bim to prevent anoikis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 733–740 (2003).
Sakamoto, S., McCann, R. O., Dhir, R. & Kyprianou, N. Talin1 promotes tumor invasion and metastasis via focal adhesion signaling and anoikis resistance. Cancer Res. 70, 1885–1895 (2010).
Frisch, S. M. & Ruoslahti, E. Integrins and anoikis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 701–706 (1997).
Frisch, S. M. & Screaton, R. A. Anoikis mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 555–562 (2001).
Lee, Y.-C. et al. Targeting constitutively activated β1 integrins inhibits prostate cancer metastasis. Mol. Cancer Res. 11, 405–417 (2013).
Han, H. D. et al. Targeted gene silencing using RGD-labeled chitosan nanoparticles. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 3910–3922 (2010).
Kamat, A. A. et al. Metronomic chemotherapy enhances the efficacy of antivascular therapy in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 67, 281–288 (2007).
Lu, C. et al. Dual targeting of endothelial cells and pericytes in antivascular therapy for ovarian carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 13, 4209–4217 (2007).
Lu, C. et al. Gene alterations identified by expression profiling in tumor-associated endothelial cells from invasive ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res. 67, 1757–1768 (2007).
Sood, A. K. et al. Molecular determinants of ovarian cancer plasticity. Am. J. Pathol. 158, 1279–1288 (2001).
Thaker, P. H. et al. EphA2 expression is associated with aggressive features in ovarian carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 5145–5150 (2004).
Landen, C. N. et al. Therapeutic EphA2 gene targeting in vivo using neutral liposomal small interfering RNA delivery. Cancer Res. 65, 6910–6918 (2005).
Halder, J. et al. Focal adhesion kinase targeting using in vivo short interfering RNA delivery in neutral liposomes for ovarian carcinoma therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 12, 4916–4924 (2006).
Spannuth, W. A. et al. Functional significance of VEGFR–2 on ovarian cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 124, 1045–1053 (2009).
Kim, H.-S. et al. Functional roles of Src and Fgr in ovarian carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 1713–1721 (2011).
Tibes, R. et al. Reverse phase protein array: validation of a novel proteomic technology and utility for analysis of primary leukemia specimens and hematopoietic stem cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5, 2512–2521 (2006).
Landen, C. N. et al. Targeting aldehyde dehydrogenase cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 9, 3186–3199 (2010).
Cheema, S. K. et al. Par-4 transcriptionally regulates Bcl-2 through a WT1-binding site on the bcl-2 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 19995–20005 (2003).
Lu, C. et al. Impact of vessel maturation on antiangiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 198, 477. e471–477. e410 (2008).
Landen, C. N. et al. Efficacy and antivascular effects of EphA2 reduction with an agonistic antibody in ovarian cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98, 1558–1570 (2006).
Langley, R. R. et al. Tissue-specific microvascular endothelial cell lines from H-2Kb-tsA58 mice for studies of angiogenesis and metastasis. Cancer Res. 63, 2971–2976 (2003).
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B (Methodol.) 57, 289–300 (1995).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (R44GM086937, P50 CA093459, U54 CA151668, P50 CA083639, P50 CA098258, R21 CA180145, UH2TR000943 and U54CA96300) and from the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RP120214).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.A. designed, conducted, interpreted and analysed most of the studies. P.M. helped in the conduct of the ChIP and luciferase reporter assays and qPCRs. M.-C.H assisted with the elements of ChIP analysis. G.A.P helped in the design and conduct of in vitro and in vivo anoikis and in vivo toxicity studies. C.R.-A helped in the design, conduct of most of the animal studies conducted. V.G.-V., R.R., A.S.N., S.M., H.-D.H., E.Y. and S.P. participated in animal studies. S.Y.W. assisted in the TCGA analysis. C.I. conducted the analysis and interpretation of TCGA, RPPA and animal models. G.B., T.J.M. and P.T.R. assisted in the TCGA analysis. H.W. and O.O. analysed immunohistochemical and toxicology studies. A.G.-C. and N.K assisted in conduct and analysis of some of the western blots. P.K. helped in the IPA pathway analysis. E.F.-M helped in the design and conduct of cytokine analysis. B.O. helped in the design of animal studies. S.T. and K.B. conducted bioinformatics analysis of the TCGA data set. M.-C.H helped in the design and the analysis of the ChIP and Luciferase reporter. G.C. helped in the design, analysis and interpretation of the molecular biology data obtained. A.K.S. helped in the overall design, conduct, analysis and interpretation of animal models. G.L.-B. directed, designed, analysed and interpreted all of the studies conducted in the study. B.A. and G.L.-B. prepared and corrected all versions of the manuscript, and all elements related to this body work. All authors edited and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-18 and Supplementary Tables 1-6 (PDF 5777 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aslan, B., Monroig, P., Hsu, MC. et al. The ZNF304-integrin axis protects against anoikis in cancer. Nat Commun 6, 7351 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8351
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8351
This article is cited by
-
Integrinβ-1 in disorders and cancers: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets
Cell Communication and Signaling (2024)
-
A missing piece of the puzzle in pulmonary fibrosis: anoikis resistance promotes fibroblast activation
Cell & Bioscience (2022)
-
Construction and validation of a transcription factors-based prognostic signature for ovarian cancer
Journal of Ovarian Research (2022)
-
Dissecting extracellular and intracellular distribution of nanoparticles and their contribution to therapeutic response by monochromatic ratiometric imaging
Nature Communications (2022)
-
ZEB2 facilitates peritoneal metastasis by regulating the invasiveness and tumorigenesis of cancer stem-like cells in high-grade serous ovarian cancers
Oncogene (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.